Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

Whole term: 620 final votes with named positions — 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 90.6 % (732 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

79 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Marco SQUARTA ItalyECR74.4 % of 620−17.6 pts median 91.9 %94.3 % of 458+6.6 pts median 87.7 %1.3 % of 38518.0 % of 461
Mariateresa VIVALDINI ItalyECR96.6 % of 620+4.7 pts median 91.9 %91.6 % of 595+3.9 pts median 87.7 %3.6 % of 49716.4 % of 599
Mario MANTOVANI ItalyECR67.6 % of 620−24.4 pts median 91.9 %94.2 % of 417+6.6 pts median 87.7 %1.2 % of 34517.7 % of 419
Marion MARÉCHAL FranceECR88.7 % of 620−3.2 pts median 91.9 %67.5 % of 547−20.2 pts median 87.7 %26.5 % of 45715.3 % of 550
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI PolandECR98.1 % of 620+6.1 pts median 91.9 %88.6 % of 604+0.9 pts median 87.7 %2.8 % of 50013.3 % of 608
Marlena MALĄG PolandECR96.0 % of 620+4.0 pts median 91.9 %86.0 % of 591−1.7 pts median 87.7 %4.3 % of 49013.6 % of 595
Michał DWORCZYK PolandECR69.7 % of 620−22.3 pts median 91.9 %88.1 % of 429+0.4 pts median 87.7 %3.1 % of 35512.3 % of 432
Michele PICARO ItalyECR93.7 % of 620+1.8 pts median 91.9 %94.3 % of 578+6.6 pts median 87.7 %1.3 % of 48016.7 % of 581
Nicola PROCACCINI ItalyECR86.3 % of 620−5.6 pts median 91.9 %94.2 % of 532+6.5 pts median 87.7 %1.8 % of 44517.4 % of 535
Nicolas BAY FranceECR93.1 % of 620+1.1 pts median 91.9 %67.2 % of 574−20.4 pts median 87.7 %26.0 % of 48014.7 % of 577
Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.SpainECR93.1 % of 620not compared median 91.9 %91.0 % of 525not compared median 87.7 %6.2 % of 43614.9 % of 577
Ondřej KRUTÍLEK CzechiaECR97.6 % of 620+5.6 pts median 91.9 %76.7 % of 601−11.0 pts median 87.7 %19.1 % of 49714.5 % of 605
Paolo INSELVINI ItalyECR92.1 % of 620+0.2 pts median 91.9 %93.7 % of 567+6.0 pts median 87.7 %1.5 % of 47018.4 % of 571
Patryk JAKI PolandECR95.0 % of 620+3.1 pts median 91.9 %87.7 % of 585±0.0 pts median 87.7 %4.1 % of 48514.8 % of 589
Pietro FIOCCHI ItalyECR86.1 % of 620−5.8 pts median 91.9 %90.8 % of 530+3.1 pts median 87.7 %5.2 % of 44215.7 % of 534
Piotr MÜLLER PolandECR83.2 % of 620−8.7 pts median 91.9 %87.5 % of 512−0.2 pts median 87.7 %2.6 % of 42013.6 % of 516
Reinis POZŅAKS LatviaECR97.4 % of 620+5.5 pts median 91.9 %88.2 % of 600+0.5 pts median 87.7 %6.0 % of 49811.1 % of 604
Rihards KOLS LatviaECR92.6 % of 620+0.6 pts median 91.9 %87.0 % of 570−0.7 pts median 87.7 %7.0 % of 47212.2 % of 574
Roberts ZĪLE LatviaECR73.4 % of 620−18.5 pts median 91.9 %87.4 % of 451−0.3 pts median 87.7 %7.2 % of 37713.2 % of 455
Ruggero RAZZA ItalyECR80.5 % of 620−11.5 pts median 91.9 %94.4 % of 497+6.7 pts median 87.7 %1.2 % of 41916.4 % of 499
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECR82.9 % of 620−9.0 pts median 91.9 %58.8 % of 510−28.9 pts median 87.7 %35.3 % of 4226.8 % of 514
Şerban Dimitrie STURDZA RomaniaECR89.8 % of 620−2.1 pts median 91.9 %89.9 % of 554+2.2 pts median 87.7 %6.8 % of 45915.4 % of 557
Sergio BERLATO ItalyECR99.7 % of 620+7.7 pts median 91.9 %93.0 % of 614+5.3 pts median 87.7 %2.0 % of 51017.6 % of 618
Stefano CAVEDAGNA ItalyECR89.0 % of 620−2.9 pts median 91.9 %94.0 % of 548+6.3 pts median 87.7 %1.1 % of 45517.9 % of 552
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA CroatiaECR84.8 % of 620−7.1 pts median 91.9 %92.9 % of 522+5.2 pts median 87.7 %3.2 % of 44012.0 % of 526
Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI PolandECR86.0 % of 620−6.0 pts median 91.9 %85.3 % of 529−2.4 pts median 87.7 %5.8 % of 44612.6 % of 533
Veronika VRECIONOVÁ CzechiaECR92.7 % of 620+0.8 pts median 91.9 %75.8 % of 571−11.9 pts median 87.7 %19.9 % of 47814.8 % of 575
Waldemar BUDA PolandECR79.4 % of 620−12.6 pts median 91.9 %84.7 % of 489−3.0 pts median 87.7 %6.4 % of 40511.8 % of 492
Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI LithuaniaECR71.6 % of 620−20.3 pts median 91.9 %90.0 % of 442+2.4 pts median 87.7 %4.6 % of 36814.4 % of 444
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.