Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

53 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Adam BIELAN PolandECR90.0 % of 2 521−1.9 pts median 91.9 %92.0 % of 2 264+1.6 pts median 90.5 %3.2 % of 1 9669.3 % of 2 269
Adam JARUBAS PolandEPP71.2 % of 2 521−19.8 pts median 91.0 %90.5 % of 1 795−3.2 pts median 93.7 %6.7 % of 1 7205.2 % of 1 795
Andrzej BUŁA PolandEPP93.3 % of 2 521+2.3 pts median 91.0 %92.5 % of 2 353−1.2 pts median 93.7 %5.0 % of 2 2522.6 % of 2 353
Andrzej HALICKI PolandEPP86.5 % of 2 521−4.5 pts median 91.0 %93.2 % of 2 181−0.6 pts median 93.7 %4.5 % of 2 1031.8 % of 2 181
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PolandPatriots91.2 % of 2 521+0.8 pts median 90.4 %83.5 % of 2 292+0.4 pts median 83.1 %7.9 % of 1 80810.4 % of 2 299
Anna ZALEWSKA PolandECR98.4 % of 2 521+6.5 pts median 91.9 %91.0 % of 2 475+0.5 pts median 90.5 %3.3 % of 2 1558.5 % of 2 481
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK PolandECR94.1 % of 2 521+2.2 pts median 91.9 %91.2 % of 2 367+0.7 pts median 90.5 %3.6 % of 2 0578.7 % of 2 372
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ PolandEPP99.4 % of 2 521+8.4 pts median 91.0 %92.8 % of 2 505−0.9 pts median 93.7 %5.8 % of 2 4011.4 % of 2 505
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ PolandEPP97.6 % of 2 521+6.6 pts median 91.0 %92.8 % of 2 460−1.0 pts median 93.7 %5.4 % of 2 3591.5 % of 2 460
Beata SZYDŁO PolandECR94.6 % of 2 521+2.7 pts median 91.9 %90.7 % of 2 379+0.3 pts median 90.5 %3.4 % of 2 0698.3 % of 2 385
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI PolandEPP97.8 % of 2 521+6.8 pts median 91.0 %92.5 % of 2 465−1.2 pts median 93.7 %4.9 % of 2 3713.6 % of 2 465
Bogdan RZOŃCA PolandECR98.8 % of 2 521+7.0 pts median 91.9 %89.9 % of 2 486−0.6 pts median 90.5 %4.4 % of 2 1588.6 % of 2 492
Borys BUDKA PolandEPP89.4 % of 2 521−1.6 pts median 91.0 %92.9 % of 2 253−0.9 pts median 93.7 %4.7 % of 2 1601.9 % of 2 253
Daniel OBAJTEK PolandECR84.0 % of 2 521−7.9 pts median 91.9 %90.1 % of 2 113−0.4 pts median 90.5 %4.2 % of 1 8298.7 % of 2 118
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPP98.1 % of 2 521+7.1 pts median 91.0 %92.3 % of 2 474−1.4 pts median 93.7 %5.6 % of 2 3721.4 % of 2 474
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI PolandECR65.1 % of 2 521−26.8 pts median 91.9 %90.5 % of 1 635+0.1 pts median 90.5 %3.7 % of 1 4158.2 % of 1 640
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA PolandEPP95.8 % of 2 521+4.8 pts median 91.0 %91.9 % of 2 415−1.8 pts median 93.7 %5.8 % of 2 3131.3 % of 2 415
Ewa KOPACZ PolandEPP97.9 % of 2 521+6.9 pts median 91.0 %92.8 % of 2 467−0.9 pts median 93.7 %5.3 % of 2 3641.6 % of 2 467
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.PolandPatriots81.6 % of 2 521not compared median 90.4 %81.0 % of 2 052not compared median 83.1 %11.5 % of 1 71612.5 % of 2 056
Grzegorz BRAUN PolandNo group78.0 % of 2 521—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 41.6 % of 1 967
Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ PolandEPP73.0 % of 2 521−18.0 pts median 91.0 %91.6 % of 1 840−2.1 pts median 93.7 %6.3 % of 1 7693.8 % of 1 840
Jacek OZDOBA PolandECR89.1 % of 2 521−2.7 pts median 91.9 %89.2 % of 2 241−1.3 pts median 90.5 %4.4 % of 1 9418.0 % of 2 247
Jacek PROTAS PolandEPP95.8 % of 2 521+4.8 pts median 91.0 %91.5 % of 2 414−2.2 pts median 93.7 %5.9 % of 2 3173.3 % of 2 414
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA PolandECR94.1 % of 2 521+2.3 pts median 91.9 %90.5 % of 2 368±0.0 pts median 90.5 %3.8 % of 2 0568.1 % of 2 373
Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK PolandEPP97.1 % of 2 521+6.1 pts median 91.0 %91.7 % of 2 448−2.0 pts median 93.7 %6.1 % of 2 3471.3 % of 2 448
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI PolandEPP75.8 % of 2 521−15.2 pts median 91.0 %93.7 % of 1 911±0.0 pts median 93.7 %3.9 % of 1 8554.5 % of 1 911
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI PolandECR95.8 % of 2 521+3.9 pts median 91.9 %90.0 % of 2 408−0.5 pts median 90.5 %4.4 % of 2 0908.5 % of 2 414
Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS PolandS&D98.8 % of 2 521+8.7 pts median 90.1 %97.7 % of 2 492+1.8 pts median 95.8 %1.6 % of 2 4371.5 % of 2 492
Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ PolandEPP98.0 % of 2 521+7.0 pts median 91.0 %92.0 % of 2 471−1.7 pts median 93.7 %5.8 % of 2 3691.7 % of 2 471
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI PolandECR99.4 % of 2 521+7.5 pts median 91.9 %90.5 % of 2 499±0.0 pts median 90.5 %3.7 % of 2 1718.5 % of 2 505
Krzysztof BREJZA PolandEPP99.2 % of 2 521+8.2 pts median 91.0 %92.7 % of 2 501−1.0 pts median 93.7 %5.0 % of 2 3991.6 % of 2 501
Krzysztof HETMAN PolandEPP97.4 % of 2 521+6.4 pts median 91.0 %91.0 % of 2 456−2.7 pts median 93.7 %6.2 % of 2 3534.5 % of 2 456
Krzysztof ŚMISZEK PolandS&D99.3 % of 2 521+9.2 pts median 90.1 %97.6 % of 2 504+1.7 pts median 95.8 %1.6 % of 2 4491.7 % of 2 504
Łukasz KOHUT PolandEPP95.0 % of 2 521+4.0 pts median 91.0 %92.9 % of 2 395−0.8 pts median 93.7 %4.7 % of 2 2951.5 % of 2 395
Maciej WĄSIK PolandECR97.1 % of 2 521+5.2 pts median 91.9 %90.0 % of 2 442−0.4 pts median 90.5 %4.1 % of 2 1198.1 % of 2 448
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ PolandEPP88.0 % of 2 521−3.0 pts median 91.0 %93.5 % of 2 219−0.3 pts median 93.7 %4.7 % of 2 1331.3 % of 2 219
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA PolandECR79.7 % of 2 521−12.2 pts median 91.9 %90.5 % of 2 004±0.0 pts median 90.5 %3.5 % of 1 7308.5 % of 2 008
Marcin SYPNIEWSKI PolandESN98.4 % of 2 521+2.9 pts median 95.5 %79.3 % of 2 477−14.1 pts median 93.5 %17.0 % of 2 32910.8 % of 2 481
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI PolandECR98.8 % of 2 521+6.9 pts median 91.9 %90.5 % of 2 484±0.0 pts median 90.5 %4.1 % of 2 1638.8 % of 2 490
Marlena MALĄG PolandECR97.4 % of 2 521+5.6 pts median 91.9 %90.4 % of 2 450−0.1 pts median 90.5 %3.6 % of 2 1348.5 % of 2 456
Marta WCISŁO PolandEPP91.0 % of 2 521±0.0 pts median 91.0 %92.2 % of 2 294−1.5 pts median 93.7 %5.2 % of 2 1952.0 % of 2 294
Michał DWORCZYK PolandECR75.6 % of 2 521−16.3 pts median 91.9 %90.8 % of 1 899+0.3 pts median 90.5 %3.5 % of 1 6377.2 % of 1 905
Michał KOBOSKO PolandRenew83.9 % of 2 521−7.9 pts median 91.7 %97.3 % of 2 112+2.2 pts median 95.1 %1.5 % of 2 0481.5 % of 2 114
Michał SZCZERBA PolandEPP96.9 % of 2 521+5.9 pts median 91.0 %92.3 % of 2 443−1.5 pts median 93.7 %5.5 % of 2 3441.6 % of 2 443
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ PolandEPP95.6 % of 2 521+4.6 pts median 91.0 %92.6 % of 2 409−1.1 pts median 93.7 %5.1 % of 2 3051.7 % of 2 409
Mirosława NYKIEL PolandEPP76.1 % of 2 521−14.9 pts median 91.0 %93.1 % of 1 919−0.7 pts median 93.7 %4.9 % of 1 8421.2 % of 1 919
Patryk JAKI PolandECR86.7 % of 2 521−5.2 pts median 91.9 %89.2 % of 2 179−1.3 pts median 90.5 %5.3 % of 1 8858.2 % of 2 185
Piotr MÜLLER PolandECR75.5 % of 2 521−16.3 pts median 91.9 %90.4 % of 1 899±0.0 pts median 90.5 %3.6 % of 1 6429.0 % of 1 904
Robert BIEDROŃ PolandS&D99.6 % of 2 521+9.5 pts median 90.1 %97.7 % of 2 511+1.9 pts median 95.8 %1.3 % of 2 4561.4 % of 2 511
Stanisław TYSZKA PolandESN85.1 % of 2 521−10.4 pts median 95.5 %82.0 % of 2 142−11.5 pts median 93.5 %14.2 % of 2 0209.7 % of 2 146
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.