Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

725 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Giuseppe LUPO ItalyS&D98.9 % of 2 891+8.8 pts median 90.0 %97.6 % of 2 856+1.1 pts median 96.5 %2.0 % of 2 8322.2 % of 2 858
Giuseppe MILAZZO ItalyECR46.1 % of 2 891−46.0 pts median 92.1 %93.2 % of 1 331+1.7 pts median 91.5 %1.1 % of 1 15310.4 % of 1 334
Giusi PRINCI ItalyEPP98.9 % of 2 891+8.0 pts median 91.0 %94.4 % of 2 860+0.8 pts median 93.5 %4.0 % of 2 7221.4 % of 2 860
Gordan BOSANAC CroatiaGreens97.4 % of 2 891+2.4 pts median 95.1 %96.3 % of 2 817−1.0 pts median 97.2 %3.1 % of 2 7554.4 % of 2 817
Grégory ALLIONE FranceRenew91.6 % of 2 891+0.6 pts median 91.1 %96.1 % of 2 649+0.1 pts median 96.0 %2.6 % of 2 5760.8 % of 2 649
Grzegorz BRAUN PolandNo group85.0 % of 2 891—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 59.9 % of 2 456
Guillaume PELTIER FranceECR83.6 % of 2 891−8.5 pts median 92.1 %78.8 % of 2 410−12.7 pts median 91.5 %16.5 % of 2 1145.9 % of 2 417
Günther SIDL AustriaS&D90.0 % of 2 891−0.1 pts median 90.0 %95.2 % of 2 600−1.4 pts median 96.5 %4.3 % of 2 5782.8 % of 2 601
György HÖLVÉNYI HungaryPatriots51.8 % of 2 891−41.5 pts median 93.3 %77.3 % of 1 493−5.8 pts median 83.1 %13.1 % of 1 17214.7 % of 1 497
Hana JALLOUL MURO SpainS&D74.2 % of 2 891−15.9 pts median 90.0 %98.5 % of 2 142+1.9 pts median 96.5 %1.0 % of 2 1201.9 % of 2 144
Hanna GEDIN SwedenThe Left96.7 % of 2 891+6.4 pts median 90.3 %84.9 % of 2 792−8.4 pts median 93.4 %11.6 % of 2 5888.2 % of 2 796
Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ PolandEPP85.4 % of 2 891−5.6 pts median 91.0 %88.3 % of 2 469−5.3 pts median 93.5 %8.9 % of 2 3473.2 % of 2 469
Hannah NEUMANN GermanyGreens86.4 % of 2 891−8.7 pts median 95.1 %98.1 % of 2 497+0.8 pts median 97.2 %0.9 % of 2 4384.2 % of 2 497
Hannes HEIDE AustriaS&D89.2 % of 2 891−0.8 pts median 90.0 %96.1 % of 2 578−0.4 pts median 96.5 %3.3 % of 2 5533.5 % of 2 580
Hans NEUHOFF GermanyESN72.7 % of 2 891−17.5 pts median 90.3 %99.1 % of 2 100+4.2 pts median 94.9 %0.7 % of 2 0128.5 % of 2 103
Harald VILIMSKY AustriaPatriots94.9 % of 2 891+1.6 pts median 93.3 %76.3 % of 2 738−6.7 pts median 83.1 %16.4 % of 2 19112.8 % of 2 745
Hélder SOUSA SILVA PortugalEPP75.5 % of 2 891−15.5 pts median 91.0 %94.3 % of 2 182+0.8 pts median 93.5 %3.6 % of 2 0803.7 % of 2 182
Heléne FRITZON SwedenS&D95.0 % of 2 891+5.0 pts median 90.0 %94.8 % of 2 745−1.8 pts median 96.5 %4.8 % of 2 7183.8 % of 2 747
Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER AustriaRenew76.3 % of 2 891−14.8 pts median 91.1 %96.9 % of 2 206+0.9 pts median 96.0 %2.2 % of 2 1521.0 % of 2 206
Henrik DAHL DenmarkEPP95.2 % of 2 891+4.3 pts median 91.0 %89.8 % of 2 753−3.7 pts median 93.5 %9.2 % of 2 6222.0 % of 2 753
Herbert DORFMANN ItalyEPP99.2 % of 2 891+8.3 pts median 91.0 %96.5 % of 2 869+3.0 pts median 93.5 %2.4 % of 2 7301.0 % of 2 869
Hermann TERTSCH SpainPatriots84.1 % of 2 891−9.2 pts median 93.3 %83.6 % of 2 426+0.5 pts median 83.1 %8.2 % of 1 9697.6 % of 2 431
Hilde VAUTMANS BelgiumRenew94.0 % of 2 891+2.9 pts median 91.1 %96.5 % of 2 717+0.5 pts median 96.0 %3.1 % of 2 6540.8 % of 2 717
Hildegard BENTELE GermanyEPP80.2 % of 2 891−10.7 pts median 91.0 %97.2 % of 2 320+3.7 pts median 93.5 %1.7 % of 2 1950.8 % of 2 320
Hristo PETROV BulgariaRenew97.7 % of 2 891+6.7 pts median 91.1 %96.7 % of 2 825+0.8 pts median 96.0 %2.2 % of 2 7520.9 % of 2 825
Idoia MENDIA SpainS&D95.3 % of 2 891+5.2 pts median 90.0 %98.5 % of 2 752+2.0 pts median 96.5 %1.1 % of 2 7261.7 % of 2 754
Ignazio Roberto MARINO ItalyGreens81.6 % of 2 891−13.5 pts median 95.1 %91.3 % of 2 360−6.0 pts median 97.2 %7.5 % of 2 3113.6 % of 2 360
Ilaria SALIS ItalyThe Left80.1 % of 2 891−10.2 pts median 90.3 %96.7 % of 2 313+3.4 pts median 93.4 %1.6 % of 2 1723.8 % of 2 317
Ilhan KYUCHYUK BulgariaRenew98.1 % of 2 891+7.0 pts median 91.1 %97.9 % of 2 836+1.9 pts median 96.0 %1.3 % of 2 7680.8 % of 2 836
Ilia LAZAROV BulgariaEPP75.7 % of 2 891−15.3 pts median 91.0 %89.4 % of 2 188−4.1 pts median 93.5 %8.8 % of 2 0833.9 % of 2 188
Inese VAIDERE LatviaEPP97.7 % of 2 891+6.7 pts median 91.0 %97.8 % of 2 824+4.3 pts median 93.5 %1.0 % of 2 6870.4 % of 2 824
Ingeborg TER LAAK NetherlandsEPP99.3 % of 2 891+8.3 pts median 91.0 %97.2 % of 2 870+3.7 pts median 93.5 %1.8 % of 2 7321.1 % of 2 870
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN RomaniaEPP94.1 % of 2 891+3.1 pts median 91.0 %95.0 % of 2 721+1.5 pts median 93.5 %3.5 % of 2 5971.3 % of 2 721
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ SpainS&D93.9 % of 2 891+3.9 pts median 90.0 %99.5 % of 2 714+3.0 pts median 96.5 %0.3 % of 2 6941.8 % of 2 716
Irena JOVEVA SloveniaRenew93.3 % of 2 891+2.3 pts median 91.1 %92.0 % of 2 698−4.0 pts median 96.0 %7.2 % of 2 6281.4 % of 2 698
Irene MONTERO SpainThe Left89.1 % of 2 891−1.2 pts median 90.3 %96.1 % of 2 575+2.7 pts median 93.4 %2.0 % of 2 3854.7 % of 2 577
Irene TINAGLI ItalyS&D97.0 % of 2 891+7.0 pts median 90.0 %98.6 % of 2 802+2.1 pts median 96.5 %1.2 % of 2 7822.1 % of 2 804
Irmhild BOSSDORF GermanyESN94.6 % of 2 891+4.3 pts median 90.3 %99.3 % of 2 732+4.3 pts median 94.9 %0.5 % of 2 6048.6 % of 2 734
Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA SpainEPP94.0 % of 2 891+3.0 pts median 91.0 %93.6 % of 2 717+0.1 pts median 93.5 %3.7 % of 2 5821.6 % of 2 717
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ SpainThe Left30.0 % of 2 891−60.4 pts median 90.3 %94.9 % of 863+1.5 pts median 93.4 %2.1 % of 7746.7 % of 866
Isabel WISELER-LIMA LuxembourgEPP98.0 % of 2 891+7.0 pts median 91.0 %96.7 % of 2 832+3.2 pts median 93.5 %2.0 % of 2 6971.1 % of 2 832
Isabella LÖVIN SwedenGreens99.6 % of 2 891+4.5 pts median 95.1 %96.5 % of 2 880−0.7 pts median 97.2 %2.8 % of 2 8184.5 % of 2 880
Isabella TOVAGLIERI ItalyPatriots86.4 % of 2 891−6.9 pts median 93.3 %83.0 % of 2 494−0.1 pts median 83.1 %9.7 % of 2 03412.2 % of 2 498
Isabelle LE CALLENNEC FranceEPP89.1 % of 2 891−1.8 pts median 91.0 %69.1 % of 2 577−24.4 pts median 93.5 %29.3 % of 2 44412.3 % of 2 577
Isilda GOMES PortugalS&D88.6 % of 2 891−1.4 pts median 90.0 %99.4 % of 2 560+2.9 pts median 96.5 %0.5 % of 2 5391.9 % of 2 561
Iuliu WINKLER RomaniaEPP90.5 % of 2 891−0.4 pts median 91.0 %92.3 % of 2 617−1.3 pts median 93.5 %6.3 % of 2 4982.3 % of 2 617
Ivan DAVID CzechiaESN89.7 % of 2 891−0.6 pts median 90.3 %69.7 % of 2 591−25.2 pts median 94.9 %27.5 % of 2 45816.8 % of 2 594
Ivars IJABS LatviaRenew86.8 % of 2 891−4.3 pts median 91.1 %93.5 % of 2 509−2.4 pts median 96.0 %5.5 % of 2 4441.6 % of 2 509
Ivaylo VALCHEV BulgariaECR97.8 % of 2 891+5.6 pts median 92.1 %92.8 % of 2 818+1.3 pts median 91.5 %4.3 % of 2 4609.6 % of 2 826
Jaak MADISON EstoniaECR84.2 % of 2 891−8.0 pts median 92.1 %89.5 % of 2 425−2.0 pts median 91.5 %7.6 % of 2 1345.5 % of 2 433
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.