Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

190 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Liesbet SOMMEN	Liesbet SOMMEN	Belgium	EPP	96.6 % of 2 521	+5.6 pts median 91.0 %	94.7 % of 2 435	+1.0 pts median 93.7 %	4.0 % of 2 331	1.6 % of 2 435
Select Liudas MAŽYLIS	Liudas MAŽYLIS	Lithuania	EPP	99.9 % of 2 521	+8.9 pts median 91.0 %	96.8 % of 2 518	+3.1 pts median 93.7 %	1.5 % of 2 414	2.1 % of 2 518
Select Loránt VINCZE	Loránt VINCZE	Romania	EPP	87.4 % of 2 521	−3.6 pts median 91.0 %	93.0 % of 2 204	−0.7 pts median 93.7 %	5.5 % of 2 127	2.0 % of 2 204
Select Loucas FOURLAS	Loucas FOURLAS	Cyprus	EPP	65.3 % of 2 521	−25.7 pts median 91.0 %	89.9 % of 1 645	−3.8 pts median 93.7 %	7.8 % of 1 574	3.6 % of 1 645
Select Luděk NIEDERMAYER	Luděk NIEDERMAYER	Czechia	EPP	97.8 % of 2 521	+6.8 pts median 91.0 %	90.3 % of 2 465	−3.5 pts median 93.7 %	8.6 % of 2 363	5.4 % of 2 465
Select Lukas MANDL	Lukas MANDL	Austria	EPP	91.4 % of 2 521	+0.4 pts median 91.0 %	94.5 % of 2 303	+0.8 pts median 93.7 %	3.9 % of 2 219	2.4 % of 2 303
Select Łukasz KOHUT	Łukasz KOHUT	Poland	EPP	95.0 % of 2 521	+4.0 pts median 91.0 %	92.9 % of 2 395	−0.8 pts median 93.7 %	4.7 % of 2 295	1.5 % of 2 395
Select Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Poland	EPP	88.0 % of 2 521	−3.0 pts median 91.0 %	93.5 % of 2 219	−0.3 pts median 93.7 %	4.7 % of 2 133	1.3 % of 2 219
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	Germany	EPP	82.9 % of 2 521	−8.1 pts median 91.0 %	99.9 % of 2 091	+6.1 pts median 93.7 %	0.0 % of 2 053	0.4 % of 2 091
Select Manuela RIPA	Manuela RIPA	Germany	EPP	94.6 % of 2 521	+3.6 pts median 91.0 %	84.6 % of 2 386	−9.1 pts median 93.7 %	14.3 % of 2 286	3.0 % of 2 386
Select Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER	Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER	Spain	EPP	98.4 % of 2 521	+7.4 pts median 91.0 %	93.0 % of 2 480	−0.7 pts median 93.7 %	4.7 % of 2 376	3.7 % of 2 480
Select Marco FALCONE	Marco FALCONE	Italy	EPP	88.2 % of 2 521	−2.8 pts median 91.0 %	94.4 % of 2 224	+0.7 pts median 93.7 %	4.0 % of 2 143	3.1 % of 2 224
Select Maria WALSH	Maria WALSH	Ireland	EPP	70.0 % of 2 521	−21.0 pts median 91.0 %	92.5 % of 1 765	−1.2 pts median 93.7 %	7.0 % of 1 706	1.6 % of 1 765
Select Marie-Sophie CHRIST	Marie-Sophie CHRIST	Germany	EPP	95.5 % of 1 683	+4.5 pts median 91.0 %	97.1 % of 1 608	+3.4 pts median 93.7 %	1.9 % of 1 546	1.6 % of 1 608
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	Germany	EPP	99.4 % of 2 521	+8.4 pts median 91.0 %	98.1 % of 2 505	+4.4 pts median 93.7 %	1.1 % of 2 402	1.0 % of 2 505
Select Markus FERBER	Markus FERBER	Germany	EPP	92.8 % of 2 521	+1.8 pts median 91.0 %	97.0 % of 2 340	+3.2 pts median 93.7 %	2.0 % of 2 250	1.1 % of 2 340
Select Marta WCISŁO	Marta WCISŁO	Poland	EPP	91.0 % of 2 521	±0.0 pts median 91.0 %	92.2 % of 2 294	−1.5 pts median 93.7 %	5.2 % of 2 195	2.0 % of 2 294
Select Martine KEMP	Martine KEMP	Luxembourg	EPP	99.2 % of 2 521	+8.3 pts median 91.0 %	95.8 % of 2 502	+2.1 pts median 93.7 %	2.4 % of 2 399	2.3 % of 2 502
Select Massimiliano SALINI	Massimiliano SALINI	Italy	EPP	98.6 % of 2 521	+7.6 pts median 91.0 %	90.5 % of 2 485	−3.2 pts median 93.7 %	7.8 % of 2 381	2.3 % of 2 485
Select Matej TONIN	Matej TONIN	Slovenia	EPP	99.2 % of 2 521	+8.2 pts median 91.0 %	90.7 % of 2 501	−3.0 pts median 93.7 %	7.5 % of 2 397	1.9 % of 2 501
Select Michael GAHLER	Michael GAHLER	Germany	EPP	97.3 % of 2 521	+6.3 pts median 91.0 %	98.2 % of 2 453	+4.4 pts median 93.7 %	1.0 % of 2 350	0.9 % of 2 453
Select Michał SZCZERBA	Michał SZCZERBA	Poland	EPP	96.9 % of 2 521	+5.9 pts median 91.0 %	92.3 % of 2 443	−1.5 pts median 93.7 %	5.5 % of 2 344	1.6 % of 2 443
Select Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Poland	EPP	95.6 % of 2 521	+4.6 pts median 91.0 %	92.6 % of 2 409	−1.1 pts median 93.7 %	5.1 % of 2 305	1.7 % of 2 409
Select Michalis HADJIPANTELA	Michalis HADJIPANTELA	Cyprus	EPP	86.1 % of 2 521	−4.9 pts median 91.0 %	92.2 % of 2 170	−1.6 pts median 93.7 %	6.3 % of 2 084	2.9 % of 2 170
Select Mika AALTOLA	Mika AALTOLA	Finland	EPP	74.9 % of 2 521	−16.1 pts median 91.0 %	97.0 % of 1 887	+3.3 pts median 93.7 %	1.8 % of 1 809	0.6 % of 1 887
Select Milan ZVER	Milan ZVER	Slovenia	EPP	90.6 % of 2 521	−0.4 pts median 91.0 %	82.6 % of 2 283	−11.1 pts median 93.7 %	15.4 % of 2 185	2.8 % of 2 283
Select Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Romania	EPP	52.7 % of 2 521	−38.3 pts median 91.0 %	99.2 % of 1 328	+5.5 pts median 93.7 %	0.5 % of 1 290	0.5 % of 1 328
Select Miriam LEXMANN	Miriam LEXMANN	Slovakia	EPP	93.6 % of 2 521	+2.6 pts median 91.0 %	73.1 % of 2 360	−20.6 pts median 93.7 %	25.2 % of 2 259	10.0 % of 2 360
Select Mirosława NYKIEL	Mirosława NYKIEL	Poland	EPP	76.1 % of 2 521	−14.9 pts median 91.0 %	93.1 % of 1 919	−0.7 pts median 93.7 %	4.9 % of 1 842	1.2 % of 1 919
Select Monika HOHLMEIER	Monika HOHLMEIER	Germany	EPP	83.5 % of 2 521	−7.5 pts median 91.0 %	96.3 % of 2 104	+2.6 pts median 93.7 %	2.7 % of 2 027	1.5 % of 2 104
Select Nadine MORANO	Nadine MORANO	France	EPP	94.9 % of 2 521	+3.9 pts median 91.0 %	79.5 % of 2 392	−14.2 pts median 93.7 %	19.1 % of 2 290	4.8 % of 2 392
Select Niclas HERBST	Niclas HERBST	Germany	EPP	97.0 % of 2 521	+6.0 pts median 91.0 %	97.7 % of 2 445	+4.0 pts median 93.7 %	1.4 % of 2 346	1.3 % of 2 445
Select Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE	Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE	Spain	EPP	87.3 % of 2 521	−3.6 pts median 91.0 %	93.1 % of 2 202	−0.7 pts median 93.7 %	4.8 % of 2 102	3.2 % of 2 202
Select Niels Flemming HANSEN	Niels Flemming HANSEN	Denmark	EPP	99.3 % of 2 521	+8.3 pts median 91.0 %	87.7 % of 2 504	−6.0 pts median 93.7 %	11.3 % of 2 402	2.9 % of 2 504
Select Niels GEUKING	Niels GEUKING	Germany	EPP	98.8 % of 2 521	+7.9 pts median 91.0 %	99.0 % of 2 492	+5.3 pts median 93.7 %	0.2 % of 2 402	1.0 % of 2 492
Select Nikolina BRNJAC	Nikolina BRNJAC	Croatia	EPP	56.8 % of 2 521	−34.2 pts median 91.0 %	92.3 % of 1 432	−1.4 pts median 93.7 %	6.3 % of 1 386	1.4 % of 1 432
Select Nina CARBERRY	Nina CARBERRY	Ireland	EPP	91.0 % of 2 521	±0.0 pts median 91.0 %	94.1 % of 2 295	+0.4 pts median 93.7 %	5.4 % of 2 216	1.6 % of 2 295
Select Norbert HERHAMMER	Norbert HERHAMMER	Germany	EPP	72.5 % of 891	−18.5 pts median 91.0 %	98.1 % of 646	+4.4 pts median 93.7 %	1.1 % of 614	0.8 % of 646
Select Norbert LINS	Norbert LINS	Germany	EPP	98.9 % of 2 521	+7.9 pts median 91.0 %	98.0 % of 2 493	+4.3 pts median 93.7 %	1.0 % of 2 389	1.0 % of 2 493
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	Germany	EPP	99.5 % of 2 521	+8.5 pts median 91.0 %	98.5 % of 2 509	+4.8 pts median 93.7 %	0.7 % of 2 405	1.0 % of 2 509
Select Ondřej KOLÁŘ	Ondřej KOLÁŘ	Czechia	EPP	96.8 % of 2 521	+5.8 pts median 91.0 %	91.4 % of 2 440	−2.3 pts median 93.7 %	7.2 % of 2 345	5.6 % of 2 440
Select Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA	Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA	Spain	EPP	94.2 % of 2 521	+3.2 pts median 91.0 %	93.2 % of 2 375	−0.5 pts median 93.7 %	4.8 % of 2 273	2.6 % of 2 375
Select Pascal ARIMONT	Pascal ARIMONT	Belgium	EPP	98.0 % of 2 521	+7.0 pts median 91.0 %	91.5 % of 2 471	−2.2 pts median 93.7 %	6.7 % of 2 369	3.5 % of 2 471
Select Paulius SAUDARGAS	Paulius SAUDARGAS	Lithuania	EPP	99.2 % of 2 521	+8.3 pts median 91.0 %	95.1 % of 2 502	+1.4 pts median 93.7 %	3.5 % of 2 399	2.6 % of 2 502
Select Paulo CUNHA	Paulo CUNHA	Portugal	EPP	97.8 % of 2 521	+6.8 pts median 91.0 %	95.6 % of 2 465	+1.9 pts median 93.7 %	2.8 % of 2 363	3.1 % of 2 465
Select Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL	Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL	Portugal	EPP	87.3 % of 2 521	−3.6 pts median 91.0 %	95.7 % of 2 202	+2.0 pts median 93.7 %	2.9 % of 2 111	2.8 % of 2 202
Select Pekka TOVERI	Pekka TOVERI	Finland	EPP	90.8 % of 2 521	−0.2 pts median 91.0 %	98.1 % of 2 290	+4.4 pts median 93.7 %	1.4 % of 2 211	0.7 % of 2 290
Select Peter AGIUS	Peter AGIUS	Malta	EPP	67.3 % of 2 521	−23.7 pts median 91.0 %	95.4 % of 1 697	+1.7 pts median 93.7 %	3.0 % of 1 629	2.1 % of 1 697
Select Peter LIESE	Peter LIESE	Germany	EPP	90.2 % of 2 521	−0.8 pts median 91.0 %	97.6 % of 2 273	+3.9 pts median 93.7 %	1.5 % of 2 187	0.6 % of 2 273
Select Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA	Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA	Spain	EPP	71.3 % of 2 521	−19.7 pts median 91.0 %	92.4 % of 1 797	−1.3 pts median 93.7 %	6.0 % of 1 727	2.7 % of 1 797

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.