Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

138 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Adnan DIBRANI SwedenS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %98.4 % of 64+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.6 % of 640.0 % of 64
Alessandra MORETTI ItalyS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 66+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 660.0 % of 66
Alessandro ZAN ItalyS&D90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 60+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 600.0 % of 60
Alex AGIUS SALIBA MaltaS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %84.6 % of 65−13.7 pts median 98.3 %15.4 % of 659.2 % of 65
Alicia HOMS GINEL SpainS&D10.6 % of 66−84.8 pts median 95.5 %7 of 7 — median 98.3 %0 of 7 0 of 7
Ana Catarina MENDES PortugalS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 64+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 640.0 % of 64
Andi CRISTEA RomaniaS&D16 of 18 — median 95.5 %16 of 16 — median 98.3 %0 of 16 0 of 16
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES PortugalS&D90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %96.7 % of 60−1.6 pts median 98.3 %3.3 % of 601.7 % of 60
Andreas SCHIEDER AustriaS&D87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %98.3 % of 58±0.0 pts median 98.3 %1.7 % of 581.7 % of 58
Annalisa CORRADO ItalyS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 64+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 640.0 % of 64
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN IrelandS&D68.2 % of 66−27.3 pts median 95.5 %44 of 45 — median 98.3 %1 of 45 0 of 45
Aurore LALUCQ FranceS&D83.3 % of 66−12.1 pts median 95.5 %90.9 % of 55−7.4 pts median 98.3 %9.1 % of 555.5 % of 55
Bernd LANGE GermanyS&D95.5 % of 66±0.0 pts median 95.5 %95.2 % of 63−3.0 pts median 98.3 %4.8 % of 633.2 % of 63
Biljana BORZAN CroatiaS&D93.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 62+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 620.0 % of 62
Birgit SIPPEL GermanyS&D74.2 % of 66−21.2 pts median 95.5 %48 of 49 — median 98.3 %1 of 49 0 of 49
Brando BENIFEI ItalyS&D71.2 % of 66−24.2 pts median 95.5 %47 of 47 — median 98.3 %0 of 47 0 of 47
Bruno GONÇALVES PortugalS&D90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %95.0 % of 60−3.3 pts median 98.3 %5.0 % of 605.0 % of 60
Bruno TOBBACK BelgiumS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 66+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 661.5 % of 66
Camilla LAURETI ItalyS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 64+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 640.0 % of 64
Carla TAVARES PortugalS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 65+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 650.0 % of 65
Cecilia STRADA ItalyS&D92.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 95.5 %91.8 % of 61−6.5 pts median 98.3 %8.2 % of 616.6 % of 61
César LUENA SpainS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 66+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 660.0 % of 66
Chloé RIDEL FranceS&D92.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 95.5 %93.4 % of 61−4.8 pts median 98.3 %6.6 % of 613.3 % of 61
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&D90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %93.3 % of 60−4.9 pts median 98.3 %6.7 % of 605.0 % of 60
Christophe CLERGEAU FranceS&D89.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 95.5 %91.5 % of 59−6.8 pts median 98.3 %8.5 % of 595.1 % of 59
Claire FITA FranceS&D95.5 % of 66±0.0 pts median 95.5 %93.7 % of 63−4.6 pts median 98.3 %6.3 % of 634.8 % of 63
Claudiu MANDA RomaniaS&D43.9 % of 66−51.5 pts median 95.5 %29 of 29 — median 98.3 %0 of 29 0 of 29
Costas MAVRIDES CyprusS&D72.7 % of 66−22.7 pts median 95.5 %48 of 48 — median 98.3 %0 of 48 0 of 48
Cristina MAESTRE SpainS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %89.1 % of 64−9.2 pts median 98.3 %10.9 % of 640.0 % of 64
Csaba MOLNÁR HungaryS&D87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %96.6 % of 58−1.7 pts median 98.3 %3.4 % of 580.0 % of 58
Dan NICA RomaniaS&D56.1 % of 66−39.4 pts median 95.5 %36 of 37 — median 98.3 %1 of 37 1 of 37
Daniel ATTARD MaltaS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %87.5 % of 64−10.8 pts median 98.3 %12.5 % of 647.8 % of 64
Dario NARDELLA ItalyS&D74.2 % of 66−21.2 pts median 95.5 %49 of 49 — median 98.3 %0 of 49 0 of 49
Delara BURKHARDT GermanyS&D80.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 95.5 %96.2 % of 53−2.0 pts median 98.3 %3.8 % of 531.9 % of 53
Dragoş BENEA RomaniaS&D83.3 % of 66−12.1 pts median 95.5 %98.2 % of 55−0.1 pts median 98.3 %1.8 % of 550.0 % of 55
Eero HEINÄLUOMA FinlandS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 65+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 650.0 % of 65
Elena SANCHO MURILLO SpainS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 65+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 650.0 % of 65
Elio DI RUPO BelgiumS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %96.9 % of 64−1.4 pts median 98.3 %3.1 % of 640.0 % of 64
Elisabeth GROSSMANN AustriaS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %97.0 % of 66−1.3 pts median 98.3 %3.0 % of 663.0 % of 66
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group ItalyRenew90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 60+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 600.0 % of 60
Emma RAFOWICZ FranceS&D87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %89.7 % of 58−8.6 pts median 98.3 %10.3 % of 585.2 % of 58
Eric SARGIACOMO FranceS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %92.2 % of 64−6.1 pts median 98.3 %7.8 % of 646.3 % of 64
Estelle CEULEMANS BelgiumS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %92.2 % of 64−6.1 pts median 98.3 %7.8 % of 640.0 % of 64
Evelyn REGNER AustriaS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %95.5 % of 66−2.8 pts median 98.3 %4.5 % of 664.5 % of 66
Evin INCIR SwedenS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %97.0 % of 66−1.3 pts median 98.3 %3.0 % of 661.5 % of 66
Francisco ASSIS PortugalS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %97.0 % of 66−1.3 pts median 98.3 %3.0 % of 661.5 % of 66
François KALFON FranceS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %93.8 % of 64−4.5 pts median 98.3 %6.3 % of 641.6 % of 64
Gabriela FIREA RomaniaS&D53.0 % of 66−42.4 pts median 95.5 %34 of 35 — median 98.3 %1 of 35 0 of 35
Gabriele BISCHOFF GermanyS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %96.9 % of 64−1.4 pts median 98.3 %3.1 % of 643.1 % of 64
Gheorghe CÂRCIU RomaniaS&D36.4 % of 66−59.1 pts median 95.5 %23 of 24 — median 98.3 %1 of 24 0 of 24
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.