Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

Whole term: 620 final votes with named positions — 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 90.6 % (732 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

743 members

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort A to Z↓	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Germany	Greens	99.2 % of 620	+6.9 pts median 92.3 %	97.2 % of 615	+0.8 pts median 96.4 %	1.2 % of 595	3.7 % of 615
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	Poland	ECR	78.2 % of 620	−13.7 pts median 91.9 %	88.1 % of 481	+0.5 pts median 87.7 %	3.2 % of 404	13.8 % of 485
Select Daniele POLATO	Daniele POLATO	Italy	ECR	98.9 % of 620	+6.9 pts median 91.9 %	93.9 % of 609	+6.2 pts median 87.7 %	1.2 % of 505	17.9 % of 613
Select Danilo DELLA VALLE	Danilo DELLA VALLE	Italy	The Left	95.3 % of 620	+8.4 pts median 86.9 %	87.2 % of 585	+0.5 pts median 86.6 %	5.8 % of 485	14.7 % of 591
Select Danuše NERUDOVÁ	Danuše NERUDOVÁ	Czechia	EPP	94.8 % of 620	+4.3 pts median 90.6 %	97.1 % of 588	+1.5 pts median 95.6 %	1.5 % of 548	1.5 % of 588
Select Dario NARDELLA	Dario NARDELLA	Italy	S&D	67.6 % of 620	−21.9 pts median 89.5 %	98.1 % of 419	+1.0 pts median 97.1 %	1.4 % of 414	1.7 % of 419
Select Dario TAMBURRANO	Dario TAMBURRANO	Italy	The Left	92.7 % of 620	+5.8 pts median 86.9 %	85.6 % of 569	−1.0 pts median 86.6 %	7.0 % of 473	15.0 % of 575
Select Dariusz JOŃSKI	Dariusz JOŃSKI	Poland	EPP	98.4 % of 620	+7.8 pts median 90.6 %	93.4 % of 610	−2.1 pts median 95.6 %	2.5 % of 567	1.1 % of 610
Select David CASA	David CASA	Malta	EPP	95.2 % of 620	+4.6 pts median 90.6 %	89.8 % of 590	−5.7 pts median 95.6 %	9.3 % of 550	7.3 % of 590
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	France	Greens	96.1 % of 620	+3.9 pts median 92.3 %	92.6 % of 596	−3.8 pts median 96.4 %	6.4 % of 576	6.0 % of 596
Select David MCALLISTER	David MCALLISTER	Germany	EPP	88.7 % of 620	−1.9 pts median 90.6 %	98.9 % of 550	+3.3 pts median 95.6 %	0.8 % of 511	0.2 % of 550
Select Davor Ivo STIER	Davor Ivo STIER	Croatia	EPP	89.8 % of 620	−0.7 pts median 90.6 %	92.5 % of 557	−3.1 pts median 95.6 %	2.5 % of 522	0.5 % of 557
Select Delara BURKHARDT	Delara BURKHARDT	Germany	S&D	76.5 % of 620	−13.1 pts median 89.5 %	98.1 % of 474	+1.0 pts median 97.1 %	1.3 % of 469	0.8 % of 474
Select Denis NESCI	Denis NESCI	Italy	ECR	99.7 % of 620	+7.7 pts median 91.9 %	93.6 % of 614	+6.0 pts median 87.7 %	1.6 % of 511	17.6 % of 618
Select Dennis RADTKE	Dennis RADTKE	Germany	EPP	87.6 % of 620	−3.0 pts median 90.6 %	98.5 % of 543	+3.0 pts median 95.6 %	0.8 % of 507	0.2 % of 543
Select Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ	Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ	Romania	No group	67.9 % of 620	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	32.1 % of 421
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Spain	Greens	80.3 % of 620	−11.9 pts median 92.3 %	88.4 % of 498	−8.0 pts median 96.4 %	10.5 % of 486	7.8 % of 498
Select Dick ERIXON	Dick ERIXON	Sweden	ECR	98.4 % of 620	+6.5 pts median 91.9 %	56.4 % of 606	−31.3 pts median 87.7 %	40.4 % of 502	11.5 % of 610
Select Diego SOLIER	Diego SOLIER ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Spain	ECR	95.2 % of 620	not compared median 91.9 %	92.3 % of 542	not compared median 87.7 %	3.8 % of 448	15.1 % of 590
Select Dimitris TSIODRAS	Dimitris TSIODRAS	Greece	EPP	91.9 % of 620	+1.4 pts median 90.6 %	92.3 % of 570	−3.3 pts median 95.6 %	2.4 % of 532	1.4 % of 570
Select Dirk GOTINK	Dirk GOTINK	Netherlands	EPP	96.1 % of 620	+5.6 pts median 90.6 %	95.1 % of 596	−0.4 pts median 95.6 %	4.3 % of 554	2.7 % of 596
Select Dolors MONTSERRAT	Dolors MONTSERRAT	Spain	EPP	91.8 % of 620	+1.2 pts median 90.6 %	95.8 % of 569	+0.2 pts median 95.6 %	2.6 % of 534	1.8 % of 569
Select Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Poland	ECR	63.5 % of 620	−28.4 pts median 91.9 %	86.2 % of 392	−1.5 pts median 87.7 %	4.9 % of 326	14.7 % of 394
Select Dóra DÁVID	Dóra DÁVID	Hungary	EPP	75.2 % of 620	−15.4 pts median 90.6 %	84.1 % of 466	−11.4 pts median 95.6 %	10.1 % of 436	8.4 % of 466
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	Romania	S&D	65.5 % of 620	−24.0 pts median 89.5 %	94.6 % of 406	−2.5 pts median 97.1 %	5.2 % of 403	1.5 % of 406
Select Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Finland	S&D	90.2 % of 620	+0.6 pts median 89.5 %	95.2 % of 559	−1.9 pts median 97.1 %	4.5 % of 552	3.6 % of 559
Select Elena DONAZZAN	Elena DONAZZAN	Italy	ECR	84.8 % of 620	−7.1 pts median 91.9 %	93.7 % of 522	+6.0 pts median 87.7 %	1.9 % of 432	16.9 % of 526
Select Elena KOUNTOURA	Elena KOUNTOURA	Greece	The Left	72.4 % of 620	−14.5 pts median 86.9 %	86.5 % of 446	−0.1 pts median 86.6 %	9.1 % of 386	17.6 % of 449
Select Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO	Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO	Spain	EPP	88.2 % of 620	−2.3 pts median 90.6 %	95.2 % of 547	−0.3 pts median 95.6 %	3.1 % of 511	2.4 % of 547
Select Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Spain	S&D	99.5 % of 620	+10.0 pts median 89.5 %	98.2 % of 617	+1.1 pts median 97.1 %	1.5 % of 610	1.0 % of 617
Select Elena YONCHEVA	Elena YONCHEVA ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Bulgaria	ECR	59.2 % of 620	—no group line	77.2 % of 57	—no group line	7 of 46	6.5 % of 367
Select Eleonora MELETI	Eleonora MELETI	Greece	EPP	83.5 % of 620	−7.0 pts median 90.6 %	91.3 % of 518	−4.3 pts median 95.6 %	2.7 % of 480	1.4 % of 518
Select Elio DI RUPO	Elio DI RUPO	Belgium	S&D	89.8 % of 620	+0.3 pts median 89.5 %	94.4 % of 557	−2.7 pts median 97.1 %	5.3 % of 550	2.7 % of 557
Select Elisabeth DIERINGER	Elisabeth DIERINGER	Austria	Patriots	98.5 % of 620	+7.7 pts median 90.8 %	72.0 % of 610	−8.0 pts median 80.0 %	22.7 % of 481	16.7 % of 611
Select Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Austria	S&D	99.5 % of 620	+10.0 pts median 89.5 %	96.1 % of 617	−1.0 pts median 97.1 %	3.3 % of 610	2.4 % of 617
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Italy	Renew	81.9 % of 620	not compared median 89.5 %	98.0 % of 507	not compared median 97.1 %	0.4 % of 492	2.0 % of 508
Select Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI	Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI	Greece	EPP	64.8 % of 620	−25.7 pts median 90.6 %	90.5 % of 402	−5.0 pts median 95.6 %	4.5 % of 375	1.7 % of 402
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Finland	Renew	98.4 % of 620	+6.9 pts median 91.5 %	94.9 % of 606	+1.3 pts median 93.6 %	2.1 % of 560	1.6 % of 610
Select Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Poland	EPP	95.0 % of 620	+4.4 pts median 90.6 %	90.8 % of 589	−4.7 pts median 95.6 %	4.2 % of 548	1.5 % of 589
Select Emil RADEV	Emil RADEV	Bulgaria	EPP	77.7 % of 620	−12.8 pts median 90.6 %	91.3 % of 482	−4.3 pts median 95.6 %	2.0 % of 445	1.5 % of 482
Select Emma FOURREAU	Emma FOURREAU	France	The Left	86.9 % of 620	±0.0 pts median 86.9 %	90.8 % of 534	+4.2 pts median 86.6 %	2.4 % of 449	14.5 % of 539
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	France	S&D	65.6 % of 620	−23.9 pts median 89.5 %	93.1 % of 407	−4.0 pts median 97.1 %	6.4 % of 404	3.4 % of 407
Select Emma WIESNER	Emma WIESNER	Sweden	Renew	81.3 % of 620	−10.2 pts median 91.5 %	88.6 % of 500	−5.0 pts median 93.6 %	9.3 % of 461	4.0 % of 504
Select Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Greece	ECR	97.9 % of 620	+6.0 pts median 91.9 %	46.1 % of 603	−41.6 pts median 87.7 %	51.3 % of 501	29.7 % of 607
Select Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Greece	EPP	88.4 % of 620	−2.2 pts median 90.6 %	92.7 % of 548	−2.9 pts median 95.6 %	2.7 % of 515	1.3 % of 548
Select Engin EROGLU	Engin EROGLU	Germany	Renew	90.6 % of 620	−0.9 pts median 91.5 %	81.4 % of 558	−12.2 pts median 93.6 %	17.3 % of 519	4.4 % of 562
Select Enikő GYŐRI	Enikő GYŐRI	Hungary	Patriots	79.8 % of 620	−11.0 pts median 90.8 %	80.8 % of 494	+0.8 pts median 80.0 %	9.5 % of 389	17.6 % of 495
Select Eric SARGIACOMO	Eric SARGIACOMO	France	S&D	92.3 % of 620	+2.7 pts median 89.5 %	93.5 % of 572	−3.6 pts median 97.1 %	6.0 % of 566	4.0 % of 572
Select Erik KALIŇÁK	Erik KALIŇÁK	Slovakia	No group	92.9 % of 620	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	19.1 % of 576
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Germany	Greens	92.3 % of 620	±0.0 pts median 92.3 %	96.7 % of 572	+0.3 pts median 96.4 %	2.0 % of 552	4.9 % of 572

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.