Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

Whole term: 5 928 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.2 % (737 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

139 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Gheorghe CÂRCIU RomaniaS&D58.6 % of 5 928−31.3 pts median 89.9 %94.5 % of 3 471−1.8 pts median 96.3 %5.1 % of 3 4233.5 % of 3 471
Giorgio GORI ItalyS&D91.5 % of 5 928+1.6 pts median 89.9 %96.3 % of 5 420±0.0 pts median 96.3 %3.0 % of 5 3292.6 % of 5 422
Giuseppe LUPO ItalyS&D93.3 % of 5 928+3.5 pts median 89.9 %97.1 % of 5 530+0.8 pts median 96.3 %2.4 % of 5 4562.2 % of 5 532
Günther SIDL AustriaS&D92.5 % of 5 928+2.7 pts median 89.9 %95.8 % of 5 483−0.5 pts median 96.3 %3.6 % of 5 3922.5 % of 5 484
Hana JALLOUL MURO SpainS&D84.1 % of 5 928−5.8 pts median 89.9 %96.7 % of 4 981+0.5 pts median 96.3 %2.5 % of 4 8902.2 % of 4 983
Hannes HEIDE AustriaS&D93.8 % of 5 928+3.9 pts median 89.9 %96.1 % of 5 556−0.2 pts median 96.3 %3.3 % of 5 4603.0 % of 5 558
Heléne FRITZON SwedenS&D92.4 % of 5 928+2.5 pts median 89.9 %93.7 % of 5 475−2.6 pts median 96.3 %5.6 % of 5 3863.7 % of 5 477
Idoia MENDIA SpainS&D96.7 % of 5 928+6.9 pts median 89.9 %97.2 % of 5 731+1.0 pts median 96.3 %2.0 % of 5 6352.1 % of 5 733
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ SpainS&D92.1 % of 5 928+2.3 pts median 89.9 %99.4 % of 5 458+3.1 pts median 96.3 %0.3 % of 5 3781.6 % of 5 460
Irene TINAGLI ItalyS&D96.4 % of 5 928+6.6 pts median 89.9 %98.0 % of 5 714+1.7 pts median 96.3 %1.5 % of 5 6352.1 % of 5 716
Isilda GOMES PortugalS&D88.7 % of 5 928−1.1 pts median 89.9 %99.1 % of 5 258+2.8 pts median 96.3 %0.6 % of 5 1711.7 % of 5 259
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&D77.8 % of 5 928−12.1 pts median 89.9 %97.9 % of 4 608+1.6 pts median 96.3 %1.5 % of 4 5311.5 % of 4 610
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ SpainS&D91.0 % of 5 928+1.1 pts median 89.9 %97.3 % of 5 390+1.0 pts median 96.3 %1.9 % of 5 3012.0 % of 5 392
Jean-Marc GERMAIN FranceS&D88.9 % of 5 928−1.0 pts median 89.9 %93.8 % of 5 268−2.4 pts median 96.3 %5.6 % of 5 2012.5 % of 5 269
Jens GEIER GermanyS&D84.9 % of 5 928−5.0 pts median 89.9 %97.6 % of 5 029+1.4 pts median 96.3 %1.9 % of 4 9551.6 % of 5 031
Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS PolandS&D99.0 % of 5 928+9.1 pts median 89.9 %97.8 % of 5 865+1.5 pts median 96.3 %1.7 % of 5 7671.8 % of 5 867
Johan DANIELSSON SwedenS&D99.6 % of 5 928+9.8 pts median 89.9 %93.7 % of 5 905−2.6 pts median 96.3 %5.6 % of 5 8073.8 % of 5 907
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ SpainS&D92.2 % of 5 928+2.3 pts median 89.9 %97.2 % of 5 462+0.9 pts median 96.3 %2.0 % of 5 3752.1 % of 5 463
José CEPEDA SpainS&D85.8 % of 5 928−4.1 pts median 89.9 %97.9 % of 5 084+1.6 pts median 96.3 %1.4 % of 5 0131.9 % of 5 086
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&D96.2 % of 5 928+6.3 pts median 89.9 %95.2 % of 5 698−1.1 pts median 96.3 %4.1 % of 5 6052.2 % of 5 700
Katarina BARLEY GermanyS&D71.7 % of 5 928−18.1 pts median 89.9 %97.5 % of 4 250+1.3 pts median 96.3 %1.8 % of 4 1831.9 % of 4 252
Kathleen VAN BREMPT BelgiumS&D93.6 % of 5 928+3.8 pts median 89.9 %98.1 % of 5 549+1.9 pts median 96.3 %1.4 % of 5 4571.9 % of 5 550
Klára DOBREV HungaryS&D71.1 % of 5 928−18.8 pts median 89.9 %94.7 % of 4 213−1.5 pts median 96.3 %4.5 % of 4 1440.9 % of 4 214
Kristian VIGENIN BulgariaS&D86.2 % of 5 928−3.7 pts median 89.9 %94.4 % of 5 107−1.8 pts median 96.3 %5.1 % of 5 0173.2 % of 5 109
Krzysztof ŚMISZEK PolandS&D87.7 % of 5 928−2.2 pts median 89.9 %97.7 % of 5 198+1.5 pts median 96.3 %1.7 % of 5 1042.1 % of 5 199
Lara WOLTERS NetherlandsS&D91.2 % of 5 928+1.3 pts median 89.9 %95.1 % of 5 404−1.2 pts median 96.3 %4.0 % of 5 3102.2 % of 5 405
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA SpainS&D68.3 % of 5 928−21.6 pts median 89.9 %98.1 % of 4 048+1.9 pts median 96.3 %1.2 % of 3 9912.1 % of 4 049
Leire PAJÍN SpainS&D92.4 % of 5 928+2.6 pts median 89.9 %96.8 % of 5 478+0.5 pts median 96.3 %2.4 % of 5 3892.3 % of 5 480
Lina GÁLVEZ SpainS&D83.3 % of 5 928−6.6 pts median 89.9 %98.1 % of 4 936+1.8 pts median 96.3 %1.2 % of 4 8591.7 % of 4 937
Lucia ANNUNZIATA ItalyS&D85.6 % of 5 928−4.3 pts median 89.9 %94.9 % of 5 072−1.3 pts median 96.3 %4.5 % of 4 9854.2 % of 5 074
Marc ANGEL LuxembourgS&D97.4 % of 5 928+7.6 pts median 89.9 %97.2 % of 5 774+0.9 pts median 96.3 %2.2 % of 5 6801.6 % of 5 776
Marco TARQUINIO ItalyS&D86.8 % of 5 928−3.1 pts median 89.9 %93.8 % of 5 143−2.4 pts median 96.3 %5.5 % of 5 0552.5 % of 5 145
Marcos ROS SEMPERE SpainS&D90.6 % of 5 928+0.7 pts median 89.9 %97.1 % of 5 368+0.8 pts median 96.3 %2.0 % of 5 2752.1 % of 5 370
Maria GRAPINI RomaniaS&D88.7 % of 5 928−1.1 pts median 89.9 %88.7 % of 5 260−7.6 pts median 96.3 %10.8 % of 5 1675.7 % of 5 261
Maria GUZENINA FinlandS&D92.4 % of 5 928+2.6 pts median 89.9 %96.5 % of 5 478+0.3 pts median 96.3 %3.0 % of 5 3833.2 % of 5 480
Maria NOICHL GermanyS&D95.9 % of 5 928+6.0 pts median 89.9 %96.3 % of 5 682+0.1 pts median 96.3 %2.9 % of 5 5851.9 % of 5 684
Marianne VIND DenmarkS&D86.6 % of 5 928−3.2 pts median 89.9 %90.4 % of 5 134−5.9 pts median 96.3 %9.1 % of 5 0473.4 % of 5 136
Marina KALJURAND EstoniaS&D92.3 % of 5 928+2.5 pts median 89.9 %96.5 % of 5 470+0.2 pts median 96.3 %2.8 % of 5 3832.8 % of 5 472
Marit MAIJ NetherlandsS&D99.6 % of 5 928+9.8 pts median 89.9 %95.2 % of 5 903−1.1 pts median 96.3 %4.0 % of 5 8052.3 % of 5 905
Marko VEŠLIGAJ CroatiaS&D77.1 % of 5 904−12.8 pts median 89.9 %90.0 % of 4 549−6.2 pts median 96.3 %9.1 % of 4 4665.2 % of 4 551
Marta TEMIDO PortugalS&D90.7 % of 5 928+0.8 pts median 89.9 %98.7 % of 5 374+2.4 pts median 96.3 %1.0 % of 5 2821.1 % of 5 376
Matjaž NEMEC SloveniaS&D89.2 % of 5 928−0.6 pts median 89.9 %94.1 % of 5 287−2.2 pts median 96.3 %5.2 % of 5 1952.5 % of 5 289
Matteo RICCI ItalyS&D81.3 % of 5 928−8.6 pts median 89.9 %96.8 % of 4 815+0.6 pts median 96.3 %2.5 % of 4 7362.2 % of 4 817
Matthias ECKE GermanyS&D90.2 % of 5 928+0.4 pts median 89.9 %97.1 % of 5 348+0.8 pts median 96.3 %2.2 % of 5 2581.9 % of 5 350
Mihai TUDOSE RomaniaS&D62.7 % of 5 928−27.1 pts median 89.9 %93.9 % of 3 719−2.3 pts median 96.3 %5.6 % of 3 6654.6 % of 3 719
Mohammed CHAHIM NetherlandsS&D87.6 % of 5 928−2.3 pts median 89.9 %94.1 % of 5 188−2.2 pts median 96.3 %5.3 % of 5 1162.1 % of 5 190
Murielle LAURENT FranceS&D91.2 % of 5 928+1.3 pts median 89.9 %93.0 % of 5 402−3.3 pts median 96.3 %6.3 % of 5 3202.4 % of 5 404
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR SpainS&D92.2 % of 5 928+2.3 pts median 89.9 %96.8 % of 5 461+0.6 pts median 96.3 %2.5 % of 5 3712.4 % of 5 463
Nicola ZINGARETTI ItalyS&D89.1 % of 5 928−0.8 pts median 89.9 %96.8 % of 5 281+0.5 pts median 96.3 %2.7 % of 5 1952.3 % of 5 282
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES SpainS&D86.8 % of 5 928−3.0 pts median 89.9 %97.6 % of 5 145+1.3 pts median 96.3 %1.7 % of 5 0621.5 % of 5 147
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.