Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2026: 261 final votes with named positions — 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 90.8 % (723 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

81 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Adam BIELAN	Adam BIELAN	Poland	ECR	89.3 % of 261	−3.4 pts median 92.7 %	87.9 % of 232	+2.1 pts median 85.8 %	3.6 % of 192	17.2 % of 233
Select Adrian-George AXINIA	Adrian-George AXINIA	Romania	ECR	88.1 % of 261	−4.6 pts median 92.7 %	91.3 % of 229	+5.4 pts median 85.8 %	4.2 % of 190	14.3 % of 230
Select Alberico GAMBINO	Alberico GAMBINO	Italy	ECR	89.3 % of 261	−3.4 pts median 92.7 %	94.0 % of 233	+8.1 pts median 85.8 %	1.5 % of 195	19.3 % of 233
Select Alessandro CIRIANI	Alessandro CIRIANI	Italy	ECR	94.3 % of 261	+1.5 pts median 92.7 %	94.3 % of 245	+8.4 pts median 85.8 %	1.5 % of 203	21.5 % of 246
Select Alexandr VONDRA	Alexandr VONDRA	Czechia	ECR	78.5 % of 261	−14.2 pts median 92.7 %	81.4 % of 204	−4.5 pts median 85.8 %	14.5 % of 173	15.1 % of 205
Select Anna ZALEWSKA	Anna ZALEWSKA	Poland	ECR	96.2 % of 261	+3.4 pts median 92.7 %	85.6 % of 250	−0.2 pts median 85.8 %	6.2 % of 210	19.1 % of 251
Select Antonella SBERNA	Antonella SBERNA	Italy	ECR	89.3 % of 261	−3.4 pts median 92.7 %	95.3 % of 232	+9.4 pts median 85.8 %	0.5 % of 192	21.5 % of 233
Select Arkadiusz MULARCZYK	Arkadiusz MULARCZYK	Poland	ECR	96.2 % of 261	+3.4 pts median 92.7 %	87.2 % of 250	+1.4 pts median 85.8 %	4.8 % of 209	18.7 % of 251
Select Assita KANKO	Assita KANKO	Belgium	ECR	69.3 % of 261	−23.4 pts median 92.7 %	75.0 % of 180	−10.8 pts median 85.8 %	22.1 % of 154	18.8 % of 181
Select Aurelijus VERYGA	Aurelijus VERYGA	Lithuania	ECR	92.3 % of 261	−0.4 pts median 92.7 %	90.4 % of 240	+4.6 pts median 85.8 %	7.0 % of 199	13.7 % of 241
Select Beata SZYDŁO	Beata SZYDŁO	Poland	ECR	93.5 % of 261	+0.8 pts median 92.7 %	85.6 % of 243	−0.2 pts median 85.8 %	5.4 % of 202	17.6 % of 244
Select Beatrice TIMGREN	Beatrice TIMGREN	Sweden	ECR	99.6 % of 261	+6.9 pts median 92.7 %	58.7 % of 259	−27.2 pts median 85.8 %	40.7 % of 216	11.9 % of 260
Select Bert-Jan RUISSEN	Bert-Jan RUISSEN	Netherlands	ECR	99.6 % of 261	+6.9 pts median 92.7 %	79.5 % of 259	−6.3 pts median 85.8 %	15.7 % of 216	19.2 % of 260
Select Bogdan RZOŃCA	Bogdan RZOŃCA	Poland	ECR	99.2 % of 261	+6.5 pts median 92.7 %	84.9 % of 258	−1.0 pts median 85.8 %	6.0 % of 215	17.4 % of 259
Select Carlo CICCIOLI	Carlo CICCIOLI	Italy	ECR	87.4 % of 261	−5.4 pts median 92.7 %	94.3 % of 227	+8.4 pts median 85.8 %	1.1 % of 187	20.2 % of 228
Select Carlo FIDANZA	Carlo FIDANZA	Italy	ECR	91.2 % of 261	−1.5 pts median 92.7 %	93.2 % of 237	+7.4 pts median 85.8 %	2.0 % of 196	20.2 % of 238
Select Charlie WEIMERS	Charlie WEIMERS	Sweden	ECR	99.2 % of 261	+6.5 pts median 92.7 %	59.3 % of 258	−26.5 pts median 85.8 %	39.5 % of 215	12.0 % of 259
Select Chiara GEMMA	Chiara GEMMA	Italy	ECR	99.2 % of 261	+6.5 pts median 92.7 %	94.2 % of 258	+8.3 pts median 85.8 %	1.4 % of 215	20.1 % of 259
Select Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU	Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU	Romania	ECR	98.9 % of 261	+6.1 pts median 92.7 %	90.3 % of 257	+4.4 pts median 85.8 %	5.6 % of 214	17.1 % of 258
Select Cristian TERHEŞ	Cristian TERHEŞ	Romania	ECR	97.3 % of 261	+4.6 pts median 92.7 %	80.2 % of 253	−5.6 pts median 85.8 %	14.2 % of 211	9.4 % of 254
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	Poland	ECR	83.9 % of 261	−8.8 pts median 92.7 %	86.2 % of 218	+0.4 pts median 85.8 %	4.9 % of 183	19.2 % of 219
Select Daniele POLATO	Daniele POLATO	Italy	ECR	99.2 % of 261	+6.5 pts median 92.7 %	94.6 % of 258	+8.7 pts median 85.8 %	1.4 % of 215	20.8 % of 259
Select Denis NESCI	Denis NESCI	Italy	ECR	100.0 % of 261	+7.3 pts median 92.7 %	94.2 % of 260	+8.4 pts median 85.8 %	1.4 % of 217	20.3 % of 261
Select Dick ERIXON	Dick ERIXON	Sweden	ECR	98.1 % of 261	+5.4 pts median 92.7 %	58.8 % of 255	−27.0 pts median 85.8 %	40.1 % of 212	11.7 % of 256
Select Diego SOLIER	Diego SOLIER ⇄changed group	Spain	ECR	98.5 % of 261	+5.7 pts median 92.7 %	90.6 % of 256	+4.8 pts median 85.8 %	4.7 % of 215	16.7 % of 257
Select Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Poland	ECR	68.6 % of 261	−24.1 pts median 92.7 %	84.4 % of 179	−1.5 pts median 85.8 %	6.2 % of 146	19.6 % of 179
Select Elena DONAZZAN	Elena DONAZZAN	Italy	ECR	76.2 % of 261	−16.5 pts median 92.7 %	93.9 % of 198	+8.1 pts median 85.8 %	1.8 % of 163	20.6 % of 199
Select Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Greece	ECR	98.9 % of 261	+6.1 pts median 92.7 %	45.9 % of 257	−39.9 pts median 85.8 %	49.3 % of 215	25.6 % of 258
Select Francesco TORSELLI	Francesco TORSELLI	Italy	ECR	99.2 % of 261	+6.5 pts median 92.7 %	94.2 % of 258	+8.3 pts median 85.8 %	1.4 % of 215	20.1 % of 259
Select Francesco VENTOLA	Francesco VENTOLA	Italy	ECR	86.6 % of 261	−6.1 pts median 92.7 %	94.2 % of 225	+8.4 pts median 85.8 %	1.1 % of 185	22.1 % of 226
Select Galato ALEXANDRAKI	Galato ALEXANDRAKI	Greece	ECR	81.2 % of 261	−11.5 pts median 92.7 %	46.4 % of 211	−39.4 pts median 85.8 %	48.0 % of 175	24.1 % of 212
Select Geadis GEADI	Geadis GEADI	Cyprus	ECR	90.0 % of 261	−2.7 pts median 92.7 %	85.5 % of 234	−0.4 pts median 85.8 %	10.8 % of 195	16.2 % of 235
Select Georgiana TEODORESCU	Georgiana TEODORESCU	Romania	ECR	88.9 % of 261	−3.8 pts median 92.7 %	82.7 % of 231	−3.2 pts median 85.8 %	13.1 % of 191	16.4 % of 232
Select Gheorghe PIPEREA	Gheorghe PIPEREA	Romania	ECR	85.1 % of 261	−7.7 pts median 92.7 %	85.1 % of 221	−0.8 pts median 85.8 %	12.1 % of 182	17.1 % of 222
Select Giovanni CROSETTO	Giovanni CROSETTO	Italy	ECR	94.6 % of 261	+1.9 pts median 92.7 %	94.3 % of 246	+8.5 pts median 85.8 %	1.4 % of 207	19.8 % of 247
Select Giuseppe MILAZZO	Giuseppe MILAZZO	Italy	ECR	54.8 % of 261	−37.9 pts median 92.7 %	90.2 % of 143	+4.4 pts median 85.8 %	2.6 % of 115	19.6 % of 143
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	France	ECR	89.3 % of 261	−3.4 pts median 92.7 %	66.8 % of 232	−19.0 pts median 85.8 %	27.3 % of 194	16.3 % of 233
Select Ivaylo VALCHEV	Ivaylo VALCHEV	Bulgaria	ECR	96.2 % of 261	+3.4 pts median 92.7 %	94.0 % of 250	+8.2 pts median 85.8 %	2.4 % of 208	17.9 % of 251
Select Jaak MADISON	Jaak MADISON	Estonia	ECR	87.4 % of 261	−5.4 pts median 92.7 %	78.4 % of 227	−7.4 pts median 85.8 %	17.2 % of 192	15.8 % of 228
Select Jacek OZDOBA	Jacek OZDOBA	Poland	ECR	85.4 % of 261	−7.3 pts median 92.7 %	82.4 % of 222	−3.4 pts median 85.8 %	8.1 % of 186	14.8 % of 223
Select Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Poland	ECR	93.9 % of 261	+1.1 pts median 92.7 %	84.0 % of 244	−1.8 pts median 85.8 %	6.4 % of 202	17.1 % of 245
Select Jessika VAN LEEUWEN	Jessika VAN LEEUWEN ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Netherlands	ECR	96.9 % of 261	not compared median 92.7 %	75.4 % of 252	not compared median 85.8 %	22.2 % of 212	25.3 % of 253
Select Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Poland	ECR	95.0 % of 261	+2.3 pts median 92.7 %	85.0 % of 247	−0.8 pts median 85.8 %	5.9 % of 205	18.5 % of 248
Select Johan VAN OVERTVELDT	Johan VAN OVERTVELDT	Belgium	ECR	53.6 % of 261	−39.1 pts median 92.7 %	77.9 % of 140	−8.0 pts median 85.8 %	18.9 % of 111	22.9 % of 140
Select Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Poland	ECR	99.6 % of 261	+6.9 pts median 92.7 %	85.7 % of 259	−0.1 pts median 85.8 %	5.6 % of 216	18.1 % of 260
Select Kris VAN DIJCK	Kris VAN DIJCK	Belgium	ECR	97.7 % of 261	+5.0 pts median 92.7 %	76.4 % of 254	−9.5 pts median 85.8 %	19.8 % of 212	19.6 % of 255
Select Kristoffer STORM	Kristoffer STORM	Denmark	ECR	95.0 % of 261	+2.3 pts median 92.7 %	59.1 % of 247	−26.7 pts median 85.8 %	36.5 % of 208	11.3 % of 248
Select Lara MAGONI	Lara MAGONI	Italy	ECR	95.4 % of 261	+2.7 pts median 92.7 %	94.0 % of 248	+8.1 pts median 85.8 %	1.9 % of 207	20.5 % of 249
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	France	ECR	97.3 % of 261	+4.6 pts median 92.7 %	65.6 % of 253	−20.2 pts median 85.8 %	27.5 % of 211	18.9 % of 254
Select Maciej WĄSIK	Maciej WĄSIK	Poland	ECR	95.0 % of 261	+2.3 pts median 92.7 %	81.4 % of 247	−4.5 pts median 85.8 %	8.8 % of 205	17.3 % of 248

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.