Skip to content

Member

Norbert HERHAMMER

EPP · Germany

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
no votesⓘ chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls Not in office in this period.
With majority line
no votesⓘ
More facts (5)
National party
CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office
Since 11 Jun 2026
Against clear line
no votesⓘ
Committees
EMPL (substitute), PETI
Member id
278406
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

Not in office in this period.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

no votes

no roll calls while in office in the period

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

no votes

no votes where their group had a line in the period

Against clear line ⓘ

no votes

no votes where their group had a clear line in the period

Abstention ⓘ

no votes

no votes cast in the period

  • 2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 891

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital G — part 2 149 for, 331 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital G — part 1 495 for, 23 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital F 517 for, 10 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital E 489 for, 28 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital D 510 for, 7 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital C 497 for, 30 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital B — part 2 341 for, 180 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital B — part 1 484 for, 34 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital A 491 for, 28 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 25 81 for, 397 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 62 for, 418 against, 68 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 25 85 for, 413 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 25 84 for, 416 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 3 408 for, 96 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 2 357 for, 144 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 1 319 for, 190 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on paragraph 2 503 for, 12 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on paragraph 1 522 for, 4 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 169 for, 389 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 15 167 for, 363 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15 176 for, 249 against, 140 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 15 — part 2 409 for, 144 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 372 for, 139 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 3 402 for, 135 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 2 262 for, 291 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 1 509 for, 48 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 283 for, 199 against, 85 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 14, adding text after recital F 217 for, 319 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 181 for, 379 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Separate vote on paragraph 3 431 for, 58 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 13, adding text after recital A 238 for, 315 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 23 to paragraph 5 166 for, 394 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 4 215 for, 313 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 4 248 for, 279 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 4 267 for, 245 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 4 264 for, 289 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 213 for, 324 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 202 for, 330 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 206 for, 319 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 195 for, 353 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 202 for, 329 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 112 for, 330 against, 124 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 185 for, 334 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 22 to paragraph 1 177 for, 381 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 294 for, 245 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 6, adding text after recital Q 288 for, 263 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 5, adding text after recital M 302 for, 256 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 4, adding text after recital M 291 for, 269 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 282 for, 276 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 8 to paragraph 8 282 for, 274 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No sitting with a roll call while in office in this period.

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

No member meets the rule within the group.

Outside the group

No member meets the rule outside the group.

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeSubstitute3 Jul 2026now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeMember6 Jul 2026now
Delegation for relations with South AfricaD-ZA DelegationMember6 Jul 2026now

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

No speech or statement in plenary recorded this term.

Questions and motions, 1

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
10 Sept 2026Potential market disruption linked to the European Positive List process under Directive (EU) 2020/2184 E-10-2026-003614Written questionwith 9 co-authorsNot yet answered

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Norbert HERHAMMER”. Member record. memberId 278406. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/278406?page=14&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/278406. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/278406?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-278406,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Norbert HERHAMMER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/278406?page=14&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/278406?page=14&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 278406. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/278406. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}