Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

188 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Lídia PEREIRA	Lídia PEREIRA	Portugal	EPP	85.3 % of 2 891	−5.7 pts median 91.0 %	94.6 % of 2 465	+1.0 pts median 93.5 %	3.2 % of 2 336	3.4 % of 2 465
Select Liesbet SOMMEN	Liesbet SOMMEN	Belgium	EPP	98.1 % of 2 891	+7.1 pts median 91.0 %	94.3 % of 2 836	+0.7 pts median 93.5 %	4.4 % of 2 698	1.7 % of 2 836
Select Liudas MAŽYLIS	Liudas MAŽYLIS	Lithuania	EPP	99.3 % of 2 891	+8.3 pts median 91.0 %	97.5 % of 2 870	+3.9 pts median 93.5 %	0.6 % of 2 733	1.8 % of 2 870
Select Loránt VINCZE	Loránt VINCZE	Romania	EPP	88.5 % of 2 891	−2.5 pts median 91.0 %	88.0 % of 2 559	−5.6 pts median 93.5 %	9.7 % of 2 431	2.6 % of 2 559
Select Loucas FOURLAS	Loucas FOURLAS	Cyprus	EPP	68.7 % of 2 891	−22.2 pts median 91.0 %	90.0 % of 1 987	−3.5 pts median 93.5 %	8.1 % of 1 897	3.9 % of 1 987
Select Luděk NIEDERMAYER	Luděk NIEDERMAYER	Czechia	EPP	98.7 % of 2 891	+7.7 pts median 91.0 %	90.2 % of 2 854	−3.4 pts median 93.5 %	8.7 % of 2 718	7.2 % of 2 854
Select Lukas MANDL	Lukas MANDL	Austria	EPP	89.5 % of 2 891	−1.5 pts median 91.0 %	93.0 % of 2 586	−0.5 pts median 93.5 %	4.6 % of 2 452	2.2 % of 2 586
Select Łukasz KOHUT	Łukasz KOHUT	Poland	EPP	98.2 % of 2 891	+7.2 pts median 91.0 %	90.2 % of 2 839	−3.3 pts median 93.5 %	7.8 % of 2 704	3.0 % of 2 839
Select Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Poland	EPP	96.9 % of 2 891	+5.9 pts median 91.0 %	90.8 % of 2 802	−2.7 pts median 93.5 %	6.8 % of 2 665	2.5 % of 2 802
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	Germany	EPP	76.3 % of 2 891	−14.7 pts median 91.0 %	98.6 % of 2 205	+5.0 pts median 93.5 %	0.7 % of 2 130	0.3 % of 2 205
Select Manuela RIPA	Manuela RIPA	Germany	EPP	83.2 % of 2 891	−7.8 pts median 91.0 %	83.1 % of 2 405	−10.4 pts median 93.5 %	16.2 % of 2 307	4.1 % of 2 405
Select Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER	Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER	Spain	EPP	92.4 % of 2 891	+1.4 pts median 91.0 %	94.3 % of 2 671	+0.8 pts median 93.5 %	3.1 % of 2 538	2.3 % of 2 671
Select Marco FALCONE	Marco FALCONE	Italy	EPP	90.5 % of 2 891	−0.5 pts median 91.0 %	93.7 % of 2 615	+0.1 pts median 93.5 %	4.8 % of 2 488	2.4 % of 2 615
Select Maria WALSH	Maria WALSH	Ireland	EPP	91.3 % of 2 891	+0.3 pts median 91.0 %	89.5 % of 2 639	−4.1 pts median 93.5 %	9.4 % of 2 502	2.2 % of 2 639
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	Germany	EPP	95.5 % of 2 891	+4.5 pts median 91.0 %	98.0 % of 2 761	+4.5 pts median 93.5 %	1.2 % of 2 624	0.6 % of 2 761
Select Markus FERBER	Markus FERBER	Germany	EPP	96.6 % of 2 891	+5.6 pts median 91.0 %	96.7 % of 2 793	+3.2 pts median 93.5 %	1.6 % of 2 658	1.1 % of 2 793
Select Marta WCISŁO	Marta WCISŁO	Poland	EPP	98.5 % of 2 891	+7.6 pts median 91.0 %	89.0 % of 2 849	−4.5 pts median 93.5 %	8.6 % of 2 715	2.6 % of 2 849
Select Martine KEMP	Martine KEMP	Luxembourg	EPP	78.8 % of 2 891	−12.2 pts median 91.0 %	96.2 % of 2 278	+2.7 pts median 93.5 %	2.1 % of 2 150	1.2 % of 2 278
Select Massimiliano SALINI	Massimiliano SALINI	Italy	EPP	99.5 % of 2 891	+8.5 pts median 91.0 %	89.9 % of 2 877	−3.7 pts median 93.5 %	8.3 % of 2 738	2.6 % of 2 877
Select Matej TONIN	Matej TONIN	Slovenia	EPP	97.9 % of 2 891	+6.9 pts median 91.0 %	89.6 % of 2 830	−3.9 pts median 93.5 %	8.1 % of 2 695	1.5 % of 2 830
Select Michael GAHLER	Michael GAHLER	Germany	EPP	93.5 % of 2 891	+2.5 pts median 91.0 %	98.2 % of 2 703	+4.6 pts median 93.5 %	1.2 % of 2 572	0.4 % of 2 703
Select Michał SZCZERBA	Michał SZCZERBA	Poland	EPP	98.1 % of 2 891	+7.1 pts median 91.0 %	89.0 % of 2 836	−4.5 pts median 93.5 %	8.9 % of 2 698	2.1 % of 2 836
Select Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Poland	EPP	90.1 % of 2 891	−0.8 pts median 91.0 %	91.3 % of 2 606	−2.3 pts median 93.5 %	6.6 % of 2 480	1.8 % of 2 606
Select Michalis HADJIPANTELA	Michalis HADJIPANTELA	Cyprus	EPP	92.5 % of 2 891	+1.5 pts median 91.0 %	91.3 % of 2 673	−2.2 pts median 93.5 %	7.0 % of 2 537	3.4 % of 2 673
Select Mika AALTOLA	Mika AALTOLA	Finland	EPP	88.3 % of 2 891	−2.6 pts median 91.0 %	98.2 % of 2 554	+4.7 pts median 93.5 %	0.8 % of 2 423	0.4 % of 2 554
Select Milan ZVER	Milan ZVER	Slovenia	EPP	88.2 % of 2 891	−2.7 pts median 91.0 %	77.9 % of 2 551	−15.6 pts median 93.5 %	19.6 % of 2 413	4.3 % of 2 551
Select Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Romania	EPP	98.0 % of 2 891	+7.1 pts median 91.0 %	98.2 % of 2 834	+4.7 pts median 93.5 %	0.4 % of 2 696	1.0 % of 2 834
Select Miriam LEXMANN	Miriam LEXMANN	Slovakia	EPP	87.6 % of 2 891	−3.4 pts median 91.0 %	79.2 % of 2 533	−14.4 pts median 93.5 %	18.4 % of 2 402	6.5 % of 2 533
Select Mirosława NYKIEL	Mirosława NYKIEL	Poland	EPP	99.1 % of 2 891	+8.1 pts median 91.0 %	90.4 % of 2 865	−3.2 pts median 93.5 %	7.2 % of 2 727	2.6 % of 2 865
Select Monika HOHLMEIER	Monika HOHLMEIER	Germany	EPP	76.8 % of 2 891	−14.1 pts median 91.0 %	96.8 % of 2 221	+3.2 pts median 93.5 %	2.2 % of 2 111	1.5 % of 2 221
Select Nadine MORANO	Nadine MORANO	France	EPP	83.3 % of 2 891	−7.7 pts median 91.0 %	68.5 % of 2 407	−25.0 pts median 93.5 %	30.1 % of 2 282	5.3 % of 2 407
Select Niclas HERBST	Niclas HERBST	Germany	EPP	94.6 % of 2 891	+3.6 pts median 91.0 %	97.4 % of 2 734	+3.9 pts median 93.5 %	1.7 % of 2 602	0.9 % of 2 734
Select Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE	Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE	Spain	EPP	89.0 % of 2 891	−1.9 pts median 91.0 %	93.3 % of 2 574	−0.3 pts median 93.5 %	3.8 % of 2 439	1.2 % of 2 574
Select Niels Flemming HANSEN	Niels Flemming HANSEN	Denmark	EPP	96.5 % of 2 891	+5.6 pts median 91.0 %	92.9 % of 2 791	−0.6 pts median 93.5 %	6.0 % of 2 653	2.0 % of 2 791
Select Niels GEUKING	Niels GEUKING	Germany	EPP	99.0 % of 2 891	+8.0 pts median 91.0 %	97.5 % of 2 861	+4.0 pts median 93.5 %	1.2 % of 2 726	1.5 % of 2 861
Select Nikolina BRNJAC	Nikolina BRNJAC	Croatia	EPP	80.7 % of 2 891	−10.3 pts median 91.0 %	92.2 % of 2 333	−1.4 pts median 93.5 %	5.8 % of 2 222	1.9 % of 2 333
Select Nina CARBERRY	Nina CARBERRY	Ireland	EPP	99.3 % of 2 891	+8.4 pts median 91.0 %	91.6 % of 2 872	−1.9 pts median 93.5 %	7.2 % of 2 733	1.7 % of 2 872
Select Norbert LINS	Norbert LINS	Germany	EPP	95.4 % of 2 891	+4.4 pts median 91.0 %	97.7 % of 2 757	+4.1 pts median 93.5 %	1.3 % of 2 619	0.7 % of 2 757
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	Germany	EPP	97.1 % of 2 891	+6.1 pts median 91.0 %	98.2 % of 2 807	+4.6 pts median 93.5 %	1.0 % of 2 669	0.5 % of 2 807
Select Ondřej KOLÁŘ	Ondřej KOLÁŘ	Czechia	EPP	97.2 % of 2 891	+6.2 pts median 91.0 %	88.8 % of 2 809	−4.7 pts median 93.5 %	10.1 % of 2 679	7.7 % of 2 809
Select Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA	Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA	Spain	EPP	96.0 % of 2 891	+5.0 pts median 91.0 %	94.1 % of 2 774	+0.5 pts median 93.5 %	3.5 % of 2 637	1.4 % of 2 774
Select Pascal ARIMONT	Pascal ARIMONT	Belgium	EPP	90.0 % of 2 891	−1.0 pts median 91.0 %	89.7 % of 2 602	−3.9 pts median 93.5 %	8.6 % of 2 479	4.7 % of 2 602
Select Paulius SAUDARGAS	Paulius SAUDARGAS	Lithuania	EPP	99.2 % of 2 891	+8.3 pts median 91.0 %	95.5 % of 2 869	+2.0 pts median 93.5 %	2.9 % of 2 732	1.2 % of 2 869
Select Paulo CUNHA	Paulo CUNHA	Portugal	EPP	97.4 % of 2 891	+6.5 pts median 91.0 %	94.9 % of 2 817	+1.4 pts median 93.5 %	3.3 % of 2 682	3.2 % of 2 817
Select Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL	Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL	Portugal	EPP	91.9 % of 2 891	+0.9 pts median 91.0 %	95.3 % of 2 656	+1.7 pts median 93.5 %	3.1 % of 2 520	3.0 % of 2 656
Select Pekka TOVERI	Pekka TOVERI	Finland	EPP	86.5 % of 2 891	−4.5 pts median 91.0 %	98.6 % of 2 501	+5.0 pts median 93.5 %	0.5 % of 2 367	0.4 % of 2 501
Select Peter AGIUS	Peter AGIUS	Malta	EPP	89.2 % of 2 891	−1.8 pts median 91.0 %	91.0 % of 2 579	−2.5 pts median 93.5 %	7.0 % of 2 466	3.8 % of 2 579
Select Peter LIESE	Peter LIESE	Germany	EPP	94.0 % of 2 891	+3.0 pts median 91.0 %	97.1 % of 2 717	+3.6 pts median 93.5 %	1.5 % of 2 588	0.6 % of 2 717
Select Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA	Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA	Spain	EPP	81.4 % of 2 891	−9.6 pts median 91.0 %	93.4 % of 2 352	−0.2 pts median 93.5 %	4.2 % of 2 238	2.1 % of 2 352
Select Radan KANEV	Radan KANEV	Bulgaria	EPP	80.5 % of 2 891	−10.5 pts median 91.0 %	88.5 % of 2 327	−5.0 pts median 93.5 %	9.6 % of 2 200	6.7 % of 2 327

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.