Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2026: 261 final votes with named positions — 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 90.8 % (723 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

53 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Adam BIELAN	Adam BIELAN	Poland	ECR	89.3 % of 261	−3.4 pts median 92.7 %	87.9 % of 232	+2.1 pts median 85.8 %	3.6 % of 192	17.2 % of 233
Select Adam JARUBAS	Adam JARUBAS	Poland	EPP	77.4 % of 261	−13.8 pts median 91.2 %	95.5 % of 202	+0.6 pts median 94.9 %	3.2 % of 188	2.0 % of 202
Select Andrzej BUŁA	Andrzej BUŁA	Poland	EPP	95.0 % of 261	+3.8 pts median 91.2 %	92.7 % of 248	−2.2 pts median 94.9 %	3.0 % of 235	4.4 % of 248
Select Andrzej HALICKI	Andrzej HALICKI	Poland	EPP	88.5 % of 261	−2.7 pts median 91.2 %	91.3 % of 231	−3.6 pts median 94.9 %	3.2 % of 218	2.2 % of 231
Select Anna BRYŁKA	Anna BRYŁKA ⇄changed group	Poland	Patriots	89.3 % of 261	±0.0 pts median 89.3 %	78.9 % of 232	±0.0 pts median 78.9 %	13.2 % of 174	19.7 % of 233
Select Anna ZALEWSKA	Anna ZALEWSKA	Poland	ECR	96.2 % of 261	+3.4 pts median 92.7 %	85.6 % of 250	−0.2 pts median 85.8 %	6.2 % of 210	19.1 % of 251
Select Arkadiusz MULARCZYK	Arkadiusz MULARCZYK	Poland	ECR	96.2 % of 261	+3.4 pts median 92.7 %	87.2 % of 250	+1.4 pts median 85.8 %	4.8 % of 209	18.7 % of 251
Select Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ	Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ	Poland	EPP	98.9 % of 261	+7.7 pts median 91.2 %	95.7 % of 258	+0.8 pts median 94.9 %	3.3 % of 244	1.6 % of 258
Select Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ	Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ	Poland	EPP	95.4 % of 261	+4.2 pts median 91.2 %	96.0 % of 249	+1.1 pts median 94.9 %	2.5 % of 236	1.2 % of 249
Select Beata SZYDŁO	Beata SZYDŁO	Poland	ECR	93.5 % of 261	+0.8 pts median 92.7 %	85.6 % of 243	−0.2 pts median 85.8 %	5.4 % of 202	17.6 % of 244
Select Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI	Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI	Poland	EPP	98.5 % of 261	+7.3 pts median 91.2 %	91.8 % of 257	−3.1 pts median 94.9 %	3.7 % of 243	6.2 % of 257
Select Bogdan RZOŃCA	Bogdan RZOŃCA	Poland	ECR	99.2 % of 261	+6.5 pts median 92.7 %	84.9 % of 258	−1.0 pts median 85.8 %	6.0 % of 215	17.4 % of 259
Select Borys BUDKA	Borys BUDKA	Poland	EPP	89.3 % of 261	−1.9 pts median 91.2 %	94.4 % of 233	−0.5 pts median 94.9 %	2.3 % of 220	0.9 % of 233
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	Poland	ECR	83.9 % of 261	−8.8 pts median 92.7 %	86.2 % of 218	+0.4 pts median 85.8 %	4.9 % of 183	19.2 % of 219
Select Dariusz JOŃSKI	Dariusz JOŃSKI	Poland	EPP	99.2 % of 261	+8.0 pts median 91.2 %	93.8 % of 259	−1.1 pts median 94.9 %	2.4 % of 245	1.2 % of 259
Select Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Poland	ECR	68.6 % of 261	−24.1 pts median 92.7 %	84.4 % of 179	−1.5 pts median 85.8 %	6.2 % of 146	19.6 % of 179
Select Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Poland	EPP	98.1 % of 261	+6.9 pts median 91.2 %	91.8 % of 256	−3.1 pts median 94.9 %	4.1 % of 242	1.2 % of 256
Select Ewa KOPACZ	Ewa KOPACZ	Poland	EPP	99.2 % of 261	+8.0 pts median 91.2 %	95.0 % of 259	+0.1 pts median 94.9 %	3.3 % of 245	1.5 % of 259
Select Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK	Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Poland	Patriots	82.4 % of 261	not compared median 89.3 %	80.0 % of 215	not compared median 78.9 %	13.9 % of 180	19.5 % of 215
Select Grzegorz BRAUN	Grzegorz BRAUN	Poland	No group	75.5 % of 261	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	16.2 % of 197
Select Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ	Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ	Poland	EPP	71.3 % of 261	−19.9 pts median 91.2 %	93.0 % of 186	−1.9 pts median 94.9 %	5.6 % of 179	3.2 % of 186
Select Jacek OZDOBA	Jacek OZDOBA	Poland	ECR	85.4 % of 261	−7.3 pts median 92.7 %	82.4 % of 222	−3.4 pts median 85.8 %	8.1 % of 186	14.8 % of 223
Select Jacek PROTAS	Jacek PROTAS	Poland	EPP	90.4 % of 261	−0.8 pts median 91.2 %	91.9 % of 236	−3.0 pts median 94.9 %	4.0 % of 225	4.7 % of 236
Select Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Poland	ECR	93.9 % of 261	+1.1 pts median 92.7 %	84.0 % of 244	−1.8 pts median 85.8 %	6.4 % of 202	17.1 % of 245
Select Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Poland	EPP	97.3 % of 261	+6.1 pts median 91.2 %	92.5 % of 254	−2.4 pts median 94.9 %	3.7 % of 242	1.2 % of 254
Select Janusz LEWANDOWSKI	Janusz LEWANDOWSKI	Poland	EPP	80.1 % of 261	−11.1 pts median 91.2 %	93.3 % of 209	−1.6 pts median 94.9 %	3.0 % of 200	4.8 % of 209
Select Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Poland	ECR	95.0 % of 261	+2.3 pts median 92.7 %	85.0 % of 247	−0.8 pts median 85.8 %	5.9 % of 205	18.5 % of 248
Select Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS	Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS	Poland	S&D	98.1 % of 261	+8.0 pts median 90.0 %	98.4 % of 256	+1.1 pts median 97.4 %	1.6 % of 254	0.4 % of 256
Select Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	Poland	EPP	98.5 % of 261	+7.3 pts median 91.2 %	91.4 % of 257	−3.5 pts median 94.9 %	3.7 % of 243	1.6 % of 257
Select Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Poland	ECR	99.6 % of 261	+6.9 pts median 92.7 %	85.7 % of 259	−0.1 pts median 85.8 %	5.6 % of 216	18.1 % of 260
Select Krzysztof BREJZA	Krzysztof BREJZA	Poland	EPP	99.2 % of 261	+8.0 pts median 91.2 %	91.9 % of 259	−3.0 pts median 94.9 %	3.7 % of 246	1.5 % of 259
Select Krzysztof HETMAN	Krzysztof HETMAN	Poland	EPP	99.2 % of 261	+8.0 pts median 91.2 %	96.1 % of 259	+1.2 pts median 94.9 %	2.9 % of 245	1.5 % of 259
Select Krzysztof ŚMISZEK	Krzysztof ŚMISZEK	Poland	S&D	97.3 % of 261	+7.3 pts median 90.0 %	98.8 % of 254	+1.5 pts median 97.4 %	1.2 % of 252	0.4 % of 254
Select Łukasz KOHUT	Łukasz KOHUT	Poland	EPP	96.2 % of 261	+5.0 pts median 91.2 %	94.0 % of 251	−0.9 pts median 94.9 %	1.3 % of 237	1.2 % of 251
Select Maciej WĄSIK	Maciej WĄSIK	Poland	ECR	95.0 % of 261	+2.3 pts median 92.7 %	81.4 % of 247	−4.5 pts median 85.8 %	8.8 % of 205	17.3 % of 248
Select Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Poland	EPP	87.4 % of 261	−3.8 pts median 91.2 %	94.3 % of 228	−0.6 pts median 94.9 %	2.3 % of 215	1.3 % of 228
Select Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Poland	ECR	78.9 % of 261	−13.8 pts median 92.7 %	84.4 % of 205	−1.5 pts median 85.8 %	4.8 % of 166	19.9 % of 206
Select Marcin SYPNIEWSKI	Marcin SYPNIEWSKI	Poland	ESN	96.6 % of 261	+4.2 pts median 92.3 %	77.0 % of 252	−14.0 pts median 91.0 %	20.7 % of 241	16.3 % of 252
Select Mariusz KAMIŃSKI	Mariusz KAMIŃSKI	Poland	ECR	98.1 % of 261	+5.4 pts median 92.7 %	87.5 % of 255	+1.6 pts median 85.8 %	4.2 % of 212	18.0 % of 256
Select Marlena MALĄG	Marlena MALĄG	Poland	ECR	95.4 % of 261	+2.7 pts median 92.7 %	84.7 % of 248	−1.2 pts median 85.8 %	5.8 % of 207	18.9 % of 249
Select Marta WCISŁO	Marta WCISŁO	Poland	EPP	94.6 % of 261	+3.4 pts median 91.2 %	94.7 % of 247	−0.2 pts median 94.9 %	3.0 % of 235	0.8 % of 247
Select Michał DWORCZYK	Michał DWORCZYK	Poland	ECR	75.1 % of 261	−17.6 pts median 92.7 %	86.2 % of 195	+0.3 pts median 85.8 %	3.8 % of 160	17.3 % of 196
Select Michał KOBOSKO	Michał KOBOSKO	Poland	Renew	86.2 % of 261	−6.1 pts median 92.3 %	92.0 % of 224	−1.2 pts median 93.1 %	1.5 % of 204	5.3 % of 225
Select Michał SZCZERBA	Michał SZCZERBA	Poland	EPP	98.1 % of 261	+6.9 pts median 91.2 %	93.8 % of 256	−1.2 pts median 94.9 %	2.1 % of 243	1.2 % of 256
Select Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Poland	EPP	95.0 % of 261	+3.8 pts median 91.2 %	91.9 % of 248	−3.0 pts median 94.9 %	3.8 % of 234	0.8 % of 248
Select Mirosława NYKIEL	Mirosława NYKIEL	Poland	EPP	82.8 % of 261	−8.4 pts median 91.2 %	91.2 % of 216	−3.7 pts median 94.9 %	3.9 % of 204	1.9 % of 216
Select Patryk JAKI	Patryk JAKI	Poland	ECR	92.3 % of 261	−0.4 pts median 92.7 %	86.7 % of 240	+0.8 pts median 85.8 %	5.1 % of 198	19.5 % of 241
Select Piotr MÜLLER	Piotr MÜLLER	Poland	ECR	75.9 % of 261	−16.9 pts median 92.7 %	85.3 % of 197	−0.6 pts median 85.8 %	4.3 % of 161	19.7 % of 198
Select Robert BIEDROŃ	Robert BIEDROŃ	Poland	S&D	99.6 % of 261	+9.6 pts median 90.0 %	98.8 % of 260	+1.5 pts median 97.4 %	1.2 % of 258	0.4 % of 260
Select Stanisław TYSZKA	Stanisław TYSZKA	Poland	ESN	87.7 % of 261	−4.6 pts median 92.3 %	77.7 % of 229	−13.2 pts median 91.0 %	19.4 % of 217	18.3 % of 229

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.