Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2026: 261 final votes with named positions — 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 90.8 % (723 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

27 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Alexander JUNGBLUTH	Alexander JUNGBLUTH	Germany	ESN	98.9 % of 261	+6.5 pts median 92.3 %	97.3 % of 258	+6.3 pts median 91.0 %	1.6 % of 248	15.5 % of 258
Select Alexander SELL	Alexander SELL	Germany	ESN	96.2 % of 261	+3.8 pts median 92.3 %	98.4 % of 251	+7.5 pts median 91.0 %	0.8 % of 242	15.9 % of 251
Select Anja ARNDT	Anja ARNDT	Germany	ESN	85.1 % of 261	−7.3 pts median 92.3 %	97.7 % of 222	+6.8 pts median 91.0 %	1.4 % of 214	16.7 % of 222
Select Arno BAUSEMER	Arno BAUSEMER	Germany	ESN	92.3 % of 261	±0.0 pts median 92.3 %	98.3 % of 241	+7.4 pts median 91.0 %	1.3 % of 232	15.4 % of 241
Select Christine ANDERSON	Christine ANDERSON	Germany	ESN	85.8 % of 261	−6.5 pts median 92.3 %	99.6 % of 224	+8.6 pts median 91.0 %	0.5 % of 215	17.9 % of 224
Select Hans NEUHOFF	Hans NEUHOFF	Germany	ESN	74.7 % of 261	−17.6 pts median 92.3 %	96.9 % of 195	+6.0 pts median 91.0 %	2.1 % of 187	17.4 % of 195
Select Irmhild BOSSDORF	Irmhild BOSSDORF	Germany	ESN	98.5 % of 261	+6.1 pts median 92.3 %	99.6 % of 257	+8.7 pts median 91.0 %	0.0 % of 247	16.7 % of 257
Select Ivan DAVID	Ivan DAVID	Czechia	ESN	91.2 % of 261	−1.1 pts median 92.3 %	82.4 % of 238	−8.6 pts median 91.0 %	16.2 % of 228	22.3 % of 238
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	Germany	ESN	90.8 % of 261	−1.5 pts median 92.3 %	97.9 % of 237	+6.9 pts median 91.0 %	1.3 % of 227	17.7 % of 237
Select Marcin SYPNIEWSKI	Marcin SYPNIEWSKI	Poland	ESN	96.6 % of 261	+4.2 pts median 92.3 %	77.0 % of 252	−14.0 pts median 91.0 %	20.7 % of 241	16.3 % of 252
Select Markus BUCHHEIT	Markus BUCHHEIT	Germany	ESN	88.5 % of 261	−3.8 pts median 92.3 %	96.1 % of 231	+5.2 pts median 91.0 %	3.6 % of 222	14.3 % of 231
Select Mary KHAN	Mary KHAN	Germany	ESN	82.8 % of 261	−9.6 pts median 92.3 %	94.0 % of 216	+3.0 pts median 91.0 %	5.8 % of 208	18.5 % of 216
Select Milan MAZUREK	Milan MAZUREK ⇄changed group	Slovakia	ESN	99.2 % of 261	+6.9 pts median 92.3 %	84.2 % of 259	−6.8 pts median 91.0 %	13.3 % of 248	23.9 % of 259
Select Milan UHRÍK	Milan UHRÍK	Slovakia	ESN	99.6 % of 261	+7.3 pts median 92.3 %	83.8 % of 260	−7.1 pts median 91.0 %	13.7 % of 249	23.8 % of 260
Select Petar VOLGIN	Petar VOLGIN	Bulgaria	ESN	98.5 % of 261	+6.1 pts median 92.3 %	83.7 % of 257	−7.3 pts median 91.0 %	14.6 % of 246	17.5 % of 257
Select Petr BYSTRON	Petr BYSTRON	Germany	ESN	85.8 % of 261	−6.5 pts median 92.3 %	96.9 % of 224	+5.9 pts median 91.0 %	2.8 % of 213	17.0 % of 224
Select Petras GRAŽULIS	Petras GRAŽULIS	Lithuania	ESN	81.6 % of 261	−10.7 pts median 92.3 %	69.0 % of 213	−21.9 pts median 91.0 %	29.1 % of 203	25.4 % of 213
Select Rada LAYKOVA	Rada LAYKOVA	Bulgaria	ESN	80.5 % of 261	−11.9 pts median 92.3 %	91.0 % of 210	±0.0 pts median 91.0 %	7.8 % of 204	15.2 % of 210
Select René AUST	René AUST	Germany	ESN	92.3 % of 261	±0.0 pts median 92.3 %	98.8 % of 241	+7.8 pts median 91.0 %	0.9 % of 230	16.6 % of 241
Select Roberto VANNACCI	Roberto VANNACCI ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Italy	ESN	99.2 % of 261	not compared median 92.3 %	83.7 % of 233	not compared median 91.0 %	12.4 % of 217	22.0 % of 259
Select Sarah KNAFO	Sarah KNAFO	France	ESN	73.9 % of 261	−18.4 pts median 92.3 %	65.3 % of 193	−25.7 pts median 91.0 %	34.1 % of 185	19.2 % of 193
Select Siegbert Frank DROESE	Siegbert Frank DROESE	Germany	ESN	96.2 % of 261	+3.8 pts median 92.3 %	90.4 % of 251	−0.5 pts median 91.0 %	8.3 % of 241	19.5 % of 251
Select Stanislav STOYANOV	Stanislav STOYANOV	Bulgaria	ESN	97.7 % of 261	+5.4 pts median 92.3 %	89.8 % of 255	−1.1 pts median 91.0 %	8.2 % of 245	16.9 % of 255
Select Stanisław TYSZKA	Stanisław TYSZKA	Poland	ESN	87.7 % of 261	−4.6 pts median 92.3 %	77.7 % of 229	−13.2 pts median 91.0 %	19.4 % of 217	18.3 % of 229
Select Tomasz FROELICH	Tomasz FROELICH	Germany	ESN	98.5 % of 261	+6.1 pts median 92.3 %	94.2 % of 257	+3.2 pts median 91.0 %	4.0 % of 247	15.2 % of 257
Select Volker SCHNURRBUSCH	Volker SCHNURRBUSCH ⇄changed group	Germany	ESN	94.3 % of 261	+1.9 pts median 92.3 %	87.8 % of 246	−3.1 pts median 91.0 %	11.1 % of 235	13.8 % of 246
Select Zsuzsanna BORVENDÉG	Zsuzsanna BORVENDÉG	Hungary	ESN	94.3 % of 261	+1.9 pts median 92.3 %	87.8 % of 246	−3.1 pts median 91.0 %	9.7 % of 236	22.0 % of 246

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.