Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

Whole term: 5 928 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.2 % (737 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

197 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort A to ZCountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Adam JARUBAS PolandEPP74.3 % of 5 928−15.6 pts median 89.9 %90.1 % of 4 404−3.6 pts median 93.6 %7.2 % of 4 2224.3 % of 4 404
Adina VĂLEAN RomaniaEPP88.6 % of 5 928−1.3 pts median 89.9 %95.9 % of 5 255+2.3 pts median 93.6 %2.7 % of 5 0240.8 % of 5 255
Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA SpainEPP82.1 % of 5 928−7.8 pts median 89.9 %94.1 % of 4 868+0.5 pts median 93.6 %4.1 % of 4 6582.6 % of 4 868
Alexander BERNHUBER AustriaEPP85.6 % of 5 928−4.3 pts median 89.9 %92.6 % of 5 076−1.0 pts median 93.6 %5.5 % of 4 8333.2 % of 5 076
Alexandra MEHNERT GermanyEPP87.4 % of 5 928−2.5 pts median 89.9 %98.5 % of 5 182+4.9 pts median 93.6 %0.6 % of 4 9410.7 % of 5 182
Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE SwedenEPP85.9 % of 5 928−4.0 pts median 89.9 %80.8 % of 5 091−12.9 pts median 93.6 %18.2 % of 4 8403.3 % of 5 091
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA SpainEPP35.1 % of 5 928−54.8 pts median 89.9 %94.1 % of 2 080+0.5 pts median 93.6 %4.5 % of 1 9882.2 % of 2 080
Ana Miguel PEDRO PortugalEPP86.3 % of 5 928−3.6 pts median 89.9 %93.8 % of 5 116+0.2 pts median 93.6 %4.3 % of 4 8752.8 % of 5 116
András Tivadar KULJA HungaryEPP61.2 % of 5 928−28.7 pts median 89.9 %86.4 % of 3 628−7.3 pts median 93.6 %11.2 % of 3 4707.3 % of 3 628
Andrea WECHSLER GermanyEPP96.5 % of 5 928+6.6 pts median 89.9 %97.7 % of 5 723+4.1 pts median 93.6 %1.3 % of 5 4471.1 % of 5 723
Andreas SCHWAB GermanyEPP89.6 % of 5 928−0.3 pts median 89.9 %96.5 % of 5 310+2.9 pts median 93.6 %2.3 % of 5 0471.3 % of 5 310
Andrey KOVATCHEV BulgariaEPP95.5 % of 5 928+5.6 pts median 89.9 %93.5 % of 5 664−0.1 pts median 93.6 %4.3 % of 5 3983.1 % of 5 664
Andrey NOVAKOV BulgariaEPP90.7 % of 5 928+0.7 pts median 89.9 %93.4 % of 5 374−0.2 pts median 93.6 %4.5 % of 5 1123.0 % of 5 374
Andrzej BUŁA PolandEPP91.5 % of 5 928+1.6 pts median 89.9 %92.3 % of 5 426−1.3 pts median 93.6 %5.1 % of 5 1772.5 % of 5 426
Andrzej HALICKI PolandEPP91.1 % of 5 928+1.2 pts median 89.9 %92.2 % of 5 399−1.5 pts median 93.6 %5.3 % of 5 1641.7 % of 5 399
Angelika NIEBLER GermanyEPP87.6 % of 5 928−2.4 pts median 89.9 %97.8 % of 5 190+4.2 pts median 93.6 %1.3 % of 4 9570.8 % of 5 190
Angelika WINZIG AustriaEPP94.3 % of 5 928+4.4 pts median 89.9 %94.1 % of 5 589+0.5 pts median 93.6 %4.3 % of 5 3403.1 % of 5 589
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE SpainEPP87.2 % of 5 928−2.7 pts median 89.9 %94.1 % of 5 170+0.5 pts median 93.6 %3.8 % of 4 9252.5 % of 5 170
Arba KOKALARI SwedenEPP86.5 % of 5 928−3.4 pts median 89.9 %91.7 % of 5 129−1.9 pts median 93.6 %7.1 % of 4 8841.7 % of 5 129
Aura SALLA FinlandEPP83.7 % of 5 928−6.2 pts median 89.9 %95.6 % of 4 960+2.0 pts median 93.6 %3.3 % of 4 7181.3 % of 4 960
Axel VOSS GermanyEPP78.6 % of 5 928−11.3 pts median 89.9 %98.5 % of 4 659+4.9 pts median 93.6 %0.9 % of 4 4700.6 % of 4 659
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ PolandEPP97.6 % of 5 928+7.7 pts median 89.9 %92.0 % of 5 787−1.6 pts median 93.6 %5.7 % of 5 5121.9 % of 5 787
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ PolandEPP95.4 % of 5 928+5.5 pts median 89.9 %90.8 % of 5 658−2.8 pts median 93.6 %7.0 % of 5 3912.1 % of 5 658
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI PolandEPP98.5 % of 5 928+8.6 pts median 89.9 %91.7 % of 5 842−1.9 pts median 93.6 %5.3 % of 5 5723.5 % of 5 842
Borja GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ SpainEPP97.3 % of 5 928+7.4 pts median 89.9 %94.4 % of 5 769+0.8 pts median 93.6 %3.5 % of 5 5012.2 % of 5 769
Borys BUDKA PolandEPP84.6 % of 5 928−5.3 pts median 89.9 %91.1 % of 5 015−2.5 pts median 93.6 %5.9 % of 4 7602.5 % of 5 015
Branko GRIMS changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.SloveniaNo group91.6 % of 5 928not compared median 89.9 %70.2 % of 5 006not compared median 93.6 %27.5 % of 4 7527.4 % of 5 429
Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ SpainEPP86.0 % of 5 928−3.9 pts median 89.9 %93.7 % of 5 098±0.0 pts median 93.6 %4.2 % of 4 8652.6 % of 5 098
Caterina CHINNICI ItalyEPP70.1 % of 5 928−19.8 pts median 89.9 %95.2 % of 4 156+1.6 pts median 93.6 %3.6 % of 3 9641.5 % of 4 156
Céline IMART FranceEPP90.9 % of 5 928+0.9 pts median 89.9 %77.0 % of 5 386−16.6 pts median 93.6 %21.3 % of 5 1414.9 % of 5 386
Christian DOLESCHAL GermanyEPP82.1 % of 5 928−7.8 pts median 89.9 %97.2 % of 4 869+3.6 pts median 93.6 %1.9 % of 4 6350.9 % of 4 869
Christian EHLER GermanyEPP83.1 % of 5 928−6.8 pts median 89.9 %97.3 % of 4 928+3.7 pts median 93.6 %2.0 % of 4 6990.5 % of 4 928
Christophe GOMART FranceEPP93.0 % of 5 928+3.1 pts median 89.9 %70.2 % of 5 515−23.4 pts median 93.6 %27.7 % of 5 2534.9 % of 5 515
Csaba BOGDÁN HungaryEPP90.9 % of 891+1.0 pts median 89.9 %89.5 % of 810−4.1 pts median 93.6 %8.1 % of 7786.8 % of 810
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU RomaniaEPP70.9 % of 5 928−19.0 pts median 89.9 %96.7 % of 4 202+3.1 pts median 93.6 %1.9 % of 3 9871.3 % of 4 202
Daniel BUDA RomaniaEPP92.7 % of 5 928+2.8 pts median 89.9 %97.5 % of 5 494+3.9 pts median 93.6 %1.4 % of 5 2421.1 % of 5 494
Danuše NERUDOVÁ CzechiaEPP95.3 % of 5 928+5.4 pts median 89.9 %89.7 % of 5 652−3.9 pts median 93.6 %9.2 % of 5 3854.8 % of 5 652
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPP97.7 % of 5 928+7.8 pts median 89.9 %90.5 % of 5 793−3.1 pts median 93.6 %7.1 % of 5 5121.9 % of 5 793
David CASA MaltaEPP96.5 % of 5 928+6.6 pts median 89.9 %92.7 % of 5 723−0.9 pts median 93.6 %5.3 % of 5 4422.5 % of 5 723
David MCALLISTER GermanyEPP83.8 % of 5 928−6.1 pts median 89.9 %97.9 % of 4 968+4.3 pts median 93.6 %1.3 % of 4 7471.2 % of 4 968
Davor Ivo STIER CroatiaEPP85.2 % of 5 928−4.7 pts median 89.9 %91.5 % of 5 051−2.1 pts median 93.6 %6.1 % of 4 8272.0 % of 5 051
Dennis RADTKE GermanyEPP81.7 % of 5 928−8.2 pts median 89.9 %97.3 % of 4 844+3.7 pts median 93.6 %1.5 % of 4 6210.8 % of 4 844
Dimitris TSIODRAS GreeceEPP89.9 % of 5 928±0.0 pts median 89.9 %93.8 % of 5 331+0.2 pts median 93.6 %4.4 % of 5 0831.8 % of 5 331
Dirk GOTINK NetherlandsEPP97.6 % of 5 928+7.7 pts median 89.9 %94.4 % of 5 787+0.8 pts median 93.6 %4.2 % of 5 5062.1 % of 5 787
Dolors MONTSERRAT SpainEPP90.4 % of 5 928+0.5 pts median 89.9 %93.8 % of 5 361+0.2 pts median 93.6 %3.9 % of 5 1122.5 % of 5 361
Dóra DÁVID HungaryEPP67.4 % of 5 928−22.6 pts median 89.9 %87.0 % of 3 993−6.6 pts median 93.6 %10.6 % of 3 8256.9 % of 3 993
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO SpainEPP89.0 % of 5 928−0.9 pts median 89.9 %93.6 % of 5 276±0.0 pts median 93.6 %4.2 % of 5 0192.6 % of 5 276
Eleonora MELETI GreeceEPP78.7 % of 5 928−11.3 pts median 89.9 %93.6 % of 4 663±0.0 pts median 93.6 %4.5 % of 4 4221.8 % of 4 663
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI GreeceEPP65.5 % of 5 928−24.4 pts median 89.9 %93.0 % of 3 885−0.6 pts median 93.6 %5.4 % of 3 7291.9 % of 3 885
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA PolandEPP94.2 % of 5 928+4.3 pts median 89.9 %90.7 % of 5 587−2.9 pts median 93.6 %6.8 % of 5 3112.1 % of 5 587
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.