Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Whole term: 5 928 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.2 % (737 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

54 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort A to Z↓	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Alexandra GEESE	Alexandra GEESE	Germany	Greens	89.6 % of 5 928	−2.5 pts median 92.2 %	98.3 % of 5 311	+1.2 pts median 97.1 %	1.1 % of 5 197	4.9 % of 5 312
Select Alice KUHNKE	Alice KUHNKE	Sweden	Greens	98.6 % of 5 928	+6.5 pts median 92.2 %	96.7 % of 5 846	−0.4 pts median 97.1 %	2.7 % of 5 725	5.1 % of 5 847
Select Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Spain	Greens	81.1 % of 5 928	−11.0 pts median 92.2 %	87.9 % of 4 808	−9.2 pts median 97.1 %	11.2 % of 4 699	3.7 % of 4 809
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Germany	Greens	99.0 % of 5 928	+6.8 pts median 92.2 %	98.7 % of 5 865	+1.6 pts median 97.1 %	0.7 % of 5 745	4.6 % of 5 866
Select Anna STROLENBERG	Anna STROLENBERG	Netherlands	Greens	99.5 % of 5 928	+7.3 pts median 92.2 %	96.9 % of 5 897	−0.1 pts median 97.1 %	2.1 % of 5 775	4.6 % of 5 898
Select Benedetta SCUDERI	Benedetta SCUDERI	Italy	Greens	95.4 % of 5 928	+3.2 pts median 92.2 %	91.2 % of 5 653	−5.8 pts median 97.1 %	7.9 % of 5 544	3.6 % of 5 654
Select Catarina VIEIRA	Catarina VIEIRA	Netherlands	Greens	92.3 % of 5 928	+0.2 pts median 92.2 %	97.8 % of 5 473	+0.7 pts median 97.1 %	1.5 % of 5 358	4.3 % of 5 474
Select Cristina GUARDA	Cristina GUARDA	Italy	Greens	83.5 % of 5 928	−8.7 pts median 92.2 %	91.3 % of 4 946	−5.8 pts median 97.1 %	7.8 % of 4 863	3.2 % of 4 947
Select Damian BOESELAGER	Damian BOESELAGER	Germany	Greens	95.1 % of 5 928	+2.9 pts median 92.2 %	96.9 % of 5 634	−0.2 pts median 97.1 %	2.1 % of 5 516	4.8 % of 5 635
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Germany	Greens	99.2 % of 5 928	+7.1 pts median 92.2 %	98.4 % of 5 882	+1.3 pts median 97.1 %	0.9 % of 5 760	4.5 % of 5 883
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	France	Greens	96.4 % of 5 928	+4.2 pts median 92.2 %	93.2 % of 5 712	−3.9 pts median 97.1 %	5.8 % of 5 597	2.5 % of 5 713
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Spain	Greens	85.0 % of 5 928	−7.2 pts median 92.2 %	90.2 % of 5 038	−6.9 pts median 97.1 %	8.8 % of 4 942	4.3 % of 5 039
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Germany	Greens	94.8 % of 5 928	+2.6 pts median 92.2 %	98.6 % of 5 619	+1.6 pts median 97.1 %	0.7 % of 5 500	4.6 % of 5 620
Select Gordan BOSANAC	Gordan BOSANAC	Croatia	Greens	98.2 % of 5 928	+6.0 pts median 92.2 %	95.4 % of 5 819	−1.7 pts median 97.1 %	3.9 % of 5 699	4.6 % of 5 820
Select Hannah NEUMANN	Hannah NEUMANN	Germany	Greens	92.0 % of 5 928	−0.2 pts median 92.2 %	98.3 % of 5 451	+1.3 pts median 97.1 %	0.9 % of 5 334	4.7 % of 5 452
Select Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Italy	Greens	75.4 % of 5 928	−16.8 pts median 92.2 %	91.0 % of 4 466	−6.1 pts median 97.1 %	8.0 % of 4 374	3.8 % of 4 467
Select Isabella LÖVIN	Isabella LÖVIN	Sweden	Greens	89.0 % of 5 928	−3.2 pts median 92.2 %	96.8 % of 5 273	−0.3 pts median 97.1 %	2.6 % of 5 156	5.1 % of 5 274
Select Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Spain	Greens	80.3 % of 5 928	−11.9 pts median 92.2 %	88.0 % of 4 757	−9.1 pts median 97.1 %	10.9 % of 4 650	4.8 % of 4 758
Select Jutta PAULUS	Jutta PAULUS	Germany	Greens	90.7 % of 5 928	−1.4 pts median 92.2 %	98.0 % of 5 377	+1.0 pts median 97.1 %	1.3 % of 5 273	4.6 % of 5 378
Select Kai TEGETHOFF	Kai TEGETHOFF	Germany	Greens	89.8 % of 5 928	−2.3 pts median 92.2 %	97.1 % of 5 325	±0.0 pts median 97.1 %	1.8 % of 5 207	4.3 % of 5 326
Select Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Germany	Greens	91.3 % of 5 928	−0.9 pts median 92.2 %	98.3 % of 5 409	+1.2 pts median 97.1 %	0.9 % of 5 298	4.0 % of 5 410
Select Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Netherlands	Greens	92.4 % of 5 928	+0.2 pts median 92.2 %	97.8 % of 5 476	+0.7 pts median 97.1 %	1.5 % of 5 366	4.4 % of 5 477
Select Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Denmark	Greens	91.5 % of 5 928	−0.6 pts median 92.2 %	97.8 % of 5 424	+0.7 pts median 97.1 %	1.6 % of 5 307	5.3 % of 5 425
Select Lena SCHILLING	Lena SCHILLING	Austria	Greens	95.9 % of 5 928	+3.8 pts median 92.2 %	97.4 % of 5 685	+0.3 pts median 97.1 %	1.8 % of 5 570	5.7 % of 5 686
Select Leoluca ORLANDO	Leoluca ORLANDO	Italy	Greens	86.2 % of 5 928	−5.9 pts median 92.2 %	88.8 % of 5 111	−8.3 pts median 97.1 %	10.1 % of 5 001	4.9 % of 5 112
Select Majdouline SBAI	Majdouline SBAI	France	Greens	48.0 % of 5 928	−44.1 pts median 92.2 %	92.9 % of 2 846	−4.2 pts median 97.1 %	5.7 % of 2 779	2.7 % of 2 847
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Finland	Greens	85.4 % of 5 928	−6.7 pts median 92.2 %	99.4 % of 5 062	+2.3 pts median 97.1 %	0.2 % of 4 964	4.4 % of 5 063
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	France	Greens	93.4 % of 5 928	+1.2 pts median 92.2 %	92.4 % of 5 536	−4.7 pts median 97.1 %	6.6 % of 5 419	2.6 % of 5 537
Select Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Czechia	Greens	90.7 % of 5 928	−1.5 pts median 92.2 %	96.6 % of 5 375	−0.5 pts median 97.1 %	2.5 % of 5 265	4.8 % of 5 376
Select Martin HÄUSLING	Martin HÄUSLING	Germany	Greens	94.9 % of 5 928	+2.7 pts median 92.2 %	98.2 % of 5 623	+1.1 pts median 97.1 %	1.1 % of 5 505	5.1 % of 5 624
Select Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Latvia	Greens	97.5 % of 5 928	+5.4 pts median 92.2 %	93.1 % of 5 781	−4.0 pts median 97.1 %	6.1 % of 5 661	7.5 % of 5 782
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	France	Greens	86.3 % of 5 928	−5.9 pts median 92.2 %	92.6 % of 5 112	−4.4 pts median 97.1 %	6.2 % of 4 996	2.7 % of 5 113
Select Michael BLOSS	Michael BLOSS	Germany	Greens	97.9 % of 5 928	+5.8 pts median 92.2 %	97.8 % of 5 805	+0.8 pts median 97.1 %	1.3 % of 5 687	4.4 % of 5 806
Select Mounir SATOURI	Mounir SATOURI	France	Greens	88.5 % of 5 928	−3.7 pts median 92.2 %	93.5 % of 5 243	−3.6 pts median 97.1 %	5.4 % of 5 132	2.7 % of 5 244
Select Nela RIEHL	Nela RIEHL	Germany	Greens	92.7 % of 5 928	+0.5 pts median 92.2 %	97.0 % of 5 493	−0.1 pts median 97.1 %	2.1 % of 5 387	4.6 % of 5 494
Select Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Romania	Greens	62.2 % of 5 928	−29.9 pts median 92.2 %	97.5 % of 3 689	+0.4 pts median 97.1 %	1.8 % of 3 602	3.8 % of 3 690
Select Pär HOLMGREN	Pär HOLMGREN	Sweden	Greens	95.8 % of 5 928	+3.7 pts median 92.2 %	96.8 % of 5 680	−0.3 pts median 97.1 %	2.6 % of 5 566	4.8 % of 5 680
Select Rasmus ANDRESEN	Rasmus ANDRESEN	Germany	Greens	91.3 % of 5 928	−0.9 pts median 92.2 %	97.7 % of 5 410	+0.6 pts median 97.1 %	1.7 % of 5 295	4.6 % of 5 411
Select Rasmus NORDQVIST	Rasmus NORDQVIST	Denmark	Greens	99.6 % of 5 928	+7.5 pts median 92.2 %	98.3 % of 5 906	+1.2 pts median 97.1 %	1.2 % of 5 785	5.0 % of 5 907
Select Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Netherlands	Greens	97.1 % of 5 928	+5.0 pts median 92.2 %	97.1 % of 5 756	±0.0 pts median 97.1 %	1.9 % of 5 638	4.6 % of 5 757
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Belgium	Greens	87.5 % of 5 928	−4.7 pts median 92.2 %	98.9 % of 5 186	+1.8 pts median 97.1 %	0.5 % of 5 081	3.8 % of 5 187
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Belgium	Greens	92.9 % of 5 928	+0.7 pts median 92.2 %	93.0 % of 5 504	−4.1 pts median 97.1 %	6.0 % of 5 392	3.3 % of 5 505
Select Sergey LAGODINSKY	Sergey LAGODINSKY	Germany	Greens	72.9 % of 5 928	−19.2 pts median 92.2 %	96.4 % of 4 322	−0.7 pts median 97.1 %	2.9 % of 4 232	5.9 % of 4 323
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Germany	Greens	92.5 % of 5 928	+0.4 pts median 92.2 %	98.9 % of 5 485	+1.8 pts median 97.1 %	0.5 % of 5 397	4.2 % of 5 485
Select Thomas WAITZ	Thomas WAITZ	Austria	Greens	95.2 % of 5 928	+3.0 pts median 92.2 %	97.4 % of 5 640	+0.3 pts median 97.1 %	1.8 % of 5 522	5.8 % of 5 641
Select Tilly METZ	Tilly METZ	Luxembourg	Greens	96.2 % of 5 928	+4.0 pts median 92.2 %	94.6 % of 5 700	−2.5 pts median 97.1 %	4.4 % of 5 592	3.3 % of 5 701
Select Tineke STRIK	Tineke STRIK	Netherlands	Greens	93.8 % of 5 928	+1.6 pts median 92.2 %	97.8 % of 5 557	+0.7 pts median 97.1 %	1.7 % of 5 441	4.5 % of 5 558
Select Ufuk KÂHYA	Ufuk KÂHYA	Netherlands	Greens	98.3 % of 645	+6.1 pts median 92.2 %	99.1 % of 634	+2.0 pts median 97.1 %	0.5 % of 623	3.0 % of 634
Select Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Spain	Greens	91.0 % of 5 928	−1.1 pts median 92.2 %	88.1 % of 5 395	−9.0 pts median 97.1 %	11.0 % of 5 280	3.9 % of 5 396
Select Ville NIINISTÖ	Ville NIINISTÖ	Finland	Greens	74.0 % of 5 928	−18.1 pts median 92.2 %	99.2 % of 4 388	+2.1 pts median 97.1 %	0.3 % of 4 290	4.6 % of 4 389

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.