Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

725 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Branko GRIMS changed group SloveniaNo group93.2 % of 2 891+2.2 pts median 91.0 %68.5 % of 2 695−25.0 pts median 93.5 %29.4 % of 2 5568.2 % of 2 695
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG NetherlandsRenew80.8 % of 2 891−10.2 pts median 91.1 %96.2 % of 2 337+0.3 pts median 96.0 %2.7 % of 2 2731.0 % of 2 337
Bruno GONÇALVES PortugalS&D82.9 % of 2 891−7.1 pts median 90.0 %95.7 % of 2 396−0.8 pts median 96.5 %4.0 % of 2 3722.3 % of 2 398
Bruno TOBBACK BelgiumS&D97.1 % of 2 891+7.0 pts median 90.0 %98.6 % of 2 804+2.1 pts median 96.5 %1.1 % of 2 7801.8 % of 2 806
Camilla LAURETI ItalyS&D99.5 % of 2 891+9.5 pts median 90.0 %99.0 % of 2 874+2.5 pts median 96.5 %0.8 % of 2 8482.2 % of 2 876
Carla TAVARES PortugalS&D95.5 % of 2 891+5.5 pts median 90.0 %99.5 % of 2 759+3.0 pts median 96.5 %0.3 % of 2 7331.8 % of 2 761
Carlo CICCIOLI ItalyECR74.8 % of 2 891−17.3 pts median 92.1 %93.6 % of 2 156+2.1 pts median 91.5 %1.0 % of 1 87410.3 % of 2 163
Carlo FIDANZA ItalyECR94.8 % of 2 891+2.6 pts median 92.1 %93.5 % of 2 732+2.0 pts median 91.5 %0.6 % of 2 39210.9 % of 2 740
Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ SpainEPP88.9 % of 2 891−2.1 pts median 91.0 %93.8 % of 2 570+0.3 pts median 93.5 %3.6 % of 2 4482.1 % of 2 570
Carolina MORACE ItalyThe Left95.5 % of 2 891+5.2 pts median 90.3 %89.4 % of 2 756−4.0 pts median 93.4 %7.8 % of 2 5529.1 % of 2 760
Catarina MARTINS PortugalThe Left65.7 % of 2 891−24.6 pts median 90.3 %96.5 % of 1 895+3.2 pts median 93.4 %1.2 % of 1 7514.6 % of 1 899
Catarina VIEIRA NetherlandsGreens98.9 % of 2 891+3.8 pts median 95.1 %97.9 % of 2 860+0.7 pts median 97.2 %1.4 % of 2 7983.7 % of 2 860
Caterina CHINNICI ItalyEPP78.2 % of 2 891−12.8 pts median 91.0 %95.5 % of 2 260+2.0 pts median 93.5 %3.7 % of 2 1611.2 % of 2 260
Catherine GRISET FrancePatriots99.5 % of 2 891+6.2 pts median 93.3 %93.1 % of 2 870+10.0 pts median 83.1 %0.4 % of 2 31211.0 % of 2 876
Cecilia STRADA ItalyS&D88.3 % of 2 891−1.7 pts median 90.0 %93.8 % of 2 552−2.7 pts median 96.5 %5.9 % of 2 5292.8 % of 2 554
Céline IMART FranceEPP91.7 % of 2 891+0.7 pts median 91.0 %70.4 % of 2 650−23.2 pts median 93.5 %28.2 % of 2 5215.1 % of 2 650
César LUENA SpainS&D88.0 % of 2 891−2.1 pts median 90.0 %98.2 % of 2 541+1.7 pts median 96.5 %1.4 % of 2 5161.9 % of 2 543
Charles GOERENS LuxembourgRenew89.2 % of 2 891−1.9 pts median 91.1 %96.9 % of 2 579+1.0 pts median 96.0 %2.0 % of 2 5141.0 % of 2 579
Charlie WEIMERS SwedenECR97.7 % of 2 891+5.6 pts median 92.1 %74.7 % of 2 818−16.8 pts median 91.5 %22.5 % of 2 4568.0 % of 2 825
Chiara GEMMA ItalyECR98.6 % of 2 891+6.4 pts median 92.1 %93.3 % of 2 842+1.8 pts median 91.5 %1.0 % of 2 48411.1 % of 2 850
Chloé RIDEL FranceS&D62.3 % of 2 891−27.7 pts median 90.0 %95.8 % of 1 801−0.7 pts median 96.5 %3.9 % of 1 7882.7 % of 1 802
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&D95.4 % of 2 891+5.4 pts median 90.0 %92.6 % of 2 758−3.9 pts median 96.5 %7.1 % of 2 7353.6 % of 2 759
Christian DOLESCHAL GermanyEPP89.7 % of 2 891−1.3 pts median 91.0 %97.1 % of 2 593+3.5 pts median 93.5 %1.9 % of 2 4680.8 % of 2 593
Christian EHLER GermanyEPP87.6 % of 2 891−3.4 pts median 91.0 %97.5 % of 2 533+4.0 pts median 93.5 %1.8 % of 2 4060.4 % of 2 533
Christine ANDERSON GermanyESN99.3 % of 2 891+9.0 pts median 90.3 %99.7 % of 2 867+4.8 pts median 94.9 %0.1 % of 2 7299.5 % of 2 870
Christine SINGER GermanyRenew94.2 % of 2 891+3.1 pts median 91.1 %80.1 % of 2 722−15.9 pts median 96.0 %19.2 % of 2 6524.4 % of 2 722
Christophe BAY FrancePatriots98.8 % of 2 891+5.4 pts median 93.3 %92.8 % of 2 848+9.7 pts median 83.1 %0.6 % of 2 29511.1 % of 2 855
Christophe CLERGEAU FranceS&D80.8 % of 2 891−9.3 pts median 90.0 %94.3 % of 2 333−2.2 pts median 96.5 %5.3 % of 2 3112.6 % of 2 335
Christophe GOMART FranceEPP94.7 % of 2 891+3.8 pts median 91.0 %66.7 % of 2 739−26.8 pts median 93.5 %31.3 % of 2 6074.9 % of 2 739
Christophe GRUDLER FranceRenew96.3 % of 2 891+5.2 pts median 91.1 %96.0 % of 2 783+0.1 pts median 96.0 %2.7 % of 2 7130.9 % of 2 783
Ciaran MULLOOLY IrelandRenew83.7 % of 2 891−7.4 pts median 91.1 %85.6 % of 2 420−10.4 pts median 96.0 %13.5 % of 2 3645.6 % of 2 420
Claire FITA FranceS&D66.3 % of 2 891−23.7 pts median 90.0 %95.3 % of 1 915−1.2 pts median 96.5 %4.2 % of 1 9012.3 % of 1 916
Claudiu MANDA RomaniaS&D54.5 % of 2 891−35.5 pts median 90.0 %92.7 % of 1 575−3.8 pts median 96.5 %6.9 % of 1 5555.3 % of 1 576
Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU RomaniaECR95.4 % of 2 891+3.2 pts median 92.1 %89.9 % of 2 749−1.6 pts median 91.5 %6.5 % of 2 41110.1 % of 2 757
Costas MAVRIDES CyprusS&D64.9 % of 2 891−25.2 pts median 90.0 %94.9 % of 1 873−1.6 pts median 96.5 %5.0 % of 1 8522.1 % of 1 875
Cristian TERHEŞ RomaniaECR78.6 % of 2 891−13.6 pts median 92.1 %85.7 % of 2 266−5.8 pts median 91.5 %9.8 % of 1 9957.3 % of 2 272
Cristina GUARDA ItalyGreens89.9 % of 2 891−5.2 pts median 95.1 %91.8 % of 2 600−5.4 pts median 97.2 %7.2 % of 2 5543.5 % of 2 600
Cristina MAESTRE SpainS&D91.1 % of 2 891+1.1 pts median 90.0 %98.1 % of 2 633+1.6 pts median 96.5 %1.3 % of 2 6081.6 % of 2 635
Csaba DÖMÖTÖR HungaryPatriots90.8 % of 2 891−2.5 pts median 93.3 %80.8 % of 2 620−2.3 pts median 83.1 %10.9 % of 2 11413.3 % of 2 626
Csaba MOLNÁR HungaryS&D72.3 % of 2 891−17.7 pts median 90.0 %96.1 % of 2 089−0.4 pts median 96.5 %3.6 % of 2 0731.1 % of 2 091
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ IrelandRenew98.1 % of 2 891+7.1 pts median 91.1 %91.6 % of 2 837−4.3 pts median 96.0 %7.5 % of 2 7660.8 % of 2 837
Dainius ŽALIMAS LithuaniaRenew86.7 % of 2 891−4.4 pts median 91.1 %98.5 % of 2 506+2.5 pts median 96.0 %0.9 % of 2 4400.5 % of 2 506
Damian BOESELAGER GermanyGreens97.5 % of 2 891+2.4 pts median 95.1 %96.8 % of 2 819−0.4 pts median 97.2 %1.8 % of 2 7584.5 % of 2 819
Damien CARÊME FranceThe Left91.5 % of 2 891+1.1 pts median 90.3 %94.4 % of 2 640+1.0 pts median 93.4 %1.8 % of 2 4534.8 % of 2 644
Dan BARNA RomaniaRenew82.8 % of 2 891−8.3 pts median 91.1 %97.7 % of 2 393+1.8 pts median 96.0 %1.6 % of 2 3230.7 % of 2 393
Dan NICA RomaniaS&D61.8 % of 2 891−28.2 pts median 90.0 %95.2 % of 1 786−1.3 pts median 96.5 %4.6 % of 1 7702.5 % of 1 788
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU RomaniaEPP91.8 % of 2 891+0.8 pts median 91.0 %96.7 % of 2 654+3.2 pts median 93.5 %2.0 % of 2 5241.1 % of 2 654
Daniel ATTARD MaltaS&D84.3 % of 2 891−5.7 pts median 90.0 %84.0 % of 2 436−12.5 pts median 96.5 %15.7 % of 2 4106.5 % of 2 438
Daniel BUDA RomaniaEPP93.8 % of 2 891+2.9 pts median 91.0 %97.4 % of 2 713+3.8 pts median 93.5 %1.7 % of 2 5800.7 % of 2 713
Daniel FREUND GermanyGreens98.7 % of 2 891+3.6 pts median 95.1 %98.2 % of 2 854+0.9 pts median 97.2 %0.9 % of 2 7913.9 % of 2 854
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.