Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

725 members

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Luděk NIEDERMAYER	Luděk NIEDERMAYER	Czechia	EPP	98.7 % of 2 891	+7.7 pts median 91.0 %	90.2 % of 2 854	−3.4 pts median 93.5 %	8.7 % of 2 718	7.2 % of 2 854
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Slovakia	Renew	89.3 % of 2 891	−1.8 pts median 91.1 %	97.1 % of 2 581	+1.1 pts median 96.0 %	1.8 % of 2 513	1.5 % of 2 581
Select Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	Romania	No group	80.3 % of 2 891	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	15.6 % of 2 322
Select Lukas MANDL	Lukas MANDL	Austria	EPP	89.5 % of 2 891	−1.5 pts median 91.0 %	93.0 % of 2 586	−0.5 pts median 93.5 %	4.6 % of 2 452	2.2 % of 2 586
Select Lukas SIEPER	Lukas SIEPER ⇄changed group	Germany	Renew	93.7 % of 2 891	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	2.1 % of 2 708
Select Łukasz KOHUT	Łukasz KOHUT	Poland	EPP	98.2 % of 2 891	+7.2 pts median 91.0 %	90.2 % of 2 839	−3.3 pts median 93.5 %	7.8 % of 2 704	3.0 % of 2 839
Select Luke Ming FLANAGAN	Luke Ming FLANAGAN	Ireland	The Left	74.1 % of 2 891	−16.2 pts median 90.3 %	93.9 % of 2 139	+0.6 pts median 93.4 %	3.8 % of 1 977	5.8 % of 2 143
Select Lynn BOYLAN	Lynn BOYLAN	Ireland	The Left	72.0 % of 2 891	−18.3 pts median 90.3 %	90.1 % of 2 078	−3.3 pts median 93.4 %	7.8 % of 1 908	5.9 % of 2 081
Select Maciej WĄSIK	Maciej WĄSIK	Poland	ECR	95.1 % of 2 891	+2.9 pts median 92.1 %	91.2 % of 2 741	−0.3 pts median 91.5 %	3.3 % of 2 393	7.4 % of 2 748
Select Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Poland	EPP	96.9 % of 2 891	+5.9 pts median 91.0 %	90.8 % of 2 802	−2.7 pts median 93.5 %	6.8 % of 2 665	2.5 % of 2 802
Select Majdouline SBAI	Majdouline SBAI	France	Greens	62.5 % of 2 891	−32.6 pts median 95.1 %	92.9 % of 1 807	−4.4 pts median 97.2 %	5.8 % of 1 761	2.9 % of 1 807
Select Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Poland	ECR	99.1 % of 2 891	+7.0 pts median 92.1 %	91.8 % of 2 857	+0.3 pts median 91.5 %	2.4 % of 2 497	7.7 % of 2 865
Select Malik AZMANI	Malik AZMANI	Netherlands	Renew	99.4 % of 2 891	+8.4 pts median 91.1 %	92.5 % of 2 875	−3.5 pts median 96.0 %	6.6 % of 2 803	1.8 % of 2 875
Select Malika SOREL	Malika SOREL ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	France	No group	99.6 % of 2 891	—no group line	83.2 % of 726	—no group line	7.5 % of 536	28.1 % of 2 878
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	Germany	EPP	76.3 % of 2 891	−14.7 pts median 91.0 %	98.6 % of 2 205	+5.0 pts median 93.5 %	0.7 % of 2 130	0.3 % of 2 205
Select Manon AUBRY	Manon AUBRY	France	The Left	96.4 % of 2 891	+6.1 pts median 90.3 %	93.9 % of 2 782	+0.5 pts median 93.4 %	2.4 % of 2 585	4.7 % of 2 786
Select Manuela RIPA	Manuela RIPA	Germany	EPP	83.2 % of 2 891	−7.8 pts median 91.0 %	83.1 % of 2 405	−10.4 pts median 93.5 %	16.2 % of 2 307	4.1 % of 2 405
Select Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER	Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER	Spain	EPP	92.4 % of 2 891	+1.4 pts median 91.0 %	94.3 % of 2 671	+0.8 pts median 93.5 %	3.1 % of 2 538	2.3 % of 2 671
Select Marc ANGEL	Marc ANGEL	Luxembourg	S&D	98.6 % of 2 891	+8.6 pts median 90.0 %	97.6 % of 2 849	+1.1 pts median 96.5 %	2.1 % of 2 822	2.0 % of 2 851
Select Marc BOTENGA	Marc BOTENGA	Belgium	The Left	92.4 % of 2 891	+2.1 pts median 90.3 %	92.2 % of 2 669	−1.1 pts median 93.4 %	5.2 % of 2 470	7.9 % of 2 672
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	Germany	ESN	96.3 % of 2 891	+6.1 pts median 90.3 %	99.0 % of 2 782	+4.1 pts median 94.9 %	0.6 % of 2 648	9.3 % of 2 785
Select Marcin SYPNIEWSKI	Marcin SYPNIEWSKI	Poland	ESN	88.1 % of 2 891	−2.2 pts median 90.3 %	72.7 % of 2 544	−22.2 pts median 94.9 %	24.4 % of 2 431	18.1 % of 2 547
Select Marco FALCONE	Marco FALCONE	Italy	EPP	90.5 % of 2 891	−0.5 pts median 91.0 %	93.7 % of 2 615	+0.1 pts median 93.5 %	4.8 % of 2 488	2.4 % of 2 615
Select Marco SQUARTA	Marco SQUARTA	Italy	ECR	84.5 % of 2 891	−7.6 pts median 92.1 %	93.8 % of 2 437	+2.3 pts median 91.5 %	0.8 % of 2 129	10.8 % of 2 443
Select Marco TARQUINIO	Marco TARQUINIO	Italy	S&D	93.3 % of 2 891	+3.3 pts median 90.0 %	95.1 % of 2 695	−1.4 pts median 96.5 %	4.3 % of 2 668	2.6 % of 2 697
Select Marcos ROS SEMPERE	Marcos ROS SEMPERE	Spain	S&D	86.3 % of 2 891	−3.8 pts median 90.0 %	98.3 % of 2 492	+1.8 pts median 96.5 %	1.2 % of 2 470	1.8 % of 2 494
Select Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Spain	Patriots	99.4 % of 2 891	+6.1 pts median 93.3 %	83.0 % of 2 867	±0.0 pts median 83.1 %	8.1 % of 2 308	8.4 % of 2 874
Select Maria GRAPINI	Maria GRAPINI	Romania	S&D	82.8 % of 2 891	−7.2 pts median 90.0 %	87.4 % of 2 392	−9.1 pts median 96.5 %	12.3 % of 2 370	6.2 % of 2 393
Select Maria GUZENINA	Maria GUZENINA	Finland	S&D	85.1 % of 2 891	−4.9 pts median 90.0 %	96.6 % of 2 459	+0.1 pts median 96.5 %	3.1 % of 2 435	3.4 % of 2 461
Select Maria NOICHL	Maria NOICHL	Germany	S&D	94.5 % of 2 891	+4.5 pts median 90.0 %	96.0 % of 2 730	−0.5 pts median 96.5 %	3.5 % of 2 704	2.3 % of 2 732
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Finland	Greens	70.7 % of 2 891	−24.4 pts median 95.1 %	99.4 % of 2 045	+2.1 pts median 97.2 %	0.1 % of 2 005	3.9 % of 2 045
Select Maria WALSH	Maria WALSH	Ireland	EPP	91.3 % of 2 891	+0.3 pts median 91.0 %	89.5 % of 2 639	−4.1 pts median 93.5 %	9.4 % of 2 502	2.2 % of 2 639
Select Maria ZACHARIA	Maria ZACHARIA	Greece	No group	98.1 % of 2 891	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	12.7 % of 2 836
Select Marianne VIND	Marianne VIND	Denmark	S&D	92.1 % of 2 891	+2.1 pts median 90.0 %	90.8 % of 2 662	−5.8 pts median 96.5 %	9.0 % of 2 638	3.7 % of 2 664
Select Mariateresa VIVALDINI	Mariateresa VIVALDINI	Italy	ECR	98.1 % of 2 891	+5.9 pts median 92.1 %	93.2 % of 2 827	+1.7 pts median 91.5 %	0.9 % of 2 469	11.0 % of 2 835
Select Marie DAUCHY	Marie DAUCHY	France	Patriots	80.0 % of 2 891	−13.3 pts median 93.3 %	93.5 % of 2 309	+10.5 pts median 83.1 %	0.3 % of 1 850	11.5 % of 2 314
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	France	Greens	95.3 % of 2 891	+0.2 pts median 95.1 %	93.4 % of 2 754	−3.9 pts median 97.2 %	5.6 % of 2 692	2.6 % of 2 754
Select Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Germany	Renew	68.0 % of 2 891	−23.1 pts median 91.1 %	92.5 % of 1 966	−3.5 pts median 96.0 %	6.1 % of 1 906	1.9 % of 1 966
Select Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN	Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN	France	Patriots	99.9 % of 2 891	+6.6 pts median 93.3 %	93.1 % of 2 882	+10.1 pts median 83.1 %	0.3 % of 2 321	11.1 % of 2 889
Select Marieke EHLERS	Marieke EHLERS	Netherlands	Patriots	97.0 % of 2 891	+3.7 pts median 93.3 %	81.0 % of 2 797	−2.1 pts median 83.1 %	11.7 % of 2 248	9.8 % of 2 804
Select Marina KALJURAND	Marina KALJURAND	Estonia	S&D	98.4 % of 2 891	+8.4 pts median 90.0 %	96.9 % of 2 842	+0.4 pts median 96.5 %	2.9 % of 2 817	2.8 % of 2 844
Select Marina MESURE	Marina MESURE	France	The Left	97.5 % of 2 891	+7.2 pts median 90.3 %	94.3 % of 2 814	+1.0 pts median 93.4 %	2.0 % of 2 612	4.6 % of 2 818
Select Mario FURORE	Mario FURORE	Italy	The Left	89.2 % of 2 891	−1.1 pts median 90.3 %	89.2 % of 2 575	−4.2 pts median 93.4 %	8.1 % of 2 382	8.8 % of 2 579
Select Mario MANTOVANI	Mario MANTOVANI	Italy	ECR	75.6 % of 2 891	−16.5 pts median 92.1 %	94.1 % of 2 178	+2.6 pts median 91.5 %	0.9 % of 1 925	10.8 % of 2 186
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	France	ECR	80.2 % of 2 891	−11.9 pts median 92.1 %	77.6 % of 2 315	−13.9 pts median 91.5 %	17.3 % of 2 006	7.1 % of 2 320
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	Germany	EPP	95.5 % of 2 891	+4.5 pts median 91.0 %	98.0 % of 2 761	+4.5 pts median 93.5 %	1.2 % of 2 624	0.6 % of 2 761
Select Marit MAIJ	Marit MAIJ	Netherlands	S&D	99.5 % of 2 891	+9.5 pts median 90.0 %	96.2 % of 2 875	−0.3 pts median 96.5 %	3.4 % of 2 848	2.4 % of 2 877
Select Mariusz KAMIŃSKI	Mariusz KAMIŃSKI	Poland	ECR	97.7 % of 2 891	+5.6 pts median 92.1 %	92.7 % of 2 817	+1.1 pts median 91.5 %	2.1 % of 2 476	7.2 % of 2 825
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Slovenia	Renew	87.3 % of 2 891	−3.8 pts median 91.1 %	98.1 % of 2 523	+2.1 pts median 96.0 %	0.9 % of 2 454	0.7 % of 2 523
Select Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Czechia	Greens	86.3 % of 2 891	−8.8 pts median 95.1 %	96.1 % of 2 495	−1.2 pts median 97.2 %	3.0 % of 2 440	4.7 % of 2 495

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.