Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

136 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Giorgio GORI ItalyS&D94.5 % of 2 891+4.5 pts median 90.0 %97.2 % of 2 731+0.7 pts median 96.5 %2.4 % of 2 7042.8 % of 2 733
Giuseppe LUPO ItalyS&D98.9 % of 2 891+8.8 pts median 90.0 %97.6 % of 2 856+1.1 pts median 96.5 %2.0 % of 2 8322.2 % of 2 858
Günther SIDL AustriaS&D90.0 % of 2 891−0.1 pts median 90.0 %95.2 % of 2 600−1.4 pts median 96.5 %4.3 % of 2 5782.8 % of 2 601
Hana JALLOUL MURO SpainS&D74.2 % of 2 891−15.9 pts median 90.0 %98.5 % of 2 142+1.9 pts median 96.5 %1.0 % of 2 1201.9 % of 2 144
Hannes HEIDE AustriaS&D89.2 % of 2 891−0.8 pts median 90.0 %96.1 % of 2 578−0.4 pts median 96.5 %3.3 % of 2 5533.5 % of 2 580
Heléne FRITZON SwedenS&D95.0 % of 2 891+5.0 pts median 90.0 %94.8 % of 2 745−1.8 pts median 96.5 %4.8 % of 2 7183.8 % of 2 747
Idoia MENDIA SpainS&D95.3 % of 2 891+5.2 pts median 90.0 %98.5 % of 2 752+2.0 pts median 96.5 %1.1 % of 2 7261.7 % of 2 754
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ SpainS&D93.9 % of 2 891+3.9 pts median 90.0 %99.5 % of 2 714+3.0 pts median 96.5 %0.3 % of 2 6941.8 % of 2 716
Irene TINAGLI ItalyS&D97.0 % of 2 891+7.0 pts median 90.0 %98.6 % of 2 802+2.1 pts median 96.5 %1.2 % of 2 7822.1 % of 2 804
Isilda GOMES PortugalS&D88.6 % of 2 891−1.4 pts median 90.0 %99.4 % of 2 560+2.9 pts median 96.5 %0.5 % of 2 5391.9 % of 2 561
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&D87.5 % of 2 891−2.5 pts median 90.0 %97.9 % of 2 527+1.4 pts median 96.5 %1.7 % of 2 5041.9 % of 2 529
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ SpainS&D85.4 % of 2 891−4.7 pts median 90.0 %98.5 % of 2 466+2.0 pts median 96.5 %1.0 % of 2 4421.7 % of 2 468
Jean-Marc GERMAIN FranceS&D89.6 % of 2 891−0.4 pts median 90.0 %96.2 % of 2 589−0.3 pts median 96.5 %3.7 % of 2 5732.5 % of 2 590
Jens GEIER GermanyS&D92.3 % of 2 891+2.3 pts median 90.0 %98.2 % of 2 667+1.7 pts median 96.5 %1.6 % of 2 6431.8 % of 2 669
Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS PolandS&D99.0 % of 2 891+9.0 pts median 90.0 %98.0 % of 2 861+1.5 pts median 96.5 %1.8 % of 2 8342.1 % of 2 863
Johan DANIELSSON SwedenS&D99.6 % of 2 891+9.6 pts median 90.0 %94.8 % of 2 877−1.8 pts median 96.5 %4.8 % of 2 8503.9 % of 2 879
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ SpainS&D93.9 % of 2 891+3.9 pts median 90.0 %98.2 % of 2 714+1.7 pts median 96.5 %1.3 % of 2 6912.0 % of 2 715
José CEPEDA SpainS&D91.9 % of 2 891+1.9 pts median 90.0 %98.2 % of 2 655+1.7 pts median 96.5 %1.3 % of 2 6301.8 % of 2 657
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&D95.6 % of 2 891+5.6 pts median 90.0 %95.9 % of 2 762−0.6 pts median 96.5 %3.7 % of 2 7372.0 % of 2 764
Katarina BARLEY GermanyS&D74.7 % of 2 891−15.3 pts median 90.0 %98.3 % of 2 157+1.8 pts median 96.5 %1.1 % of 2 1362.0 % of 2 159
Kathleen VAN BREMPT BelgiumS&D93.6 % of 2 891+3.6 pts median 90.0 %98.3 % of 2 706+1.8 pts median 96.5 %1.4 % of 2 6841.9 % of 2 707
Klára DOBREV HungaryS&D71.0 % of 2 891−19.0 pts median 90.0 %95.2 % of 2 053−1.3 pts median 96.5 %4.5 % of 2 0351.2 % of 2 054
Kristian VIGENIN BulgariaS&D89.4 % of 2 891−0.6 pts median 90.0 %94.2 % of 2 582−2.4 pts median 96.5 %5.6 % of 2 5583.6 % of 2 584
Krzysztof ŚMISZEK PolandS&D75.4 % of 2 891−14.6 pts median 90.0 %98.1 % of 2 179+1.6 pts median 96.5 %1.7 % of 2 1562.5 % of 2 180
Lara WOLTERS NetherlandsS&D84.8 % of 2 891−5.2 pts median 90.0 %95.9 % of 2 452−0.6 pts median 96.5 %3.7 % of 2 4282.2 % of 2 453
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA SpainS&D93.4 % of 2 891+3.3 pts median 90.0 %98.4 % of 2 698+1.9 pts median 96.5 %1.2 % of 2 6762.2 % of 2 699
Leire PAJÍN SpainS&D97.8 % of 2 891+7.8 pts median 90.0 %98.2 % of 2 826+1.7 pts median 96.5 %1.4 % of 2 8012.0 % of 2 828
Lina GÁLVEZ SpainS&D84.3 % of 2 891−5.8 pts median 90.0 %98.8 % of 2 435+2.3 pts median 96.5 %0.8 % of 2 4151.6 % of 2 436
Lucia ANNUNZIATA ItalyS&D78.1 % of 2 891−11.9 pts median 90.0 %97.7 % of 2 257+1.2 pts median 96.5 %2.0 % of 2 2382.0 % of 2 259
Marc ANGEL LuxembourgS&D98.6 % of 2 891+8.6 pts median 90.0 %97.6 % of 2 849+1.1 pts median 96.5 %2.1 % of 2 8222.0 % of 2 851
Marco TARQUINIO ItalyS&D93.3 % of 2 891+3.3 pts median 90.0 %95.1 % of 2 695−1.4 pts median 96.5 %4.3 % of 2 6682.6 % of 2 697
Marcos ROS SEMPERE SpainS&D86.3 % of 2 891−3.8 pts median 90.0 %98.3 % of 2 492+1.8 pts median 96.5 %1.2 % of 2 4701.8 % of 2 494
Maria GRAPINI RomaniaS&D82.8 % of 2 891−7.2 pts median 90.0 %87.4 % of 2 392−9.1 pts median 96.5 %12.3 % of 2 3706.2 % of 2 393
Maria GUZENINA FinlandS&D85.1 % of 2 891−4.9 pts median 90.0 %96.6 % of 2 459+0.1 pts median 96.5 %3.1 % of 2 4353.4 % of 2 461
Maria NOICHL GermanyS&D94.5 % of 2 891+4.5 pts median 90.0 %96.0 % of 2 730−0.5 pts median 96.5 %3.5 % of 2 7042.3 % of 2 732
Marianne VIND DenmarkS&D92.1 % of 2 891+2.1 pts median 90.0 %90.8 % of 2 662−5.8 pts median 96.5 %9.0 % of 2 6383.7 % of 2 664
Marina KALJURAND EstoniaS&D98.4 % of 2 891+8.4 pts median 90.0 %96.9 % of 2 842+0.4 pts median 96.5 %2.9 % of 2 8172.8 % of 2 844
Marit MAIJ NetherlandsS&D99.5 % of 2 891+9.5 pts median 90.0 %96.2 % of 2 875−0.3 pts median 96.5 %3.4 % of 2 8482.4 % of 2 877
Marko VEŠLIGAJ CroatiaS&D71.5 % of 2 891−18.5 pts median 90.0 %92.8 % of 2 065−3.7 pts median 96.5 %6.8 % of 2 0454.7 % of 2 067
Marta TEMIDO PortugalS&D86.3 % of 2 891−3.8 pts median 90.0 %98.9 % of 2 492+2.4 pts median 96.5 %0.9 % of 2 4681.2 % of 2 494
Matjaž NEMEC SloveniaS&D92.0 % of 2 891+2.0 pts median 90.0 %94.1 % of 2 658−2.4 pts median 96.5 %5.6 % of 2 6312.4 % of 2 660
Matteo RICCI ItalyS&D81.8 % of 2 891−8.2 pts median 90.0 %97.5 % of 2 364+1.0 pts median 96.5 %2.1 % of 2 3421.9 % of 2 366
Matthias ECKE GermanyS&D91.8 % of 2 891+1.8 pts median 90.0 %97.6 % of 2 653+1.1 pts median 96.5 %1.9 % of 2 6272.3 % of 2 655
Mihai TUDOSE RomaniaS&D57.2 % of 2 891−32.8 pts median 90.0 %94.6 % of 1 655−2.0 pts median 96.5 %5.3 % of 1 6465.2 % of 1 655
Mohammed CHAHIM NetherlandsS&D96.9 % of 2 891+6.8 pts median 90.0 %95.0 % of 2 798−1.6 pts median 96.5 %4.7 % of 2 7762.3 % of 2 800
Murielle LAURENT FranceS&D87.2 % of 2 891−2.8 pts median 90.0 %94.6 % of 2 520−1.9 pts median 96.5 %5.0 % of 2 5022.6 % of 2 522
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR SpainS&D88.3 % of 2 891−1.7 pts median 90.0 %98.5 % of 2 550+2.0 pts median 96.5 %1.3 % of 2 5291.9 % of 2 552
Nicola ZINGARETTI ItalyS&D90.3 % of 2 891+0.3 pts median 90.0 %97.3 % of 2 611+0.8 pts median 96.5 %2.4 % of 2 5852.2 % of 2 612
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES SpainS&D93.7 % of 2 891+3.7 pts median 90.0 %97.9 % of 2 707+1.4 pts median 96.5 %1.7 % of 2 6821.7 % of 2 709
Niels FUGLSANG DenmarkS&D68.9 % of 2 891−21.1 pts median 90.0 %90.8 % of 1 992−5.8 pts median 96.5 %9.0 % of 1 9743.7 % of 1 993
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.