Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

136 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Giorgio GORI ItalyS&D92.9 % of 2 521+2.8 pts median 90.1 %95.5 % of 2 342−0.3 pts median 95.8 %3.3 % of 2 2912.3 % of 2 342
Giuseppe LUPO ItalyS&D86.0 % of 2 521−4.1 pts median 90.1 %96.6 % of 2 168+0.8 pts median 95.8 %2.8 % of 2 1342.2 % of 2 168
Günther SIDL AustriaS&D97.8 % of 2 521+7.7 pts median 90.1 %97.3 % of 2 465+1.5 pts median 95.8 %2.0 % of 2 4101.7 % of 2 465
Hana JALLOUL MURO SpainS&D93.2 % of 2 521+3.1 pts median 90.1 %95.1 % of 2 350−0.7 pts median 95.8 %3.9 % of 2 2962.7 % of 2 350
Hannes HEIDE AustriaS&D99.3 % of 2 521+9.2 pts median 90.1 %97.0 % of 2 504+1.2 pts median 95.8 %2.4 % of 2 4491.8 % of 2 504
Heléne FRITZON SwedenS&D88.0 % of 2 521−2.1 pts median 90.1 %91.9 % of 2 219−3.9 pts median 95.8 %7.0 % of 2 1723.7 % of 2 219
Idoia MENDIA SpainS&D98.5 % of 2 521+8.4 pts median 90.1 %95.8 % of 2 483±0.0 pts median 95.8 %3.2 % of 2 4282.8 % of 2 483
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ SpainS&D91.3 % of 2 521+1.2 pts median 90.1 %99.1 % of 2 302+3.3 pts median 95.8 %0.2 % of 2 2521.4 % of 2 302
Irene TINAGLI ItalyS&D96.2 % of 2 521+6.1 pts median 90.1 %97.7 % of 2 425+1.9 pts median 95.8 %1.6 % of 2 3801.9 % of 2 425
Isilda GOMES PortugalS&D87.4 % of 2 521−2.7 pts median 90.1 %99.2 % of 2 204+3.4 pts median 95.8 %0.2 % of 2 1531.7 % of 2 204
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&D64.5 % of 2 521−25.6 pts median 90.1 %98.0 % of 1 626+2.2 pts median 95.8 %1.3 % of 1 5871.2 % of 1 626
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ SpainS&D95.7 % of 2 521+5.6 pts median 90.1 %95.9 % of 2 413+0.1 pts median 95.8 %3.1 % of 2 3642.6 % of 2 413
Jean-Marc GERMAIN FranceS&D91.0 % of 2 521+0.9 pts median 90.1 %91.9 % of 2 294−3.9 pts median 95.8 %7.4 % of 2 2522.1 % of 2 294
Jens GEIER GermanyS&D78.7 % of 2 521−11.4 pts median 90.1 %97.2 % of 1 984+1.3 pts median 95.8 %2.2 % of 1 9471.4 % of 1 984
Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS PolandS&D98.8 % of 2 521+8.7 pts median 90.1 %97.7 % of 2 492+1.8 pts median 95.8 %1.6 % of 2 4371.5 % of 2 492
Johan DANIELSSON SwedenS&D99.7 % of 2 521+9.6 pts median 90.1 %92.2 % of 2 513−3.7 pts median 95.8 %6.9 % of 2 4583.9 % of 2 513
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ SpainS&D94.6 % of 2 521+4.5 pts median 90.1 %95.9 % of 2 386+0.1 pts median 95.8 %3.0 % of 2 3342.5 % of 2 386
José CEPEDA SpainS&D80.6 % of 2 521−9.6 pts median 90.1 %97.2 % of 2 031+1.4 pts median 95.8 %1.8 % of 1 9942.1 % of 2 031
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&D96.9 % of 2 521+6.7 pts median 90.1 %94.0 % of 2 442−1.9 pts median 95.8 %4.9 % of 2 3892.4 % of 2 442
Katarina BARLEY GermanyS&D73.6 % of 2 521−16.5 pts median 90.1 %97.0 % of 1 855+1.1 pts median 95.8 %2.4 % of 1 8181.8 % of 1 855
Kathleen VAN BREMPT BelgiumS&D94.6 % of 2 521+4.5 pts median 90.1 %98.0 % of 2 385+2.2 pts median 95.8 %1.3 % of 2 3311.6 % of 2 385
Klára DOBREV HungaryS&D70.6 % of 2 521−19.5 pts median 90.1 %93.7 % of 1 780−2.1 pts median 95.8 %4.9 % of 1 7370.7 % of 1 780
Kristian VIGENIN BulgariaS&D88.7 % of 2 521−1.5 pts median 90.1 %95.7 % of 2 235−0.2 pts median 95.8 %3.7 % of 2 1832.3 % of 2 235
Krzysztof ŚMISZEK PolandS&D99.3 % of 2 521+9.2 pts median 90.1 %97.6 % of 2 504+1.7 pts median 95.8 %1.6 % of 2 4491.7 % of 2 504
Lara WOLTERS NetherlandsS&D99.5 % of 2 521+9.4 pts median 90.1 %94.6 % of 2 508−1.3 pts median 95.8 %4.3 % of 2 4532.0 % of 2 508
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA SpainS&D35.1 % of 2 521−55.1 pts median 90.1 %96.8 % of 884+1.0 pts median 95.8 %2.0 % of 8612.6 % of 884
Leire PAJÍN SpainS&D84.9 % of 2 521−5.2 pts median 90.1 %95.0 % of 2 141−0.8 pts median 95.8 %4.0 % of 2 0932.9 % of 2 141
Lina GÁLVEZ SpainS&D79.8 % of 2 521−10.3 pts median 90.1 %97.2 % of 2 012+1.3 pts median 95.8 %1.8 % of 1 9661.9 % of 2 012
Lucia ANNUNZIATA ItalyS&D94.8 % of 2 521+4.7 pts median 90.1 %96.7 % of 2 390+0.8 pts median 95.8 %2.7 % of 2 3352.0 % of 2 390
Marc ANGEL LuxembourgS&D95.8 % of 2 521+5.7 pts median 90.1 %97.5 % of 2 416+1.6 pts median 95.8 %1.6 % of 2 3651.1 % of 2 416
Marco TARQUINIO ItalyS&D77.5 % of 2 521−12.7 pts median 90.1 %93.7 % of 1 953−2.2 pts median 95.8 %5.7 % of 1 9072.0 % of 1 953
Marcos ROS SEMPERE SpainS&D94.0 % of 2 521+3.9 pts median 90.1 %95.7 % of 2 371−0.2 pts median 95.8 %3.2 % of 2 3162.7 % of 2 371
Maria GRAPINI RomaniaS&D95.0 % of 2 521+4.9 pts median 90.1 %90.7 % of 2 396−5.1 pts median 95.8 %8.7 % of 2 3415.1 % of 2 396
Maria GUZENINA FinlandS&D99.4 % of 2 521+9.3 pts median 90.1 %96.3 % of 2 507+0.5 pts median 95.8 %3.2 % of 2 4523.1 % of 2 507
Maria NOICHL GermanyS&D97.0 % of 2 521+6.9 pts median 90.1 %96.8 % of 2 445+1.0 pts median 95.8 %2.5 % of 2 3901.6 % of 2 445
Marianne VIND DenmarkS&D85.0 % of 2 521−5.2 pts median 90.1 %89.5 % of 2 142−6.3 pts median 95.8 %9.7 % of 2 0903.0 % of 2 142
Marina KALJURAND EstoniaS&D99.1 % of 2 521+9.0 pts median 90.1 %96.4 % of 2 498+0.5 pts median 95.8 %2.5 % of 2 4432.7 % of 2 498
Marit MAIJ NetherlandsS&D99.7 % of 2 521+9.6 pts median 90.1 %94.2 % of 2 513−1.6 pts median 95.8 %4.7 % of 2 4582.0 % of 2 513
Marko VEŠLIGAJ CroatiaS&D81.0 % of 2 521−9.1 pts median 90.1 %87.3 % of 2 042−8.5 pts median 95.8 %11.5 % of 1 9935.7 % of 2 042
Marta TEMIDO PortugalS&D95.6 % of 2 521+5.5 pts median 90.1 %98.7 % of 2 410+2.9 pts median 95.8 %0.8 % of 2 3551.0 % of 2 410
Matjaž NEMEC SloveniaS&D84.3 % of 2 521−5.8 pts median 90.1 %96.2 % of 2 125+0.4 pts median 95.8 %3.0 % of 2 0762.0 % of 2 125
Matteo RICCI ItalyS&D77.9 % of 2 521−12.2 pts median 90.1 %96.4 % of 1 964+0.6 pts median 95.8 %2.8 % of 1 9232.4 % of 1 964
Matthias ECKE GermanyS&D87.5 % of 2 521−2.6 pts median 90.1 %96.9 % of 2 207+1.1 pts median 95.8 %2.2 % of 2 1591.6 % of 2 207
Mihai TUDOSE RomaniaS&D71.4 % of 2 521−18.8 pts median 90.1 %93.4 % of 1 799−2.5 pts median 95.8 %5.9 % of 1 7594.4 % of 1 799
Mohammed CHAHIM NetherlandsS&D74.7 % of 2 521−15.4 pts median 90.1 %92.6 % of 1 884−3.3 pts median 95.8 %6.6 % of 1 8501.9 % of 1 884
Murielle LAURENT FranceS&D95.9 % of 2 521+5.8 pts median 90.1 %91.6 % of 2 417−4.2 pts median 95.8 %7.5 % of 2 3652.2 % of 2 417
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR SpainS&D99.0 % of 2 521+8.8 pts median 90.1 %95.0 % of 2 495−0.8 pts median 95.8 %3.9 % of 2 4403.0 % of 2 495
Nicola ZINGARETTI ItalyS&D86.2 % of 2 521−3.9 pts median 90.1 %96.7 % of 2 173+0.8 pts median 95.8 %2.7 % of 2 1291.9 % of 2 173
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES SpainS&D78.7 % of 2 521−11.4 pts median 90.1 %97.5 % of 1 984+1.6 pts median 95.8 %1.7 % of 1 9411.3 % of 1 984
Niels FUGLSANG DenmarkS&D89.4 % of 2 521−0.7 pts median 90.1 %88.1 % of 2 254−7.7 pts median 95.8 %11.0 % of 2 2022.9 % of 2 254
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.