Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

190 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Emil RADEV	Emil RADEV	Bulgaria	EPP	86.1 % of 2 521	−4.9 pts median 91.0 %	92.3 % of 2 171	−1.4 pts median 93.7 %	6.2 % of 2 086	3.8 % of 2 171
Select Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Greece	EPP	93.7 % of 2 521	+2.7 pts median 91.0 %	94.9 % of 2 362	+1.2 pts median 93.7 %	3.8 % of 2 283	1.4 % of 2 362
Select Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS	Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS	Spain	EPP	81.1 % of 2 521	−9.9 pts median 91.0 %	94.4 % of 2 044	+0.7 pts median 93.7 %	4.0 % of 1 973	2.3 % of 2 044
Select Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA	Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA	Spain	EPP	58.2 % of 2 521	−32.8 pts median 91.0 %	95.4 % of 1 467	+1.6 pts median 93.7 %	3.5 % of 1 418	2.0 % of 1 467
Select Eszter LAKOS	Eszter LAKOS	Hungary	EPP	55.6 % of 2 521	−35.4 pts median 91.0 %	89.9 % of 1 401	−3.9 pts median 93.7 %	7.8 % of 1 340	5.9 % of 1 401
Select Eva MAYDELL	Eva MAYDELL	Bulgaria	EPP	18.2 % of 2 521	−72.8 pts median 91.0 %	92.2 % of 459	−1.6 pts median 93.7 %	3.5 % of 432	3.9 % of 459
Select Ewa KOPACZ	Ewa KOPACZ	Poland	EPP	97.9 % of 2 521	+6.9 pts median 91.0 %	92.8 % of 2 467	−0.9 pts median 93.7 %	5.3 % of 2 364	1.6 % of 2 467
Select Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS	Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS	Spain	EPP	98.8 % of 2 521	+7.9 pts median 91.0 %	93.8 % of 2 492	+0.1 pts median 93.7 %	4.2 % of 2 391	3.0 % of 2 492
Select Flavio TOSI	Flavio TOSI	Italy	EPP	94.6 % of 2 521	+3.6 pts median 91.0 %	94.0 % of 2 386	+0.2 pts median 93.7 %	4.7 % of 2 295	2.1 % of 2 386
Select Francisco José MILLÁN MON	Francisco José MILLÁN MON	Spain	EPP	98.3 % of 2 521	+7.3 pts median 91.0 %	93.7 % of 2 477	±0.0 pts median 93.7 %	4.3 % of 2 374	2.9 % of 2 477
Select François-Xavier BELLAMY	François-Xavier BELLAMY	France	EPP	86.4 % of 2 521	−4.6 pts median 91.0 %	80.9 % of 2 178	−12.8 pts median 93.7 %	17.6 % of 2 105	4.9 % of 2 178
Select Fredis BELERIS	Fredis BELERIS	Greece	EPP	84.3 % of 2 521	−6.7 pts median 91.0 %	93.6 % of 2 124	−0.1 pts median 93.7 %	4.6 % of 2 042	2.5 % of 2 124
Select Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO	Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO	Italy	EPP	39.9 % of 2 521	−51.1 pts median 91.0 %	96.2 % of 1 007	+2.5 pts median 93.7 %	2.4 % of 983	0.7 % of 1 007
Select Gabriel MATO	Gabriel MATO	Spain	EPP	88.0 % of 2 521	−3.0 pts median 91.0 %	93.6 % of 2 219	−0.2 pts median 93.7 %	4.6 % of 2 131	2.9 % of 2 219
Select Gabriella GERZSENYI	Gabriella GERZSENYI	Hungary	EPP	24.5 % of 2 521	−66.5 pts median 91.0 %	87.1 % of 618	−6.7 pts median 93.7 %	10.6 % of 592	6.6 % of 618
Select Georgios AFTIAS	Georgios AFTIAS	Greece	EPP	82.7 % of 2 521	−8.3 pts median 91.0 %	94.1 % of 2 086	+0.3 pts median 93.7 %	4.1 % of 2 008	2.8 % of 2 086
Select Gheorghe FALCĂ	Gheorghe FALCĂ	Romania	EPP	86.4 % of 2 521	−4.6 pts median 91.0 %	97.7 % of 2 177	+4.0 pts median 93.7 %	1.3 % of 2 117	0.9 % of 2 177
Select Giusi PRINCI	Giusi PRINCI	Italy	EPP	99.0 % of 2 521	+8.1 pts median 91.0 %	95.4 % of 2 497	+1.6 pts median 93.7 %	3.3 % of 2 395	1.7 % of 2 497
Select Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ	Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ	Poland	EPP	73.0 % of 2 521	−18.0 pts median 91.0 %	91.6 % of 1 840	−2.1 pts median 93.7 %	6.3 % of 1 769	3.8 % of 1 840
Select Hélder SOUSA SILVA	Hélder SOUSA SILVA	Portugal	EPP	96.7 % of 2 521	+5.7 pts median 91.0 %	94.1 % of 2 438	+0.3 pts median 93.7 %	4.2 % of 2 335	3.7 % of 2 438
Select Henrik DAHL	Henrik DAHL	Denmark	EPP	99.5 % of 2 521	+8.5 pts median 91.0 %	81.8 % of 2 509	−11.9 pts median 93.7 %	17.3 % of 2 407	2.7 % of 2 509
Select Herbert DORFMANN	Herbert DORFMANN	Italy	EPP	99.7 % of 2 521	+8.7 pts median 91.0 %	96.6 % of 2 513	+2.9 pts median 93.7 %	2.7 % of 2 409	1.0 % of 2 513
Select Hildegard BENTELE	Hildegard BENTELE	Germany	EPP	90.0 % of 2 521	−1.0 pts median 91.0 %	98.3 % of 2 269	+4.6 pts median 93.7 %	1.1 % of 2 184	0.8 % of 2 269
Select Ilia LAZAROV	Ilia LAZAROV	Bulgaria	EPP	75.6 % of 2 521	−15.4 pts median 91.0 %	87.2 % of 1 905	−6.5 pts median 93.7 %	11.2 % of 1 815	3.9 % of 1 905
Select Inese VAIDERE	Inese VAIDERE	Latvia	EPP	93.1 % of 2 521	+2.1 pts median 91.0 %	97.7 % of 2 346	+4.0 pts median 93.7 %	0.8 % of 2 242	0.9 % of 2 346
Select Ingeborg TER LAAK	Ingeborg TER LAAK	Netherlands	EPP	99.4 % of 2 521	+8.4 pts median 91.0 %	96.2 % of 2 507	+2.5 pts median 93.7 %	2.5 % of 2 403	1.6 % of 2 507
Select Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN	Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN	Romania	EPP	80.0 % of 2 521	−11.0 pts median 91.0 %	97.2 % of 2 017	+3.5 pts median 93.7 %	1.8 % of 1 934	1.4 % of 2 017
Select Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA	Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA	Spain	EPP	98.8 % of 2 521	+7.9 pts median 91.0 %	93.2 % of 2 492	−0.5 pts median 93.7 %	4.8 % of 2 392	2.7 % of 2 492
Select Isabel WISELER-LIMA	Isabel WISELER-LIMA	Luxembourg	EPP	96.1 % of 2 521	+5.1 pts median 91.0 %	95.7 % of 2 422	+2.0 pts median 93.7 %	2.5 % of 2 322	2.0 % of 2 422
Select Isabelle LE CALLENNEC	Isabelle LE CALLENNEC	France	EPP	93.0 % of 2 521	+2.0 pts median 91.0 %	77.7 % of 2 345	−16.0 pts median 93.7 %	20.2 % of 2 243	12.1 % of 2 345
Select Iuliu WINKLER	Iuliu WINKLER	Romania	EPP	93.9 % of 2 521	+2.9 pts median 91.0 %	96.9 % of 2 366	+3.2 pts median 93.7 %	2.1 % of 2 276	1.7 % of 2 366
Select Jacek PROTAS	Jacek PROTAS	Poland	EPP	95.8 % of 2 521	+4.8 pts median 91.0 %	91.5 % of 2 414	−2.2 pts median 93.7 %	5.9 % of 2 317	3.3 % of 2 414
Select Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Poland	EPP	97.1 % of 2 521	+6.1 pts median 91.0 %	91.7 % of 2 448	−2.0 pts median 93.7 %	6.1 % of 2 347	1.3 % of 2 448
Select Jan FARSKÝ	Jan FARSKÝ	Czechia	EPP	97.9 % of 2 521	+6.9 pts median 91.0 %	90.6 % of 2 467	−3.1 pts median 93.7 %	8.7 % of 2 380	3.9 % of 2 467
Select Janusz LEWANDOWSKI	Janusz LEWANDOWSKI	Poland	EPP	75.8 % of 2 521	−15.2 pts median 91.0 %	93.7 % of 1 911	±0.0 pts median 93.7 %	3.9 % of 1 855	4.5 % of 1 911
Select Javier ZARZALEJOS	Javier ZARZALEJOS	Spain	EPP	95.4 % of 2 521	+4.4 pts median 91.0 %	93.7 % of 2 404	±0.0 pts median 93.7 %	4.4 % of 2 323	2.4 % of 2 404
Select Jens GIESEKE	Jens GIESEKE	Germany	EPP	99.3 % of 2 521	+8.3 pts median 91.0 %	96.6 % of 2 503	+2.9 pts median 93.7 %	2.1 % of 2 399	1.9 % of 2 503
Select Jeroen LENAERS	Jeroen LENAERS	Netherlands	EPP	99.8 % of 2 521	+8.8 pts median 91.0 %	96.7 % of 2 515	+3.0 pts median 93.7 %	2.0 % of 2 412	1.7 % of 2 515
Select Jessica POLFJÄRD	Jessica POLFJÄRD	Sweden	EPP	96.9 % of 2 521	+5.9 pts median 91.0 %	91.0 % of 2 443	−2.7 pts median 93.7 %	7.8 % of 2 340	1.4 % of 2 443
Select Jörgen WARBORN	Jörgen WARBORN	Sweden	EPP	90.7 % of 2 521	−0.3 pts median 91.0 %	90.6 % of 2 287	−3.2 pts median 93.7 %	8.2 % of 2 184	1.6 % of 2 287
Select Juan Ignacio ZOIDO ÁLVAREZ	Juan Ignacio ZOIDO ÁLVAREZ	Spain	EPP	96.2 % of 2 521	+5.2 pts median 91.0 %	92.7 % of 2 424	−1.0 pts median 93.7 %	5.0 % of 2 321	3.3 % of 2 424
Select Jüri RATAS	Jüri RATAS	Estonia	EPP	98.0 % of 2 521	+7.0 pts median 91.0 %	97.3 % of 2 470	+3.6 pts median 93.7 %	1.4 % of 2 367	1.1 % of 2 470
Select Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	Poland	EPP	98.0 % of 2 521	+7.0 pts median 91.0 %	92.0 % of 2 471	−1.7 pts median 93.7 %	5.8 % of 2 369	1.7 % of 2 471
Select Karlo RESSLER	Karlo RESSLER	Croatia	EPP	84.7 % of 2 521	−6.3 pts median 91.0 %	92.9 % of 2 135	−0.8 pts median 93.7 %	6.0 % of 2 058	2.6 % of 2 135
Select Kinga KOLLÁR	Kinga KOLLÁR	Hungary	EPP	52.9 % of 2 521	−38.1 pts median 91.0 %	88.4 % of 1 333	−5.3 pts median 93.7 %	9.0 % of 1 275	6.5 % of 1 333
Select Krzysztof BREJZA	Krzysztof BREJZA	Poland	EPP	99.2 % of 2 521	+8.2 pts median 91.0 %	92.7 % of 2 501	−1.0 pts median 93.7 %	5.0 % of 2 399	1.6 % of 2 501
Select Krzysztof HETMAN	Krzysztof HETMAN	Poland	EPP	97.4 % of 2 521	+6.4 pts median 91.0 %	91.0 % of 2 456	−2.7 pts median 93.7 %	6.2 % of 2 353	4.5 % of 2 456
Select Lena DÜPONT	Lena DÜPONT	Germany	EPP	81.9 % of 2 521	−9.1 pts median 91.0 %	98.6 % of 2 064	+4.9 pts median 93.7 %	0.5 % of 1 977	0.9 % of 2 064
Select Letizia MORATTI	Letizia MORATTI	Italy	EPP	81.1 % of 2 521	−9.9 pts median 91.0 %	93.6 % of 2 045	−0.1 pts median 93.7 %	4.6 % of 1 968	2.0 % of 2 045
Select Lídia PEREIRA	Lídia PEREIRA	Portugal	EPP	93.3 % of 2 521	+2.3 pts median 91.0 %	94.7 % of 2 353	+1.0 pts median 93.7 %	3.6 % of 2 254	3.9 % of 2 353

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.