Member

Marie-Sophie CHRIST

EPP · Germany

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 92.4 %ⓘ of 172 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 97.5 %ⓘ of 159 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office: Since 27 Mar 2026
Against clear line: 3 of 154 votesⓘ
Committees: LIBE (substitute), SANT
Member id: 277057

National party: CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office: Since 27 Mar 2026
Against clear line: 3 of 154 votesⓘ
Committees: LIBE (substitute), SANT
Member id: 277057

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.4 %

159 of 172 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+1.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.5 %

155 of 159 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+1.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.9 %

3 of 154 votes where their group had a clear line

2 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.6 %

1 of 159 votes cast

Participation 92.4 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Marie-Sophie CHRIST	92.4 %
EPP median	90.6 %
Lowest in the group	18.4 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	192

With majority line 97.5 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Marie-Sophie CHRIST	97.5 %
EPP median	95.6 %
Lowest in the group	67.8 %
Highest in the group	99.0 %
Members	192

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 1 683

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to Article 1	371 for, 260 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 126 to Article 1	173 for, 477 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 70 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 17; Regulation (EU) 2023/956	362 for, 272 against, 25 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 120 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2023/956	181 for, 462 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 103 to Article 1	182 for, 441 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 87 to Article 1	174 for, 465 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 7 — part 4	451 for, 197 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 7 — part 2	450 for, 196 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 7 — part 1	636 for, 10 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
14 Sept 2026	Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – ECB Monday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — ECB	154 for, 216 against, 85 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 15 to recital K	208 for, 347 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 13 to recital D	238 for, 251 against, 88 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 6 to paragraph 7	283 for, 216 against, 83 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4	279 for, 259 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1	255 for, 315 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Adopted 366 for, 192 against, 39 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 4, adding text after recital D	480 for, 77 against, 32 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 3 to recital B	310 for, 261 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 6 to paragraph 7	334 for, 231 against, 29 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 5 to paragraph 6	312 for, 248 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3	301 for, 281 against, 14 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 510 for, 1 against, 86 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 1 to recital E	176 for, 412 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 5 to recital E	195 for, 391 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 4 to recital C — part 2	133 for, 422 against, 40 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 4 to recital C — part 1	207 for, 379 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 2	148 for, 414 against, 35 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 1	194 for, 392 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 476 for, 28 against, 96 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 — part 2	190 for, 402 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 — part 1	177 for, 412 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 1, adding text after recital D	188 for, 330 against, 84 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 7 — part 2	281 for, 285 against, 31 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 7 — part 1	580 for, 2 against, 17 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6	100 for, 404 against, 94 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5	72 for, 482 against, 49 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5	85 for, 445 against, 68 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 5	543 for, 23 against, 36 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 4	292 for, 279 against, 32 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 3	563 for, 14 against, 28 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 2	291 for, 280 against, 33 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 1	583 for, 1 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4	87 for, 454 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3	172 for, 431 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 4	570 for, 10 against, 20 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 3	532 for, 49 against, 25 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 2	594 for, 0 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 1	594 for, 4 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Proposal to reject the text	276 for, 286 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 25 to recital 32	157 for, 385 against, 20 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 15 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	15
30 Apr 2026	11	10
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	11
21 May 2026	10	9
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	15
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	13
8 Jul 2026	15	12
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	14
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	EPP	Romania	99 % of 482 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 387 shared	89 %
Select Andrea WECHSLER	Andrea WECHSLER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 585 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 603 shared	89 %
Select Alexandra MEHNERT	Alexandra MEHNERT	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 523 shared	89 %
Select Verena MERTENS	Verena MERTENS	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 459 shared	89 %
Select Norbert LINS	Norbert LINS	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 583 shared	89 %
Select Stefan KÖHLER	Stefan KÖHLER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 602 shared	89 %
Select Ralf SEEKATZ	Ralf SEEKATZ	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 337 shared	89 %
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 600 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	86 % of 1 142 shared	82 %
Select Claudiu MANDA	Claudiu MANDA	S&D	Romania	86 % of 279 shared	75 %
Select Stéphanie YON-COURTIN	Stéphanie YON-COURTIN	Renew	France	85 % of 1 062 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	85 % of 1 173 shared	82 %
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	S&D	Romania	85 % of 794 shared	75 %
Select Sandro GOZI	Sandro GOZI	Renew	France	84 % of 1 473 shared	82 %
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	84 % of 1 032 shared	75 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	84 % of 1 261 shared	82 %
Select Nathalie LOISEAU	Nathalie LOISEAU	Renew	France	84 % of 1 459 shared	82 %
Select Gilles BOYER	Gilles BOYER	Renew	France	84 % of 1 602 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Substitute	19 May 2026	now
Committee on Public HealthSANT Committee	Member	19 May 2026	now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	17 Sept 2026	now

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
European Investigation Order in criminal matters and European Remote Participation Order (recast)	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	7 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	7 Sept 2026

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

No speech or statement in plenary recorded this term.

Questions and motions, 1

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
23 Jul 2026	Energy Performance of Buildings Directive E-10-2026-003113	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	Not yet answered

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=8&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marie-Sophie CHRIST”. Member record. memberId 277057. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=8&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/277057. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/277057?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-277057,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marie-Sophie CHRIST}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=8&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=8&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 277057. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/277057. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 1 683

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 1

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 1 683