Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

2026: 261 final votes with named positions — 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 90.8 % (723 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

190 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Adam JARUBAS PolandEPP77.4 % of 261−13.8 pts median 91.2 %95.5 % of 202+0.6 pts median 94.9 %3.2 % of 1882.0 % of 202
Adina VĂLEAN RomaniaEPP82.0 % of 261−9.2 pts median 91.2 %99.1 % of 214+4.1 pts median 94.9 %0.0 % of 2030.5 % of 214
Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA SpainEPP78.9 % of 261−12.3 pts median 91.2 %95.1 % of 206+0.2 pts median 94.9 %4.0 % of 2012.9 % of 206
Alexander BERNHUBER AustriaEPP93.1 % of 261+1.9 pts median 91.2 %92.6 % of 243−2.3 pts median 94.9 %4.8 % of 2302.1 % of 243
Alexandra MEHNERT GermanyEPP90.4 % of 261−0.8 pts median 91.2 %99.6 % of 236+4.7 pts median 94.9 %0.5 % of 2220.4 % of 236
Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE SwedenEPP80.1 % of 261−11.1 pts median 91.2 %82.8 % of 209−12.1 pts median 94.9 %16.4 % of 1954.3 % of 209
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA SpainEPP39.5 % of 261−51.7 pts median 91.2 %95.1 % of 103+0.2 pts median 94.9 %4.1 % of 982.9 % of 103
Ana Miguel PEDRO PortugalEPP91.2 % of 261±0.0 pts median 91.2 %95.4 % of 238+0.5 pts median 94.9 %3.1 % of 2252.5 % of 238
András Tivadar KULJA HungaryEPP66.3 % of 261−24.9 pts median 91.2 %86.7 % of 173−8.2 pts median 94.9 %7.4 % of 1622.9 % of 173
Andrea WECHSLER GermanyEPP96.2 % of 261+5.0 pts median 91.2 %97.6 % of 251+2.7 pts median 94.9 %2.1 % of 2382.0 % of 251
Andreas SCHWAB GermanyEPP83.5 % of 261−7.7 pts median 91.2 %97.7 % of 218+2.8 pts median 94.9 %2.4 % of 2061.8 % of 218
Andrey KOVATCHEV BulgariaEPP94.6 % of 261+3.4 pts median 91.2 %93.1 % of 247−1.8 pts median 94.9 %3.0 % of 2333.6 % of 247
Andrey NOVAKOV BulgariaEPP82.8 % of 261−8.4 pts median 91.2 %92.6 % of 216−2.3 pts median 94.9 %3.5 % of 2024.2 % of 216
Andrzej BUŁA PolandEPP95.0 % of 261+3.8 pts median 91.2 %92.7 % of 248−2.2 pts median 94.9 %3.0 % of 2354.4 % of 248
Andrzej HALICKI PolandEPP88.5 % of 261−2.7 pts median 91.2 %91.3 % of 231−3.6 pts median 94.9 %3.2 % of 2182.2 % of 231
Angelika NIEBLER GermanyEPP85.8 % of 261−5.4 pts median 91.2 %98.2 % of 224+3.3 pts median 94.9 %1.8 % of 2170.9 % of 224
Angelika WINZIG AustriaEPP94.3 % of 261+3.1 pts median 91.2 %92.7 % of 246−2.2 pts median 94.9 %3.8 % of 2342.0 % of 246
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE SpainEPP90.0 % of 261−1.1 pts median 91.2 %94.9 % of 235±0.0 pts median 94.9 %3.6 % of 2213.0 % of 235
Arba KOKALARI SwedenEPP96.9 % of 261+5.7 pts median 91.2 %94.9 % of 253−0.1 pts median 94.9 %5.0 % of 2400.4 % of 253
Aura SALLA FinlandEPP82.8 % of 261−8.4 pts median 91.2 %95.4 % of 216+0.4 pts median 94.9 %4.4 % of 2031.4 % of 216
Axel VOSS GermanyEPP88.1 % of 261−3.1 pts median 91.2 %99.1 % of 230+4.2 pts median 94.9 %0.9 % of 2180.4 % of 230
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ PolandEPP98.9 % of 261+7.7 pts median 91.2 %95.7 % of 258+0.8 pts median 94.9 %3.3 % of 2441.6 % of 258
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ PolandEPP95.4 % of 261+4.2 pts median 91.2 %96.0 % of 249+1.1 pts median 94.9 %2.5 % of 2361.2 % of 249
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI PolandEPP98.5 % of 261+7.3 pts median 91.2 %91.8 % of 257−3.1 pts median 94.9 %3.7 % of 2436.2 % of 257
Borja GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ SpainEPP94.6 % of 261+3.4 pts median 91.2 %95.5 % of 247+0.6 pts median 94.9 %3.0 % of 2332.0 % of 247
Borys BUDKA PolandEPP89.3 % of 261−1.9 pts median 91.2 %94.4 % of 233−0.5 pts median 94.9 %2.3 % of 2200.9 % of 233
Branko GRIMS changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.SloveniaNo group86.6 % of 261not compared median 91.2 %76.6 % of 184not compared median 94.9 %18.5 % of 17310.2 % of 226
Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ SpainEPP88.1 % of 261−3.1 pts median 91.2 %94.8 % of 230−0.1 pts median 94.9 %4.1 % of 2192.6 % of 230
Caterina CHINNICI ItalyEPP59.8 % of 261−31.4 pts median 91.2 %98.1 % of 156+3.2 pts median 94.9 %1.4 % of 1460.0 % of 156
Céline IMART FranceEPP94.3 % of 261+3.1 pts median 91.2 %83.3 % of 246−11.6 pts median 94.9 %12.4 % of 2349.3 % of 246
Christian DOLESCHAL GermanyEPP84.3 % of 261−6.9 pts median 91.2 %97.3 % of 220+2.4 pts median 94.9 %2.4 % of 2081.8 % of 220
Christian EHLER GermanyEPP85.1 % of 261−6.1 pts median 91.2 %98.6 % of 222+3.7 pts median 94.9 %1.4 % of 2100.5 % of 222
Christophe GOMART FranceEPP90.0 % of 261−1.1 pts median 91.2 %73.6 % of 235−21.3 pts median 94.9 %22.2 % of 2219.4 % of 235
Csaba BOGDÁN HungaryEPP89.5 % of 105−1.7 pts median 91.2 %88.3 % of 94−6.6 pts median 94.9 %7.8 % of 906.4 % of 94
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU RomaniaEPP64.0 % of 261−27.2 pts median 91.2 %98.8 % of 167+3.9 pts median 94.9 %0.6 % of 1560.0 % of 167
Daniel BUDA RomaniaEPP99.2 % of 261+8.0 pts median 91.2 %99.2 % of 259+4.3 pts median 94.9 %0.0 % of 2450.8 % of 259
Danuše NERUDOVÁ CzechiaEPP94.3 % of 261+3.1 pts median 91.2 %97.6 % of 246+2.6 pts median 94.9 %1.7 % of 2331.6 % of 246
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPP99.2 % of 261+8.0 pts median 91.2 %93.8 % of 259−1.1 pts median 94.9 %2.4 % of 2451.2 % of 259
David CASA MaltaEPP95.4 % of 261+4.2 pts median 91.2 %90.4 % of 249−4.6 pts median 94.9 %9.7 % of 2368.4 % of 249
David MCALLISTER GermanyEPP91.2 % of 261±0.0 pts median 91.2 %100.0 % of 238+5.1 pts median 94.9 %0.0 % of 2250.0 % of 238
Davor Ivo STIER CroatiaEPP85.8 % of 261−5.4 pts median 91.2 %93.8 % of 224−1.2 pts median 94.9 %2.8 % of 2130.9 % of 224
Dennis RADTKE GermanyEPP83.5 % of 261−7.7 pts median 91.2 %100.0 % of 218+5.1 pts median 94.9 %0.0 % of 2060.0 % of 218
Dimitris TSIODRAS GreeceEPP90.4 % of 261−0.8 pts median 91.2 %93.6 % of 236−1.3 pts median 94.9 %1.8 % of 2221.3 % of 236
Dirk GOTINK NetherlandsEPP96.6 % of 261+5.4 pts median 91.2 %96.4 % of 252+1.5 pts median 94.9 %3.3 % of 2392.0 % of 252
Dolors MONTSERRAT SpainEPP96.9 % of 261+5.7 pts median 91.2 %95.3 % of 253+0.3 pts median 94.9 %3.3 % of 2393.2 % of 253
Dóra DÁVID HungaryEPP71.6 % of 261−19.5 pts median 91.2 %86.6 % of 187−8.3 pts median 94.9 %8.0 % of 1763.2 % of 187
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO SpainEPP88.9 % of 261−2.3 pts median 91.2 %94.0 % of 232−1.0 pts median 94.9 %4.5 % of 2233.9 % of 232
Eleonora MELETI GreeceEPP87.7 % of 261−3.4 pts median 91.2 %92.6 % of 229−2.3 pts median 94.9 %2.8 % of 2161.3 % of 229
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI GreeceEPP65.5 % of 261−25.7 pts median 91.2 %90.1 % of 171−4.9 pts median 94.9 %5.0 % of 1591.2 % of 171
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA PolandEPP98.1 % of 261+6.9 pts median 91.2 %91.8 % of 256−3.1 pts median 94.9 %4.1 % of 2421.2 % of 256
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.