Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

Whole term: 5 928 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.2 % (737 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

54 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Adam BIELAN PolandECR92.4 % of 5 928+0.7 pts median 91.6 %92.0 % of 5 460+0.9 pts median 91.1 %2.7 % of 4 7428.6 % of 5 476
Adam JARUBAS PolandEPP74.3 % of 5 928−15.6 pts median 89.9 %90.1 % of 4 404−3.6 pts median 93.6 %7.2 % of 4 2224.3 % of 4 404
Andrzej BUŁA PolandEPP91.5 % of 5 928+1.6 pts median 89.9 %92.3 % of 5 426−1.3 pts median 93.6 %5.1 % of 5 1772.5 % of 5 426
Andrzej HALICKI PolandEPP91.1 % of 5 928+1.2 pts median 89.9 %92.2 % of 5 399−1.5 pts median 93.6 %5.3 % of 5 1641.7 % of 5 399
Anna BRYŁKA changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.PolandPatriots90.0 % of 5 928not compared median 91.1 %85.2 % of 5 205not compared median 82.7 %6.9 % of 4 14510.3 % of 5 336
Anna ZALEWSKA PolandECR98.2 % of 5 928+6.6 pts median 91.6 %91.2 % of 5 807+0.1 pts median 91.1 %3.2 % of 5 0588.2 % of 5 824
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK PolandECR96.3 % of 5 928+4.6 pts median 91.6 %91.5 % of 5 690+0.3 pts median 91.1 %3.3 % of 4 9508.0 % of 5 706
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ PolandEPP97.6 % of 5 928+7.7 pts median 89.9 %92.0 % of 5 787−1.6 pts median 93.6 %5.7 % of 5 5121.9 % of 5 787
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ PolandEPP95.4 % of 5 928+5.5 pts median 89.9 %90.8 % of 5 658−2.8 pts median 93.6 %7.0 % of 5 3912.1 % of 5 658
Beata SZYDŁO PolandECR93.3 % of 5 928+1.7 pts median 91.6 %91.3 % of 5 516+0.2 pts median 91.1 %3.3 % of 4 8048.0 % of 5 531
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI PolandEPP98.5 % of 5 928+8.6 pts median 89.9 %91.7 % of 5 842−1.9 pts median 93.6 %5.3 % of 5 5723.5 % of 5 842
Bogdan RZOŃCA PolandECR99.1 % of 5 928+7.5 pts median 91.6 %91.1 % of 5 859±0.0 pts median 91.1 %3.4 % of 5 0967.8 % of 5 876
Borys BUDKA PolandEPP84.6 % of 5 928−5.3 pts median 89.9 %91.1 % of 5 015−2.5 pts median 93.6 %5.9 % of 4 7602.5 % of 5 015
Daniel OBAJTEK PolandECR82.8 % of 5 928−8.8 pts median 91.6 %91.4 % of 4 893+0.2 pts median 91.1 %3.2 % of 4 2487.9 % of 4 909
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPP97.7 % of 5 928+7.8 pts median 89.9 %90.5 % of 5 793−3.1 pts median 93.6 %7.1 % of 5 5121.9 % of 5 793
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI PolandECR64.0 % of 5 928−27.6 pts median 91.6 %90.9 % of 3 781−0.3 pts median 91.1 %3.6 % of 3 2498.4 % of 3 795
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA PolandEPP94.2 % of 5 928+4.3 pts median 89.9 %90.7 % of 5 587−2.9 pts median 93.6 %6.8 % of 5 3112.1 % of 5 587
Ewa KOPACZ PolandEPP98.7 % of 5 928+8.8 pts median 89.9 %91.6 % of 5 853−2.0 pts median 93.6 %6.0 % of 5 5711.9 % of 5 853
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.PolandPatriots76.8 % of 5 928not compared median 91.3 %76.2 % of 4 546not compared median 94.6 %18.9 % of 4 07615.7 % of 4 554
Grzegorz BRAUN PolandNo group83.1 % of 5 928—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 50.2 % of 4 928
Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ PolandEPP80.1 % of 5 787−9.8 pts median 89.9 %89.2 % of 4 638−4.4 pts median 93.6 %8.1 % of 4 4093.4 % of 4 638
Jacek OZDOBA PolandECR90.1 % of 5 928−1.6 pts median 91.6 %90.6 % of 5 323−0.6 pts median 91.1 %3.8 % of 4 6547.9 % of 5 340
Jacek PROTAS PolandEPP95.1 % of 5 928+5.2 pts median 89.9 %90.7 % of 5 640−2.9 pts median 93.6 %6.8 % of 5 3663.2 % of 5 640
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA PolandECR96.4 % of 5 928+4.8 pts median 91.6 %91.3 % of 5 699+0.1 pts median 91.1 %3.2 % of 4 9557.6 % of 5 715
Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK PolandEPP93.4 % of 5 928+3.5 pts median 89.9 %90.8 % of 5 539−2.8 pts median 93.6 %6.6 % of 5 2791.8 % of 5 539
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI PolandEPP83.1 % of 5 928−6.8 pts median 89.9 %91.4 % of 4 926−2.3 pts median 93.6 %5.8 % of 4 7186.0 % of 4 926
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI PolandECR93.6 % of 5 928+1.9 pts median 91.6 %90.9 % of 5 531−0.3 pts median 91.1 %3.7 % of 4 8138.3 % of 5 547
Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS PolandS&D99.0 % of 5 928+9.1 pts median 89.9 %97.8 % of 5 865+1.5 pts median 96.3 %1.7 % of 5 7671.8 % of 5 867
Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ PolandEPP97.4 % of 5 928+7.5 pts median 89.9 %90.9 % of 5 773−2.7 pts median 93.6 %6.9 % of 5 5162.0 % of 5 773
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI PolandECR98.9 % of 5 928+7.3 pts median 91.6 %91.4 % of 5 847+0.2 pts median 91.1 %3.0 % of 5 0817.9 % of 5 864
Krzysztof BREJZA PolandEPP92.5 % of 5 928+2.6 pts median 89.9 %91.8 % of 5 485−1.8 pts median 93.6 %5.5 % of 5 2111.9 % of 5 485
Krzysztof HETMAN PolandEPP90.7 % of 5 928+0.7 pts median 89.9 %89.6 % of 5 374−4.1 pts median 93.6 %7.5 % of 5 1323.8 % of 5 374
Krzysztof ŚMISZEK PolandS&D87.7 % of 5 928−2.2 pts median 89.9 %97.7 % of 5 198+1.5 pts median 96.3 %1.7 % of 5 1042.1 % of 5 199
Łukasz KOHUT PolandEPP96.8 % of 5 928+6.9 pts median 89.9 %91.6 % of 5 740−2.0 pts median 93.6 %6.1 % of 5 4642.2 % of 5 740
Maciej WĄSIK PolandECR96.1 % of 5 928+4.5 pts median 91.6 %91.0 % of 5 683−0.2 pts median 91.1 %3.5 % of 4 9387.6 % of 5 699
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ PolandEPP93.1 % of 5 928+3.2 pts median 89.9 %92.0 % of 5 521−1.6 pts median 93.6 %5.6 % of 5 2571.9 % of 5 521
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA PolandECR90.8 % of 5 928−0.8 pts median 91.6 %91.7 % of 5 367+0.5 pts median 91.1 %2.7 % of 4 6587.8 % of 5 382
Marcin SYPNIEWSKI PolandESN93.2 % of 5 928+1.8 pts median 91.3 %76.1 % of 5 516−18.5 pts median 94.6 %20.7 % of 5 22914.5 % of 5 524
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI PolandECR98.2 % of 5 928+6.6 pts median 91.6 %91.9 % of 5 804+0.7 pts median 91.1 %3.0 % of 5 0667.9 % of 5 821
Marlena MALĄG PolandECR97.4 % of 5 928+5.8 pts median 91.6 %91.1 % of 5 756−0.1 pts median 91.1 %3.1 % of 5 0097.8 % of 5 773
Marta WCISŁO PolandEPP95.3 % of 5 928+5.4 pts median 89.9 %90.6 % of 5 652−3.1 pts median 93.6 %6.7 % of 5 3782.3 % of 5 652
Michał DWORCZYK PolandECR72.0 % of 5 928−19.6 pts median 91.6 %91.7 % of 4 256+0.6 pts median 91.1 %3.0 % of 3 7127.1 % of 4 270
Michał KOBOSKO PolandRenew91.6 % of 5 928+1.2 pts median 90.4 %97.2 % of 5 426+1.7 pts median 95.5 %1.7 % of 5 2771.3 % of 5 431
Michał SZCZERBA PolandEPP97.5 % of 5 928+7.6 pts median 89.9 %90.8 % of 5 778−2.9 pts median 93.6 %6.9 % of 5 5011.8 % of 5 778
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ PolandEPP90.9 % of 5 928+1.0 pts median 89.9 %91.9 % of 5 391−1.7 pts median 93.6 %5.6 % of 5 1231.7 % of 5 391
Mirosława NYKIEL PolandEPP89.4 % of 5 928−0.5 pts median 89.9 %91.5 % of 5 298−2.1 pts median 93.6 %6.0 % of 5 0422.0 % of 5 298
Patryk JAKI PolandECR91.9 % of 5 928+0.2 pts median 91.6 %90.6 % of 5 429−0.6 pts median 91.1 %4.3 % of 4 7267.9 % of 5 446
Piotr MÜLLER PolandECR85.3 % of 5 928−6.3 pts median 91.6 %91.6 % of 5 043+0.4 pts median 91.1 %2.9 % of 4 3788.1 % of 5 059
Robert BIEDROŃ PolandS&D99.6 % of 5 928+9.7 pts median 89.9 %97.9 % of 5 900+1.7 pts median 96.3 %1.4 % of 5 8031.8 % of 5 902
Stanisław TYSZKA PolandESN68.6 % of 5 928−22.8 pts median 91.3 %78.5 % of 4 060−16.1 pts median 94.6 %18.2 % of 3 85912.5 % of 4 066
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.