Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

192 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Adam JARUBAS PolandEPP57.6 % of 66−34.8 pts median 92.4 %38 of 38 — median 95.3 %0 of 38 0 of 38
Adina VĂLEAN RomaniaEPP84.8 % of 66−7.6 pts median 92.4 %100.0 % of 56+4.7 pts median 95.3 %0 of 45 0.0 % of 56
Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA SpainEPP77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %98.0 % of 51+2.7 pts median 95.3 %1 of 48 0.0 % of 51
Alexander BERNHUBER AustriaEPP83.3 % of 66−9.1 pts median 92.4 %74.5 % of 55−20.8 pts median 95.3 %3 of 44 5.5 % of 55
Alexandra MEHNERT GermanyEPP40.9 % of 66−51.5 pts median 92.4 %27 of 27 — median 95.3 %0 of 26 0 of 27
Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE SwedenEPP92.4 % of 66±0.0 pts median 92.4 %88.5 % of 61−6.8 pts median 95.3 %6 of 49 1.6 % of 61
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA SpainEPP77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %98.0 % of 51+2.7 pts median 95.3 %1 of 42 0.0 % of 51
Ana Miguel PEDRO PortugalEPP68.2 % of 66−24.2 pts median 92.4 %43 of 45 — median 95.3 %0 of 34 0 of 45
András Tivadar KULJA HungaryEPP89.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 92.4 %72.9 % of 59−22.5 pts median 95.3 %6 of 49 25.4 % of 59
Andrea WECHSLER GermanyEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %98.3 % of 60+3.0 pts median 95.3 %0 of 48 0.0 % of 60
Andreas SCHWAB GermanyEPP93.9 % of 66+1.5 pts median 92.4 %93.5 % of 62−1.8 pts median 95.3 %4.0 % of 504.8 % of 62
Andrey KOVATCHEV BulgariaEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %83.3 % of 66−12.0 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 540.0 % of 66
Andrey NOVAKOV BulgariaEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %84.6 % of 65−10.7 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Andrzej BUŁA PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %90.9 % of 66−4.4 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
Andrzej HALICKI PolandEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %85.0 % of 60−10.3 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 500.0 % of 60
Angelika NIEBLER GermanyEPP72.7 % of 66−19.7 pts median 92.4 %48 of 48 — median 95.3 %0 of 37 0 of 48
Angelika WINZIG AustriaEPP62.1 % of 66−30.3 pts median 92.4 %37 of 41 — median 95.3 %2 of 39 2 of 41
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE SpainEPP77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %98.0 % of 51+2.7 pts median 95.3 %1 of 41 0.0 % of 51
Arba KOKALARI SwedenEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %97.0 % of 66+1.6 pts median 95.3 %3.7 % of 541.5 % of 66
Aura SALLA FinlandEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %100.0 % of 64+4.7 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 520.0 % of 64
Axel VOSS GermanyEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %98.5 % of 65+3.1 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ PolandEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %95.3 % of 64±0.0 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 521.6 % of 64
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ PolandEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %100.0 % of 65+4.7 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %84.8 % of 66−10.5 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 541.5 % of 66
Borja GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ SpainEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %97.0 % of 66+1.6 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 541.5 % of 66
Borys BUDKA PolandEPP86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %86.0 % of 57−9.4 pts median 95.3 %0 of 46 0.0 % of 57
Branko GRIMS changed group SloveniaNo group95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %69.8 % of 63−25.5 pts median 95.3 %13.7 % of 516.3 % of 63
Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ SpainEPP77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %98.0 % of 51+2.7 pts median 95.3 %1 of 40 0.0 % of 51
Caterina CHINNICI ItalyEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %95.4 % of 65±0.0 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 541.5 % of 65
Céline IMART FranceEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %78.5 % of 65−16.9 pts median 95.3 %5.7 % of 537.7 % of 65
Christian DOLESCHAL GermanyEPP74.2 % of 66−18.2 pts median 92.4 %47 of 49 — median 95.3 %0 of 39 1 of 49
Christian EHLER GermanyEPP59.1 % of 66−33.3 pts median 92.4 %38 of 39 — median 95.3 %0 of 30 0 of 39
Christophe GOMART FranceEPP92.4 % of 66±0.0 pts median 92.4 %75.4 % of 61−19.9 pts median 95.3 %4 of 49 9.8 % of 61
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU RomaniaEPP40.9 % of 66−51.5 pts median 92.4 %25 of 27 — median 95.3 %0 of 24 0 of 27
Daniel BUDA RomaniaEPP69.7 % of 66−22.7 pts median 92.4 %42 of 46 — median 95.3 %1 of 42 1 of 46
Danuše NERUDOVÁ CzechiaEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %95.5 % of 66+0.1 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 541.5 % of 66
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %87.9 % of 66−7.5 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
David CASA MaltaEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %88.3 % of 60−7.0 pts median 95.3 %4 of 48 5.0 % of 60
David MCALLISTER GermanyEPP89.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 92.4 %98.3 % of 59+3.0 pts median 95.3 %0 of 47 0.0 % of 59
Davor Ivo STIER CroatiaEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %82.8 % of 64−12.5 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 530.0 % of 64
Dennis RADTKE GermanyEPP86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %96.5 % of 57+1.1 pts median 95.3 %1 of 48 0.0 % of 57
Dimitris TSIODRAS GreeceEPP93.9 % of 66+1.5 pts median 92.4 %80.6 % of 62−14.7 pts median 95.3 %3.9 % of 511.6 % of 62
Dirk GOTINK NetherlandsEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %96.9 % of 65+1.6 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 530.0 % of 65
Dolors MONTSERRAT SpainEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %95.3 % of 64±0.0 pts median 95.3 %3.8 % of 521.6 % of 64
Dóra DÁVID HungaryEPP86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %75.4 % of 57−19.9 pts median 95.3 %5 of 48 22.8 % of 57
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO SpainEPP87.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 92.4 %96.6 % of 58+1.2 pts median 95.3 %1 of 47 1.7 % of 58
Eleonora MELETI GreeceEPP95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %81.0 % of 63−14.4 pts median 95.3 %3.8 % of 521.6 % of 63
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI GreeceEPP39.4 % of 66−53.0 pts median 92.4 %23 of 26 — median 95.3 %1 of 24 1 of 26
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA PolandEPP95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %84.1 % of 63−11.2 pts median 95.3 %3.9 % of 511.6 % of 63
Emil RADEV BulgariaEPP57.6 % of 66−34.8 pts median 92.4 %28 of 38 — median 95.3 %0 of 28 0 of 38
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.