Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

81 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Poland	ECR	79.7 % of 2 521	−12.2 pts median 91.9 %	90.5 % of 2 004	±0.0 pts median 90.5 %	3.5 % of 1 730	8.5 % of 2 008
Select Marco SQUARTA	Marco SQUARTA	Italy	ECR	66.3 % of 2 521	−25.5 pts median 91.9 %	93.8 % of 1 668	+3.4 pts median 90.5 %	1.4 % of 1 473	9.9 % of 1 672
Select Mariateresa VIVALDINI	Mariateresa VIVALDINI	Italy	ECR	94.0 % of 2 521	+2.2 pts median 91.9 %	92.9 % of 2 366	+2.5 pts median 90.5 %	1.6 % of 2 061	10.9 % of 2 371
Select Mario MANTOVANI	Mario MANTOVANI	Italy	ECR	67.3 % of 2 521	−24.6 pts median 91.9 %	93.6 % of 1 693	+3.1 pts median 90.5 %	1.0 % of 1 491	11.5 % of 1 696
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	France	ECR	93.1 % of 2 521	+1.2 pts median 91.9 %	79.3 % of 2 340	−11.2 pts median 90.5 %	15.8 % of 2 052	7.7 % of 2 346
Select Mariusz KAMIŃSKI	Mariusz KAMIŃSKI	Poland	ECR	98.8 % of 2 521	+6.9 pts median 91.9 %	90.5 % of 2 484	±0.0 pts median 90.5 %	4.1 % of 2 163	8.8 % of 2 490
Select Marlena MALĄG	Marlena MALĄG	Poland	ECR	97.4 % of 2 521	+5.6 pts median 91.9 %	90.4 % of 2 450	−0.1 pts median 90.5 %	3.6 % of 2 134	8.5 % of 2 456
Select Michał DWORCZYK	Michał DWORCZYK	Poland	ECR	75.6 % of 2 521	−16.3 pts median 91.9 %	90.8 % of 1 899	+0.3 pts median 90.5 %	3.5 % of 1 637	7.2 % of 1 905
Select Michele PICARO	Michele PICARO	Italy	ECR	96.7 % of 2 521	+4.9 pts median 91.9 %	92.7 % of 2 434	+2.3 pts median 90.5 %	1.9 % of 2 122	11.2 % of 2 439
Select Nicola PROCACCINI	Nicola PROCACCINI	Italy	ECR	83.5 % of 2 521	−8.4 pts median 91.9 %	92.3 % of 2 099	+1.9 pts median 90.5 %	1.8 % of 1 816	11.5 % of 2 105
Select Nicolas BAY	Nicolas BAY	France	ECR	96.2 % of 2 521	+4.4 pts median 91.9 %	78.8 % of 2 420	−11.7 pts median 90.5 %	16.4 % of 2 108	7.4 % of 2 426
Select Nora JUNCO GARCÍA	Nora JUNCO GARCÍA ⇄changed group	Spain	ECR	91.2 % of 2 521	−0.7 pts median 91.9 %	92.1 % of 2 294	+1.6 pts median 90.5 %	4.4 % of 1 982	10.7 % of 2 299
Select Ondřej KRUTÍLEK	Ondřej KRUTÍLEK	Czechia	ECR	94.6 % of 2 521	+2.8 pts median 91.9 %	81.4 % of 2 380	−9.0 pts median 90.5 %	15.3 % of 2 070	10.2 % of 2 386
Select Paolo INSELVINI	Paolo INSELVINI	Italy	ECR	90.0 % of 2 521	−1.9 pts median 91.9 %	92.9 % of 2 264	+2.4 pts median 90.5 %	1.4 % of 1 967	11.7 % of 2 268
Select Patryk JAKI	Patryk JAKI	Poland	ECR	86.7 % of 2 521	−5.2 pts median 91.9 %	89.2 % of 2 179	−1.3 pts median 90.5 %	5.3 % of 1 885	8.2 % of 2 185
Select Pietro FIOCCHI	Pietro FIOCCHI	Italy	ECR	85.8 % of 2 521	−6.1 pts median 91.9 %	92.0 % of 2 157	+1.6 pts median 90.5 %	2.1 % of 1 869	11.5 % of 2 162
Select Piotr MÜLLER	Piotr MÜLLER	Poland	ECR	75.5 % of 2 521	−16.3 pts median 91.9 %	90.4 % of 1 899	±0.0 pts median 90.5 %	3.6 % of 1 642	9.0 % of 1 904
Select Reinis POZŅAKS	Reinis POZŅAKS	Latvia	ECR	93.8 % of 2 521	+1.9 pts median 91.9 %	88.0 % of 2 358	−2.5 pts median 90.5 %	8.4 % of 2 039	10.4 % of 2 364
Select Rihards KOLS	Rihards KOLS	Latvia	ECR	86.7 % of 2 521	−5.2 pts median 91.9 %	87.1 % of 2 180	−3.4 pts median 90.5 %	9.9 % of 1 899	11.5 % of 2 186
Select Roberts ZĪLE	Roberts ZĪLE	Latvia	ECR	86.0 % of 2 521	−5.8 pts median 91.9 %	86.2 % of 2 165	−4.3 pts median 90.5 %	10.4 % of 1 893	11.5 % of 2 169
Select Ruggero RAZZA	Ruggero RAZZA	Italy	ECR	79.8 % of 2 521	−12.1 pts median 91.9 %	93.1 % of 2 007	+2.7 pts median 90.5 %	1.6 % of 1 762	11.1 % of 2 011
Select Sander SMIT	Sander SMIT ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Netherlands	ECR	94.8 % of 2 521	not compared median 91.9 %	79.1 % of 2 387	not compared median 90.5 %	18.0 % of 2 111	12.7 % of 2 389
Select Sebastian TYNKKYNEN	Sebastian TYNKKYNEN	Finland	ECR	86.0 % of 2 521	−5.9 pts median 91.9 %	74.1 % of 2 163	−16.4 pts median 90.5 %	21.3 % of 1 881	4.4 % of 2 168
Select Şerban Dimitrie STURDZA	Şerban Dimitrie STURDZA	Romania	ECR	80.4 % of 2 521	−11.5 pts median 91.9 %	86.0 % of 2 022	−4.5 pts median 90.5 %	9.9 % of 1 746	11.7 % of 2 026
Select Sergio BERLATO	Sergio BERLATO	Italy	ECR	99.6 % of 2 521	+7.7 pts median 91.9 %	92.6 % of 2 505	+2.2 pts median 90.5 %	1.8 % of 2 176	11.5 % of 2 511
Select Stefano CAVEDAGNA	Stefano CAVEDAGNA	Italy	ECR	90.6 % of 2 521	−1.2 pts median 91.9 %	92.4 % of 2 279	+1.9 pts median 90.5 %	1.7 % of 1 975	11.3 % of 2 285
Select Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	Croatia	ECR	79.8 % of 2 521	−12.1 pts median 91.9 %	92.7 % of 2 006	+2.2 pts median 90.5 %	2.9 % of 1 729	7.5 % of 2 011
Select Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI	Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI	Poland	ECR	80.8 % of 2 521	−11.1 pts median 91.9 %	88.6 % of 2 031	−1.9 pts median 90.5 %	4.7 % of 1 750	8.8 % of 2 036
Select Veronika VRECIONOVÁ	Veronika VRECIONOVÁ	Czechia	ECR	87.4 % of 2 521	−4.5 pts median 91.9 %	81.2 % of 2 197	−9.3 pts median 90.5 %	15.8 % of 1 929	10.6 % of 2 203
Select Waldemar BUDA	Waldemar BUDA	Poland	ECR	75.0 % of 2 521	−16.9 pts median 91.9 %	90.8 % of 1 886	+0.3 pts median 90.5 %	3.5 % of 1 641	8.0 % of 1 891
Select Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI	Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI	Lithuania	ECR	82.1 % of 2 521	−9.8 pts median 91.9 %	91.0 % of 2 065	+0.5 pts median 90.5 %	4.1 % of 1 797	7.9 % of 2 070

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.