Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

136 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Nikos PAPANDREOU GreeceS&D76.8 % of 2 521−13.3 pts median 90.1 %93.0 % of 1 937−2.9 pts median 95.8 %6.5 % of 1 8862.0 % of 1 937
Nils UŠAKOVS LatviaS&D88.1 % of 2 521−2.0 pts median 90.1 %94.6 % of 2 222−1.2 pts median 95.8 %4.8 % of 2 1731.1 % of 2 222
Nora MEBAREK FranceS&D86.1 % of 2 521−4.0 pts median 90.1 %91.8 % of 2 171−4.1 pts median 95.8 %7.5 % of 2 1232.2 % of 2 171
Pierfrancesco MARAN ItalyS&D95.6 % of 2 521+5.5 pts median 90.1 %96.5 % of 2 410+0.7 pts median 95.8 %2.5 % of 2 3652.2 % of 2 410
Pierre JOUVET FranceS&D80.2 % of 2 521−10.0 pts median 90.1 %90.5 % of 2 021−5.3 pts median 95.8 %8.5 % of 1 9722.2 % of 2 021
Pina PICIERNO changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.ItalyRenew81.3 % of 2 521not compared median 90.1 %96.2 % of 2 048not compared median 95.8 %2.7 % of 1 9971.8 % of 2 049
Raffaele TOPO ItalyS&D96.7 % of 2 521+6.6 pts median 90.1 %95.8 % of 2 438−0.1 pts median 95.8 %3.4 % of 2 3872.0 % of 2 438
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN FranceS&D89.5 % of 2 521−0.6 pts median 90.1 %91.7 % of 2 257−4.2 pts median 95.8 %7.2 % of 2 2081.9 % of 2 257
René REPASI GermanyS&D97.3 % of 2 521+7.2 pts median 90.1 %97.4 % of 2 454+1.6 pts median 95.8 %1.8 % of 2 3991.4 % of 2 454
Robert BIEDROŃ PolandS&D99.6 % of 2 521+9.5 pts median 90.1 %97.7 % of 2 511+1.9 pts median 95.8 %1.3 % of 2 4561.4 % of 2 511
Romana JERKOVIĆ CroatiaS&D67.9 % of 2 521−22.2 pts median 90.1 %88.7 % of 1 713−7.1 pts median 95.8 %10.5 % of 1 6835.1 % of 1 713
Rosa SERRANO SIERRA SpainS&D99.1 % of 2 521+9.0 pts median 90.1 %95.8 % of 2 498±0.0 pts median 95.8 %3.1 % of 2 4432.9 % of 2 498
Sabrina REPP GermanyS&D98.5 % of 2 521+8.3 pts median 90.1 %97.0 % of 2 482+1.1 pts median 95.8 %2.3 % of 2 4271.8 % of 2 482
Sakis ARNAOUTOGLOU GreeceS&D98.1 % of 2 521+7.9 pts median 90.1 %94.9 % of 2 472−1.0 pts median 95.8 %4.6 % of 2 4172.1 % of 2 472
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ SpainS&D98.7 % of 2 521+8.5 pts median 90.1 %96.0 % of 2 487+0.1 pts median 95.8 %3.0 % of 2 4322.7 % of 2 487
Sandro RUOTOLO ItalyS&D56.7 % of 2 521−33.4 pts median 90.1 %96.9 % of 1 430+1.1 pts median 95.8 %2.9 % of 1 4151.6 % of 1 430
Sérgio GONÇALVES PortugalS&D98.2 % of 2 521+8.1 pts median 90.1 %99.2 % of 2 475+3.3 pts median 95.8 %0.4 % of 2 4201.6 % of 2 475
Sofie ERIKSSON SwedenS&D90.4 % of 2 521+0.3 pts median 90.1 %92.5 % of 2 280−3.3 pts median 95.8 %6.5 % of 2 2283.5 % of 2 280
Ştefan MUŞOIU RomaniaS&D75.7 % of 2 521−14.4 pts median 90.1 %94.3 % of 1 909−1.5 pts median 95.8 %4.9 % of 1 8623.9 % of 1 909
Stefano BONACCINI ItalyS&D94.3 % of 2 521+4.2 pts median 90.1 %96.4 % of 2 378+0.5 pts median 95.8 %2.7 % of 2 3272.3 % of 2 378
Sven MIKSER EstoniaS&D97.5 % of 2 521+7.4 pts median 90.1 %97.1 % of 2 458+1.3 pts median 95.8 %1.7 % of 2 4032.8 % of 2 458
Thijs REUTEN NetherlandsS&D97.4 % of 2 521+7.3 pts median 90.1 %94.7 % of 2 456−1.2 pts median 95.8 %4.2 % of 2 4021.9 % of 2 456
Thomas BAJADA MaltaS&D67.7 % of 2 521−22.5 pts median 90.1 %87.9 % of 1 706−8.0 pts median 95.8 %11.1 % of 1 6696.5 % of 1 706
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN FranceS&D97.1 % of 2 521+7.0 pts median 90.1 %91.9 % of 2 448−4.0 pts median 95.8 %7.1 % of 2 3962.0 % of 2 448
Tiemo WÖLKEN GermanyS&D72.7 % of 2 521−17.4 pts median 90.1 %96.3 % of 1 833+0.5 pts median 95.8 %2.8 % of 1 7981.0 % of 1 833
Tobias CREMER GermanyS&D87.1 % of 2 521−3.1 pts median 90.1 %97.5 % of 2 195+1.7 pts median 95.8 %1.6 % of 2 1431.4 % of 2 195
Tonino PICULA CroatiaS&D95.6 % of 2 521+5.4 pts median 90.1 %90.6 % of 2 409−5.2 pts median 95.8 %8.4 % of 2 3574.4 % of 2 409
Tsvetelina PENKOVA BulgariaS&D82.8 % of 2 521−7.3 pts median 90.1 %97.8 % of 2 088+2.0 pts median 95.8 %1.9 % of 2 0392.1 % of 2 088
Udo BULLMANN GermanyS&D93.8 % of 2 521+3.7 pts median 90.1 %96.5 % of 2 365+0.7 pts median 95.8 %2.5 % of 2 3161.9 % of 2 365
Vasile DÎNCU RomaniaS&D97.2 % of 2 521+7.1 pts median 90.1 %97.1 % of 2 451+1.2 pts median 95.8 %2.3 % of 2 3981.8 % of 2 451
Victor NEGRESCU RomaniaS&D77.0 % of 2 521−13.2 pts median 90.1 %94.9 % of 1 940−0.9 pts median 95.8 %4.2 % of 1 8884.0 % of 1 940
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ LithuaniaS&D89.9 % of 2 521−0.2 pts median 90.1 %99.0 % of 2 267+3.1 pts median 95.8 %0.5 % of 2 2151.4 % of 2 267
Vivien COSTANZO GermanyS&D96.7 % of 2 521+6.5 pts median 90.1 %97.1 % of 2 437+1.3 pts median 95.8 %2.1 % of 2 3821.5 % of 2 437
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS LithuaniaS&D99.0 % of 2 521+8.9 pts median 90.1 %96.2 % of 2 497+0.3 pts median 95.8 %3.1 % of 2 4441.9 % of 2 497
Yannis MANIATIS GreeceS&D72.1 % of 2 521−18.0 pts median 90.1 %93.6 % of 1 817−2.2 pts median 95.8 %5.8 % of 1 7802.5 % of 1 817
Antonio DECARO Left on 1 Feb 2026 No vote recorded while in office in this period (not the same as absent: chairing the sittings, as the President does, looks the same).ItalyS&D0.0 % of 237not compared median 90.1 %no votes not compared median 95.8 %no votes no votes
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.