Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

188 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Greece	EPP	84.6 % of 2 891	−6.4 pts median 91.0 %	93.8 % of 2 446	+0.3 pts median 93.5 %	4.9 % of 2 344	0.9 % of 2 446
Select Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS	Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS	Spain	EPP	96.5 % of 2 891	+5.5 pts median 91.0 %	95.4 % of 2 789	+1.9 pts median 93.5 %	2.6 % of 2 660	1.3 % of 2 789
Select Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA	Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA	Spain	EPP	84.0 % of 2 891	−7.0 pts median 91.0 %	93.7 % of 2 427	+0.2 pts median 93.5 %	3.7 % of 2 308	2.1 % of 2 427
Select Eszter LAKOS	Eszter LAKOS	Hungary	EPP	64.8 % of 2 891	−26.2 pts median 91.0 %	85.6 % of 1 873	−8.0 pts median 93.5 %	12.3 % of 1 806	6.3 % of 1 873
Select Eva MAYDELL	Eva MAYDELL	Bulgaria	EPP	68.1 % of 2 891	−22.8 pts median 91.0 %	93.4 % of 1 970	−0.2 pts median 93.5 %	5.2 % of 1 887	1.9 % of 1 970
Select Ewa KOPACZ	Ewa KOPACZ	Poland	EPP	99.4 % of 2 891	+8.4 pts median 91.0 %	90.3 % of 2 874	−3.2 pts median 93.5 %	7.5 % of 2 736	2.1 % of 2 874
Select Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS	Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS	Spain	EPP	98.3 % of 2 891	+7.3 pts median 91.0 %	94.4 % of 2 841	+0.9 pts median 93.5 %	3.1 % of 2 705	1.6 % of 2 841
Select Flavio TOSI	Flavio TOSI	Italy	EPP	83.5 % of 2 891	−7.4 pts median 91.0 %	94.0 % of 2 415	+0.4 pts median 93.5 %	5.3 % of 2 313	1.8 % of 2 415
Select Francisco José MILLÁN MON	Francisco José MILLÁN MON	Spain	EPP	95.3 % of 2 891	+4.4 pts median 91.0 %	94.0 % of 2 756	+0.5 pts median 93.5 %	3.5 % of 2 625	1.4 % of 2 756
Select François-Xavier BELLAMY	François-Xavier BELLAMY	France	EPP	92.4 % of 2 891	+1.4 pts median 91.0 %	70.4 % of 2 670	−23.1 pts median 93.5 %	28.0 % of 2 549	5.2 % of 2 670
Select Fredis BELERIS	Fredis BELERIS	Greece	EPP	74.5 % of 2 891	−16.5 pts median 91.0 %	92.6 % of 2 154	−1.0 pts median 93.5 %	5.4 % of 2 052	1.7 % of 2 154
Select Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO	Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO	Italy	EPP	47.8 % of 2 891	−43.2 pts median 91.0 %	93.3 % of 1 381	−0.3 pts median 93.5 %	4.9 % of 1 317	2.7 % of 1 381
Select Gabriel MATO	Gabriel MATO	Spain	EPP	90.4 % of 2 891	−0.6 pts median 91.0 %	94.0 % of 2 614	+0.4 pts median 93.5 %	3.5 % of 2 483	1.6 % of 2 614
Select Gabriella GERZSENYI	Gabriella GERZSENYI	Hungary	EPP	59.0 % of 2 891	−32.0 pts median 91.0 %	84.6 % of 1 705	−9.0 pts median 93.5 %	13.2 % of 1 646	7.0 % of 1 705
Select Georgios AFTIAS	Georgios AFTIAS	Greece	EPP	80.9 % of 2 891	−10.1 pts median 91.0 %	93.5 % of 2 339	±0.0 pts median 93.5 %	4.7 % of 2 224	1.6 % of 2 339
Select Gheorghe FALCĂ	Gheorghe FALCĂ	Romania	EPP	85.4 % of 2 891	−5.5 pts median 91.0 %	97.9 % of 2 470	+4.3 pts median 93.5 %	1.2 % of 2 370	1.1 % of 2 470
Select Giusi PRINCI	Giusi PRINCI	Italy	EPP	98.9 % of 2 891	+8.0 pts median 91.0 %	94.4 % of 2 860	+0.8 pts median 93.5 %	4.0 % of 2 722	1.4 % of 2 860
Select Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ	Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ	Poland	EPP	85.4 % of 2 891	−5.6 pts median 91.0 %	88.3 % of 2 469	−5.3 pts median 93.5 %	8.9 % of 2 347	3.2 % of 2 469
Select Hélder SOUSA SILVA	Hélder SOUSA SILVA	Portugal	EPP	75.5 % of 2 891	−15.5 pts median 91.0 %	94.3 % of 2 182	+0.8 pts median 93.5 %	3.6 % of 2 080	3.7 % of 2 182
Select Henrik DAHL	Henrik DAHL	Denmark	EPP	95.2 % of 2 891	+4.3 pts median 91.0 %	89.8 % of 2 753	−3.7 pts median 93.5 %	9.2 % of 2 622	2.0 % of 2 753
Select Herbert DORFMANN	Herbert DORFMANN	Italy	EPP	99.2 % of 2 891	+8.3 pts median 91.0 %	96.5 % of 2 869	+3.0 pts median 93.5 %	2.4 % of 2 730	1.0 % of 2 869
Select Hildegard BENTELE	Hildegard BENTELE	Germany	EPP	80.2 % of 2 891	−10.7 pts median 91.0 %	97.2 % of 2 320	+3.7 pts median 93.5 %	1.7 % of 2 195	0.8 % of 2 320
Select Ilia LAZAROV	Ilia LAZAROV	Bulgaria	EPP	75.7 % of 2 891	−15.3 pts median 91.0 %	89.4 % of 2 188	−4.1 pts median 93.5 %	8.8 % of 2 083	3.9 % of 2 188
Select Inese VAIDERE	Inese VAIDERE	Latvia	EPP	97.7 % of 2 891	+6.7 pts median 91.0 %	97.8 % of 2 824	+4.3 pts median 93.5 %	1.0 % of 2 687	0.4 % of 2 824
Select Ingeborg TER LAAK	Ingeborg TER LAAK	Netherlands	EPP	99.3 % of 2 891	+8.3 pts median 91.0 %	97.2 % of 2 870	+3.7 pts median 93.5 %	1.8 % of 2 732	1.1 % of 2 870
Select Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN	Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN	Romania	EPP	94.1 % of 2 891	+3.1 pts median 91.0 %	95.0 % of 2 721	+1.5 pts median 93.5 %	3.5 % of 2 597	1.3 % of 2 721
Select Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA	Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA	Spain	EPP	94.0 % of 2 891	+3.0 pts median 91.0 %	93.6 % of 2 717	+0.1 pts median 93.5 %	3.7 % of 2 582	1.6 % of 2 717
Select Isabel WISELER-LIMA	Isabel WISELER-LIMA	Luxembourg	EPP	98.0 % of 2 891	+7.0 pts median 91.0 %	96.7 % of 2 832	+3.2 pts median 93.5 %	2.0 % of 2 697	1.1 % of 2 832
Select Isabelle LE CALLENNEC	Isabelle LE CALLENNEC	France	EPP	89.1 % of 2 891	−1.8 pts median 91.0 %	69.1 % of 2 577	−24.4 pts median 93.5 %	29.3 % of 2 444	12.3 % of 2 577
Select Iuliu WINKLER	Iuliu WINKLER	Romania	EPP	90.5 % of 2 891	−0.4 pts median 91.0 %	92.3 % of 2 617	−1.3 pts median 93.5 %	6.3 % of 2 498	2.3 % of 2 617
Select Jacek PROTAS	Jacek PROTAS	Poland	EPP	94.1 % of 2 891	+3.1 pts median 91.0 %	89.3 % of 2 719	−4.2 pts median 93.5 %	8.5 % of 2 583	3.2 % of 2 719
Select Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Poland	EPP	91.0 % of 2 891	±0.0 pts median 91.0 %	89.9 % of 2 631	−3.6 pts median 93.5 %	7.6 % of 2 499	2.3 % of 2 631
Select Jan FARSKÝ	Jan FARSKÝ	Czechia	EPP	96.1 % of 2 891	+5.2 pts median 91.0 %	89.0 % of 2 779	−4.6 pts median 93.5 %	10.0 % of 2 643	5.3 % of 2 779
Select Janusz LEWANDOWSKI	Janusz LEWANDOWSKI	Poland	EPP	87.0 % of 2 891	−4.0 pts median 91.0 %	89.6 % of 2 515	−3.9 pts median 93.5 %	7.7 % of 2 403	6.8 % of 2 515
Select Javier ZARZALEJOS	Javier ZARZALEJOS	Spain	EPP	93.7 % of 2 891	+2.7 pts median 91.0 %	93.5 % of 2 709	±0.0 pts median 93.5 %	3.7 % of 2 573	1.7 % of 2 709
Select Jens GIESEKE	Jens GIESEKE	Germany	EPP	95.4 % of 2 891	+4.5 pts median 91.0 %	96.2 % of 2 759	+2.6 pts median 93.5 %	2.1 % of 2 620	1.2 % of 2 759
Select Jeroen LENAERS	Jeroen LENAERS	Netherlands	EPP	99.5 % of 2 891	+8.5 pts median 91.0 %	97.5 % of 2 876	+3.9 pts median 93.5 %	1.6 % of 2 738	1.0 % of 2 876
Select Jessica POLFJÄRD	Jessica POLFJÄRD	Sweden	EPP	99.1 % of 2 891	+8.1 pts median 91.0 %	92.3 % of 2 865	−1.3 pts median 93.5 %	6.6 % of 2 727	1.9 % of 2 865
Select Jessika VAN LEEUWEN	Jessika VAN LEEUWEN ⇄changed group	Netherlands	ECR	99.0 % of 2 891	+8.0 pts median 91.0 %	70.1 % of 2 861	−23.4 pts median 93.5 %	28.0 % of 2 719	9.3 % of 2 861
Select Jörgen WARBORN	Jörgen WARBORN	Sweden	EPP	99.6 % of 2 891	+8.6 pts median 91.0 %	92.2 % of 2 878	−1.3 pts median 93.5 %	6.7 % of 2 739	1.9 % of 2 878
Select Juan Ignacio ZOIDO ÁLVAREZ	Juan Ignacio ZOIDO ÁLVAREZ	Spain	EPP	88.1 % of 2 891	−2.9 pts median 91.0 %	93.3 % of 2 547	−0.3 pts median 93.5 %	4.0 % of 2 415	2.0 % of 2 547
Select Jüri RATAS	Jüri RATAS	Estonia	EPP	98.9 % of 2 891	+8.0 pts median 91.0 %	98.1 % of 2 860	+4.6 pts median 93.5 %	0.6 % of 2 720	0.6 % of 2 860
Select Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	Poland	EPP	97.4 % of 2 891	+6.5 pts median 91.0 %	89.1 % of 2 817	−4.4 pts median 93.5 %	8.5 % of 2 684	2.3 % of 2 817
Select Karlo RESSLER	Karlo RESSLER	Croatia	EPP	90.2 % of 2 891	−0.7 pts median 91.0 %	91.1 % of 2 609	−2.5 pts median 93.5 %	6.0 % of 2 486	3.0 % of 2 609
Select Kinga KOLLÁR	Kinga KOLLÁR	Hungary	EPP	60.4 % of 2 891	−30.6 pts median 91.0 %	84.4 % of 1 745	−9.2 pts median 93.5 %	13.5 % of 1 685	7.0 % of 1 745
Select Krzysztof BREJZA	Krzysztof BREJZA	Poland	EPP	85.7 % of 2 891	−5.3 pts median 91.0 %	90.7 % of 2 478	−2.9 pts median 93.5 %	6.6 % of 2 346	2.1 % of 2 478
Select Krzysztof HETMAN	Krzysztof HETMAN	Poland	EPP	86.1 % of 2 891	−4.9 pts median 91.0 %	88.0 % of 2 488	−5.5 pts median 93.5 %	9.3 % of 2 377	3.6 % of 2 488
Select Laurent CASTILLO	Laurent CASTILLO ⇄changed group	France	Patriots	93.0 % of 2 891	+2.1 pts median 91.0 %	68.0 % of 2 690	−25.6 pts median 93.5 %	30.5 % of 2 569	5.6 % of 2 690
Select Lena DÜPONT	Lena DÜPONT	Germany	EPP	80.0 % of 2 891	−11.0 pts median 91.0 %	97.9 % of 2 313	+4.3 pts median 93.5 %	1.4 % of 2 204	0.7 % of 2 313
Select Letizia MORATTI	Letizia MORATTI	Italy	EPP	66.4 % of 2 891	−24.5 pts median 91.0 %	93.5 % of 1 921	±0.0 pts median 93.5 %	4.4 % of 1 821	1.8 % of 1 921

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.