Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

729 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Abir AL-SAHLANI SwedenRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %90.3 % of 62−0.6 pts median 90.9 %7.3 % of 551.5 % of 65
Adam BIELAN PolandECR77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %98.0 % of 50+5.9 pts median 92.1 %0 of 43 7.8 % of 51
Adam JARUBAS PolandEPP57.6 % of 66−34.8 pts median 92.4 %38 of 38 — median 95.3 %0 of 38 0 of 38
Adina VĂLEAN RomaniaEPP84.8 % of 66−7.6 pts median 92.4 %100.0 % of 56+4.7 pts median 95.3 %0 of 45 0.0 % of 56
Adnan DIBRANI SwedenS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %98.4 % of 64+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.6 % of 640.0 % of 64
Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA SpainEPP77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %98.0 % of 51+2.7 pts median 95.3 %1 of 48 0.0 % of 51
Adrian-George AXINIA RomaniaECR98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %78.1 % of 64−14.0 pts median 92.1 %21.1 % of 5712.3 % of 65
Afroditi LATINOPOULOU GreecePatriots69.7 % of 66−24.2 pts median 93.9 %43 of 46 — median 85.0 %1 of 41 5 of 46
Alberico GAMBINO ItalyECR72.7 % of 66−19.7 pts median 92.4 %44 of 48 — median 92.1 %0 of 40 5 of 48
Aldo PATRICIELLO ItalyPatriots47.0 % of 66−47.0 pts median 93.9 %28 of 31 — median 85.0 %3 of 29 4 of 31
Aleksandar NIKOLIC FrancePatriots93.9 % of 66±0.0 pts median 93.9 %96.8 % of 62+11.8 pts median 85.0 %0.0 % of 5314.5 % of 62
Alessandra MORETTI ItalyS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 66+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 660.0 % of 66
Alessandro CIRIANI ItalyECR83.3 % of 66−9.1 pts median 92.4 %92.6 % of 54+0.5 pts median 92.1 %0 of 47 10.9 % of 55
Alessandro ZAN ItalyS&D90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 60+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 600.0 % of 60
Alex AGIUS SALIBA MaltaS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %84.6 % of 65−13.7 pts median 98.3 %15.4 % of 659.2 % of 65
Alexander BERNHUBER AustriaEPP83.3 % of 66−9.1 pts median 92.4 %74.5 % of 55−20.8 pts median 95.3 %3 of 44 5.5 % of 55
Alexander JUNGBLUTH GermanyESN100.0 % of 66+9.1 pts median 90.9 %96.9 % of 65+2.5 pts median 94.4 %1.7 % of 6021.2 % of 66
Alexander SELL GermanyESN90.9 % of 66±0.0 pts median 90.9 %100.0 % of 60+5.6 pts median 94.4 %0.0 % of 5520.0 % of 60
Alexandr VONDRA CzechiaECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %72.3 % of 65−19.8 pts median 92.1 %22.8 % of 577.6 % of 66
Alexandra GEESE GermanyGreens95.5 % of 66−1.5 pts median 97.0 %98.4 % of 63+1.6 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 590.0 % of 63
Alexandra MEHNERT GermanyEPP40.9 % of 66−51.5 pts median 92.4 %27 of 27 — median 95.3 %0 of 26 0 of 27
Alexandre VARAUT FrancePatriots93.9 % of 66±0.0 pts median 93.9 %96.8 % of 62+11.8 pts median 85.0 %1.8 % of 5516.1 % of 62
Alice KUHNKE SwedenGreens98.5 % of 66+1.5 pts median 97.0 %93.8 % of 65−3.0 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 611.5 % of 65
Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE SwedenEPP92.4 % of 66±0.0 pts median 92.4 %88.5 % of 61−6.8 pts median 95.3 %6 of 49 1.6 % of 61
Alicia HOMS GINEL SpainS&D10.6 % of 66−84.8 pts median 95.5 %7 of 7 — median 98.3 %0 of 7 0 of 7
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA SpainEPP77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %98.0 % of 51+2.7 pts median 95.3 %1 of 42 0.0 % of 51
Alvise PÉREZ SpainNo group53.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 1 of 35
Ana Catarina MENDES PortugalS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 64+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 640.0 % of 64
Ana Miguel PEDRO PortugalEPP68.2 % of 66−24.2 pts median 92.4 %43 of 45 — median 95.3 %0 of 34 0 of 45
Ana MIRANDA PAZ SpainGreens98.5 % of 66+1.5 pts median 97.0 %84.6 % of 65−12.2 pts median 96.8 %14.8 % of 6110.8 % of 65
Ana VASCONCELOS PortugalRenew93.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 95.5 %89.8 % of 59−1.1 pts median 90.9 %7.7 % of 524.8 % of 62
Andi CRISTEA RomaniaS&D16 of 18 — median 95.5 %16 of 16 — median 98.3 %0 of 16 0 of 16
András GYÜRK HungaryPatriots74.2 % of 66−19.7 pts median 93.9 %40 of 49 — median 85.0 %5 of 45 3 of 49
András LÁSZLÓ HungaryPatriots66.7 % of 66−27.3 pts median 93.9 %36 of 44 — median 85.0 %5 of 41 3 of 44
András Tivadar KULJA HungaryEPP89.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 92.4 %72.9 % of 59−22.5 pts median 95.3 %6 of 49 25.4 % of 59
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES PortugalS&D90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %96.7 % of 60−1.6 pts median 98.3 %3.3 % of 601.7 % of 60
André ROUGÉ FrancePatriots97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %98.4 % of 64+13.5 pts median 85.0 %0.0 % of 5614.1 % of 64
Andrea WECHSLER GermanyEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %98.3 % of 60+3.0 pts median 95.3 %0 of 48 0.0 % of 60
Andreas GLÜCK GermanyRenew75.8 % of 66−19.7 pts median 95.5 %43 of 47 — median 90.9 %3 of 40 0.0 % of 50
Andreas SCHIEDER AustriaS&D87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %98.3 % of 58±0.0 pts median 98.3 %1.7 % of 581.7 % of 58
Andreas SCHWAB GermanyEPP93.9 % of 66+1.5 pts median 92.4 %93.5 % of 62−1.8 pts median 95.3 %4.0 % of 504.8 % of 62
Andrey KOVATCHEV BulgariaEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %83.3 % of 66−12.0 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 540.0 % of 66
Andrey NOVAKOV BulgariaEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %84.6 % of 65−10.7 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Andrzej BUŁA PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %90.9 % of 66−4.4 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
Andrzej HALICKI PolandEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %85.0 % of 60−10.3 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 500.0 % of 60
Angelika NIEBLER GermanyEPP72.7 % of 66−19.7 pts median 92.4 %48 of 48 — median 95.3 %0 of 37 0 of 48
Angelika WINZIG AustriaEPP62.1 % of 66−30.3 pts median 92.4 %37 of 41 — median 95.3 %2 of 39 2 of 41
Angéline FURET FrancePatriots72.7 % of 66−21.2 pts median 93.9 %48 of 48 — median 85.0 %0 of 43 8 of 48
Anja ARNDT GermanyESN89.4 % of 66−1.5 pts median 90.9 %100.0 % of 58+5.6 pts median 94.4 %0.0 % of 5323.7 % of 59
Anja HAZEKAMP NetherlandsThe Left68.2 % of 66−25.8 pts median 93.9 %38 of 45 — median 86.5 %5 of 38 3 of 45
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.