Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

Whole term: 5 928 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.2 % (737 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

79 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort A to ZCountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Marco SQUARTA ItalyECR76.7 % of 5 928−14.9 pts median 91.6 %93.2 % of 4 534+2.0 pts median 91.1 %1.1 % of 3 96110.5 % of 4 547
Mariateresa VIVALDINI ItalyECR96.4 % of 5 928+4.7 pts median 91.6 %92.3 % of 5 697+1.2 pts median 91.1 %1.6 % of 4 96011.0 % of 5 713
Mario MANTOVANI ItalyECR71.2 % of 5 928−20.4 pts median 91.6 %93.4 % of 4 209+2.3 pts median 91.1 %1.1 % of 3 70911.2 % of 4 221
Marion MARÉCHAL FranceECR85.6 % of 5 928−6.0 pts median 91.6 %77.6 % of 5 063−13.6 pts median 91.1 %17.3 % of 4 3988.0 % of 5 077
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI PolandECR98.2 % of 5 928+6.6 pts median 91.6 %91.9 % of 5 804+0.7 pts median 91.1 %3.0 % of 5 0667.9 % of 5 821
Marlena MALĄG PolandECR97.4 % of 5 928+5.8 pts median 91.6 %91.1 % of 5 756−0.1 pts median 91.1 %3.1 % of 5 0097.8 % of 5 773
Michał DWORCZYK PolandECR72.0 % of 5 928−19.6 pts median 91.6 %91.7 % of 4 256+0.6 pts median 91.1 %3.0 % of 3 7127.1 % of 4 270
Michele PICARO ItalyECR94.7 % of 5 928+3.0 pts median 91.6 %92.6 % of 5 596+1.4 pts median 91.1 %1.6 % of 4 87511.0 % of 5 611
Nicola PROCACCINI ItalyECR86.6 % of 5 928−5.0 pts median 91.6 %92.2 % of 5 117+1.0 pts median 91.1 %1.6 % of 4 44411.3 % of 5 133
Nicolas BAY FranceECR90.2 % of 5 928−1.4 pts median 91.6 %76.8 % of 5 334−14.4 pts median 91.1 %18.3 % of 4 6237.7 % of 5 348
Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.SpainECR92.8 % of 5 928not compared median 91.6 %92.5 % of 5 079not compared median 91.1 %3.9 % of 4 42010.8 % of 5 504
Ondřej KRUTÍLEK CzechiaECR97.5 % of 5 928+5.9 pts median 91.6 %82.3 % of 5 764−8.9 pts median 91.1 %14.8 % of 5 0179.2 % of 5 781
Paolo INSELVINI ItalyECR92.1 % of 5 928+0.5 pts median 91.6 %92.8 % of 5 445+1.6 pts median 91.1 %1.3 % of 4 74111.3 % of 5 459
Patryk JAKI PolandECR91.9 % of 5 928+0.2 pts median 91.6 %90.6 % of 5 429−0.6 pts median 91.1 %4.3 % of 4 7267.9 % of 5 446
Pietro FIOCCHI ItalyECR84.3 % of 5 928−7.3 pts median 91.6 %92.0 % of 4 981+0.8 pts median 91.1 %2.2 % of 4 36210.8 % of 4 997
Piotr MÜLLER PolandECR85.3 % of 5 928−6.3 pts median 91.6 %91.6 % of 5 043+0.4 pts median 91.1 %2.9 % of 4 3788.1 % of 5 059
Reinis POZŅAKS LatviaECR96.1 % of 5 928+4.5 pts median 91.6 %88.9 % of 5 681−2.3 pts median 91.1 %8.1 % of 4 9469.8 % of 5 698
Rihards KOLS LatviaECR92.7 % of 5 928+1.1 pts median 91.6 %88.4 % of 5 481−2.7 pts median 91.1 %8.6 % of 4 77010.1 % of 5 498
Roberts ZĪLE LatviaECR73.1 % of 5 928−18.5 pts median 91.6 %88.6 % of 4 321−2.6 pts median 91.1 %8.1 % of 3 79210.6 % of 4 335
Ruggero RAZZA ItalyECR76.7 % of 5 928−14.9 pts median 91.6 %92.8 % of 4 533+1.6 pts median 91.1 %1.3 % of 3 97010.9 % of 4 546
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECR85.8 % of 5 928−5.9 pts median 91.6 %73.4 % of 5 072−17.8 pts median 91.1 %22.8 % of 4 4025.2 % of 5 085
Şerban Dimitrie STURDZA RomaniaECR87.8 % of 5 928−3.8 pts median 91.6 %87.0 % of 5 193−4.1 pts median 91.1 %9.1 % of 4 50910.6 % of 5 207
Sergio BERLATO ItalyECR99.5 % of 5 928+7.9 pts median 91.6 %92.4 % of 5 884+1.3 pts median 91.1 %1.5 % of 5 11611.3 % of 5 901
Stefano CAVEDAGNA ItalyECR88.0 % of 5 928−3.7 pts median 91.6 %92.5 % of 5 199+1.4 pts median 91.1 %1.3 % of 4 51511.1 % of 5 215
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA CroatiaECR83.8 % of 5 928−7.8 pts median 91.6 %93.7 % of 4 952+2.6 pts median 91.1 %2.7 % of 4 2967.0 % of 4 967
Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI PolandECR87.2 % of 5 928−4.4 pts median 91.6 %90.2 % of 5 155−0.9 pts median 91.1 %3.9 % of 4 4758.5 % of 5 170
Veronika VRECIONOVÁ CzechiaECR93.2 % of 5 928+1.6 pts median 91.6 %81.9 % of 5 507−9.3 pts median 91.1 %15.3 % of 4 8089.5 % of 5 524
Waldemar BUDA PolandECR83.0 % of 5 928−8.6 pts median 91.6 %91.1 % of 4 908±0.0 pts median 91.1 %3.4 % of 4 2707.2 % of 4 922
Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI LithuaniaECR70.7 % of 5 928−20.9 pts median 91.6 %91.0 % of 4 179−0.1 pts median 91.1 %3.6 % of 3 5928.4 % of 4 192
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.