Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

78 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Adam BIELAN	Adam BIELAN	Poland	ECR	77.3 % of 66	−15.2 pts median 92.4 %	98.0 % of 50	+5.9 pts median 92.1 %	0 of 43	7.8 % of 51
Select Adrian-George AXINIA	Adrian-George AXINIA	Romania	ECR	98.5 % of 66	+6.1 pts median 92.4 %	78.1 % of 64	−14.0 pts median 92.1 %	21.1 % of 57	12.3 % of 65
Select Alberico GAMBINO	Alberico GAMBINO	Italy	ECR	72.7 % of 66	−19.7 pts median 92.4 %	44 of 48	— median 92.1 %	0 of 40	5 of 48
Select Alessandro CIRIANI	Alessandro CIRIANI	Italy	ECR	83.3 % of 66	−9.1 pts median 92.4 %	92.6 % of 54	+0.5 pts median 92.1 %	0 of 47	10.9 % of 55
Select Alexandr VONDRA	Alexandr VONDRA	Czechia	ECR	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	72.3 % of 65	−19.8 pts median 92.1 %	22.8 % of 57	7.6 % of 66
Select Anna ZALEWSKA	Anna ZALEWSKA	Poland	ECR	97.0 % of 66	+4.5 pts median 92.4 %	88.9 % of 63	−3.2 pts median 92.1 %	3.6 % of 55	12.5 % of 64
Select Antonella SBERNA	Antonella SBERNA	Italy	ECR	92.4 % of 66	±0.0 pts median 92.4 %	95.0 % of 60	+2.9 pts median 92.1 %	0.0 % of 53	8.2 % of 61
Select Arkadiusz MULARCZYK	Arkadiusz MULARCZYK	Poland	ECR	98.5 % of 66	+6.1 pts median 92.4 %	96.9 % of 64	+4.8 pts median 92.1 %	1.8 % of 57	6.2 % of 65
Select Assita KANKO	Assita KANKO	Belgium	ECR	87.9 % of 66	−4.5 pts median 92.4 %	77.2 % of 57	−14.9 pts median 92.1 %	6 of 49	12.1 % of 58
Select Aurelijus VERYGA	Aurelijus VERYGA	Lithuania	ECR	98.5 % of 66	+6.1 pts median 92.4 %	85.9 % of 64	−6.2 pts median 92.1 %	7.1 % of 56	4.6 % of 65
Select Beata SZYDŁO	Beata SZYDŁO	Poland	ECR	98.5 % of 66	+6.1 pts median 92.4 %	93.8 % of 65	+1.7 pts median 92.1 %	1.8 % of 57	6.2 % of 65
Select Beatrice TIMGREN	Beatrice TIMGREN	Sweden	ECR	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	55.4 % of 65	−36.7 pts median 92.1 %	40.4 % of 57	7.6 % of 66
Select Bert-Jan RUISSEN	Bert-Jan RUISSEN	Netherlands	ECR	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	76.9 % of 65	−15.2 pts median 92.1 %	14.0 % of 57	7.6 % of 66
Select Bogdan RZOŃCA	Bogdan RZOŃCA	Poland	ECR	98.5 % of 66	+6.1 pts median 92.4 %	93.8 % of 64	+1.6 pts median 92.1 %	1.8 % of 56	6.2 % of 65
Select Carlo CICCIOLI	Carlo CICCIOLI	Italy	ECR	75.8 % of 66	−16.7 pts median 92.4 %	45 of 49	— median 92.1 %	0 of 41	10.0 % of 50
Select Carlo FIDANZA	Carlo FIDANZA	Italy	ECR	97.0 % of 66	+4.5 pts median 92.4 %	93.8 % of 64	+1.6 pts median 92.1 %	0.0 % of 56	7.8 % of 64
Select Charlie WEIMERS	Charlie WEIMERS	Sweden	ECR	89.4 % of 66	−3.0 pts median 92.4 %	51.7 % of 58	−40.4 pts median 92.1 %	44.0 % of 50	8.5 % of 59
Select Chiara GEMMA	Chiara GEMMA	Italy	ECR	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	93.8 % of 65	+1.7 pts median 92.1 %	0.0 % of 57	9.1 % of 66
Select Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU	Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU	Romania	ECR	86.4 % of 66	−6.1 pts median 92.4 %	85.7 % of 56	−6.4 pts median 92.1 %	4 of 49	7.0 % of 57
Select Cristian TERHEŞ	Cristian TERHEŞ	Romania	ECR	15.2 % of 66	−77.3 pts median 92.4 %	9 of 10	— median 92.1 %	1 of 10	0 of 10
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	Poland	ECR	69.7 % of 66	−22.7 pts median 92.4 %	44 of 45	— median 92.1 %	0 of 41	2 of 46
Select Daniele POLATO	Daniele POLATO	Italy	ECR	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	93.8 % of 65	+1.7 pts median 92.1 %	0.0 % of 57	9.1 % of 66
Select Denis NESCI	Denis NESCI	Italy	ECR	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	93.8 % of 65	+1.7 pts median 92.1 %	0.0 % of 57	9.1 % of 66
Select Dick ERIXON	Dick ERIXON	Sweden	ECR	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	55.4 % of 65	−36.7 pts median 92.1 %	40.4 % of 57	7.6 % of 66
Select Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Poland	ECR	62.1 % of 66	−30.3 pts median 92.4 %	38 of 40	— median 92.1 %	0 of 36	3 of 41
Select Elena DONAZZAN	Elena DONAZZAN	Italy	ECR	86.4 % of 66	−6.1 pts median 92.4 %	92.9 % of 56	+0.7 pts median 92.1 %	0 of 48	8.8 % of 57
Select Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Greece	ECR	90.9 % of 66	−1.5 pts median 92.4 %	42.4 % of 59	−49.7 pts median 92.1 %	56.9 % of 51	35.0 % of 60
Select Fernand KARTHEISER	Fernand KARTHEISER ⇄changed group	Luxembourg	No group	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	75.4 % of 65	−16.7 pts median 92.1 %	21.1 % of 57	7.6 % of 66
Select Francesco TORSELLI	Francesco TORSELLI	Italy	ECR	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	93.8 % of 65	+1.7 pts median 92.1 %	0.0 % of 57	9.1 % of 66
Select Francesco VENTOLA	Francesco VENTOLA	Italy	ECR	97.0 % of 66	+4.5 pts median 92.4 %	93.7 % of 63	+1.5 pts median 92.1 %	0.0 % of 55	9.4 % of 64
Select Galato ALEXANDRAKI	Galato ALEXANDRAKI	Greece	ECR	48.5 % of 66	−43.9 pts median 92.4 %	18 of 31	— median 92.1 %	11 of 27	6 of 32
Select Geadis GEADI	Geadis GEADI	Cyprus	ECR	97.0 % of 66	+4.5 pts median 92.4 %	87.3 % of 63	−4.8 pts median 92.1 %	9.1 % of 55	10.9 % of 64
Select Georgiana TEODORESCU	Georgiana TEODORESCU	Romania	ECR	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	78.5 % of 65	−13.7 pts median 92.1 %	21.1 % of 57	10.6 % of 66
Select Gheorghe PIPEREA	Gheorghe PIPEREA	Romania	ECR	77.3 % of 66	−15.2 pts median 92.4 %	80.0 % of 50	−12.1 pts median 92.1 %	9 of 47	7.8 % of 51
Select Giovanni CROSETTO	Giovanni CROSETTO	Italy	ECR	80.3 % of 66	−12.1 pts median 92.4 %	92.3 % of 52	+0.2 pts median 92.1 %	0 of 44	11.3 % of 53
Select Giuseppe MILAZZO	Giuseppe MILAZZO	Italy	ECR	53.0 % of 66	−39.4 pts median 92.4 %	30 of 34	— median 92.1 %	0 of 27	5 of 35
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	France	ECR	95.5 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 92.4 %	69.4 % of 62	−22.8 pts median 92.1 %	27.3 % of 55	12.7 % of 63
Select Ivaylo VALCHEV	Ivaylo VALCHEV	Bulgaria	ECR	98.5 % of 66	+6.1 pts median 92.4 %	90.6 % of 64	−1.5 pts median 92.1 %	5.4 % of 56	12.3 % of 65
Select Jaak MADISON	Jaak MADISON	Estonia	ECR	92.4 % of 66	±0.0 pts median 92.4 %	65.0 % of 60	−27.1 pts median 92.1 %	32.7 % of 52	13.1 % of 61
Select Jacek OZDOBA	Jacek OZDOBA	Poland	ECR	90.9 % of 66	−1.5 pts median 92.4 %	88.1 % of 59	−4.0 pts median 92.1 %	7.7 % of 52	10.0 % of 60
Select Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Poland	ECR	95.5 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 92.4 %	91.9 % of 62	−0.2 pts median 92.1 %	3.6 % of 55	7.9 % of 63
Select Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Poland	ECR	92.4 % of 66	±0.0 pts median 92.4 %	93.3 % of 60	+1.2 pts median 92.1 %	3.8 % of 52	8.2 % of 61
Select Johan VAN OVERTVELDT	Johan VAN OVERTVELDT	Belgium	ECR	54.5 % of 66	−37.9 pts median 92.4 %	23 of 35	— median 92.1 %	9 of 32	2 of 36
Select Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Poland	ECR	87.9 % of 66	−4.5 pts median 92.4 %	93.0 % of 57	+0.9 pts median 92.1 %	1 of 49	6.9 % of 58
Select Kris VAN DIJCK	Kris VAN DIJCK	Belgium	ECR	89.4 % of 66	−3.0 pts median 92.4 %	69.0 % of 58	−23.2 pts median 92.1 %	25.0 % of 52	11.9 % of 59
Select Kristoffer STORM	Kristoffer STORM	Denmark	ECR	75.8 % of 66	−16.7 pts median 92.4 %	26 of 49	— median 92.1 %	16 of 41	8.0 % of 50
Select Lara MAGONI	Lara MAGONI	Italy	ECR	97.0 % of 66	+4.5 pts median 92.4 %	93.8 % of 64	+1.6 pts median 92.1 %	0.0 % of 56	9.4 % of 64
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	France	ECR	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	67.7 % of 65	−24.4 pts median 92.1 %	28.1 % of 57	13.6 % of 66
Select Maciej WĄSIK	Maciej WĄSIK	Poland	ECR	97.0 % of 66	+4.5 pts median 92.4 %	95.2 % of 63	+3.1 pts median 92.1 %	1.8 % of 56	4.7 % of 64
Select Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Poland	ECR	100.0 % of 66	+7.6 pts median 92.4 %	93.8 % of 65	+1.7 pts median 92.1 %	1.8 % of 57	6.1 % of 66

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.