Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

Whole term: 5 928 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.2 % (737 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

197 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Letizia MORATTI ItalyEPP71.3 % of 5 928−18.6 pts median 89.9 %93.7 % of 4 228+0.1 pts median 93.6 %4.4 % of 4 0271.9 % of 4 228
Lídia PEREIRA PortugalEPP89.9 % of 5 928±0.0 pts median 89.9 %94.7 % of 5 330+1.1 pts median 93.6 %3.5 % of 5 0613.6 % of 5 330
Liesbet SOMMEN BelgiumEPP95.8 % of 5 928+5.9 pts median 89.9 %94.3 % of 5 679+0.7 pts median 93.6 %4.3 % of 5 4101.7 % of 5 679
Liudas MAŽYLIS LithuaniaEPP99.6 % of 5 503+9.7 pts median 89.9 %97.0 % of 5 479+3.3 pts median 93.6 %1.1 % of 5 2252.1 % of 5 479
Loránt VINCZE RomaniaEPP87.1 % of 5 928−2.8 pts median 89.9 %89.9 % of 5 162−3.7 pts median 93.6 %8.1 % of 4 9352.5 % of 5 162
Loucas FOURLAS CyprusEPP65.7 % of 5 928−24.3 pts median 89.9 %90.2 % of 3 892−3.5 pts median 93.6 %7.7 % of 3 7083.7 % of 3 892
Luděk NIEDERMAYER CzechiaEPP96.0 % of 5 928+6.1 pts median 89.9 %90.1 % of 5 690−3.5 pts median 93.6 %8.7 % of 5 4146.6 % of 5 690
Lukas MANDL AustriaEPP89.6 % of 5 928−0.4 pts median 89.9 %93.2 % of 5 309−0.5 pts median 93.6 %4.4 % of 5 0512.7 % of 5 309
Łukasz KOHUT PolandEPP96.8 % of 5 928+6.9 pts median 89.9 %91.6 % of 5 740−2.0 pts median 93.6 %6.1 % of 5 4642.2 % of 5 740
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ PolandEPP93.1 % of 5 928+3.2 pts median 89.9 %92.0 % of 5 521−1.6 pts median 93.6 %5.6 % of 5 2571.9 % of 5 521
Manfred WEBER GermanyEPP78.5 % of 5 928−11.4 pts median 89.9 %99.1 % of 4 654+5.5 pts median 93.6 %0.4 % of 4 5160.4 % of 4 654
Manuela RIPA GermanyEPP87.9 % of 5 928−2.0 pts median 89.9 %83.5 % of 5 211−10.1 pts median 93.6 %15.5 % of 4 9853.9 % of 5 211
Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER SpainEPP94.7 % of 5 928+4.8 pts median 89.9 %93.8 % of 5 615+0.2 pts median 93.6 %3.9 % of 5 3502.8 % of 5 615
Marco FALCONE ItalyEPP90.1 % of 5 928+0.2 pts median 89.9 %94.2 % of 5 343+0.6 pts median 93.6 %4.3 % of 5 0952.7 % of 5 343
Maria WALSH IrelandEPP80.1 % of 5 928−9.8 pts median 89.9 %90.1 % of 4 750−3.5 pts median 93.6 %8.8 % of 4 5162.4 % of 4 750
Marie-Sophie CHRIST GermanyEPP95.5 % of 1 683+5.6 pts median 89.9 %97.1 % of 1 608+3.5 pts median 93.6 %1.9 % of 1 5461.6 % of 1 608
Marion WALSMANN GermanyEPP97.5 % of 5 928+7.5 pts median 89.9 %98.0 % of 5 777+4.4 pts median 93.6 %1.1 % of 5 4970.9 % of 5 777
Markus FERBER GermanyEPP95.1 % of 5 928+5.2 pts median 89.9 %96.8 % of 5 639+3.2 pts median 93.6 %1.7 % of 5 3751.1 % of 5 639
Marta WCISŁO PolandEPP95.3 % of 5 928+5.4 pts median 89.9 %90.6 % of 5 652−3.1 pts median 93.6 %6.7 % of 5 3782.3 % of 5 652
Martine KEMP LuxembourgEPP88.5 % of 5 503−1.4 pts median 89.9 %96.0 % of 4 871+2.3 pts median 93.6 %2.3 % of 4 6271.8 % of 4 871
Massimiliano SALINI ItalyEPP98.5 % of 5 928+8.6 pts median 89.9 %90.3 % of 5 842−3.3 pts median 93.6 %7.8 % of 5 5602.5 % of 5 842
Matej TONIN SloveniaEPP98.6 % of 5 928+8.7 pts median 89.9 %90.2 % of 5 843−3.4 pts median 93.6 %7.4 % of 5 5631.7 % of 5 843
Michael GAHLER GermanyEPP94.5 % of 5 928+4.6 pts median 89.9 %98.0 % of 5 601+4.4 pts median 93.6 %1.2 % of 5 3290.7 % of 5 601
Michał SZCZERBA PolandEPP97.5 % of 5 928+7.6 pts median 89.9 %90.8 % of 5 778−2.9 pts median 93.6 %6.9 % of 5 5011.8 % of 5 778
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ PolandEPP90.9 % of 5 928+1.0 pts median 89.9 %91.9 % of 5 391−1.7 pts median 93.6 %5.6 % of 5 1231.7 % of 5 391
Michalis HADJIPANTELA CyprusEPP87.4 % of 5 928−2.5 pts median 89.9 %91.5 % of 5 182−2.1 pts median 93.6 %6.8 % of 4 9243.2 % of 5 182
Mika AALTOLA FinlandEPP83.0 % of 5 928−6.9 pts median 89.9 %97.8 % of 4 921+4.2 pts median 93.6 %1.2 % of 4 6730.5 % of 4 921
Milan ZVER SloveniaEPP90.1 % of 5 928+0.2 pts median 89.9 %80.1 % of 5 344−13.5 pts median 93.6 %17.3 % of 5 0673.8 % of 5 344
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA RomaniaEPP78.8 % of 5 928−11.2 pts median 89.9 %98.2 % of 4 669+4.6 pts median 93.6 %0.6 % of 4 4521.0 % of 4 669
Miriam LEXMANN SlovakiaEPP90.3 % of 5 928+0.4 pts median 89.9 %76.9 % of 5 353−16.7 pts median 93.6 %20.8 % of 5 0957.8 % of 5 353
Mirosława NYKIEL PolandEPP89.4 % of 5 928−0.5 pts median 89.9 %91.5 % of 5 298−2.1 pts median 93.6 %6.0 % of 5 0422.0 % of 5 298
Monika HOHLMEIER GermanyEPP79.6 % of 5 928−10.3 pts median 89.9 %96.5 % of 4 717+2.9 pts median 93.6 %2.3 % of 4 4911.6 % of 4 717
Nadine MORANO FranceEPP88.5 % of 5 928−1.4 pts median 89.9 %73.8 % of 5 249−19.8 pts median 93.6 %24.8 % of 5 0015.4 % of 5 249
Niclas HERBST GermanyEPP95.9 % of 5 928+6.0 pts median 89.9 %97.4 % of 5 685+3.7 pts median 93.6 %1.7 % of 5 4141.3 % of 5 685
Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE SpainEPP89.0 % of 5 928−1.0 pts median 89.9 %93.2 % of 5 273−0.4 pts median 93.6 %4.3 % of 4 9972.2 % of 5 273
Niels Flemming HANSEN DenmarkEPP97.8 % of 5 928+7.9 pts median 89.9 %90.8 % of 5 800−2.9 pts median 93.6 %8.3 % of 5 5202.4 % of 5 800
Niels GEUKING GermanyEPP98.9 % of 5 928+9.0 pts median 89.9 %97.9 % of 5 865+4.2 pts median 93.6 %0.9 % of 5 5991.6 % of 5 865
Nikolina BRNJAC CroatiaEPP70.5 % of 5 928−19.4 pts median 89.9 %92.7 % of 4 182−0.9 pts median 93.6 %5.4 % of 3 9981.6 % of 4 182
Nina CARBERRY IrelandEPP93.3 % of 5 928+3.4 pts median 89.9 %92.1 % of 5 532−1.5 pts median 93.6 %6.9 % of 5 2752.1 % of 5 532
Norbert HERHAMMER GermanyEPP72.5 % of 891−17.4 pts median 89.9 %98.1 % of 646+4.5 pts median 93.6 %1.1 % of 6140.8 % of 646
Norbert LINS GermanyEPP97.2 % of 5 928+7.3 pts median 89.9 %97.8 % of 5 764+4.2 pts median 93.6 %1.2 % of 5 4820.9 % of 5 764
Oliver SCHENK GermanyEPP98.3 % of 5 928+8.4 pts median 89.9 %98.3 % of 5 830+4.7 pts median 93.6 %0.8 % of 5 5480.8 % of 5 830
Ondřej KOLÁŘ CzechiaEPP95.5 % of 5 928+5.6 pts median 89.9 %89.6 % of 5 662−4.1 pts median 93.6 %9.0 % of 5 4107.3 % of 5 662
Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA SpainEPP92.3 % of 5 928+2.4 pts median 89.9 %93.6 % of 5 474±0.0 pts median 93.6 %4.1 % of 5 2151.9 % of 5 474
Pascal ARIMONT BelgiumEPP93.6 % of 5 928+3.7 pts median 89.9 %90.5 % of 5 550−3.1 pts median 93.6 %7.5 % of 5 2844.1 % of 5 550
Paulius SAUDARGAS LithuaniaEPP98.8 % of 5 928+8.9 pts median 89.9 %95.4 % of 5 856+1.8 pts median 93.6 %3.2 % of 5 5881.8 % of 5 856
Paulo CUNHA PortugalEPP97.7 % of 5 928+7.8 pts median 89.9 %95.1 % of 5 792+1.5 pts median 93.6 %3.2 % of 5 5143.1 % of 5 792
Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL PortugalEPP88.0 % of 5 928−1.9 pts median 89.9 %95.5 % of 5 219+1.9 pts median 93.6 %2.9 % of 4 9542.8 % of 5 219
Pekka TOVERI FinlandEPP88.4 % of 5 928−1.5 pts median 89.9 %98.5 % of 5 241+4.8 pts median 93.6 %0.8 % of 5 0000.6 % of 5 241
Peter AGIUS MaltaEPP80.0 % of 5 928−9.9 pts median 89.9 %92.9 % of 4 743−0.7 pts median 93.6 %5.4 % of 4 5343.3 % of 4 743
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.