Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

79 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Adam BIELAN PolandECR98.3 % of 2 891+6.2 pts median 92.1 %91.6 % of 2 834+0.1 pts median 91.5 %2.6 % of 2 4778.2 % of 2 842
Adrian-George AXINIA RomaniaECR80.0 % of 2 891−12.1 pts median 92.1 %90.5 % of 2 307−1.0 pts median 91.5 %5.5 % of 2 0369.1 % of 2 313
Alberico GAMBINO ItalyECR68.6 % of 2 891−23.5 pts median 92.1 %93.0 % of 1 978+1.5 pts median 91.5 %0.9 % of 1 72412.1 % of 1 984
Alessandro CIRIANI ItalyECR83.1 % of 2 891−9.1 pts median 92.1 %94.4 % of 2 394+2.9 pts median 91.5 %0.7 % of 2 11910.2 % of 2 401
Alexandr VONDRA CzechiaECR95.4 % of 2 891+3.3 pts median 92.1 %85.9 % of 2 751−5.6 pts median 91.5 %10.8 % of 2 4018.4 % of 2 759
Anna ZALEWSKA PolandECR98.3 % of 2 891+6.1 pts median 92.1 %90.9 % of 2 833−0.7 pts median 91.5 %3.2 % of 2 4778.1 % of 2 841
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECR91.9 % of 2 891−0.2 pts median 92.1 %93.3 % of 2 650+1.8 pts median 91.5 %0.7 % of 2 30711.4 % of 2 657
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK PolandECR98.0 % of 2 891+5.9 pts median 92.1 %91.4 % of 2 826−0.1 pts median 91.5 %3.0 % of 2 4697.5 % of 2 834
Assita KANKO BelgiumECR64.7 % of 2 891−27.5 pts median 92.1 %68.3 % of 1 865−23.2 pts median 91.5 %29.4 % of 1 62521.2 % of 1 870
Aurelijus VERYGA LithuaniaECR88.2 % of 2 891−3.9 pts median 92.1 %91.6 % of 2 544+0.1 pts median 91.5 %4.3 % of 2 2197.9 % of 2 550
Beata SZYDŁO PolandECR91.7 % of 2 891−0.4 pts median 92.1 %91.3 % of 2 645−0.2 pts median 91.5 %3.3 % of 2 3168.0 % of 2 652
Beatrice TIMGREN SwedenECR99.1 % of 2 891+6.9 pts median 92.1 %74.4 % of 2 856−17.1 pts median 91.5 %22.8 % of 2 4948.2 % of 2 864
Bert-Jan RUISSEN NetherlandsECR99.7 % of 2 891+7.6 pts median 92.1 %87.1 % of 2 875−4.4 pts median 91.5 %9.8 % of 2 5159.5 % of 2 883
Bogdan RZOŃCA PolandECR99.3 % of 2 891+7.2 pts median 92.1 %91.5 % of 2 864±0.0 pts median 91.5 %2.9 % of 2 5047.5 % of 2 872
Carlo CICCIOLI ItalyECR74.8 % of 2 891−17.3 pts median 92.1 %93.6 % of 2 156+2.1 pts median 91.5 %1.0 % of 1 87410.3 % of 2 163
Carlo FIDANZA ItalyECR94.8 % of 2 891+2.6 pts median 92.1 %93.5 % of 2 732+2.0 pts median 91.5 %0.6 % of 2 39210.9 % of 2 740
Charlie WEIMERS SwedenECR97.7 % of 2 891+5.6 pts median 92.1 %74.7 % of 2 818−16.8 pts median 91.5 %22.5 % of 2 4568.0 % of 2 825
Chiara GEMMA ItalyECR98.6 % of 2 891+6.4 pts median 92.1 %93.3 % of 2 842+1.8 pts median 91.5 %1.0 % of 2 48411.1 % of 2 850
Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU RomaniaECR95.4 % of 2 891+3.2 pts median 92.1 %89.9 % of 2 749−1.6 pts median 91.5 %6.5 % of 2 41110.1 % of 2 757
Cristian TERHEŞ RomaniaECR78.6 % of 2 891−13.6 pts median 92.1 %85.7 % of 2 266−5.8 pts median 91.5 %9.8 % of 1 9957.3 % of 2 272
Daniel OBAJTEK PolandECR82.5 % of 2 891−9.6 pts median 92.1 %91.8 % of 2 378+0.3 pts median 91.5 %2.7 % of 2 0807.5 % of 2 386
Daniele POLATO ItalyECR98.8 % of 2 891+6.6 pts median 92.1 %93.2 % of 2 847+1.6 pts median 91.5 %1.0 % of 2 48411.2 % of 2 855
Denis NESCI ItalyECR99.5 % of 2 891+7.3 pts median 92.1 %93.4 % of 2 868+1.9 pts median 91.5 %0.9 % of 2 50711.0 % of 2 876
Dick ERIXON SwedenECR98.6 % of 2 891+6.5 pts median 92.1 %74.3 % of 2 843−17.2 pts median 91.5 %22.9 % of 2 4828.2 % of 2 851
Diego SOLIER changed group SpainECR94.5 % of 2 891+2.3 pts median 92.1 %93.4 % of 2 723+1.9 pts median 91.5 %2.3 % of 2 3839.5 % of 2 731
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI PolandECR61.4 % of 2 891−30.8 pts median 92.1 %90.3 % of 1 768−1.2 pts median 91.5 %4.0 % of 1 5179.1 % of 1 774
Elena DONAZZAN ItalyECR92.0 % of 2 891−0.1 pts median 92.1 %93.1 % of 2 653+1.6 pts median 91.5 %1.1 % of 2 31111.0 % of 2 661
Emmanouil FRAGKOS GreeceECR96.3 % of 2 891+4.1 pts median 92.1 %68.8 % of 2 775−22.7 pts median 91.5 %28.1 % of 2 43516.7 % of 2 783
Francesco TORSELLI ItalyECR96.9 % of 2 891+4.7 pts median 92.1 %93.7 % of 2 793+2.2 pts median 91.5 %0.6 % of 2 43911.0 % of 2 801
Francesco VENTOLA ItalyECR85.6 % of 2 891−6.5 pts median 92.1 %93.6 % of 2 469+2.1 pts median 91.5 %0.7 % of 2 15810.9 % of 2 475
Galato ALEXANDRAKI GreeceECR55.3 % of 2 891−36.9 pts median 92.1 %67.6 % of 1 593−23.9 pts median 91.5 %29.8 % of 1 38517.1 % of 1 598
Geadis GEADI CyprusECR95.5 % of 2 891+3.3 pts median 92.1 %85.6 % of 2 752−5.9 pts median 91.5 %10.9 % of 2 4109.2 % of 2 760
Georgiana TEODORESCU RomaniaECR92.0 % of 2 891−0.1 pts median 92.1 %82.7 % of 2 654−8.8 pts median 91.5 %12.8 % of 2 32911.8 % of 2 661
Gheorghe PIPEREA RomaniaECR87.6 % of 2 891−4.6 pts median 92.1 %88.1 % of 2 524−3.4 pts median 91.5 %8.4 % of 2 2149.0 % of 2 532
Giovanni CROSETTO ItalyECR91.6 % of 2 891−0.6 pts median 92.1 %93.5 % of 2 641+2.0 pts median 91.5 %0.7 % of 2 30311.0 % of 2 647
Giuseppe MILAZZO ItalyECR46.1 % of 2 891−46.0 pts median 92.1 %93.2 % of 1 331+1.7 pts median 91.5 %1.1 % of 1 15310.4 % of 1 334
Guillaume PELTIER FranceECR83.6 % of 2 891−8.5 pts median 92.1 %78.8 % of 2 410−12.7 pts median 91.5 %16.5 % of 2 1145.9 % of 2 417
Ivaylo VALCHEV BulgariaECR97.8 % of 2 891+5.6 pts median 92.1 %92.8 % of 2 818+1.3 pts median 91.5 %4.3 % of 2 4609.6 % of 2 826
Jaak MADISON EstoniaECR84.2 % of 2 891−8.0 pts median 92.1 %89.5 % of 2 425−2.0 pts median 91.5 %7.6 % of 2 1345.5 % of 2 433
Jacek OZDOBA PolandECR90.3 % of 2 891−1.8 pts median 92.1 %91.5 % of 2 603±0.0 pts median 91.5 %3.0 % of 2 3017.8 % of 2 611
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA PolandECR98.1 % of 2 891+5.9 pts median 92.1 %91.3 % of 2 827−0.2 pts median 91.5 %2.9 % of 2 4707.3 % of 2 835
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI PolandECR92.1 % of 2 891±0.0 pts median 92.1 %91.5 % of 2 657−0.1 pts median 91.5 %2.9 % of 2 3298.0 % of 2 664
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT BelgiumECR61.6 % of 2 891−30.6 pts median 92.1 %69.7 % of 1 776−21.8 pts median 91.5 %27.4 % of 1 54521.3 % of 1 780
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI PolandECR99.1 % of 2 891+7.0 pts median 92.1 %91.6 % of 2 858+0.1 pts median 91.5 %2.6 % of 2 4967.6 % of 2 866
Kris VAN DIJCK BelgiumECR85.9 % of 2 891−6.2 pts median 92.1 %68.7 % of 2 477−22.8 pts median 91.5 %29.0 % of 2 15921.2 % of 2 484
Kristoffer STORM DenmarkECR91.9 % of 2 891−0.3 pts median 92.1 %74.9 % of 2 650−16.6 pts median 91.5 %22.0 % of 2 3179.5 % of 2 656
Lara MAGONI ItalyECR95.4 % of 2 891+3.3 pts median 92.1 %92.9 % of 2 750+1.4 pts median 91.5 %1.3 % of 2 39811.2 % of 2 758
Laurence TROCHU FranceECR93.3 % of 2 891+1.1 pts median 92.1 %77.9 % of 2 689−13.6 pts median 91.5 %17.4 % of 2 3536.7 % of 2 697
Maciej WĄSIK PolandECR95.1 % of 2 891+2.9 pts median 92.1 %91.2 % of 2 741−0.3 pts median 91.5 %3.3 % of 2 3937.4 % of 2 748
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA PolandECR99.1 % of 2 891+7.0 pts median 92.1 %91.8 % of 2 857+0.3 pts median 91.5 %2.4 % of 2 4977.7 % of 2 865
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.