Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

Whole term: 620 final votes with named positions — 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 90.6 % (732 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

34 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Anja HAZEKAMP NetherlandsThe Left50.3 % of 620−36.6 pts median 86.9 %79.2 % of 308−7.4 pts median 86.6 %16.9 % of 24913.1 % of 312
Anna STROLENBERG NetherlandsGreens98.9 % of 620+6.6 pts median 92.3 %96.7 % of 613+0.3 pts median 96.4 %2.0 % of 5935.4 % of 613
Anouk VAN BRUG NetherlandsRenew73.2 % of 620−18.3 pts median 91.5 %89.8 % of 450−3.8 pts median 93.6 %7.9 % of 4163.3 % of 454
Auke ZIJLSTRA NetherlandsPatriots96.3 % of 620+5.5 pts median 90.8 %74.8 % of 596−5.2 pts median 80.0 %16.9 % of 47315.1 % of 597
Bart GROOTHUIS NetherlandsRenew81.3 % of 620−10.2 pts median 91.5 %90.4 % of 501−3.1 pts median 93.6 %7.0 % of 4583.4 % of 504
Bert-Jan RUISSEN NetherlandsECR99.8 % of 620+7.9 pts median 91.9 %80.5 % of 615−7.2 pts median 87.7 %13.9 % of 51113.9 % of 619
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG NetherlandsRenew82.7 % of 620−8.8 pts median 91.5 %93.3 % of 509−0.2 pts median 93.6 %2.3 % of 4721.9 % of 513
Catarina VIEIRA NetherlandsGreens91.0 % of 620−1.3 pts median 92.3 %97.2 % of 564+0.8 pts median 96.4 %1.8 % of 5475.3 % of 564
Dirk GOTINK NetherlandsEPP96.1 % of 620+5.6 pts median 90.6 %95.1 % of 596−0.4 pts median 95.6 %4.3 % of 5542.7 % of 596
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY NetherlandsRenew98.2 % of 620+6.7 pts median 91.5 %93.6 % of 605±0.0 pts median 93.6 %2.5 % of 5612.0 % of 609
Ingeborg TER LAAK NetherlandsEPP99.4 % of 620+8.8 pts median 90.6 %96.9 % of 616+1.4 pts median 95.6 %2.8 % of 5732.3 % of 616
Jeannette BALJEU NetherlandsRenew91.6 % of 620+0.1 pts median 91.5 %90.4 % of 564−3.1 pts median 93.6 %6.9 % of 5193.5 % of 568
Jeroen LENAERS NetherlandsEPP99.8 % of 620+9.3 pts median 90.6 %97.1 % of 619+1.5 pts median 95.6 %2.6 % of 5762.1 % of 619
Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.NetherlandsECR98.1 % of 620not compared median 90.6 %82.4 % of 607not compared median 95.6 %15.6 % of 53815.8 % of 608
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK NetherlandsGreens91.3 % of 620−1.0 pts median 92.3 %96.6 % of 566+0.2 pts median 96.4 %2.2 % of 5494.9 % of 566
Lara WOLTERS NetherlandsS&D87.9 % of 620−1.6 pts median 89.5 %93.6 % of 545−3.5 pts median 97.1 %5.8 % of 5383.5 % of 545
Malik AZMANI NetherlandsRenew98.5 % of 620+7.0 pts median 91.5 %90.1 % of 607−3.4 pts median 93.6 %7.6 % of 5634.4 % of 611
Marieke EHLERS NetherlandsPatriots97.6 % of 620+6.8 pts median 90.8 %74.3 % of 604−5.7 pts median 80.0 %17.0 % of 47615.0 % of 605
Marit MAIJ NetherlandsS&D99.5 % of 620+10.0 pts median 89.5 %92.7 % of 617−4.4 pts median 97.1 %6.7 % of 6103.9 % of 617
Mieke ANDRIESE NetherlandsPatriots91.6 % of 323+0.8 pts median 90.8 %72.5 % of 295−7.5 pts median 80.0 %17.1 % of 22812.2 % of 296
Mohammed CHAHIM NetherlandsS&D90.2 % of 620+0.6 pts median 89.5 %93.7 % of 559−3.4 pts median 97.1 %6.0 % of 5543.4 % of 559
Rachel BLOM NetherlandsPatriots95.3 % of 620+4.5 pts median 90.8 %74.7 % of 590−5.3 pts median 80.0 %16.6 % of 46514.9 % of 591
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE NetherlandsRenew99.7 % of 620+8.1 pts median 91.5 %93.5 % of 614−0.1 pts median 93.6 %2.6 % of 5681.9 % of 618
Reinier VAN LANSCHOT NetherlandsGreens95.8 % of 620+3.5 pts median 92.3 %96.6 % of 594+0.2 pts median 96.4 %1.9 % of 5755.4 % of 594
Sander SMIT changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.NetherlandsECR90.3 % of 620not compared median 90.6 %81.9 % of 559not compared median 95.6 %16.1 % of 49815.9 % of 560
Sebastian KRUIS NetherlandsPatriots88.9 % of 620−1.9 pts median 90.8 %74.5 % of 550−5.5 pts median 80.0 %16.4 % of 43414.7 % of 551
Thijs REUTEN NetherlandsS&D97.4 % of 620+7.9 pts median 89.5 %92.9 % of 604−4.2 pts median 97.1 %6.5 % of 5973.5 % of 604
Tineke STRIK NetherlandsGreens91.8 % of 620−0.5 pts median 92.3 %97.4 % of 569+1.0 pts median 96.4 %2.0 % of 5535.3 % of 569
Ton DIEPEVEEN NetherlandsPatriots91.0 % of 620+0.2 pts median 90.8 %73.9 % of 563−6.1 pts median 80.0 %17.9 % of 44815.1 % of 564
Ufuk KÂHYA NetherlandsGreens98.6 % of 72+6.4 pts median 92.3 %95.8 % of 71−0.6 pts median 96.4 %2.9 % of 698.5 % of 71
Willemien KONING NetherlandsEPP95.3 % of 212+4.7 pts median 90.6 %97.0 % of 202+1.5 pts median 95.6 %2.6 % of 1942.0 % of 202
Bas EICKHOUT Left on 20 Jun 2026 NetherlandsGreens88.9 % of 548−3.4 pts median 92.3 %99.8 % of 487+3.4 pts median 96.4 %0.0 % of 4753.9 % of 487
Sebastiaan STÖTELER Left on 11 Nov 2025 NetherlandsPatriots72.6 % of 281−18.2 pts median 90.8 %75.0 % of 204−5.0 pts median 80.0 %17.6 % of 16519.6 % of 204
Tom BERENDSEN Left on 22 Feb 2026 NetherlandsEPP98.3 % of 407+7.7 pts median 90.6 %96.8 % of 400+1.2 pts median 95.6 %3.0 % of 3662.8 % of 400
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.