Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

Whole term: 5 928 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.2 % (737 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

27 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort A to ZCountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Alexander JUNGBLUTH GermanyESN99.0 % of 5 928+7.6 pts median 91.3 %93.3 % of 5 859−1.3 pts median 94.6 %5.4 % of 5 5516.9 % of 5 868
Alexander SELL GermanyESN91.8 % of 5 928+0.4 pts median 91.3 %98.6 % of 5 431+4.0 pts median 94.6 %0.9 % of 5 1479.0 % of 5 439
Anja ARNDT GermanyESN86.9 % of 5 928−4.4 pts median 91.3 %99.0 % of 5 145+4.4 pts median 94.6 %0.8 % of 4 8848.6 % of 5 152
Arno BAUSEMER GermanyESN86.2 % of 5 928−5.2 pts median 91.3 %98.6 % of 5 099+4.0 pts median 94.6 %1.0 % of 4 8178.1 % of 5 107
Christine ANDERSON GermanyESN93.9 % of 5 928+2.6 pts median 91.3 %99.6 % of 5 562+5.0 pts median 94.6 %0.2 % of 5 2718.5 % of 5 568
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.PolandPatriots76.8 % of 5 928not compared median 91.3 %76.2 % of 4 546not compared median 94.6 %18.9 % of 4 07615.7 % of 4 554
Hans NEUHOFF GermanyESN74.9 % of 5 928−16.5 pts median 91.3 %99.1 % of 4 431+4.4 pts median 94.6 %0.7 % of 4 2077.9 % of 4 439
Irmhild BOSSDORF GermanyESN95.4 % of 5 928+4.1 pts median 91.3 %99.2 % of 5 650+4.6 pts median 94.6 %0.4 % of 5 3538.2 % of 5 657
Ivan DAVID CzechiaESN91.5 % of 5 928+0.1 pts median 91.3 %70.6 % of 5 413−24.1 pts median 94.6 %26.5 % of 5 11117.3 % of 5 422
Marc JONGEN GermanyESN89.2 % of 5 928−2.1 pts median 91.3 %99.1 % of 5 281+4.5 pts median 94.6 %0.5 % of 5 0098.3 % of 5 290
Marcin SYPNIEWSKI PolandESN93.2 % of 5 928+1.8 pts median 91.3 %76.1 % of 5 516−18.5 pts median 94.6 %20.7 % of 5 22914.5 % of 5 524
Markus BUCHHEIT GermanyESN90.9 % of 5 928−0.5 pts median 91.3 %96.7 % of 5 379+2.1 pts median 94.6 %2.6 % of 5 1047.1 % of 5 387
Mary KHAN GermanyESN90.6 % of 5 928−0.7 pts median 91.3 %97.4 % of 5 365+2.8 pts median 94.6 %2.2 % of 5 0799.1 % of 5 371
Milan MAZUREK changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.SlovakiaESN94.7 % of 5 928not compared median 91.3 %79.5 % of 5 103not compared median 94.6 %17.0 % of 4 83014.8 % of 5 611
Milan UHRÍK SlovakiaESN93.5 % of 5 928+2.1 pts median 91.3 %79.3 % of 5 533−15.4 pts median 94.6 %17.2 % of 5 22815.5 % of 5 542
Petar VOLGIN BulgariaESN91.5 % of 5 928+0.1 pts median 91.3 %89.7 % of 5 413−4.9 pts median 94.6 %7.4 % of 5 1228.9 % of 5 422
Petr BYSTRON GermanyESN86.4 % of 5 928−4.9 pts median 91.3 %97.6 % of 5 116+3.0 pts median 94.6 %2.0 % of 4 8738.7 % of 5 123
Petras GRAŽULIS LithuaniaESN82.9 % of 5 928−8.5 pts median 91.3 %70.9 % of 4 904−23.7 pts median 94.6 %26.5 % of 4 63924.1 % of 4 912
Rada LAYKOVA BulgariaESN83.0 % of 5 928−8.3 pts median 91.3 %95.1 % of 4 914+0.5 pts median 94.6 %3.2 % of 4 6619.5 % of 4 921
René AUST GermanyESN91.2 % of 5 928−0.2 pts median 91.3 %98.3 % of 5 397+3.7 pts median 94.6 %1.2 % of 5 1258.3 % of 5 405
Sarah KNAFO FranceESN74.9 % of 5 928−16.4 pts median 91.3 %75.6 % of 4 438−19.0 pts median 94.6 %22.3 % of 4 20211.0 % of 4 443
Siegbert Frank DROESE GermanyESN91.3 % of 5 928±0.0 pts median 91.3 %96.9 % of 5 406+2.3 pts median 94.6 %2.4 % of 5 1219.2 % of 5 415
Stanislav STOYANOV BulgariaESN92.2 % of 5 928+0.8 pts median 91.3 %92.5 % of 5 456−2.1 pts median 94.6 %4.8 % of 5 1779.6 % of 5 464
Stanisław TYSZKA PolandESN68.6 % of 5 928−22.8 pts median 91.3 %78.5 % of 4 060−16.1 pts median 94.6 %18.2 % of 3 85912.5 % of 4 066
Tomasz FROELICH GermanyESN96.0 % of 5 928+4.6 pts median 91.3 %94.6 % of 5 681±0.0 pts median 94.6 %3.6 % of 5 38911.1 % of 5 688
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.GermanyESN97.8 % of 4 675not compared median 91.3 %93.0 % of 4 335not compared median 94.6 %5.0 % of 4 1007.1 % of 4 574
Zsuzsanna BORVENDÉG HungaryESN93.2 % of 5 928+1.9 pts median 91.3 %82.0 % of 5 517−12.6 pts median 94.6 %14.7 % of 5 21914.5 % of 5 526
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.