Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

79 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Marco SQUARTA ItalyECR84.5 % of 2 891−7.6 pts median 92.1 %93.8 % of 2 437+2.3 pts median 91.5 %0.8 % of 2 12910.8 % of 2 443
Mariateresa VIVALDINI ItalyECR98.1 % of 2 891+5.9 pts median 92.1 %93.2 % of 2 827+1.7 pts median 91.5 %0.9 % of 2 46911.0 % of 2 835
Mario MANTOVANI ItalyECR75.6 % of 2 891−16.5 pts median 92.1 %94.1 % of 2 178+2.6 pts median 91.5 %0.9 % of 1 92510.8 % of 2 186
Marion MARÉCHAL FranceECR80.2 % of 2 891−11.9 pts median 92.1 %77.6 % of 2 315−13.9 pts median 91.5 %17.3 % of 2 0067.1 % of 2 320
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI PolandECR97.7 % of 2 891+5.6 pts median 92.1 %92.7 % of 2 817+1.1 pts median 91.5 %2.1 % of 2 4767.2 % of 2 825
Marlena MALĄG PolandECR97.2 % of 2 891+5.1 pts median 92.1 %91.2 % of 2 803−0.4 pts median 91.5 %2.9 % of 2 4477.4 % of 2 811
Michał DWORCZYK PolandECR68.8 % of 2 891−23.4 pts median 92.1 %92.0 % of 1 982+0.5 pts median 91.5 %2.8 % of 1 7477.5 % of 1 988
Michele PICARO ItalyECR92.1 % of 2 891±0.0 pts median 92.1 %93.3 % of 2 656+1.8 pts median 91.5 %1.2 % of 2 32110.8 % of 2 663
Nicola PROCACCINI ItalyECR88.7 % of 2 891−3.5 pts median 92.1 %93.2 % of 2 556+1.7 pts median 91.5 %1.3 % of 2 23910.9 % of 2 563
Nicolas BAY FranceECR88.6 % of 2 891−3.5 pts median 92.1 %76.2 % of 2 554−15.4 pts median 91.5 %18.8 % of 2 1987.0 % of 2 562
Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group SpainECR94.1 % of 2 891+1.9 pts median 92.1 %93.3 % of 2 711+1.8 pts median 91.5 %2.9 % of 2 3739.5 % of 2 719
Ondřej KRUTÍLEK CzechiaECR99.6 % of 2 891+7.5 pts median 92.1 %83.6 % of 2 872−7.9 pts median 91.5 %13.7 % of 2 5118.4 % of 2 880
Paolo INSELVINI ItalyECR94.6 % of 2 891+2.5 pts median 92.1 %93.3 % of 2 729+1.8 pts median 91.5 %1.1 % of 2 38311.3 % of 2 736
Patryk JAKI PolandECR95.6 % of 2 891+3.5 pts median 92.1 %91.0 % of 2 756−0.5 pts median 91.5 %3.7 % of 2 4187.7 % of 2 764
Pietro FIOCCHI ItalyECR80.5 % of 2 891−11.6 pts median 92.1 %93.6 % of 2 320+2.1 pts median 91.5 %1.5 % of 2 06210.1 % of 2 328
Piotr MÜLLER PolandECR92.8 % of 2 891+0.7 pts median 92.1 %91.8 % of 2 676+0.3 pts median 91.5 %2.4 % of 2 3397.5 % of 2 684
Reinis POZŅAKS LatviaECR97.5 % of 2 891+5.4 pts median 92.1 %89.9 % of 2 812−1.6 pts median 91.5 %7.2 % of 2 4729.3 % of 2 820
Rihards KOLS LatviaECR98.1 % of 2 891+6.0 pts median 92.1 %89.7 % of 2 829−1.8 pts median 91.5 %7.2 % of 2 4699.1 % of 2 837
Roberts ZĪLE LatviaECR61.5 % of 2 891−30.6 pts median 92.1 %91.6 % of 1 771+0.1 pts median 91.5 %5.6 % of 1 5709.3 % of 1 778
Ruggero RAZZA ItalyECR69.9 % of 2 891−22.2 pts median 92.1 %93.7 % of 2 016+2.2 pts median 91.5 %0.8 % of 1 77410.6 % of 2 022
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECR84.4 % of 2 891−7.7 pts median 92.1 %73.3 % of 2 435−18.2 pts median 91.5 %23.3 % of 2 1195.5 % of 2 441
Şerban Dimitrie STURDZA RomaniaECR92.7 % of 2 891+0.6 pts median 92.1 %89.0 % of 2 674−2.5 pts median 91.5 %7.1 % of 2 34010.1 % of 2 681
Sergio BERLATO ItalyECR99.7 % of 2 891+7.5 pts median 92.1 %93.2 % of 2 873+1.7 pts median 91.5 %1.0 % of 2 51011.0 % of 2 881
Stefano CAVEDAGNA ItalyECR86.8 % of 2 891−5.3 pts median 92.1 %93.7 % of 2 503+2.2 pts median 91.5 %1.0 % of 2 18810.8 % of 2 510
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA CroatiaECR90.7 % of 2 891−1.4 pts median 92.1 %94.0 % of 2 616+2.5 pts median 91.5 %2.8 % of 2 2807.1 % of 2 623
Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI PolandECR95.9 % of 2 891+3.7 pts median 92.1 %91.1 % of 2 765−0.4 pts median 91.5 %3.2 % of 2 4178.1 % of 2 772
Veronika VRECIONOVÁ CzechiaECR98.5 % of 2 891+6.4 pts median 92.1 %83.1 % of 2 840−8.4 pts median 91.5 %14.1 % of 2 4808.7 % of 2 848
Waldemar BUDA PolandECR88.6 % of 2 891−3.5 pts median 92.1 %90.8 % of 2 556−0.7 pts median 91.5 %3.4 % of 2 2287.0 % of 2 562
Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI LithuaniaECR65.5 % of 2 891−26.6 pts median 92.1 %91.9 % of 1 890+0.3 pts median 91.5 %2.7 % of 1 6138.3 % of 1 895
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.