Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

727 members

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Germany	Greens	99.8 % of 2 521	+7.3 pts median 92.5 %	98.4 % of 2 515	+1.0 pts median 97.5 %	0.9 % of 2 474	5.0 % of 2 516
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	Poland	ECR	84.0 % of 2 521	−7.9 pts median 91.9 %	90.1 % of 2 113	−0.4 pts median 90.5 %	4.2 % of 1 829	8.7 % of 2 118
Select Daniele POLATO	Daniele POLATO	Italy	ECR	97.3 % of 2 521	+5.5 pts median 91.9 %	92.9 % of 2 448	+2.4 pts median 90.5 %	1.6 % of 2 126	11.5 % of 2 454
Select Danilo DELLA VALLE	Danilo DELLA VALLE	Italy	The Left	96.2 % of 2 521	+8.1 pts median 88.2 %	92.0 % of 2 419	−1.6 pts median 93.6 %	5.8 % of 2 245	7.0 % of 2 426
Select Danuše NERUDOVÁ	Danuše NERUDOVÁ	Czechia	EPP	94.4 % of 2 521	+3.5 pts median 91.0 %	90.4 % of 2 381	−3.3 pts median 93.7 %	8.4 % of 2 294	3.4 % of 2 381
Select Dario NARDELLA	Dario NARDELLA	Italy	S&D	72.1 % of 2 521	−18.0 pts median 90.1 %	96.4 % of 1 818	+0.5 pts median 95.8 %	2.7 % of 1 783	2.0 % of 1 818
Select Dario TAMBURRANO	Dario TAMBURRANO	Italy	The Left	88.6 % of 2 521	+0.4 pts median 88.2 %	91.6 % of 2 227	−2.0 pts median 93.6 %	6.0 % of 2 061	7.0 % of 2 234
Select Dariusz JOŃSKI	Dariusz JOŃSKI	Poland	EPP	98.1 % of 2 521	+7.1 pts median 91.0 %	92.3 % of 2 474	−1.4 pts median 93.7 %	5.6 % of 2 372	1.4 % of 2 474
Select David CASA	David CASA	Malta	EPP	96.5 % of 2 521	+5.5 pts median 91.0 %	94.3 % of 2 433	+0.6 pts median 93.7 %	4.0 % of 2 330	1.9 % of 2 433
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	France	Greens	96.1 % of 2 521	+3.6 pts median 92.5 %	92.1 % of 2 421	−5.4 pts median 97.5 %	7.1 % of 2 380	2.6 % of 2 422
Select David MCALLISTER	David MCALLISTER	Germany	EPP	85.4 % of 2 521	−5.6 pts median 91.0 %	98.0 % of 2 153	+4.3 pts median 93.7 %	1.1 % of 2 075	1.2 % of 2 153
Select Davor Ivo STIER	Davor Ivo STIER	Croatia	EPP	80.1 % of 2 521	−10.9 pts median 91.0 %	91.7 % of 2 019	−2.0 pts median 93.7 %	6.8 % of 1 947	2.8 % of 2 019
Select Delara BURKHARDT	Delara BURKHARDT	Germany	S&D	96.2 % of 2 521	+6.0 pts median 90.1 %	96.4 % of 2 424	+0.5 pts median 95.8 %	2.7 % of 2 369	1.5 % of 2 424
Select Denis NESCI	Denis NESCI	Italy	ECR	99.7 % of 2 521	+7.8 pts median 91.9 %	92.9 % of 2 507	+2.4 pts median 90.5 %	1.7 % of 2 178	11.5 % of 2 513
Select Dennis RADTKE	Dennis RADTKE	Germany	EPP	75.4 % of 2 521	−15.5 pts median 91.0 %	97.9 % of 1 902	+4.2 pts median 93.7 %	1.1 % of 1 826	0.9 % of 1 902
Select Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ	Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ	Romania	No group	65.5 % of 2 521	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	26.6 % of 1 650
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Spain	Greens	81.4 % of 2 521	−11.0 pts median 92.5 %	90.6 % of 2 052	−6.9 pts median 97.5 %	8.5 % of 2 020	3.5 % of 2 053
Select Dick ERIXON	Dick ERIXON	Sweden	ECR	97.9 % of 2 521	+6.1 pts median 91.9 %	74.1 % of 2 463	−16.4 pts median 90.5 %	22.3 % of 2 138	9.8 % of 2 469
Select Diego SOLIER	Diego SOLIER ⇄changed group	Spain	ECR	98.5 % of 2 521	+6.6 pts median 91.9 %	94.3 % of 2 476	+3.9 pts median 90.5 %	1.8 % of 2 154	9.5 % of 2 482
Select Dimitris TSIODRAS	Dimitris TSIODRAS	Greece	EPP	86.6 % of 2 521	−4.4 pts median 91.0 %	94.1 % of 2 184	+0.4 pts median 93.7 %	4.1 % of 2 105	2.3 % of 2 184
Select Dirk GOTINK	Dirk GOTINK	Netherlands	EPP	98.2 % of 2 521	+7.2 pts median 91.0 %	95.0 % of 2 476	+1.2 pts median 93.7 %	3.8 % of 2 373	2.3 % of 2 476
Select Dolors MONTSERRAT	Dolors MONTSERRAT	Spain	EPP	96.5 % of 2 521	+5.6 pts median 91.0 %	93.4 % of 2 434	−0.3 pts median 93.7 %	4.4 % of 2 330	3.3 % of 2 434
Select Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Poland	ECR	65.1 % of 2 521	−26.8 pts median 91.9 %	90.5 % of 1 635	+0.1 pts median 90.5 %	3.7 % of 1 415	8.2 % of 1 640
Select Dóra DÁVID	Dóra DÁVID	Hungary	EPP	65.3 % of 2 521	−25.7 pts median 91.0 %	89.8 % of 1 646	−3.9 pts median 93.7 %	7.8 % of 1 575	6.0 % of 1 646
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	Romania	S&D	56.9 % of 2 521	−33.2 pts median 90.1 %	95.4 % of 1 435	−0.4 pts median 95.8 %	4.0 % of 1 411	2.8 % of 1 435
Select Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Finland	S&D	94.5 % of 2 521	+4.4 pts median 90.1 %	94.9 % of 2 382	−1.0 pts median 95.8 %	4.4 % of 2 328	4.1 % of 2 382
Select Elena DONAZZAN	Elena DONAZZAN	Italy	ECR	83.5 % of 2 521	−8.4 pts median 91.9 %	93.0 % of 2 100	+2.5 pts median 90.5 %	1.5 % of 1 825	11.2 % of 2 105
Select Elena KOUNTOURA	Elena KOUNTOURA	Greece	The Left	63.6 % of 2 521	−24.6 pts median 88.2 %	95.8 % of 1 601	+2.2 pts median 93.6 %	2.3 % of 1 500	4.6 % of 1 603
Select Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO	Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO	Spain	EPP	90.4 % of 2 521	−0.6 pts median 91.0 %	93.1 % of 2 278	−0.6 pts median 93.7 %	4.8 % of 2 183	2.9 % of 2 278
Select Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Spain	S&D	99.7 % of 2 521	+9.6 pts median 90.1 %	95.7 % of 2 514	−0.1 pts median 95.8 %	3.3 % of 2 459	2.8 % of 2 514
Select Elena YONCHEVA	Elena YONCHEVA ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Bulgaria	ECR	38.4 % of 2 521	—no group line	78.2 % of 229	—no group line	20.3 % of 207	3.4 % of 968
Select Eleonora MELETI	Eleonora MELETI	Greece	EPP	83.5 % of 2 521	−7.5 pts median 91.0 %	93.5 % of 2 104	−0.2 pts median 93.7 %	4.6 % of 2 015	2.6 % of 2 104
Select Elio DI RUPO	Elio DI RUPO	Belgium	S&D	89.3 % of 2 521	−0.9 pts median 90.1 %	90.7 % of 2 250	−5.1 pts median 95.8 %	8.7 % of 2 204	2.8 % of 2 250
Select Elisabeth DIERINGER	Elisabeth DIERINGER	Austria	Patriots	99.6 % of 2 521	+9.2 pts median 90.4 %	76.6 % of 2 504	−6.5 pts median 83.1 %	15.7 % of 1 972	15.4 % of 2 512
Select Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Austria	S&D	99.1 % of 2 521	+9.0 pts median 90.1 %	97.4 % of 2 499	+1.6 pts median 95.8 %	2.0 % of 2 449	2.0 % of 2 499
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Italy	Renew	77.6 % of 2 521	not compared median 91.7 %	95.1 % of 1 955	not compared median 95.1 %	4.1 % of 1 907	2.7 % of 1 957
Select Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI	Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI	Greece	EPP	57.8 % of 2 521	−33.2 pts median 91.0 %	92.4 % of 1 456	−1.3 pts median 93.7 %	6.0 % of 1 407	2.7 % of 1 456
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Finland	Renew	99.6 % of 2 521	+7.9 pts median 91.7 %	96.3 % of 2 509	+1.2 pts median 95.1 %	2.2 % of 2 434	1.0 % of 2 511
Select Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Poland	EPP	95.8 % of 2 521	+4.8 pts median 91.0 %	91.9 % of 2 415	−1.8 pts median 93.7 %	5.8 % of 2 313	1.3 % of 2 415
Select Emil RADEV	Emil RADEV	Bulgaria	EPP	86.1 % of 2 521	−4.9 pts median 91.0 %	92.3 % of 2 171	−1.4 pts median 93.7 %	6.2 % of 2 086	3.8 % of 2 171
Select Emma FOURREAU	Emma FOURREAU	France	The Left	89.6 % of 2 521	+1.4 pts median 88.2 %	94.7 % of 2 251	+1.1 pts median 93.6 %	1.5 % of 2 085	5.4 % of 2 258
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	France	S&D	68.7 % of 2 521	−21.4 pts median 90.1 %	89.8 % of 1 732	−6.1 pts median 95.8 %	9.2 % of 1 692	1.7 % of 1 732
Select Emma WIESNER	Emma WIESNER	Sweden	Renew	69.7 % of 2 521	−22.0 pts median 91.7 %	91.9 % of 1 757	−3.2 pts median 95.1 %	6.8 % of 1 706	1.3 % of 1 758
Select Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Greece	ECR	99.5 % of 2 521	+7.6 pts median 91.9 %	69.9 % of 2 502	−20.6 pts median 90.5 %	26.1 % of 2 176	14.3 % of 2 508
Select Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Greece	EPP	93.7 % of 2 521	+2.7 pts median 91.0 %	94.9 % of 2 362	+1.2 pts median 93.7 %	3.8 % of 2 283	1.4 % of 2 362
Select Engin EROGLU	Engin EROGLU	Germany	Renew	91.7 % of 2 521	±0.0 pts median 91.7 %	80.9 % of 2 311	−14.2 pts median 95.1 %	17.9 % of 2 242	4.8 % of 2 313
Select Enikő GYŐRI	Enikő GYŐRI	Hungary	Patriots	77.1 % of 2 521	−13.3 pts median 90.4 %	76.5 % of 1 939	−6.6 pts median 83.1 %	16.2 % of 1 534	17.3 % of 1 944
Select Eric SARGIACOMO	Eric SARGIACOMO	France	S&D	95.1 % of 2 521	+5.0 pts median 90.1 %	91.8 % of 2 398	−4.0 pts median 95.8 %	7.5 % of 2 352	2.3 % of 2 398
Select Erik KALIŇÁK	Erik KALIŇÁK	Slovakia	No group	89.8 % of 2 521	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	13.3 % of 2 264
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Germany	Greens	97.1 % of 2 521	+4.6 pts median 92.5 %	98.6 % of 2 446	+1.1 pts median 97.5 %	0.8 % of 2 406	5.4 % of 2 447

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.