Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

Whole term: 5 928 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.2 % (737 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

34 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Anja HAZEKAMP NetherlandsThe Left51.3 % of 5 928−37.1 pts median 88.5 %85.6 % of 3 033−7.2 pts median 92.8 %10.7 % of 2 7855.6 % of 3 044
Anna STROLENBERG NetherlandsGreens99.5 % of 5 928+7.3 pts median 92.2 %96.9 % of 5 897−0.1 pts median 97.1 %2.1 % of 5 7754.6 % of 5 898
Anouk VAN BRUG NetherlandsRenew75.1 % of 5 928−15.4 pts median 90.4 %93.0 % of 4 446−2.5 pts median 95.5 %5.7 % of 4 3230.8 % of 4 451
Auke ZIJLSTRA NetherlandsPatriots94.6 % of 5 928+3.5 pts median 91.1 %79.4 % of 5 591−3.3 pts median 82.7 %12.6 % of 4 4339.9 % of 5 609
Bart GROOTHUIS NetherlandsRenew75.3 % of 5 928−15.2 pts median 90.4 %91.9 % of 4 459−3.7 pts median 95.5 %7.0 % of 4 3381.3 % of 4 462
Bert-Jan RUISSEN NetherlandsECR99.7 % of 5 928+8.1 pts median 91.6 %86.2 % of 5 896−4.9 pts median 91.1 %10.9 % of 5 13310.2 % of 5 913
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG NetherlandsRenew85.5 % of 5 928−5.0 pts median 90.4 %96.6 % of 5 062+1.1 pts median 95.5 %2.3 % of 4 9200.7 % of 5 067
Catarina VIEIRA NetherlandsGreens92.3 % of 5 928+0.2 pts median 92.2 %97.8 % of 5 473+0.7 pts median 97.1 %1.5 % of 5 3584.3 % of 5 474
Dirk GOTINK NetherlandsEPP97.6 % of 5 928+7.7 pts median 89.9 %94.4 % of 5 787+0.8 pts median 93.6 %4.2 % of 5 5062.1 % of 5 787
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY NetherlandsRenew98.6 % of 5 928+8.2 pts median 90.4 %97.1 % of 5 840+1.6 pts median 95.5 %1.9 % of 5 6820.8 % of 5 845
Ingeborg TER LAAK NetherlandsEPP99.2 % of 5 928+9.3 pts median 89.9 %96.8 % of 5 882+3.2 pts median 93.6 %2.1 % of 5 5991.4 % of 5 882
Jeannette BALJEU NetherlandsRenew87.9 % of 5 928−2.5 pts median 90.4 %92.3 % of 5 207−3.3 pts median 95.5 %6.5 % of 5 0641.2 % of 5 211
Jeroen LENAERS NetherlandsEPP99.6 % of 5 928+9.7 pts median 89.9 %97.1 % of 5 905+3.5 pts median 93.6 %1.8 % of 5 6231.4 % of 5 905
Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.NetherlandsECR98.3 % of 5 928not compared median 89.9 %74.1 % of 5 824not compared median 93.6 %23.6 % of 5 34911.1 % of 5 827
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK NetherlandsGreens92.4 % of 5 928+0.2 pts median 92.2 %97.8 % of 5 476+0.7 pts median 97.1 %1.5 % of 5 3664.4 % of 5 477
Lara WOLTERS NetherlandsS&D91.2 % of 5 928+1.3 pts median 89.9 %95.1 % of 5 404−1.2 pts median 96.3 %4.0 % of 5 3102.2 % of 5 405
Malik AZMANI NetherlandsRenew98.9 % of 5 928+8.5 pts median 90.4 %92.3 % of 5 859−3.2 pts median 95.5 %6.5 % of 5 6991.3 % of 5 864
Marieke EHLERS NetherlandsPatriots97.9 % of 5 928+6.8 pts median 91.1 %79.8 % of 5 783−2.9 pts median 82.7 %12.3 % of 4 5899.6 % of 5 804
Marit MAIJ NetherlandsS&D99.6 % of 5 928+9.8 pts median 89.9 %95.2 % of 5 903−1.1 pts median 96.3 %4.0 % of 5 8052.3 % of 5 905
Mieke ANDRIESE NetherlandsPatriots91.8 % of 2 979+0.7 pts median 91.1 %78.7 % of 2 727−4.0 pts median 82.7 %12.4 % of 2 1458.7 % of 2 736
Mohammed CHAHIM NetherlandsS&D87.6 % of 5 928−2.3 pts median 89.9 %94.1 % of 5 188−2.2 pts median 96.3 %5.3 % of 5 1162.1 % of 5 190
Rachel BLOM NetherlandsPatriots97.1 % of 5 928+6.0 pts median 91.1 %79.6 % of 5 735−3.1 pts median 82.7 %12.5 % of 4 5449.8 % of 5 755
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE NetherlandsRenew99.7 % of 5 928+9.3 pts median 90.4 %97.0 % of 5 907+1.5 pts median 95.5 %1.9 % of 5 7450.7 % of 5 912
Reinier VAN LANSCHOT NetherlandsGreens97.1 % of 5 928+5.0 pts median 92.2 %97.1 % of 5 756±0.0 pts median 97.1 %1.9 % of 5 6384.6 % of 5 757
Sander SMIT changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.NetherlandsECR90.1 % of 5 928not compared median 89.9 %74.8 % of 5 340not compared median 93.6 %22.8 % of 4 91010.5 % of 5 342
Sebastian KRUIS NetherlandsPatriots87.1 % of 5 928−4.0 pts median 91.1 %79.3 % of 5 141−3.3 pts median 82.7 %12.6 % of 4 0709.3 % of 5 162
Thijs REUTEN NetherlandsS&D97.3 % of 5 928+7.4 pts median 89.9 %95.4 % of 5 764−0.8 pts median 96.3 %3.7 % of 5 6692.2 % of 5 766
Tineke STRIK NetherlandsGreens93.8 % of 5 928+1.6 pts median 92.2 %97.8 % of 5 557+0.7 pts median 97.1 %1.7 % of 5 4414.5 % of 5 558
Ton DIEPEVEEN NetherlandsPatriots92.0 % of 5 928+0.9 pts median 91.1 %79.7 % of 5 435−3.0 pts median 82.7 %12.6 % of 4 3299.5 % of 5 455
Ufuk KÂHYA NetherlandsGreens98.3 % of 645+6.1 pts median 92.2 %99.1 % of 634+2.0 pts median 97.1 %0.5 % of 6233.0 % of 634
Willemien KONING NetherlandsEPP93.6 % of 2 047+3.7 pts median 89.9 %96.0 % of 1 917+2.4 pts median 93.6 %2.5 % of 1 8381.6 % of 1 917
Bas EICKHOUT Left on 20 Jun 2026 NetherlandsGreens89.9 % of 5 283−2.2 pts median 92.2 %99.3 % of 4 751+2.2 pts median 97.1 %0.2 % of 4 6594.1 % of 4 751
Sebastiaan STÖTELER Left on 11 Nov 2025 NetherlandsPatriots80.8 % of 2 682−10.3 pts median 91.1 %79.7 % of 2 161−2.9 pts median 82.7 %13.6 % of 1 69112.2 % of 2 168
Tom BERENDSEN Left on 22 Feb 2026 NetherlandsEPP98.2 % of 3 838+8.3 pts median 89.9 %97.3 % of 3 770+3.7 pts median 93.6 %1.7 % of 3 5691.5 % of 3 770
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.