Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

33 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Anja HAZEKAMP NetherlandsThe Left88.5 % of 2 521+0.3 pts median 88.2 %89.6 % of 2 224−4.0 pts median 93.6 %7.9 % of 2 0855.3 % of 2 230
Anna STROLENBERG NetherlandsGreens99.7 % of 2 521+7.2 pts median 92.5 %97.1 % of 2 512−0.3 pts median 97.5 %2.5 % of 2 4715.2 % of 2 513
Anouk VAN BRUG NetherlandsRenew99.0 % of 2 521+7.2 pts median 91.7 %91.1 % of 2 493−4.0 pts median 95.1 %7.6 % of 2 4200.9 % of 2 495
Auke ZIJLSTRA NetherlandsPatriots94.2 % of 2 521+3.8 pts median 90.4 %78.8 % of 2 367−4.3 pts median 83.1 %12.1 % of 1 8447.8 % of 2 374
Bart GROOTHUIS NetherlandsRenew65.5 % of 2 521−26.3 pts median 91.7 %90.4 % of 1 650−4.7 pts median 95.1 %7.8 % of 1 5960.7 % of 1 650
Bert-Jan RUISSEN NetherlandsECR99.9 % of 2 521+8.0 pts median 91.9 %85.8 % of 2 512−4.7 pts median 90.5 %11.5 % of 2 18411.6 % of 2 518
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG NetherlandsRenew88.2 % of 2 521−3.5 pts median 91.7 %96.9 % of 2 222+1.8 pts median 95.1 %1.9 % of 2 1570.3 % of 2 224
Catarina VIEIRA NetherlandsGreens83.4 % of 2 521−9.1 pts median 92.5 %98.8 % of 2 101+1.3 pts median 97.5 %1.0 % of 2 0665.4 % of 2 102
Dirk GOTINK NetherlandsEPP98.2 % of 2 521+7.2 pts median 91.0 %95.0 % of 2 476+1.2 pts median 93.7 %3.8 % of 2 3732.3 % of 2 476
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY NetherlandsRenew99.5 % of 2 521+7.7 pts median 91.7 %97.2 % of 2 506+2.2 pts median 95.1 %1.6 % of 2 4320.3 % of 2 508
Ingeborg TER LAAK NetherlandsEPP99.4 % of 2 521+8.4 pts median 91.0 %96.2 % of 2 507+2.5 pts median 93.7 %2.5 % of 2 4031.6 % of 2 507
Jeannette BALJEU NetherlandsRenew75.8 % of 2 521−15.9 pts median 91.7 %91.3 % of 1 911−3.8 pts median 95.1 %7.0 % of 1 8540.7 % of 1 912
Jeroen LENAERS NetherlandsEPP99.8 % of 2 521+8.8 pts median 91.0 %96.7 % of 2 515+3.0 pts median 93.7 %2.0 % of 2 4121.7 % of 2 515
Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.NetherlandsECR97.4 % of 2 521not compared median 91.9 %78.4 % of 2 453not compared median 90.5 %18.6 % of 2 16113.8 % of 2 456
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK NetherlandsGreens84.5 % of 2 521−8.0 pts median 92.5 %98.7 % of 2 128+1.3 pts median 97.5 %1.0 % of 2 0985.4 % of 2 129
Lara WOLTERS NetherlandsS&D99.5 % of 2 521+9.4 pts median 90.1 %94.6 % of 2 508−1.3 pts median 95.8 %4.3 % of 2 4532.0 % of 2 508
Malik AZMANI NetherlandsRenew98.5 % of 2 521+6.7 pts median 91.7 %91.3 % of 2 481−3.8 pts median 95.1 %7.2 % of 2 4061.0 % of 2 483
Marieke EHLERS NetherlandsPatriots98.6 % of 2 521+8.2 pts median 90.4 %79.7 % of 2 478−3.4 pts median 83.1 %11.5 % of 1 9527.4 % of 2 486
Marit MAIJ NetherlandsS&D99.7 % of 2 521+9.6 pts median 90.1 %94.2 % of 2 513−1.6 pts median 95.8 %4.7 % of 2 4582.0 % of 2 513
Mieke ANDRIESE NetherlandsPatriots93.5 % of 2 521+3.1 pts median 90.4 %79.1 % of 2 351−4.0 pts median 83.1 %12.1 % of 1 8448.0 % of 2 358
Mohammed CHAHIM NetherlandsS&D74.7 % of 2 521−15.4 pts median 90.1 %92.6 % of 1 884−3.3 pts median 95.8 %6.6 % of 1 8501.9 % of 1 884
Rachel BLOM NetherlandsPatriots99.6 % of 2 521+9.2 pts median 90.4 %79.6 % of 2 504−3.5 pts median 83.1 %11.7 % of 1 9747.8 % of 2 512
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE NetherlandsRenew99.8 % of 2 521+8.1 pts median 91.7 %97.2 % of 2 515+2.1 pts median 95.1 %1.7 % of 2 4400.3 % of 2 517
Reinier VAN LANSCHOT NetherlandsGreens97.5 % of 2 521+5.0 pts median 92.5 %97.4 % of 2 457−0.1 pts median 97.5 %2.2 % of 2 4165.3 % of 2 458
Sander SMIT changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.NetherlandsECR94.8 % of 2 521not compared median 91.9 %79.1 % of 2 387not compared median 90.5 %18.0 % of 2 11112.7 % of 2 389
Sebastian KRUIS NetherlandsPatriots86.0 % of 2 521−4.4 pts median 90.4 %80.1 % of 2 160−3.0 pts median 83.1 %11.4 % of 1 7056.9 % of 2 168
Thijs REUTEN NetherlandsS&D97.4 % of 2 521+7.3 pts median 90.1 %94.7 % of 2 456−1.2 pts median 95.8 %4.2 % of 2 4021.9 % of 2 456
Tineke STRIK NetherlandsGreens87.3 % of 2 521−5.1 pts median 92.5 %98.5 % of 2 201+1.1 pts median 97.5 %1.1 % of 2 1665.5 % of 2 202
Ton DIEPEVEEN NetherlandsPatriots94.7 % of 2 521+4.3 pts median 90.4 %79.5 % of 2 380−3.6 pts median 83.1 %12.1 % of 1 8757.1 % of 2 388
Ufuk KÂHYA NetherlandsGreens98.3 % of 645+5.8 pts median 92.5 %99.1 % of 634+1.6 pts median 97.5 %0.5 % of 6233.0 % of 634
Willemien KONING NetherlandsEPP93.6 % of 2 047+2.7 pts median 91.0 %96.0 % of 1 917+2.3 pts median 93.7 %2.5 % of 1 8381.6 % of 1 917
Bas EICKHOUT Left on 20 Jun 2026 NetherlandsGreens80.5 % of 1 876−11.9 pts median 92.5 %99.6 % of 1 511+2.1 pts median 97.5 %0.2 % of 1 4915.9 % of 1 511
Tom BERENDSEN Left on 22 Feb 2026 NetherlandsEPP99.8 % of 431+8.8 pts median 91.0 %97.4 % of 430+3.7 pts median 93.7 %1.7 % of 4082.3 % of 430
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.