Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

76 members match the filters

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Alberico GAMBINO ItalyECR72.7 % of 66−19.7 pts median 92.4 %44 of 48 — median 92.1 %0 of 40 5 of 48
Aldo PATRICIELLO ItalyPatriots47.0 % of 66−47.0 pts median 93.9 %28 of 31 — median 85.0 %3 of 29 4 of 31
Alessandra MORETTI ItalyS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 66+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 660.0 % of 66
Alessandro CIRIANI ItalyECR83.3 % of 66−9.1 pts median 92.4 %92.6 % of 54+0.5 pts median 92.1 %0 of 47 10.9 % of 55
Alessandro ZAN ItalyS&D90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 60+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 600.0 % of 60
Anna Maria CISINT ItalyPatriots84.8 % of 66−9.1 pts median 93.9 %87.5 % of 56+2.5 pts median 85.0 %3 of 48 16.1 % of 56
Annalisa CORRADO ItalyS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 64+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 640.0 % of 64
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECR92.4 % of 66±0.0 pts median 92.4 %95.0 % of 60+2.9 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 538.2 % of 61
Benedetta SCUDERI ItalyGreens100.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 97.0 %92.4 % of 66−4.4 pts median 96.8 %6.5 % of 623.0 % of 66
Brando BENIFEI ItalyS&D71.2 % of 66−24.2 pts median 95.5 %47 of 47 — median 98.3 %0 of 47 0 of 47
Camilla LAURETI ItalyS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 64+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 640.0 % of 64
Carlo CICCIOLI ItalyECR75.8 % of 66−16.7 pts median 92.4 %45 of 49 — median 92.1 %0 of 41 10.0 % of 50
Carlo FIDANZA ItalyECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 64+1.6 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 567.8 % of 64
Carolina MORACE ItalyThe Left100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %86.4 % of 66−0.2 pts median 86.5 %7.0 % of 577.6 % of 66
Caterina CHINNICI ItalyEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %95.4 % of 65±0.0 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 541.5 % of 65
Cecilia STRADA ItalyS&D92.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 95.5 %91.8 % of 61−6.5 pts median 98.3 %8.2 % of 616.6 % of 61
Chiara GEMMA ItalyECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 579.1 % of 66
Cristina GUARDA ItalyGreens1.5 % of 66−95.5 pts median 97.0 %0 of 1 — median 96.8 %1 of 1 0 of 1
Daniele POLATO ItalyECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 579.1 % of 66
Danilo DELLA VALLE ItalyThe Left93.9 % of 66±0.0 pts median 93.9 %85.5 % of 62−1.0 pts median 86.5 %7.5 % of 538.1 % of 62
Dario NARDELLA ItalyS&D74.2 % of 66−21.2 pts median 95.5 %49 of 49 — median 98.3 %0 of 49 0 of 49
Dario TAMBURRANO ItalyThe Left97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %85.9 % of 64−0.6 pts median 86.5 %7.3 % of 557.8 % of 64
Denis NESCI ItalyECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 579.1 % of 66
Elena DONAZZAN ItalyECR86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %92.9 % of 56+0.7 pts median 92.1 %0 of 48 8.8 % of 57
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group ItalyRenew90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 60+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 600.0 % of 60
Flavio TOSI ItalyEPP87.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 92.4 %96.6 % of 58+1.2 pts median 95.3 %0 of 47 0.0 % of 58
Francesco TORSELLI ItalyECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 579.1 % of 66
Francesco VENTOLA ItalyECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.7 % of 63+1.5 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 559.4 % of 64
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO ItalyEPP50.0 % of 66−42.4 pts median 92.4 %31 of 33 — median 95.3 %0 of 23 0 of 33
Gaetano PEDULLA' ItalyThe Left100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %86.4 % of 66−0.2 pts median 86.5 %7.0 % of 577.6 % of 66
Giorgio GORI ItalyS&D78.8 % of 66−16.7 pts median 95.5 %98.1 % of 52−0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.9 % of 520.0 % of 52
Giovanni CROSETTO ItalyECR80.3 % of 66−12.1 pts median 92.4 %92.3 % of 52+0.2 pts median 92.1 %0 of 44 11.3 % of 53
Giuseppe ANTOCI ItalyThe Left97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %87.5 % of 64+1.0 pts median 86.5 %5.5 % of 556.3 % of 64
Giuseppe LUPO ItalyS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 66+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 660.0 % of 66
Giuseppe MILAZZO ItalyECR53.0 % of 66−39.4 pts median 92.4 %30 of 34 — median 92.1 %0 of 27 5 of 35
Giusi PRINCI ItalyEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %95.3 % of 64±0.0 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 521.6 % of 64
Herbert DORFMANN ItalyEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %97.0 % of 66+1.6 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
Ignazio Roberto MARINO ItalyGreens95.5 % of 66−1.5 pts median 97.0 %93.7 % of 63−3.2 pts median 96.8 %1.7 % of 600.0 % of 63
Ilaria SALIS ItalyThe Left87.9 % of 66−6.1 pts median 93.9 %91.4 % of 58+4.9 pts median 86.5 %3.9 % of 5110.3 % of 58
Irene TINAGLI ItalyS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 64+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 640.0 % of 64
Isabella TOVAGLIERI ItalyPatriots80.3 % of 66−13.6 pts median 93.9 %86.8 % of 53+1.8 pts median 85.0 %2 of 46 9.4 % of 53
Lara MAGONI ItalyECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 64+1.6 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 569.4 % of 64
Leoluca ORLANDO ItalyGreens92.4 % of 66−4.5 pts median 97.0 %88.5 % of 61−8.3 pts median 96.8 %5.3 % of 571.6 % of 61
Letizia MORATTI ItalyEPP63.6 % of 66−28.8 pts median 92.4 %40 of 42 — median 95.3 %0 of 32 0 of 42
Lucia ANNUNZIATA ItalyS&D78.8 % of 66−16.7 pts median 95.5 %94.2 % of 52−4.0 pts median 98.3 %5.8 % of 523.8 % of 52
Marco FALCONE ItalyEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %96.9 % of 64+1.5 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 531.6 % of 64
Marco SQUARTA ItalyECR87.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.0 % of 57+0.9 pts median 92.1 %0 of 49 10.3 % of 58
Marco TARQUINIO ItalyS&D95.5 % of 66±0.0 pts median 95.5 %93.7 % of 63−4.6 pts median 98.3 %6.3 % of 634.8 % of 63
Mariateresa VIVALDINI ItalyECR98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %81.3 % of 64−10.9 pts median 92.1 %14.3 % of 569.2 % of 65
Mario FURORE ItalyThe Left90.9 % of 66−3.0 pts median 93.9 %86.7 % of 60+0.2 pts median 86.5 %5.8 % of 526.7 % of 60
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.