Skip to content

Member

Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY

Renew · Netherlands

Group
Renew
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
88.4 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line
97.1 %ⓘ of 453 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 96.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
D66 Democraten 66
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
7 of 443 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT, ECON (substitute), ENVI
Member id
96940
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

Roll-call participation ⓘ

88.4 %

456 of 516 roll calls while in office

Renew median: 96.3 % (−7.9 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.1 %

440 of 453 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 96.1 % (+1.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.6 %

7 of 443 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 3 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.1 %

5 of 456 votes cast

Participation 88.4 % — Renew median 96.3 %, 77 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY88.4 %
Renew median96.3 %
Lowest in the group38.0 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members77
With majority line 97.1 % — Renew median 96.1 %, 77 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY97.1 %
Renew median96.1 %
Lowest in the group77.6 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members77
  • 2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242323
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202422
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249291
7 Oct 202421
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129129
24 Oct 20241312
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 2024570
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244545

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands99 % of 5 831 shared92 %
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG RenewNetherlands99 % of 4 991 shared92 %
Taner KABILOV changed group ECRBulgaria98 % of 426 shared92 %
Lucia YAR RenewSlovakia97 % of 5 786 shared92 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia97 % of 5 480 shared92 %
Michal WIEZIK RenewSlovakia97 % of 5 347 shared92 %
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ RenewSlovakia97 % of 3 799 shared92 %
Elena YONCHEVA changed group ECRBulgaria97 % of 229 shared92 %
Martin HOJSÍK RenewSlovakia96 % of 5 311 shared92 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia96 % of 5 244 shared92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Birgit SIPPEL S&DGermany91 % of 4 642 shared86 %
Dan NICA S&DRomania90 % of 3 572 shared86 %
Tobias CREMER S&DGermany90 % of 5 371 shared86 %
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain90 % of 5 397 shared86 %
Bernd LANGE S&DGermany90 % of 5 280 shared86 %
Sven MIKSER S&DEstonia90 % of 5 735 shared86 %
Carla TAVARES S&DPortugal90 % of 5 392 shared86 %
René REPASI S&DGermany90 % of 5 481 shared86 %
Isilda GOMES S&DPortugal90 % of 5 181 shared86 %
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ S&DLithuania90 % of 5 499 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember20 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Attracting Investment to Ensure a Competitive and Sustainable European UnionIG10-03 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on the Welfare and Conservation of AnimalsIG10-27 Intergroup / working groupMember8 Jan 2025now
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European Council and CouncilShadow rapporteurCONT10 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European ParliamentShadow rapporteurCONT7 Sept 2026
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activitiesShadow rapporteurCONT17 Mar 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 as regards the extension of certain data protection periodsShadow rapporteurENVI17 Mar 2026
Amending Directives 2001/18/EC and 2010/53/EU as regards the placing on the market of genetically modified micro-organisms and the processing of organsShadow rapporteurENVI11 Mar 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR), Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) and repealing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288RapporteurECON29 Jan 2026
Guidelines for the 2027 Budget - Section IIIShadow rapporteur for an opinionENVI26 Jan 2026
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Council and CouncilShadow rapporteurCONT30 Sept 2025
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sectionsShadow rapporteur for an opinionENVI28 Aug 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurENVI27 Aug 2025

Show all 19 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

68 contributions recorded; 10 on behalf of their group; 93 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 39

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026Circular Economy Act: regulatory barriers to secondary raw materials E-10-2026-003654Written questionwith 29 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Jul 2026Compatibility of Latvia’s 2026 wolf hunting season with the Habitats Directive and the scientific evidence on wolf management E-10-2026-002935Written questionwith 1 co-author27 Aug 2026
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
29 Jun 2026Scrutiny of hunting trophy imports into the EU E-10-2026-002689Written questionwith 8 co-authors25 Aug 2026
19 Jun 2026Ban the butt: it is time to stub out cigarette filters E-10-2026-002547Written questionwith 9 co-authors3 Sept 2026
17 Jun 2026Tobacco industry lobbying in the name of individual citizens P-10-2026-002512Priority written question18 Aug 2026
12 May 2026Impact of the Food and Feed Safety Omnibus E-10-2026-001974Written questionwith 4 co-authors3 Jul 2026
6 May 2026Food and Feed Safety Omnibus: societal costs and scientific assessment E-10-2026-001845Written question9 Jul 2026
8 Apr 2026Russia’s influence on Hungary through the leaked 12-point plan E-10-2026-001434Written questionwith 2 co-authors16 Jun 2026
1 Apr 2026Accelerating the PFAS restriction proposal P-10-2026-001351Priority written question11 May 2026
31 Mar 2026Fourth Protocol on Environmental Crimes to UNTOC E-10-2026-001325Written questionwith 9 co-authors6 Jul 2026
18 Feb 2026Business cost savings versus health cost increase – Food and Feed Safety Omnibus P-10-2026-000703Priority written question23 Apr 2026
12 Jan 2026Next steps in tackling illegally sourced wildlife E-10-2026-000078Written question2 Mar 2026
19 Dec 2025Whale and dolphin hunting in the Faroe Islands E-10-2025-005028Written questionwith 33 co-authors30 Mar 2026
16 Dec 2025Welfare of wild animals E-10-2025-004965Written questionwith 6 co-authors12 Feb 2026
15 Dec 2025Extraterritorial sanctions leading to ‘debanking’ of EU citizens and officials of EU-supported institutions E-10-2025-004941Written questionwith 35 co-authors18 Feb 2026
5 Nov 2025Future of the LIFE programme in the next multiannual financial framework and implications for national nature restoration plans E-10-2025-004351Written question13 Jan 2026
27 Oct 2025Disappearing grasslands and weakening of environmental protections under the common agricultural policy omnibus E-10-2025-004219Written question22 Dec 2025
8 Oct 2025Transparency and targeting of political advertising scope clarification E-10-2025-003935Written question9 Dec 2025
8 Oct 2025Exports of chemicals banned in the EU E-10-2025-003973Written questionwith 2 co-authors21 Jan 2026
1 Sept 2025Lack of Dutch inspections of the Russian shadow fleet in the North Sea P-10-2025-003342Priority written question24 Sept 2025
11 Jun 2025New evidence on cancer risks of glyphosate P-10-2025-002366Priority written question28 Jul 2025
5 Jun 2025Assessment of the cancer risk from pesticide exposure E-10-2025-002283Written question30 Jul 2025
27 May 2025EU-wide ban on flavoured and disposable vapes E-10-2025-002114Written question17 Oct 2025
27 May 2025H5N1 bird flu: high-risk geographical areas E-10-2025-002113Written question22 Aug 2025
26 May 2025Continued presence of Russian shadow fleet vessels in the Western Scheldt and the risk of an environmental disaster P-10-2025-002100Priority written question6 Aug 2025
13 Apr 2025Compliance with the directive on the welfare of pigs E-10-2025-001516Written questionwith 13 co-authors2 Jul 2025
7 Apr 2025Increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires E-10-2025-001412Written questionwith 1 co-author18 Jul 2025
7 Apr 2025Increasing biodiversity financing in the next EU international cooperation budget E-10-2025-001406Written questionwith 6 co-authors27 Jun 2025
2 Apr 2025Environmentally harmful subsidies E-10-2025-001353Written question15 May 2025
12 Feb 2025Persistent obstacles to the improvement of cross-border rail transport E-10-2025-000647Written question4 Jul 2025
11 Feb 2025Russian shadow fleet and the environmental risk for our European waters and coastal communities – need for more action against the shadow fleet in the 16th sanctions package E-10-2025-000628Written question21 May 2025
11 Feb 2025Russian shadow fleet causing environmental risks to our waters and coastal communities – Commission should enforce EU sanctions violation law E-10-2025-000627Written question11 Apr 2025
10 Feb 2025LIFE grant debate P-10-2025-000595Priority written question14 Apr 2025
10 Feb 2025Agricultural policy comments during Grüne Woche E-10-2025-000596Written question10 Apr 2025
17 Jan 2025Follow-up to the Parliament resolution concerning targeted measures against the Russian shadow fleet P-10-2025-000201Priority written question18 Mar 2025
11 Dec 2024Priorities of the European Council E-10-2024-002861Written question15 Apr 2025
12 Nov 2024The Commission’s plans to include the revision of the outstanding proposals on animal welfare in its work plan for 2025 O-10-2024-000014Oral questionwith 37 co-authorsNot yet answered
6 Nov 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against Russia B-10-2024-0162Motion for a resolutionwith 30 co-authors—

Amendments tabled in committee, 84

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
10 Sept 2026Amending Directives 2001/18/EC and 2010/53/EU as regards the placing on the market of genetically modified micro-organisms and the processing of organs CJ64-AM-792138 CJ649
10 Sept 2026Amending Directives 2001/18/EC and 2010/53/EU as regards the placing on the market of genetically modified micro-organisms and the processing of organs CJ64-AM-792139 CJ646
10 Sept 2026Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council CONT-AM-792137 CONT1
23 Jul 2026Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework of measures for the acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors and amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2024/1735 and (EU) 2024/3110 ENVI-AM-791124 ENVI8
23 Jul 2026Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework of measures for the acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors and amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2024/1735 and (EU) 2024/3110 ENVI-AM-791125 ENVI23
7 Jul 2026General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections ENVI-AM-790844 ENVI7
26 Jun 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) ENVI-AM-790222 ENVI7
26 Jun 2026Amending Regulations (EC) No 561/2006, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/2144 and (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the simplification of technical requirements and testing procedures for motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 70/157/EEC and Regulation No 540/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council CJ76-AM-789933 CJ762
26 Jun 2026Amending Regulations (EC) No 561/2006, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/2144 and (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the simplification of technical requirements and testing procedures for motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 70/157/EEC and Regulation No 540/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council CJ76-AM-789089 CJ761
26 Jun 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) ENVI-AM-790221 ENVI11

Show all 84 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

  • Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY”. Member record. memberId 96940. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96940?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96940. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/96940?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-96940,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96940?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96940?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 96940. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96940. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}