Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

54 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Adam BIELAN PolandECR77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %98.0 % of 50+5.9 pts median 92.1 %0 of 43 7.8 % of 51
Adam JARUBAS PolandEPP57.6 % of 66−34.8 pts median 92.4 %38 of 38 — median 95.3 %0 of 38 0 of 38
Andrzej BUŁA PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %90.9 % of 66−4.4 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
Andrzej HALICKI PolandEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %85.0 % of 60−10.3 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 500.0 % of 60
Anna BRYŁKA changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.PolandPatriots100.0 % of 66not compared median 93.9 %91.2 % of 57not compared median 85.0 %3 of 47 18.2 % of 66
Anna ZALEWSKA PolandECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %88.9 % of 63−3.2 pts median 92.1 %3.6 % of 5512.5 % of 64
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK PolandECR98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %96.9 % of 64+4.8 pts median 92.1 %1.8 % of 576.2 % of 65
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ PolandEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %95.3 % of 64±0.0 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 521.6 % of 64
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ PolandEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %100.0 % of 65+4.7 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Beata SZYDŁO PolandECR98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %1.8 % of 576.2 % of 65
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %84.8 % of 66−10.5 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 541.5 % of 66
Bogdan RZOŃCA PolandECR98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 64+1.6 pts median 92.1 %1.8 % of 566.2 % of 65
Borys BUDKA PolandEPP86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %86.0 % of 57−9.4 pts median 95.3 %0 of 46 0.0 % of 57
Daniel OBAJTEK PolandECR69.7 % of 66−22.7 pts median 92.4 %44 of 45 — median 92.1 %0 of 41 2 of 46
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %87.9 % of 66−7.5 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI PolandECR62.1 % of 66−30.3 pts median 92.4 %38 of 40 — median 92.1 %0 of 36 3 of 41
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA PolandEPP95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %84.1 % of 63−11.2 pts median 95.3 %3.9 % of 511.6 % of 63
Ewa KOPACZ PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %87.9 % of 66−7.5 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group PolandPatriots90.9 % of 66±0.0 pts median 90.9 %80.0 % of 60−14.4 pts median 94.4 %14.5 % of 5526.7 % of 60
Grzegorz BRAUN PolandNo group100.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 13.6 % of 66
Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ PolandEPP88.9 % of 54−3.5 pts median 92.4 %39 of 48 — median 95.3 %1 of 39 0 of 48
Jacek OZDOBA PolandECR90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %88.1 % of 59−4.0 pts median 92.1 %7.7 % of 5210.0 % of 60
Jacek PROTAS PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %92.4 % of 66−2.9 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 541.5 % of 66
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA PolandECR95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %91.9 % of 62−0.2 pts median 92.1 %3.6 % of 557.9 % of 63
Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK PolandEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %86.7 % of 60−8.7 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 500.0 % of 60
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI PolandEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %89.1 % of 64−6.3 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 539.4 % of 64
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI PolandECR92.4 % of 66±0.0 pts median 92.4 %93.3 % of 60+1.2 pts median 92.1 %3.8 % of 528.2 % of 61
Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS PolandS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 66+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 660.0 % of 66
Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ PolandEPP84.8 % of 66−7.6 pts median 92.4 %98.2 % of 56+2.9 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 520.0 % of 56
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI PolandECR87.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.0 % of 57+0.9 pts median 92.1 %1 of 49 6.9 % of 58
Krzysztof BREJZA PolandEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %86.2 % of 65−9.2 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Krzysztof HETMAN PolandEPP81.8 % of 66−10.6 pts median 92.4 %85.2 % of 54−10.2 pts median 95.3 %0 of 43 0.0 % of 54
Krzysztof ŚMISZEK PolandS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 65+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 650.0 % of 65
Łukasz KOHUT PolandEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %86.2 % of 65−9.2 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Maciej WĄSIK PolandECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %95.2 % of 63+3.1 pts median 92.1 %1.8 % of 564.7 % of 64
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ PolandEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %87.7 % of 65−7.7 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA PolandECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %1.8 % of 576.1 % of 66
Marcin SYPNIEWSKI PolandESN92.4 % of 66+1.5 pts median 90.9 %86.9 % of 61−7.6 pts median 94.4 %7.1 % of 5621.3 % of 61
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI PolandECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.7 % of 63+1.5 pts median 92.1 %1.8 % of 556.3 % of 64
Marlena MALĄG PolandECR95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %93.5 % of 62+1.4 pts median 92.1 %1.9 % of 546.3 % of 63
Marta WCISŁO PolandEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %84.6 % of 65−10.7 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 531.5 % of 65
Michał DWORCZYK PolandECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %96.8 % of 63+4.7 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 564.7 % of 64
Michał KOBOSKO PolandRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %93.5 % of 62+2.6 pts median 90.9 %1.8 % of 553.1 % of 65
Michał SZCZERBA PolandEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %85.9 % of 64−9.4 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 520.0 % of 64
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ PolandEPP95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %87.3 % of 63−8.0 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 510.0 % of 63
Mirosława NYKIEL PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %87.9 % of 66−7.5 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
Patryk JAKI PolandECR98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %87.5 % of 64−4.6 pts median 92.1 %8.9 % of 5613.8 % of 65
Piotr MÜLLER PolandECR90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %94.9 % of 59+2.8 pts median 92.1 %2.0 % of 518.3 % of 60
Robert BIEDROŃ PolandS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 66+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 660.0 % of 66
Stanisław TYSZKA PolandESN74.2 % of 66−16.7 pts median 90.9 %44 of 49 — median 94.4 %1 of 44 9 of 49
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.