Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

727 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Susanna CECCARDI ItalyPatriots96.9 % of 2 521+6.5 pts median 90.4 %83.9 % of 2 435+0.8 pts median 83.1 %8.7 % of 1 91511.5 % of 2 443
Sven MIKSER EstoniaS&D97.5 % of 2 521+7.4 pts median 90.1 %97.1 % of 2 458+1.3 pts median 95.8 %1.7 % of 2 4032.8 % of 2 458
Sven SIMON GermanyEPP81.8 % of 2 521−9.2 pts median 91.0 %98.0 % of 2 062+4.2 pts median 93.7 %1.3 % of 2 0090.2 % of 2 062
Svenja HAHN GermanyRenew96.0 % of 2 521+4.3 pts median 91.7 %91.9 % of 2 419−3.2 pts median 95.1 %6.1 % of 2 3462.7 % of 2 421
Tamás DEUTSCH HungaryPatriots31.0 % of 2 521−59.4 pts median 90.4 %77.4 % of 779−5.7 pts median 83.1 %14.9 % of 61617.4 % of 782
Taner KABILOV changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.BulgariaECR77.3 % of 2 521—no group line85.1 % of 542—no group line11.4 % of 4633.1 % of 1 949
Terry REINTKE GermanyGreens96.5 % of 2 521+4.1 pts median 92.5 %99.4 % of 2 434+1.9 pts median 97.5 %0.2 % of 2 4034.7 % of 2 434
Thierry MARIANI FrancePatriots94.8 % of 2 521+4.4 pts median 90.4 %90.0 % of 2 381+6.9 pts median 83.1 %2.4 % of 1 88111.4 % of 2 389
Thijs REUTEN NetherlandsS&D97.4 % of 2 521+7.3 pts median 90.1 %94.7 % of 2 456−1.2 pts median 95.8 %4.2 % of 2 4021.9 % of 2 456
Thomas BAJADA MaltaS&D67.7 % of 2 521−22.5 pts median 90.1 %87.9 % of 1 706−8.0 pts median 95.8 %11.1 % of 1 6696.5 % of 1 706
Thomas GEISEL GermanyNo group87.6 % of 2 521—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 22.5 % of 2 208
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN FranceS&D97.1 % of 2 521+7.0 pts median 90.1 %91.9 % of 2 448−4.0 pts median 95.8 %7.1 % of 2 3962.0 % of 2 448
Thomas WAITZ AustriaGreens99.4 % of 2 521+6.9 pts median 92.5 %98.1 % of 2 505+0.7 pts median 97.5 %1.0 % of 2 4645.7 % of 2 506
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PortugalPatriots96.3 % of 2 521+5.9 pts median 90.4 %85.5 % of 2 421+2.4 pts median 83.1 %6.3 % of 1 91811.6 % of 2 427
Tiemo WÖLKEN GermanyS&D72.7 % of 2 521−17.4 pts median 90.1 %96.3 % of 1 833+0.5 pts median 95.8 %2.8 % of 1 7981.0 % of 1 833
Tilly METZ LuxembourgGreens92.7 % of 2 521+0.2 pts median 92.5 %93.6 % of 2 335−3.9 pts median 97.5 %5.7 % of 2 3022.9 % of 2 336
Tineke STRIK NetherlandsGreens87.3 % of 2 521−5.1 pts median 92.5 %98.5 % of 2 201+1.1 pts median 97.5 %1.1 % of 2 1665.5 % of 2 202
Tobias CREMER GermanyS&D87.1 % of 2 521−3.1 pts median 90.1 %97.5 % of 2 195+1.7 pts median 95.8 %1.6 % of 2 1431.4 % of 2 195
Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI PolandECR80.8 % of 2 521−11.1 pts median 91.9 %88.6 % of 2 031−1.9 pts median 90.5 %4.7 % of 1 7508.8 % of 2 036
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE BelgiumPatriots97.5 % of 2 521+7.1 pts median 90.4 %83.4 % of 2 451+0.3 pts median 83.1 %8.2 % of 1 94711.4 % of 2 459
Tomáš KUBÍN CzechiaPatriots94.2 % of 2 521+3.8 pts median 90.4 %75.5 % of 2 368−7.6 pts median 83.1 %17.1 % of 1 87815.4 % of 2 375
Tomas TOBÉ SwedenEPP99.6 % of 2 521+8.6 pts median 91.0 %91.2 % of 2 511−2.5 pts median 93.7 %7.6 % of 2 4081.4 % of 2 511
Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ CzechiaEPP87.7 % of 2 521−3.3 pts median 91.0 %93.7 % of 2 210±0.0 pts median 93.7 %5.4 % of 2 1381.5 % of 2 210
Tomasz BUCZEK changed group PolandPatriots97.8 % of 2 521+7.4 pts median 90.4 %83.2 % of 2 457±0.0 pts median 83.1 %8.2 % of 1 93911.6 % of 2 465
Tomasz FROELICH GermanyESN98.7 % of 2 521+3.2 pts median 95.5 %93.5 % of 2 484±0.0 pts median 93.5 %4.3 % of 2 33910.6 % of 2 488
Tomislav SOKOL CroatiaEPP85.8 % of 2 521−5.2 pts median 91.0 %83.5 % of 2 162−10.2 pts median 93.7 %14.7 % of 2 0662.5 % of 2 162
Ton DIEPEVEEN NetherlandsPatriots94.7 % of 2 521+4.3 pts median 90.4 %79.5 % of 2 380−3.6 pts median 83.1 %12.1 % of 1 8757.1 % of 2 388
Tonino PICULA CroatiaS&D95.6 % of 2 521+5.4 pts median 90.1 %90.6 % of 2 409−5.2 pts median 95.8 %8.4 % of 2 3574.4 % of 2 409
Tsvetelina PENKOVA BulgariaS&D82.8 % of 2 521−7.3 pts median 90.1 %97.8 % of 2 088+2.0 pts median 95.8 %1.9 % of 2 0392.1 % of 2 088
Udo BULLMANN GermanyS&D93.8 % of 2 521+3.7 pts median 90.1 %96.5 % of 2 365+0.7 pts median 95.8 %2.5 % of 2 3161.9 % of 2 365
Ufuk KÂHYA NetherlandsGreens98.3 % of 645+5.8 pts median 92.5 %99.1 % of 634+1.6 pts median 97.5 %0.5 % of 6233.0 % of 634
Urmas PAET EstoniaRenew78.7 % of 2 521−13.1 pts median 91.7 %95.0 % of 1 983−0.1 pts median 95.1 %3.7 % of 1 9242.4 % of 1 984
Valentina PALMISANO ItalyThe Left99.0 % of 2 521+10.9 pts median 88.2 %92.3 % of 2 491−1.3 pts median 93.6 %5.4 % of 2 3136.6 % of 2 497
Valérie DELOGE FrancePatriots97.1 % of 2 521+6.7 pts median 90.4 %91.0 % of 2 439+7.9 pts median 83.1 %1.5 % of 1 94110.9 % of 2 447
Valérie DEVAUX FranceRenew98.9 % of 2 521+7.2 pts median 91.7 %95.7 % of 2 492+0.6 pts median 95.1 %3.0 % of 2 4171.3 % of 2 494
Valérie HAYER FranceRenew96.7 % of 2 521+4.9 pts median 91.7 %98.1 % of 2 435+3.0 pts median 95.1 %0.9 % of 2 3630.8 % of 2 437
Vangelis MEIMARAKIS GreeceEPP77.5 % of 2 521−13.4 pts median 91.0 %93.5 % of 1 955−0.3 pts median 93.7 %4.6 % of 1 8782.5 % of 1 955
Vasile DÎNCU RomaniaS&D97.2 % of 2 521+7.1 pts median 90.1 %97.1 % of 2 451+1.2 pts median 95.8 %2.3 % of 2 3981.8 % of 2 451
Verena MERTENS GermanyEPP86.2 % of 2 521−4.8 pts median 91.0 %98.8 % of 2 172+5.1 pts median 93.7 %0.7 % of 2 1030.5 % of 2 172
Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ SlovakiaRenew64.2 % of 2 521−27.6 pts median 91.7 %95.6 % of 1 616+0.5 pts median 95.1 %3.0 % of 1 5620.8 % of 1 618
Veronika VRECIONOVÁ CzechiaECR87.4 % of 2 521−4.5 pts median 91.9 %81.2 % of 2 197−9.3 pts median 90.5 %15.8 % of 1 92910.6 % of 2 203
Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ SpainGreens99.0 % of 2 521+6.6 pts median 92.5 %89.8 % of 2 496−7.7 pts median 97.5 %9.4 % of 2 4553.1 % of 2 497
Victor NEGRESCU RomaniaS&D77.0 % of 2 521−13.2 pts median 90.1 %94.9 % of 1 940−0.9 pts median 95.8 %4.2 % of 1 8884.0 % of 1 940
Viktor WEISZ HungaryEPP93.3 % of 891+2.3 pts median 91.0 %91.3 % of 831−2.4 pts median 93.7 %6.1 % of 7985.5 % of 831
Viktória FERENC HungaryPatriots77.2 % of 2 521−13.2 pts median 90.4 %78.7 % of 1 939−4.4 pts median 83.1 %14.1 % of 1 54517.0 % of 1 945
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ LithuaniaS&D89.9 % of 2 521−0.2 pts median 90.1 %99.0 % of 2 267+3.1 pts median 95.8 %0.5 % of 2 2151.4 % of 2 267
Vilis KRIŠTOPANS LatviaPatriots93.3 % of 2 521+2.9 pts median 90.4 %87.0 % of 2 345+3.9 pts median 83.1 %5.2 % of 1 85810.4 % of 2 353
Ville NIINISTÖ FinlandGreens60.3 % of 2 521−32.1 pts median 92.5 %99.3 % of 1 520+1.8 pts median 97.5 %0.5 % of 1 4976.0 % of 1 521
Villy SØVNDAL DenmarkGreens96.4 % of 2 521+3.9 pts median 92.5 %98.5 % of 2 428+1.0 pts median 97.5 %0.9 % of 2 3885.2 % of 2 429
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU RomaniaEPP96.8 % of 2 521+5.8 pts median 91.0 %97.8 % of 2 441+4.1 pts median 93.7 %0.6 % of 2 3411.7 % of 2 441
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.