Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

727 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Marit MAIJ NetherlandsS&D99.7 % of 2 521+9.6 pts median 90.1 %94.2 % of 2 513−1.6 pts median 95.8 %4.7 % of 2 4582.0 % of 2 513
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI PolandECR98.8 % of 2 521+6.9 pts median 91.9 %90.5 % of 2 484±0.0 pts median 90.5 %4.1 % of 2 1638.8 % of 2 490
Marjan ŠAREC SloveniaRenew91.4 % of 2 521−0.4 pts median 91.7 %97.8 % of 2 301+2.7 pts median 95.1 %1.6 % of 2 2290.6 % of 2 303
Markéta GREGOROVÁ CzechiaGreens99.6 % of 2 521+7.1 pts median 92.5 %97.2 % of 2 509−0.3 pts median 97.5 %2.0 % of 2 4684.9 % of 2 510
Marko VEŠLIGAJ CroatiaS&D81.0 % of 2 521−9.1 pts median 90.1 %87.3 % of 2 042−8.5 pts median 95.8 %11.5 % of 1 9935.7 % of 2 042
Markus BUCHHEIT GermanyESN93.1 % of 2 521−2.4 pts median 95.5 %96.6 % of 2 344+3.2 pts median 93.5 %2.5 % of 2 2045.8 % of 2 348
Markus FERBER GermanyEPP92.8 % of 2 521+1.8 pts median 91.0 %97.0 % of 2 340+3.2 pts median 93.7 %2.0 % of 2 2501.1 % of 2 340
Marlena MALĄG PolandECR97.4 % of 2 521+5.6 pts median 91.9 %90.4 % of 2 450−0.1 pts median 90.5 %3.6 % of 2 1348.5 % of 2 456
Marta TEMIDO PortugalS&D95.6 % of 2 521+5.5 pts median 90.1 %98.7 % of 2 410+2.9 pts median 95.8 %0.8 % of 2 3551.0 % of 2 410
Marta WCISŁO PolandEPP91.0 % of 2 521±0.0 pts median 91.0 %92.2 % of 2 294−1.5 pts median 93.7 %5.2 % of 2 1952.0 % of 2 294
Martin GÜNTHER GermanyThe Left74.8 % of 2 521−13.4 pts median 88.2 %96.6 % of 1 881+3.0 pts median 93.6 %1.1 % of 1 7404.5 % of 1 885
Martin HÄUSLING GermanyGreens94.0 % of 2 521+1.5 pts median 92.5 %98.4 % of 2 368+0.9 pts median 97.5 %0.9 % of 2 3285.4 % of 2 369
Martin HOJSÍK SlovakiaRenew87.0 % of 2 521−4.8 pts median 91.7 %96.5 % of 2 191+1.4 pts median 95.1 %2.5 % of 2 1350.9 % of 2 193
Martin SCHIRDEWAN GermanyThe Left84.7 % of 2 521−3.5 pts median 88.2 %95.6 % of 2 130+2.0 pts median 93.6 %1.5 % of 1 9885.2 % of 2 136
Martin SONNEBORN GermanyNo group87.1 % of 2 521—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 26.1 % of 2 196
Martine KEMP LuxembourgEPP99.2 % of 2 521+8.3 pts median 91.0 %95.8 % of 2 502+2.1 pts median 93.7 %2.4 % of 2 3992.3 % of 2 502
Mārtiņš STAĶIS LatviaGreens98.9 % of 2 521+6.5 pts median 92.5 %91.9 % of 2 493−5.6 pts median 97.5 %7.4 % of 2 4528.6 % of 2 494
Mary KHAN GermanyESN85.6 % of 2 521−9.9 pts median 95.5 %97.6 % of 2 155+4.2 pts median 93.5 %2.0 % of 2 0237.7 % of 2 159
Massimiliano SALINI ItalyEPP98.6 % of 2 521+7.6 pts median 91.0 %90.5 % of 2 485−3.2 pts median 93.7 %7.8 % of 2 3812.3 % of 2 485
Matej TONIN SloveniaEPP99.2 % of 2 521+8.2 pts median 91.0 %90.7 % of 2 501−3.0 pts median 93.7 %7.5 % of 2 3971.9 % of 2 501
Mathilde ANDROUËT FrancePatriots98.4 % of 2 521+8.0 pts median 90.4 %90.7 % of 2 474+7.6 pts median 83.1 %1.7 % of 1 94711.5 % of 2 480
Matjaž NEMEC SloveniaS&D84.3 % of 2 521−5.8 pts median 90.1 %96.2 % of 2 125+0.4 pts median 95.8 %3.0 % of 2 0762.0 % of 2 125
Matteo RICCI ItalyS&D77.9 % of 2 521−12.2 pts median 90.1 %96.4 % of 1 964+0.6 pts median 95.8 %2.8 % of 1 9232.4 % of 1 964
Matthias ECKE GermanyS&D87.5 % of 2 521−2.6 pts median 90.1 %96.9 % of 2 207+1.1 pts median 95.8 %2.2 % of 2 1591.6 % of 2 207
Matthieu VALET FrancePatriots57.8 % of 2 521−32.6 pts median 90.4 %89.3 % of 1 454+6.2 pts median 83.1 %1.9 % of 1 09211.9 % of 1 458
Mélanie DISDIER FrancePatriots83.8 % of 2 521−6.6 pts median 90.4 %90.7 % of 2 106+7.6 pts median 83.1 %1.5 % of 1 65011.1 % of 2 112
Mélissa CAMARA FranceGreens76.3 % of 2 521−16.2 pts median 92.5 %90.9 % of 1 922−6.6 pts median 97.5 %8.0 % of 1 8852.1 % of 1 923
Merja KYLLÖNEN FinlandThe Left93.7 % of 2 521+5.6 pts median 88.2 %89.5 % of 2 356−4.1 pts median 93.6 %7.1 % of 2 1853.4 % of 2 363
Michael BLOSS GermanyGreens98.9 % of 2 521+6.5 pts median 92.5 %98.1 % of 2 493+0.6 pts median 97.5 %1.3 % of 2 4535.1 % of 2 494
Michael GAHLER GermanyEPP97.3 % of 2 521+6.3 pts median 91.0 %98.2 % of 2 453+4.4 pts median 93.7 %1.0 % of 2 3500.9 % of 2 453
Michael MCNAMARA IrelandRenew81.0 % of 2 521−10.7 pts median 91.7 %81.3 % of 2 042−13.8 pts median 95.1 %18.2 % of 1 9956.5 % of 2 043
Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG GermanyNo group80.2 % of 2 521—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 23.2 % of 2 021
Michał DWORCZYK PolandECR75.6 % of 2 521−16.3 pts median 91.9 %90.8 % of 1 899+0.3 pts median 90.5 %3.5 % of 1 6377.2 % of 1 905
Michał KOBOSKO PolandRenew83.9 % of 2 521−7.9 pts median 91.7 %97.3 % of 2 112+2.2 pts median 95.1 %1.5 % of 2 0481.5 % of 2 114
Michał SZCZERBA PolandEPP96.9 % of 2 521+5.9 pts median 91.0 %92.3 % of 2 443−1.5 pts median 93.7 %5.5 % of 2 3441.6 % of 2 443
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ PolandEPP95.6 % of 2 521+4.6 pts median 91.0 %92.6 % of 2 409−1.1 pts median 93.7 %5.1 % of 2 3051.7 % of 2 409
Michal WIEZIK SlovakiaRenew94.7 % of 2 521+3.0 pts median 91.7 %96.6 % of 2 386+1.5 pts median 95.1 %2.2 % of 2 3140.8 % of 2 388
Michalis HADJIPANTELA CyprusEPP86.1 % of 2 521−4.9 pts median 91.0 %92.2 % of 2 170−1.6 pts median 93.7 %6.3 % of 2 0842.9 % of 2 170
Michele PICARO ItalyECR96.7 % of 2 521+4.9 pts median 91.9 %92.7 % of 2 434+2.3 pts median 90.5 %1.9 % of 2 12211.2 % of 2 439
Mieke ANDRIESE NetherlandsPatriots93.5 % of 2 521+3.1 pts median 90.4 %79.1 % of 2 351−4.0 pts median 83.1 %12.1 % of 1 8448.0 % of 2 358
Mihai TUDOSE RomaniaS&D71.4 % of 2 521−18.8 pts median 90.1 %93.4 % of 1 799−2.5 pts median 95.8 %5.9 % of 1 7594.4 % of 1 799
Mika AALTOLA FinlandEPP74.9 % of 2 521−16.1 pts median 91.0 %97.0 % of 1 887+3.3 pts median 93.7 %1.8 % of 1 8090.6 % of 1 887
Milan MAZUREK changed group SlovakiaESN99.0 % of 2 521+3.5 pts median 95.5 %81.0 % of 2 493−12.5 pts median 93.5 %15.3 % of 2 34713.6 % of 2 497
Milan UHRÍK SlovakiaESN99.2 % of 2 521+3.7 pts median 95.5 %80.7 % of 2 498−12.8 pts median 93.5 %15.6 % of 2 35113.7 % of 2 502
Milan ZVER SloveniaEPP90.6 % of 2 521−0.4 pts median 91.0 %82.6 % of 2 283−11.1 pts median 93.7 %15.4 % of 2 1852.8 % of 2 283
Mimmo LUCANO ItalyThe Left46.5 % of 2 521−41.7 pts median 88.2 %96.6 % of 1 170+3.0 pts median 93.6 %1.5 % of 1 1162.0 % of 1 172
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA RomaniaEPP52.7 % of 2 521−38.3 pts median 91.0 %99.2 % of 1 328+5.5 pts median 93.7 %0.5 % of 1 2900.5 % of 1 328
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN SpainPatriots97.5 % of 2 521+7.1 pts median 90.4 %81.5 % of 2 451−1.6 pts median 83.1 %9.7 % of 1 92710.7 % of 2 459
Miriam LEXMANN SlovakiaEPP93.6 % of 2 521+2.6 pts median 91.0 %73.1 % of 2 360−20.6 pts median 93.7 %25.2 % of 2 25910.0 % of 2 360
Mirosława NYKIEL PolandEPP76.1 % of 2 521−14.9 pts median 91.0 %93.1 % of 1 919−0.7 pts median 93.7 %4.9 % of 1 8421.2 % of 1 919
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.