Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

27 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Alexander JUNGBLUTH GermanyESN98.7 % of 2 891+8.4 pts median 90.3 %92.4 % of 2 851−2.6 pts median 94.9 %6.4 % of 2 7156.8 % of 2 854
Alexander SELL GermanyESN87.7 % of 2 891−2.6 pts median 90.3 %98.4 % of 2 532+3.5 pts median 94.9 %1.0 % of 2 41810.2 % of 2 535
Anja ARNDT GermanyESN88.7 % of 2 891−1.6 pts median 90.3 %99.2 % of 2 562+4.2 pts median 94.9 %0.7 % of 2 4479.8 % of 2 563
Arno BAUSEMER GermanyESN77.9 % of 2 891−12.3 pts median 90.3 %99.2 % of 2 250+4.2 pts median 94.9 %0.6 % of 2 1289.6 % of 2 253
Christine ANDERSON GermanyESN99.3 % of 2 891+9.0 pts median 90.3 %99.7 % of 2 867+4.8 pts median 94.9 %0.1 % of 2 7299.5 % of 2 870
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group PolandPatriots70.0 % of 2 891−20.2 pts median 90.3 %71.6 % of 2 022−23.3 pts median 94.9 %24.6 % of 1 91218.6 % of 2 025
Hans NEUHOFF GermanyESN72.7 % of 2 891−17.5 pts median 90.3 %99.1 % of 2 100+4.2 pts median 94.9 %0.7 % of 2 0128.5 % of 2 103
Irmhild BOSSDORF GermanyESN94.6 % of 2 891+4.3 pts median 90.3 %99.3 % of 2 732+4.3 pts median 94.9 %0.5 % of 2 6048.6 % of 2 734
Ivan DAVID CzechiaESN89.7 % of 2 891−0.6 pts median 90.3 %69.7 % of 2 591−25.2 pts median 94.9 %27.5 % of 2 45816.8 % of 2 594
Marc JONGEN GermanyESN96.3 % of 2 891+6.1 pts median 90.3 %99.0 % of 2 782+4.1 pts median 94.9 %0.6 % of 2 6489.3 % of 2 785
Marcin SYPNIEWSKI PolandESN88.1 % of 2 891−2.2 pts median 90.3 %72.7 % of 2 544−22.2 pts median 94.9 %24.4 % of 2 43118.1 % of 2 547
Markus BUCHHEIT GermanyESN92.6 % of 2 891+2.3 pts median 90.3 %96.6 % of 2 675+1.7 pts median 94.9 %2.7 % of 2 5588.2 % of 2 677
Mary KHAN GermanyESN95.5 % of 2 891+5.2 pts median 90.3 %97.0 % of 2 759+2.0 pts median 94.9 %2.6 % of 2 62810.2 % of 2 761
Milan MAZUREK changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.SlovakiaESN90.4 % of 2 891not compared median 90.3 %78.0 % of 2 610not compared median 94.9 %18.6 % of 2 48316.3 % of 2 614
Milan UHRÍK SlovakiaESN87.7 % of 2 891−2.6 pts median 90.3 %77.3 % of 2 531−17.6 pts median 94.9 %19.1 % of 2 39817.0 % of 2 534
Petar VOLGIN BulgariaESN83.9 % of 2 891−6.4 pts median 90.3 %90.8 % of 2 422−4.1 pts median 94.9 %6.4 % of 2 30510.4 % of 2 425
Petr BYSTRON GermanyESN92.4 % of 2 891+2.1 pts median 90.3 %97.7 % of 2 669+2.8 pts median 94.9 %1.9 % of 2 5489.4 % of 2 671
Petras GRAŽULIS LithuaniaESN83.5 % of 2 891−6.7 pts median 90.3 %68.9 % of 2 412−26.0 pts median 94.9 %28.9 % of 2 30028.5 % of 2 415
Rada LAYKOVA BulgariaESN78.3 % of 2 891−12.0 pts median 90.3 %96.6 % of 2 262+1.7 pts median 94.9 %2.3 % of 2 15311.1 % of 2 263
René AUST GermanyESN91.4 % of 2 891+1.1 pts median 90.3 %98.0 % of 2 638+3.1 pts median 94.9 %1.6 % of 2 5139.7 % of 2 641
Sarah KNAFO FranceESN75.2 % of 2 891−15.1 pts median 90.3 %76.9 % of 2 174−18.1 pts median 94.9 %21.6 % of 2 0749.2 % of 2 174
Siegbert Frank DROESE GermanyESN90.3 % of 2 891±0.0 pts median 90.3 %98.1 % of 2 607+3.1 pts median 94.9 %1.5 % of 2 4838.9 % of 2 610
Stanislav STOYANOV BulgariaESN90.9 % of 2 891+0.7 pts median 90.3 %94.0 % of 2 626−0.9 pts median 94.9 %4.1 % of 2 51110.3 % of 2 629
Stanisław TYSZKA PolandESN55.1 % of 2 891−35.2 pts median 90.3 %74.5 % of 1 592−20.4 pts median 94.9 %22.9 % of 1 53016.0 % of 1 593
Tomasz FROELICH GermanyESN94.3 % of 2 891+4.0 pts median 90.3 %94.9 % of 2 725±0.0 pts median 94.9 %3.5 % of 2 60211.7 % of 2 726
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.GermanyESN98.8 % of 2 154not compared median 90.3 %92.8 % of 1 893not compared median 94.9 %5.1 % of 1 8018.0 % of 2 128
Zsuzsanna BORVENDÉG HungaryESN90.3 % of 2 891+0.1 pts median 90.3 %82.6 % of 2 609−12.3 pts median 94.9 %14.2 % of 2 47915.4 % of 2 612
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.