Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

727 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Patryk JAKI PolandECR86.7 % of 2 521−5.2 pts median 91.9 %89.2 % of 2 179−1.3 pts median 90.5 %5.3 % of 1 8858.2 % of 2 185
Paulius SAUDARGAS LithuaniaEPP99.2 % of 2 521+8.3 pts median 91.0 %95.1 % of 2 502+1.4 pts median 93.7 %3.5 % of 2 3992.6 % of 2 502
Paulo CUNHA PortugalEPP97.8 % of 2 521+6.8 pts median 91.0 %95.6 % of 2 465+1.9 pts median 93.7 %2.8 % of 2 3633.1 % of 2 465
Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL PortugalEPP87.3 % of 2 521−3.6 pts median 91.0 %95.7 % of 2 202+2.0 pts median 93.7 %2.9 % of 2 1112.8 % of 2 202
Pekka TOVERI FinlandEPP90.8 % of 2 521−0.2 pts median 91.0 %98.1 % of 2 290+4.4 pts median 93.7 %1.4 % of 2 2110.7 % of 2 290
Per CLAUSEN DenmarkThe Left91.4 % of 2 521+3.3 pts median 88.2 %87.5 % of 2 299−6.1 pts median 93.6 %9.1 % of 2 1294.5 % of 2 305
Pernando BARRENA ARZA SpainThe Left56.8 % of 2 521−31.3 pts median 88.2 %95.4 % of 1 428+1.8 pts median 93.6 %2.4 % of 1 3325.8 % of 1 433
Petar VOLGIN BulgariaESN98.9 % of 2 521+3.4 pts median 95.5 %89.1 % of 2 489−4.4 pts median 93.5 %7.9 % of 2 3407.6 % of 2 493
Peter AGIUS MaltaEPP67.3 % of 2 521−23.7 pts median 91.0 %95.4 % of 1 697+1.7 pts median 93.7 %3.0 % of 1 6292.1 % of 1 697
Peter LIESE GermanyEPP90.2 % of 2 521−0.8 pts median 91.0 %97.6 % of 2 273+3.9 pts median 93.7 %1.5 % of 2 1870.6 % of 2 273
Petr BYSTRON GermanyESN86.1 % of 2 521−9.4 pts median 95.5 %97.4 % of 2 167+3.9 pts median 93.5 %2.1 % of 2 0617.4 % of 2 171
Petra STEGER AustriaPatriots99.0 % of 2 521+8.6 pts median 90.4 %76.7 % of 2 489−6.4 pts median 83.1 %15.7 % of 1 96215.3 % of 2 497
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS LithuaniaRenew99.5 % of 2 521+7.8 pts median 91.7 %97.8 % of 2 507+2.7 pts median 95.1 %1.4 % of 2 4321.2 % of 2 509
Petras GRAŽULIS LithuaniaESN80.6 % of 2 521−14.9 pts median 95.5 %74.9 % of 2 029−18.6 pts median 93.5 %21.6 % of 1 90018.8 % of 2 033
Philippe OLIVIER FrancePatriots83.4 % of 2 521−7.0 pts median 90.4 %90.8 % of 2 094+7.7 pts median 83.1 %1.9 % of 1 66911.7 % of 2 102
Pierfrancesco MARAN ItalyS&D95.6 % of 2 521+5.5 pts median 90.1 %96.5 % of 2 410+0.7 pts median 95.8 %2.5 % of 2 3652.2 % of 2 410
Pierre JOUVET FranceS&D80.2 % of 2 521−10.0 pts median 90.1 %90.5 % of 2 021−5.3 pts median 95.8 %8.5 % of 1 9722.2 % of 2 021
Pierre PIMPIE FrancePatriots99.7 % of 2 521+9.3 pts median 90.4 %90.9 % of 2 506+7.8 pts median 83.1 %1.5 % of 1 97311.2 % of 2 514
Pierre-Romain THIONNET FrancePatriots90.7 % of 2 521+0.3 pts median 90.4 %91.9 % of 2 280+8.8 pts median 83.1 %0.6 % of 1 81110.8 % of 2 287
Pietro FIOCCHI ItalyECR85.8 % of 2 521−6.1 pts median 91.9 %92.0 % of 2 157+1.6 pts median 90.5 %2.1 % of 1 86911.5 % of 2 162
Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA SpainEPP71.3 % of 2 521−19.7 pts median 91.0 %92.4 % of 1 797−1.3 pts median 93.7 %6.0 % of 1 7272.7 % of 1 797
Pina PICIERNO changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.ItalyRenew81.3 % of 2 521not compared median 90.1 %96.2 % of 2 048not compared median 95.8 %2.7 % of 1 9971.8 % of 2 049
Piotr MÜLLER PolandECR75.5 % of 2 521−16.3 pts median 91.9 %90.4 % of 1 899±0.0 pts median 90.5 %3.6 % of 1 6429.0 % of 1 904
Rachel BLOM NetherlandsPatriots99.6 % of 2 521+9.2 pts median 90.4 %79.6 % of 2 504−3.5 pts median 83.1 %11.7 % of 1 9747.8 % of 2 512
Rada LAYKOVA BulgariaESN85.8 % of 2 521−9.7 pts median 95.5 %92.9 % of 2 160−0.6 pts median 93.5 %4.5 % of 2 0397.9 % of 2 164
Radan KANEV BulgariaEPP67.8 % of 2 521−23.2 pts median 91.0 %87.5 % of 1 709−6.2 pts median 93.7 %11.0 % of 1 6437.6 % of 1 709
Raffaele STANCANELLI ItalyPatriots69.1 % of 2 521−21.3 pts median 90.4 %82.7 % of 1 737−0.4 pts median 83.1 %9.2 % of 1 36114.0 % of 1 741
Raffaele TOPO ItalyS&D96.7 % of 2 521+6.6 pts median 90.1 %95.8 % of 2 438−0.1 pts median 95.8 %3.4 % of 2 3872.0 % of 2 438
Ralf SEEKATZ GermanyEPP86.9 % of 2 521−4.1 pts median 91.0 %98.9 % of 2 190+5.2 pts median 93.7 %0.4 % of 2 0990.8 % of 2 190
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN FranceS&D89.5 % of 2 521−0.6 pts median 90.1 %91.7 % of 2 257−4.2 pts median 95.8 %7.2 % of 2 2081.9 % of 2 257
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE NetherlandsRenew99.8 % of 2 521+8.1 pts median 91.7 %97.2 % of 2 515+2.1 pts median 95.1 %1.7 % of 2 4400.3 % of 2 517
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ LithuaniaEPP75.7 % of 2 521−15.3 pts median 91.0 %97.8 % of 1 909+4.1 pts median 93.7 %1.2 % of 1 8500.6 % of 1 909
Rasmus ANDRESEN GermanyGreens91.4 % of 2 521−1.1 pts median 92.5 %97.2 % of 2 302−0.2 pts median 97.5 %2.1 % of 2 2654.8 % of 2 303
Rasmus NORDQVIST DenmarkGreens99.8 % of 2 521+7.3 pts median 92.5 %98.8 % of 2 515+1.3 pts median 97.5 %0.8 % of 2 4755.5 % of 2 516
Raúl DE LA HOZ QUINTANO SpainEPP91.2 % of 2 521+0.2 pts median 91.0 %94.3 % of 2 300+0.6 pts median 93.7 %4.1 % of 2 2152.4 % of 2 300
Regina DOHERTY IrelandEPP89.0 % of 2 521−2.0 pts median 91.0 %94.6 % of 2 243+0.9 pts median 93.7 %4.9 % of 2 1631.7 % of 2 243
Reinhold LOPATKA AustriaEPP96.6 % of 2 521+5.6 pts median 91.0 %95.2 % of 2 435+1.4 pts median 93.7 %3.5 % of 2 3372.6 % of 2 435
Reinier VAN LANSCHOT NetherlandsGreens97.5 % of 2 521+5.0 pts median 92.5 %97.4 % of 2 457−0.1 pts median 97.5 %2.2 % of 2 4165.3 % of 2 458
Reinis POZŅAKS LatviaECR93.8 % of 2 521+1.9 pts median 91.9 %88.0 % of 2 358−2.5 pts median 90.5 %8.4 % of 2 03910.4 % of 2 364
René AUST GermanyESN94.0 % of 2 521−1.5 pts median 95.5 %98.7 % of 2 367+5.3 pts median 93.5 %0.9 % of 2 2357.0 % of 2 371
René REPASI GermanyS&D97.3 % of 2 521+7.2 pts median 90.1 %97.4 % of 2 454+1.6 pts median 95.8 %1.8 % of 2 3991.4 % of 2 454
Rihards KOLS LatviaECR86.7 % of 2 521−5.2 pts median 91.9 %87.1 % of 2 180−3.4 pts median 90.5 %9.9 % of 1 89911.5 % of 2 186
Riho TERRAS EstoniaEPP79.9 % of 2 521−11.1 pts median 91.0 %95.4 % of 2 015+1.7 pts median 93.7 %4.2 % of 1 9731.0 % of 2 015
Rima HASSAN FranceThe Left85.2 % of 2 521−3.0 pts median 88.2 %95.3 % of 2 141+1.8 pts median 93.6 %1.4 % of 2 0005.1 % of 2 148
Robert BIEDROŃ PolandS&D99.6 % of 2 521+9.5 pts median 90.1 %97.7 % of 2 511+1.9 pts median 95.8 %1.3 % of 2 4561.4 % of 2 511
Roberta METSOLA No vote recorded while in office in this period (not the same as absent: chairing the sittings, as the President does, looks the same).MaltaEPP0.0 % of 2 521not compared median 91.0 %no votes not compared median 93.7 %no votes no votes
Roberto VANNACCI changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.ItalyESN98.9 % of 2 521not compared median 95.5 %87.4 % of 2 298not compared median 93.5 %9.0 % of 2 14610.4 % of 2 493
Roberts ZĪLE LatviaECR86.0 % of 2 521−5.8 pts median 91.9 %86.2 % of 2 165−4.3 pts median 90.5 %10.4 % of 1 89311.5 % of 2 169
Rody TOLASSY FrancePatriots87.3 % of 2 521−3.1 pts median 90.4 %90.5 % of 2 193+7.4 pts median 83.1 %1.7 % of 1 71711.5 % of 2 200
Roman HAIDER AustriaPatriots99.6 % of 2 521+9.2 pts median 90.4 %76.6 % of 2 502−6.5 pts median 83.1 %15.8 % of 1 97415.3 % of 2 510
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.