Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

727 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Mohammed CHAHIM NetherlandsS&D74.7 % of 2 521−15.4 pts median 90.1 %92.6 % of 1 884−3.3 pts median 95.8 %6.6 % of 1 8501.9 % of 1 884
Monika BEŇOVÁ SlovakiaNo group81.8 % of 2 521—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 14.8 % of 2 061
Monika HOHLMEIER GermanyEPP83.5 % of 2 521−7.5 pts median 91.0 %96.3 % of 2 104+2.6 pts median 93.7 %2.7 % of 2 0271.5 % of 2 104
Moritz KÖRNER GermanyRenew98.3 % of 2 521+6.5 pts median 91.7 %92.6 % of 2 475−2.5 pts median 95.1 %5.6 % of 2 4012.3 % of 2 477
Morten LØKKEGAARD DenmarkRenew94.3 % of 2 521+2.5 pts median 91.7 %88.3 % of 2 375−6.8 pts median 95.1 %10.4 % of 2 3043.9 % of 2 377
Mounir SATOURI FranceGreens75.4 % of 2 521−17.1 pts median 92.5 %93.1 % of 1 899−4.4 pts median 97.5 %5.9 % of 1 8622.9 % of 1 900
Murielle LAURENT FranceS&D95.9 % of 2 521+5.8 pts median 90.1 %91.6 % of 2 417−4.2 pts median 95.8 %7.5 % of 2 3652.2 % of 2 417
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR SpainS&D99.0 % of 2 521+8.8 pts median 90.1 %95.0 % of 2 495−0.8 pts median 95.8 %3.9 % of 2 4403.0 % of 2 495
Nadine MORANO FranceEPP94.9 % of 2 521+3.9 pts median 91.0 %79.5 % of 2 392−14.2 pts median 93.7 %19.1 % of 2 2904.8 % of 2 392
Nathalie LOISEAU FranceRenew88.9 % of 2 521−2.9 pts median 91.7 %94.9 % of 2 238−0.2 pts median 95.1 %3.7 % of 2 1691.6 % of 2 240
Nela RIEHL GermanyGreens99.4 % of 2 521+7.0 pts median 92.5 %97.4 % of 2 506−0.1 pts median 97.5 %2.2 % of 2 4655.3 % of 2 507
Niclas HERBST GermanyEPP97.0 % of 2 521+6.0 pts median 91.0 %97.7 % of 2 445+4.0 pts median 93.7 %1.4 % of 2 3461.3 % of 2 445
Nicola PROCACCINI ItalyECR83.5 % of 2 521−8.4 pts median 91.9 %92.3 % of 2 099+1.9 pts median 90.5 %1.8 % of 1 81611.5 % of 2 105
Nicola ZINGARETTI ItalyS&D86.2 % of 2 521−3.9 pts median 90.1 %96.7 % of 2 173+0.8 pts median 95.8 %2.7 % of 2 1291.9 % of 2 173
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ RomaniaGreens65.4 % of 2 521−27.1 pts median 92.5 %97.6 % of 1 648+0.1 pts median 97.5 %1.8 % of 1 6134.2 % of 1 649
Nicolas BAY FranceECR96.2 % of 2 521+4.4 pts median 91.9 %78.8 % of 2 420−11.7 pts median 90.5 %16.4 % of 2 1087.4 % of 2 426
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES SpainS&D78.7 % of 2 521−11.4 pts median 90.1 %97.5 % of 1 984+1.6 pts median 95.8 %1.7 % of 1 9411.3 % of 1 984
Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE SpainEPP87.3 % of 2 521−3.6 pts median 91.0 %93.1 % of 2 202−0.7 pts median 93.7 %4.8 % of 2 1023.2 % of 2 202
Niels Flemming HANSEN DenmarkEPP99.3 % of 2 521+8.3 pts median 91.0 %87.7 % of 2 504−6.0 pts median 93.7 %11.3 % of 2 4022.9 % of 2 504
Niels FUGLSANG DenmarkS&D89.4 % of 2 521−0.7 pts median 90.1 %88.1 % of 2 254−7.7 pts median 95.8 %11.0 % of 2 2022.9 % of 2 254
Niels GEUKING GermanyEPP98.8 % of 2 521+7.9 pts median 91.0 %99.0 % of 2 492+5.3 pts median 93.7 %0.2 % of 2 4021.0 % of 2 492
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.CzechiaECR86.0 % of 2 521—no group line84.9 % of 794—no group line10.6 % of 6829.0 % of 2 169
Nikola MINCHEV BulgariaRenew96.5 % of 2 521+4.8 pts median 91.7 %96.5 % of 2 431+1.4 pts median 95.1 %2.5 % of 2 3581.6 % of 2 433
Nikolaos ANADIOTIS GreeceNo group95.1 % of 2 521—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 19.3 % of 2 397
Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.GreeceS&D67.1 % of 2 521not compared median 88.2 %93.1 % of 1 689not compared median 93.6 %5.3 % of 1 6122.4 % of 1 691
Nikolina BRNJAC CroatiaEPP56.8 % of 2 521−34.2 pts median 91.0 %92.3 % of 1 432−1.4 pts median 93.7 %6.3 % of 1 3861.4 % of 1 432
Nikos PAPANDREOU GreeceS&D76.8 % of 2 521−13.3 pts median 90.1 %93.0 % of 1 937−2.9 pts median 95.8 %6.5 % of 1 8862.0 % of 1 937
Nikos PAPPAS GreeceThe Left71.9 % of 2 521−16.3 pts median 88.2 %91.0 % of 1 811−2.6 pts median 93.6 %6.5 % of 1 6865.8 % of 1 813
Nils UŠAKOVS LatviaS&D88.1 % of 2 521−2.0 pts median 90.1 %94.6 % of 2 222−1.2 pts median 95.8 %4.8 % of 2 1731.1 % of 2 222
Nina CARBERRY IrelandEPP91.0 % of 2 521±0.0 pts median 91.0 %94.1 % of 2 295+0.4 pts median 93.7 %5.4 % of 2 2161.6 % of 2 295
Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group SpainECR91.2 % of 2 521−0.7 pts median 91.9 %92.1 % of 2 294+1.6 pts median 90.5 %4.4 % of 1 98210.7 % of 2 299
Nora MEBAREK FranceS&D86.1 % of 2 521−4.0 pts median 90.1 %91.8 % of 2 171−4.1 pts median 95.8 %7.5 % of 2 1232.2 % of 2 171
Norbert HERHAMMER GermanyEPP72.5 % of 891−18.5 pts median 91.0 %98.1 % of 646+4.4 pts median 93.7 %1.1 % of 6140.8 % of 646
Norbert LINS GermanyEPP98.9 % of 2 521+7.9 pts median 91.0 %98.0 % of 2 493+4.3 pts median 93.7 %1.0 % of 2 3891.0 % of 2 493
Oihane AGIRREGOITIA MARTÍNEZ SpainRenew99.1 % of 2 521+7.3 pts median 91.7 %95.9 % of 2 496+0.8 pts median 95.1 %3.6 % of 2 4212.0 % of 2 498
Oliver SCHENK GermanyEPP99.5 % of 2 521+8.5 pts median 91.0 %98.5 % of 2 509+4.8 pts median 93.7 %0.7 % of 2 4051.0 % of 2 509
Olivier CHASTEL BelgiumRenew83.0 % of 2 521−8.7 pts median 91.7 %95.0 % of 2 092−0.1 pts median 95.1 %3.6 % of 2 0341.2 % of 2 093
Ondřej DOSTÁL CzechiaNo group87.7 % of 2 521—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 16.7 % of 2 212
Ondřej KNOTEK CzechiaPatriots90.9 % of 2 521+0.5 pts median 90.4 %73.7 % of 2 286−9.4 pts median 83.1 %19.3 % of 1 79615.2 % of 2 292
Ondřej KOLÁŘ CzechiaEPP96.8 % of 2 521+5.8 pts median 91.0 %91.4 % of 2 440−2.3 pts median 93.7 %7.2 % of 2 3455.6 % of 2 440
Ondřej KRUTÍLEK CzechiaECR94.6 % of 2 521+2.8 pts median 91.9 %81.4 % of 2 380−9.0 pts median 90.5 %15.3 % of 2 07010.2 % of 2 386
Özlem DEMIREL GermanyThe Left80.3 % of 2 521−7.9 pts median 88.2 %95.3 % of 2 019+1.7 pts median 93.6 %2.1 % of 1 8844.9 % of 2 025
Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA SpainEPP94.2 % of 2 521+3.2 pts median 91.0 %93.2 % of 2 375−0.5 pts median 93.7 %4.8 % of 2 2732.6 % of 2 375
Paolo BORCHIA ItalyPatriots99.3 % of 2 521+8.9 pts median 90.4 %83.6 % of 2 496+0.5 pts median 83.1 %8.5 % of 1 96511.8 % of 2 504
Paolo INSELVINI ItalyECR90.0 % of 2 521−1.9 pts median 91.9 %92.9 % of 2 264+2.4 pts median 90.5 %1.4 % of 1 96711.7 % of 2 268
Pär HOLMGREN SwedenGreens90.5 % of 2 521−2.0 pts median 92.5 %97.3 % of 2 281−0.1 pts median 97.5 %2.1 % of 2 2474.9 % of 2 281
Pascal ARIMONT BelgiumEPP98.0 % of 2 521+7.0 pts median 91.0 %91.5 % of 2 471−2.2 pts median 93.7 %6.7 % of 2 3693.5 % of 2 471
Pascal CANFIN FranceRenew82.2 % of 2 521−9.5 pts median 91.7 %96.2 % of 2 071+1.1 pts median 95.1 %2.8 % of 2 0131.2 % of 2 073
Pascale PIERA FrancePatriots71.8 % of 2 521−18.6 pts median 90.4 %90.9 % of 1 804+7.8 pts median 83.1 %1.0 % of 1 41011.3 % of 1 810
Pasquale TRIDICO ItalyThe Left96.8 % of 2 521+8.6 pts median 88.2 %92.4 % of 2 434−1.2 pts median 93.6 %5.6 % of 2 2716.7 % of 2 440
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.