Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

Whole term: 5 928 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.2 % (737 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

79 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort A to ZCountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Adam BIELAN PolandECR92.4 % of 5 928+0.7 pts median 91.6 %92.0 % of 5 460+0.9 pts median 91.1 %2.7 % of 4 7428.6 % of 5 476
Adrian-George AXINIA RomaniaECR85.3 % of 5 928−6.3 pts median 91.6 %90.0 % of 5 042−1.1 pts median 91.1 %6.5 % of 4 3949.0 % of 5 056
Alberico GAMBINO ItalyECR75.9 % of 5 928−15.8 pts median 91.6 %92.6 % of 4 485+1.4 pts median 91.1 %1.2 % of 3 90911.1 % of 4 497
Alessandro CIRIANI ItalyECR86.2 % of 5 928−5.4 pts median 91.6 %93.2 % of 5 095+2.1 pts median 91.1 %1.0 % of 4 44810.8 % of 5 111
Alexandr VONDRA CzechiaECR89.5 % of 5 928−2.1 pts median 91.6 %85.6 % of 5 289−5.6 pts median 91.1 %11.1 % of 4 6178.8 % of 5 306
Anna ZALEWSKA PolandECR98.2 % of 5 928+6.6 pts median 91.6 %91.2 % of 5 807+0.1 pts median 91.1 %3.2 % of 5 0588.2 % of 5 824
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECR87.2 % of 5 928−4.5 pts median 91.6 %92.6 % of 5 151+1.5 pts median 91.1 %1.1 % of 4 47411.3 % of 5 167
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK PolandECR96.3 % of 5 928+4.6 pts median 91.6 %91.5 % of 5 690+0.3 pts median 91.1 %3.3 % of 4 9508.0 % of 5 706
Assita KANKO BelgiumECR66.8 % of 5 928−24.9 pts median 91.6 %66.8 % of 3 947−24.4 pts median 91.1 %31.2 % of 3 39421.8 % of 3 958
Aurelijus VERYGA LithuaniaECR90.6 % of 5 928−1.0 pts median 91.6 %90.1 % of 5 358−1.1 pts median 91.1 %6.0 % of 4 6587.2 % of 5 372
Beata SZYDŁO PolandECR93.3 % of 5 928+1.7 pts median 91.6 %91.3 % of 5 516+0.2 pts median 91.1 %3.3 % of 4 8048.0 % of 5 531
Beatrice TIMGREN SwedenECR98.5 % of 5 928+6.9 pts median 91.6 %73.9 % of 5 825−17.3 pts median 91.1 %23.0 % of 5 0658.8 % of 5 842
Bert-Jan RUISSEN NetherlandsECR99.7 % of 5 928+8.1 pts median 91.6 %86.2 % of 5 896−4.9 pts median 91.1 %10.9 % of 5 13310.2 % of 5 913
Bogdan RZOŃCA PolandECR99.1 % of 5 928+7.5 pts median 91.6 %91.1 % of 5 859±0.0 pts median 91.1 %3.4 % of 5 0967.8 % of 5 876
Carlo CICCIOLI ItalyECR81.5 % of 5 928−10.1 pts median 91.6 %92.7 % of 4 819+1.5 pts median 91.1 %1.5 % of 4 18110.6 % of 4 834
Carlo FIDANZA ItalyECR94.2 % of 5 928+2.5 pts median 91.6 %92.7 % of 5 567+1.5 pts median 91.1 %1.0 % of 4 84311.2 % of 5 582
Charlie WEIMERS SwedenECR97.2 % of 5 928+5.6 pts median 91.6 %73.9 % of 5 748−17.2 pts median 91.1 %23.0 % of 5 0048.8 % of 5 764
Chiara GEMMA ItalyECR98.3 % of 5 928+6.7 pts median 91.6 %92.4 % of 5 813+1.3 pts median 91.1 %1.5 % of 5 05911.3 % of 5 830
Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU RomaniaECR94.3 % of 5 928+2.7 pts median 91.6 %87.8 % of 5 576−3.3 pts median 91.1 %8.4 % of 4 8709.9 % of 5 592
Cristian TERHEŞ RomaniaECR79.6 % of 5 928−12.0 pts median 91.6 %84.9 % of 4 707−6.3 pts median 91.1 %11.0 % of 4 1257.0 % of 4 719
Daniel OBAJTEK PolandECR82.8 % of 5 928−8.8 pts median 91.6 %91.4 % of 4 893+0.2 pts median 91.1 %3.2 % of 4 2487.9 % of 4 909
Daniele POLATO ItalyECR98.2 % of 5 928+6.6 pts median 91.6 %92.6 % of 5 805+1.4 pts median 91.1 %1.3 % of 5 04411.4 % of 5 822
Denis NESCI ItalyECR99.6 % of 5 928+8.0 pts median 91.6 %92.7 % of 5 888+1.5 pts median 91.1 %1.3 % of 5 12211.2 % of 5 905
Dick ERIXON SwedenECR98.4 % of 5 928+6.8 pts median 91.6 %73.8 % of 5 816−17.4 pts median 91.1 %23.2 % of 5 0548.8 % of 5 833
Diego SOLIER changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.SpainECR94.9 % of 5 928not compared median 91.6 %93.6 % of 5 274not compared median 91.1 %2.3 % of 4 6039.9 % of 5 628
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI PolandECR64.0 % of 5 928−27.6 pts median 91.6 %90.9 % of 3 781−0.3 pts median 91.1 %3.6 % of 3 2498.4 % of 3 795
Elena DONAZZAN ItalyECR87.8 % of 5 928−3.9 pts median 91.6 %92.7 % of 5 186+1.6 pts median 91.1 %1.3 % of 4 50910.9 % of 5 202
Emmanouil FRAGKOS GreeceECR96.2 % of 5 928+4.6 pts median 91.6 %68.8 % of 5 685−22.3 pts median 91.1 %27.8 % of 4 95515.9 % of 5 702
Francesco TORSELLI ItalyECR97.5 % of 5 928+5.9 pts median 91.6 %92.9 % of 5 766+1.7 pts median 91.1 %1.1 % of 5 01911.2 % of 5 782
Francesco VENTOLA ItalyECR87.7 % of 5 928−3.9 pts median 91.6 %92.6 % of 5 184+1.5 pts median 91.1 %1.1 % of 4 50511.4 % of 5 199
Galato ALEXANDRAKI GreeceECR67.1 % of 5 928−24.5 pts median 91.6 %70.7 % of 3 965−20.5 pts median 91.1 %25.7 % of 3 43515.2 % of 3 978
Geadis GEADI CyprusECR92.7 % of 5 928+1.1 pts median 91.6 %84.4 % of 5 480−6.7 pts median 91.1 %12.1 % of 4 7838.9 % of 5 496
Georgiana TEODORESCU RomaniaECR93.1 % of 5 928+1.5 pts median 91.6 %81.6 % of 5 503−9.6 pts median 91.1 %14.0 % of 4 79410.7 % of 5 519
Gheorghe PIPEREA RomaniaECR83.3 % of 5 928−8.3 pts median 91.6 %85.4 % of 4 922−5.8 pts median 91.1 %11.1 % of 4 2699.9 % of 4 938
Giovanni CROSETTO ItalyECR91.6 % of 5 928±0.0 pts median 91.6 %92.7 % of 5 417+1.5 pts median 91.1 %1.2 % of 4 70111.1 % of 5 432
Giuseppe MILAZZO ItalyECR47.1 % of 5 928−44.6 pts median 91.6 %91.9 % of 2 780+0.7 pts median 91.1 %1.8 % of 2 39410.4 % of 2 790
Guillaume PELTIER FranceECR86.4 % of 5 928−5.3 pts median 91.6 %78.5 % of 5 106−12.6 pts median 91.1 %16.7 % of 4 4636.9 % of 5 120
Ivaylo VALCHEV BulgariaECR97.5 % of 5 928+5.8 pts median 91.6 %92.5 % of 5 760+1.3 pts median 91.1 %4.3 % of 5 01110.0 % of 5 777
Jaak MADISON EstoniaECR82.7 % of 5 928−9.0 pts median 91.6 %89.0 % of 4 884−2.1 pts median 91.1 %7.4 % of 4 2555.9 % of 4 900
Jacek OZDOBA PolandECR90.1 % of 5 928−1.6 pts median 91.6 %90.6 % of 5 323−0.6 pts median 91.1 %3.8 % of 4 6547.9 % of 5 340
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA PolandECR96.4 % of 5 928+4.8 pts median 91.6 %91.3 % of 5 699+0.1 pts median 91.1 %3.2 % of 4 9557.6 % of 5 715
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI PolandECR93.6 % of 5 928+1.9 pts median 91.6 %90.9 % of 5 531−0.3 pts median 91.1 %3.7 % of 4 8138.3 % of 5 547
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT BelgiumECR57.6 % of 5 928−34.0 pts median 91.6 %67.9 % of 3 407−23.2 pts median 91.1 %30.1 % of 2 95722.0 % of 3 417
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI PolandECR98.9 % of 5 928+7.3 pts median 91.6 %91.4 % of 5 847+0.2 pts median 91.1 %3.0 % of 5 0817.9 % of 5 864
Kris VAN DIJCK BelgiumECR90.9 % of 5 928−0.7 pts median 91.6 %67.8 % of 5 375−23.4 pts median 91.1 %30.2 % of 4 66321.3 % of 5 391
Kristoffer STORM DenmarkECR91.9 % of 5 928+0.3 pts median 91.6 %74.5 % of 5 432−16.6 pts median 91.1 %22.0 % of 4 7219.6 % of 5 447
Lara MAGONI ItalyECR96.1 % of 5 928+4.4 pts median 91.6 %92.3 % of 5 679+1.2 pts median 91.1 %1.6 % of 4 93211.4 % of 5 695
Laurence TROCHU FranceECR95.9 % of 5 928+4.2 pts median 91.6 %77.7 % of 5 665−13.5 pts median 91.1 %17.6 % of 4 9347.5 % of 5 682
Maciej WĄSIK PolandECR96.1 % of 5 928+4.5 pts median 91.6 %91.0 % of 5 683−0.2 pts median 91.1 %3.5 % of 4 9387.6 % of 5 699
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA PolandECR90.8 % of 5 928−0.8 pts median 91.6 %91.7 % of 5 367+0.5 pts median 91.1 %2.7 % of 4 6587.8 % of 5 382
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.