Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

190 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Adam JARUBAS PolandEPP71.2 % of 2 521−19.8 pts median 91.0 %90.5 % of 1 795−3.2 pts median 93.7 %6.7 % of 1 7205.2 % of 1 795
Adina VĂLEAN RomaniaEPP82.1 % of 2 521−8.9 pts median 91.0 %97.3 % of 2 070+3.6 pts median 93.7 %1.5 % of 1 9950.8 % of 2 070
Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA SpainEPP78.2 % of 2 521−12.8 pts median 91.0 %93.1 % of 1 972−0.6 pts median 93.7 %4.8 % of 1 8943.9 % of 1 972
Alexander BERNHUBER AustriaEPP87.5 % of 2 521−3.5 pts median 91.0 %94.9 % of 2 207+1.2 pts median 93.7 %4.0 % of 2 1182.2 % of 2 207
Alexandra MEHNERT GermanyEPP92.7 % of 2 521+1.7 pts median 91.0 %98.9 % of 2 336+5.2 pts median 93.7 %0.4 % of 2 2420.9 % of 2 336
Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE SwedenEPP79.3 % of 2 521−11.7 pts median 91.0 %79.0 % of 2 000−14.7 pts median 93.7 %19.8 % of 1 9153.8 % of 2 000
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA SpainEPP34.7 % of 2 521−56.2 pts median 91.0 %93.6 % of 876−0.1 pts median 93.7 %5.3 % of 8432.6 % of 876
Ana Miguel PEDRO PortugalEPP92.7 % of 2 521+1.7 pts median 91.0 %93.5 % of 2 337−0.2 pts median 93.7 %4.5 % of 2 2403.1 % of 2 337
András Tivadar KULJA HungaryEPP56.6 % of 2 521−34.4 pts median 91.0 %89.5 % of 1 427−4.2 pts median 93.7 %8.0 % of 1 3636.1 % of 1 427
Andrea WECHSLER GermanyEPP98.4 % of 2 521+7.4 pts median 91.0 %97.6 % of 2 481+3.9 pts median 93.7 %1.3 % of 2 3801.4 % of 2 481
Andreas SCHWAB GermanyEPP82.9 % of 2 521−8.1 pts median 91.0 %96.6 % of 2 089+2.9 pts median 93.7 %2.2 % of 1 9931.3 % of 2 089
Andrey KOVATCHEV BulgariaEPP94.1 % of 2 521+3.1 pts median 91.0 %93.3 % of 2 373−0.4 pts median 93.7 %5.0 % of 2 2783.5 % of 2 373
Andrey NOVAKOV BulgariaEPP82.9 % of 2 521−8.1 pts median 91.0 %93.8 % of 2 090+0.1 pts median 93.7 %4.7 % of 2 0073.5 % of 2 090
Andrzej BUŁA PolandEPP93.3 % of 2 521+2.3 pts median 91.0 %92.5 % of 2 353−1.2 pts median 93.7 %5.0 % of 2 2522.6 % of 2 353
Andrzej HALICKI PolandEPP86.5 % of 2 521−4.5 pts median 91.0 %93.2 % of 2 181−0.6 pts median 93.7 %4.5 % of 2 1031.8 % of 2 181
Angelika NIEBLER GermanyEPP81.0 % of 2 521−10.0 pts median 91.0 %97.7 % of 2 043+4.0 pts median 93.7 %1.5 % of 1 9780.8 % of 2 043
Angelika WINZIG AustriaEPP92.8 % of 2 521+1.8 pts median 91.0 %95.0 % of 2 339+1.3 pts median 93.7 %3.6 % of 2 2492.3 % of 2 339
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE SpainEPP91.2 % of 2 521+0.2 pts median 91.0 %93.9 % of 2 299+0.2 pts median 93.7 %4.3 % of 2 2102.9 % of 2 299
Arba KOKALARI SwedenEPP93.9 % of 2 521+2.9 pts median 91.0 %91.1 % of 2 367−2.6 pts median 93.7 %7.6 % of 2 2751.3 % of 2 367
Aura SALLA FinlandEPP80.0 % of 2 521−10.9 pts median 91.0 %94.7 % of 2 018+1.0 pts median 93.7 %3.8 % of 1 9421.3 % of 2 018
Axel VOSS GermanyEPP82.3 % of 2 521−8.7 pts median 91.0 %98.6 % of 2 074+4.8 pts median 93.7 %0.8 % of 2 0030.7 % of 2 074
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ PolandEPP99.4 % of 2 521+8.4 pts median 91.0 %92.8 % of 2 505−0.9 pts median 93.7 %5.8 % of 2 4011.4 % of 2 505
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ PolandEPP97.6 % of 2 521+6.6 pts median 91.0 %92.8 % of 2 460−1.0 pts median 93.7 %5.4 % of 2 3591.5 % of 2 460
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI PolandEPP97.8 % of 2 521+6.8 pts median 91.0 %92.5 % of 2 465−1.2 pts median 93.7 %4.9 % of 2 3713.6 % of 2 465
Borja GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ SpainEPP94.8 % of 2 521+3.8 pts median 91.0 %94.5 % of 2 389+0.8 pts median 93.7 %4.0 % of 2 3012.3 % of 2 389
Borys BUDKA PolandEPP89.4 % of 2 521−1.6 pts median 91.0 %92.9 % of 2 253−0.9 pts median 93.7 %4.7 % of 2 1601.9 % of 2 253
Branko GRIMS changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.SloveniaNo group89.6 % of 2 521not compared median 91.0 %70.9 % of 1 836not compared median 93.7 %27.3 % of 1 7626.7 % of 2 259
Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ SpainEPP83.6 % of 2 521−7.4 pts median 91.0 %93.3 % of 2 108−0.5 pts median 93.7 %4.7 % of 2 0253.5 % of 2 108
Caterina CHINNICI ItalyEPP55.9 % of 2 521−35.1 pts median 91.0 %94.8 % of 1 409+1.1 pts median 93.7 %3.6 % of 1 3561.7 % of 1 409
Céline IMART FranceEPP89.8 % of 2 521−1.2 pts median 91.0 %84.9 % of 2 263−8.8 pts median 93.7 %13.8 % of 2 1884.7 % of 2 263
Christian DOLESCHAL GermanyEPP75.3 % of 2 521−15.7 pts median 91.0 %97.5 % of 1 899+3.8 pts median 93.7 %2.0 % of 1 8230.9 % of 1 899
Christian EHLER GermanyEPP83.2 % of 2 521−7.8 pts median 91.0 %97.1 % of 2 098+3.4 pts median 93.7 %2.4 % of 2 0200.5 % of 2 098
Christophe GOMART FranceEPP91.4 % of 2 521+0.4 pts median 91.0 %74.2 % of 2 303−19.6 pts median 93.7 %24.3 % of 2 2144.7 % of 2 303
Csaba BOGDÁN HungaryEPP90.9 % of 891−0.1 pts median 91.0 %89.5 % of 810−4.2 pts median 93.7 %8.1 % of 7786.8 % of 810
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU RomaniaEPP53.3 % of 2 521−37.7 pts median 91.0 %96.8 % of 1 343+3.1 pts median 93.7 %1.6 % of 1 2731.6 % of 1 343
Daniel BUDA RomaniaEPP99.0 % of 2 521+8.1 pts median 91.0 %98.1 % of 2 497+4.4 pts median 93.7 %0.7 % of 2 3931.2 % of 2 497
Danuše NERUDOVÁ CzechiaEPP94.4 % of 2 521+3.5 pts median 91.0 %90.4 % of 2 381−3.3 pts median 93.7 %8.4 % of 2 2943.4 % of 2 381
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPP98.1 % of 2 521+7.1 pts median 91.0 %92.3 % of 2 474−1.4 pts median 93.7 %5.6 % of 2 3721.4 % of 2 474
David CASA MaltaEPP96.5 % of 2 521+5.5 pts median 91.0 %94.3 % of 2 433+0.6 pts median 93.7 %4.0 % of 2 3301.9 % of 2 433
David MCALLISTER GermanyEPP85.4 % of 2 521−5.6 pts median 91.0 %98.0 % of 2 153+4.3 pts median 93.7 %1.1 % of 2 0751.2 % of 2 153
Davor Ivo STIER CroatiaEPP80.1 % of 2 521−10.9 pts median 91.0 %91.7 % of 2 019−2.0 pts median 93.7 %6.8 % of 1 9472.8 % of 2 019
Dennis RADTKE GermanyEPP75.4 % of 2 521−15.5 pts median 91.0 %97.9 % of 1 902+4.2 pts median 93.7 %1.1 % of 1 8260.9 % of 1 902
Dimitris TSIODRAS GreeceEPP86.6 % of 2 521−4.4 pts median 91.0 %94.1 % of 2 184+0.4 pts median 93.7 %4.1 % of 2 1052.3 % of 2 184
Dirk GOTINK NetherlandsEPP98.2 % of 2 521+7.2 pts median 91.0 %95.0 % of 2 476+1.2 pts median 93.7 %3.8 % of 2 3732.3 % of 2 476
Dolors MONTSERRAT SpainEPP96.5 % of 2 521+5.6 pts median 91.0 %93.4 % of 2 434−0.3 pts median 93.7 %4.4 % of 2 3303.3 % of 2 434
Dóra DÁVID HungaryEPP65.3 % of 2 521−25.7 pts median 91.0 %89.8 % of 1 646−3.9 pts median 93.7 %7.8 % of 1 5756.0 % of 1 646
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO SpainEPP90.4 % of 2 521−0.6 pts median 91.0 %93.1 % of 2 278−0.6 pts median 93.7 %4.8 % of 2 1832.9 % of 2 278
Eleonora MELETI GreeceEPP83.5 % of 2 521−7.5 pts median 91.0 %93.5 % of 2 104−0.2 pts median 93.7 %4.6 % of 2 0152.6 % of 2 104
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI GreeceEPP57.8 % of 2 521−33.2 pts median 91.0 %92.4 % of 1 456−1.3 pts median 93.7 %6.0 % of 1 4072.7 % of 1 456
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA PolandEPP95.8 % of 2 521+4.8 pts median 91.0 %91.9 % of 2 415−1.8 pts median 93.7 %5.8 % of 2 3131.3 % of 2 415
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.