Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

81 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Adam BIELAN	Adam BIELAN	Poland	ECR	90.0 % of 2 521	−1.9 pts median 91.9 %	92.0 % of 2 264	+1.6 pts median 90.5 %	3.2 % of 1 966	9.3 % of 2 269
Select Adrian-George AXINIA	Adrian-George AXINIA	Romania	ECR	89.3 % of 2 521	−2.6 pts median 91.9 %	91.8 % of 2 246	+1.4 pts median 90.5 %	5.0 % of 1 940	8.9 % of 2 251
Select Alberico GAMBINO	Alberico GAMBINO	Italy	ECR	83.1 % of 2 521	−8.8 pts median 91.9 %	93.0 % of 2 091	+2.5 pts median 90.5 %	1.6 % of 1 830	10.6 % of 2 095
Select Alessandro CIRIANI	Alessandro CIRIANI	Italy	ECR	91.2 % of 2 521	−0.7 pts median 91.9 %	92.8 % of 2 292	+2.4 pts median 90.5 %	1.3 % of 1 980	11.6 % of 2 298
Select Alexandr VONDRA	Alexandr VONDRA	Czechia	ECR	80.9 % of 2 521	−10.9 pts median 91.9 %	86.0 % of 2 034	−4.5 pts median 90.5 %	10.5 % of 1 786	9.4 % of 2 040
Select Anna ZALEWSKA	Anna ZALEWSKA	Poland	ECR	98.4 % of 2 521	+6.5 pts median 91.9 %	91.0 % of 2 475	+0.5 pts median 90.5 %	3.3 % of 2 155	8.5 % of 2 481
Select Antonella SBERNA	Antonella SBERNA	Italy	ECR	81.1 % of 2 521	−10.8 pts median 91.9 %	93.0 % of 2 038	+2.5 pts median 90.5 %	1.4 % of 1 777	11.2 % of 2 044
Select Arkadiusz MULARCZYK	Arkadiusz MULARCZYK	Poland	ECR	94.1 % of 2 521	+2.2 pts median 91.9 %	91.2 % of 2 367	+0.7 pts median 90.5 %	3.6 % of 2 057	8.7 % of 2 372
Select Assita KANKO	Assita KANKO	Belgium	ECR	63.4 % of 2 521	−28.5 pts median 91.9 %	63.8 % of 1 595	−26.7 pts median 90.5 %	34.2 % of 1 358	24.6 % of 1 598
Select Aurelijus VERYGA	Aurelijus VERYGA	Lithuania	ECR	91.9 % of 2 521	±0.0 pts median 91.9 %	89.0 % of 2 311	−1.4 pts median 90.5 %	7.1 % of 2 010	6.4 % of 2 316
Select Beata SZYDŁO	Beata SZYDŁO	Poland	ECR	94.6 % of 2 521	+2.7 pts median 91.9 %	90.7 % of 2 379	+0.3 pts median 90.5 %	3.4 % of 2 069	8.3 % of 2 385
Select Beatrice TIMGREN	Beatrice TIMGREN	Sweden	ECR	98.1 % of 2 521	+6.2 pts median 91.9 %	74.3 % of 2 467	−16.2 pts median 90.5 %	21.9 % of 2 144	9.6 % of 2 473
Select Bert-Jan RUISSEN	Bert-Jan RUISSEN	Netherlands	ECR	99.9 % of 2 521	+8.0 pts median 91.9 %	85.8 % of 2 512	−4.7 pts median 90.5 %	11.5 % of 2 184	11.6 % of 2 518
Select Bogdan RZOŃCA	Bogdan RZOŃCA	Poland	ECR	98.8 % of 2 521	+7.0 pts median 91.9 %	89.9 % of 2 486	−0.6 pts median 90.5 %	4.4 % of 2 158	8.6 % of 2 492
Select Carlo CICCIOLI	Carlo CICCIOLI	Italy	ECR	89.6 % of 2 521	−2.3 pts median 91.9 %	92.6 % of 2 254	+2.1 pts median 90.5 %	1.9 % of 1 957	11.1 % of 2 259
Select Carlo FIDANZA	Carlo FIDANZA	Italy	ECR	92.4 % of 2 521	+0.6 pts median 91.9 %	92.8 % of 2 325	+2.3 pts median 90.5 %	1.4 % of 2 016	11.6 % of 2 330
Select Charlie WEIMERS	Charlie WEIMERS	Sweden	ECR	98.6 % of 2 521	+6.7 pts median 91.9 %	74.4 % of 2 480	−16.1 pts median 90.5 %	22.0 % of 2 160	9.9 % of 2 486
Select Chiara GEMMA	Chiara GEMMA	Italy	ECR	97.9 % of 2 521	+6.0 pts median 91.9 %	92.6 % of 2 462	+2.1 pts median 90.5 %	1.8 % of 2 142	11.5 % of 2 468
Select Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU	Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU	Romania	ECR	98.5 % of 2 521	+6.7 pts median 91.9 %	86.9 % of 2 478	−3.5 pts median 90.5 %	8.8 % of 2 154	10.2 % of 2 484
Select Cristian TERHEŞ	Cristian TERHEŞ	Romania	ECR	94.9 % of 2 521	+3.1 pts median 91.9 %	84.2 % of 2 387	−6.2 pts median 90.5 %	11.8 % of 2 079	6.6 % of 2 393
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	Poland	ECR	84.0 % of 2 521	−7.9 pts median 91.9 %	90.1 % of 2 113	−0.4 pts median 90.5 %	4.2 % of 1 829	8.7 % of 2 118
Select Daniele POLATO	Daniele POLATO	Italy	ECR	97.3 % of 2 521	+5.5 pts median 91.9 %	92.9 % of 2 448	+2.4 pts median 90.5 %	1.6 % of 2 126	11.5 % of 2 454
Select Denis NESCI	Denis NESCI	Italy	ECR	99.7 % of 2 521	+7.8 pts median 91.9 %	92.9 % of 2 507	+2.4 pts median 90.5 %	1.7 % of 2 178	11.5 % of 2 513
Select Dick ERIXON	Dick ERIXON	Sweden	ECR	97.9 % of 2 521	+6.1 pts median 91.9 %	74.1 % of 2 463	−16.4 pts median 90.5 %	22.3 % of 2 138	9.8 % of 2 469
Select Diego SOLIER	Diego SOLIER ⇄changed group	Spain	ECR	98.5 % of 2 521	+6.6 pts median 91.9 %	94.3 % of 2 476	+3.9 pts median 90.5 %	1.8 % of 2 154	9.5 % of 2 482
Select Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Poland	ECR	65.1 % of 2 521	−26.8 pts median 91.9 %	90.5 % of 1 635	+0.1 pts median 90.5 %	3.7 % of 1 415	8.2 % of 1 640
Select Elena DONAZZAN	Elena DONAZZAN	Italy	ECR	83.5 % of 2 521	−8.4 pts median 91.9 %	93.0 % of 2 100	+2.5 pts median 90.5 %	1.5 % of 1 825	11.2 % of 2 105
Select Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Greece	ECR	99.5 % of 2 521	+7.6 pts median 91.9 %	69.9 % of 2 502	−20.6 pts median 90.5 %	26.1 % of 2 176	14.3 % of 2 508
Select Francesco TORSELLI	Francesco TORSELLI	Italy	ECR	98.0 % of 2 521	+6.1 pts median 91.9 %	93.0 % of 2 465	+2.5 pts median 90.5 %	1.5 % of 2 147	11.4 % of 2 470
Select Francesco VENTOLA	Francesco VENTOLA	Italy	ECR	88.4 % of 2 521	−3.5 pts median 91.9 %	92.8 % of 2 222	+2.3 pts median 90.5 %	1.4 % of 1 930	11.9 % of 2 228
Select Galato ALEXANDRAKI	Galato ALEXANDRAKI	Greece	ECR	85.0 % of 2 521	−6.9 pts median 91.9 %	73.2 % of 2 137	−17.3 pts median 90.5 %	22.6 % of 1 860	14.0 % of 2 142
Select Geadis GEADI	Geadis GEADI	Cyprus	ECR	90.3 % of 2 521	−1.6 pts median 91.9 %	82.7 % of 2 271	−7.7 pts median 90.5 %	13.7 % of 1 976	8.0 % of 2 276
Select Georgiana TEODORESCU	Georgiana TEODORESCU	Romania	ECR	93.2 % of 2 521	+1.3 pts median 91.9 %	81.5 % of 2 344	−9.0 pts median 90.5 %	13.9 % of 2 034	9.4 % of 2 350
Select Gheorghe PIPEREA	Gheorghe PIPEREA	Romania	ECR	79.2 % of 2 521	−12.7 pts median 91.9 %	83.1 % of 1 992	−7.4 pts median 90.5 %	13.1 % of 1 709	11.8 % of 1 997
Select Giovanni CROSETTO	Giovanni CROSETTO	Italy	ECR	92.3 % of 2 521	+0.5 pts median 91.9 %	92.8 % of 2 322	+2.3 pts median 90.5 %	1.7 % of 2 015	11.3 % of 2 328
Select Giuseppe MILAZZO	Giuseppe MILAZZO	Italy	ECR	47.8 % of 2 521	−44.0 pts median 91.9 %	91.7 % of 1 202	+1.2 pts median 90.5 %	2.5 % of 1 038	10.4 % of 1 206
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	France	ECR	92.5 % of 2 521	+0.6 pts median 91.9 %	79.9 % of 2 326	−10.6 pts median 90.5 %	15.3 % of 2 026	6.7 % of 2 331
Select Ivaylo VALCHEV	Ivaylo VALCHEV	Bulgaria	ECR	97.0 % of 2 521	+5.2 pts median 91.9 %	92.8 % of 2 440	+2.3 pts median 90.5 %	4.0 % of 2 125	10.7 % of 2 446
Select Jaak MADISON	Jaak MADISON	Estonia	ECR	79.4 % of 2 521	−12.5 pts median 91.9 %	88.9 % of 1 996	−1.6 pts median 90.5 %	6.5 % of 1 728	6.8 % of 2 001
Select Jacek OZDOBA	Jacek OZDOBA	Poland	ECR	89.1 % of 2 521	−2.7 pts median 91.9 %	89.2 % of 2 241	−1.3 pts median 90.5 %	4.4 % of 1 941	8.0 % of 2 247
Select Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Poland	ECR	94.1 % of 2 521	+2.3 pts median 91.9 %	90.5 % of 2 368	±0.0 pts median 90.5 %	3.8 % of 2 056	8.1 % of 2 373
Select Jessika VAN LEEUWEN	Jessika VAN LEEUWEN ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Netherlands	ECR	97.4 % of 2 521	not compared median 91.9 %	78.4 % of 2 453	not compared median 90.5 %	18.6 % of 2 161	13.8 % of 2 456
Select Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Poland	ECR	95.8 % of 2 521	+3.9 pts median 91.9 %	90.0 % of 2 408	−0.5 pts median 90.5 %	4.4 % of 2 090	8.5 % of 2 414
Select Johan VAN OVERTVELDT	Johan VAN OVERTVELDT	Belgium	ECR	58.1 % of 2 521	−33.8 pts median 91.9 %	64.7 % of 1 461	−25.8 pts median 90.5 %	34.1 % of 1 268	23.9 % of 1 465
Select Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Poland	ECR	99.4 % of 2 521	+7.5 pts median 91.9 %	90.5 % of 2 499	±0.0 pts median 90.5 %	3.7 % of 2 171	8.5 % of 2 505
Select Kris VAN DIJCK	Kris VAN DIJCK	Belgium	ECR	97.3 % of 2 521	+5.5 pts median 91.9 %	66.1 % of 2 448	−24.3 pts median 90.5 %	31.7 % of 2 125	22.6 % of 2 454
Select Kristoffer STORM	Kristoffer STORM	Denmark	ECR	95.4 % of 2 521	+3.5 pts median 91.9 %	74.8 % of 2 399	−15.7 pts median 90.5 %	20.8 % of 2 084	9.7 % of 2 405
Select Lara MAGONI	Lara MAGONI	Italy	ECR	96.7 % of 2 521	+4.8 pts median 91.9 %	92.6 % of 2 431	+2.1 pts median 90.5 %	1.9 % of 2 110	11.4 % of 2 437
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	France	ECR	98.3 % of 2 521	+6.4 pts median 91.9 %	79.1 % of 2 472	−11.4 pts median 90.5 %	16.1 % of 2 150	7.3 % of 2 478
Select Maciej WĄSIK	Maciej WĄSIK	Poland	ECR	97.1 % of 2 521	+5.2 pts median 91.9 %	90.0 % of 2 442	−0.4 pts median 90.5 %	4.1 % of 2 119	8.1 % of 2 448

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.