Member

Marie-Sophie CHRIST

EPP · Germany

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 95.5 %ⓘ of 1 683 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 97.1 %ⓘ of 1 608 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office: Since 27 Mar 2026
Against clear line: 30 of 1 546 votesⓘ
Committees: LIBE (substitute), SANT
Member id: 277057

National party: CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office: Since 27 Mar 2026
Against clear line: 30 of 1 546 votesⓘ
Committees: LIBE (substitute), SANT
Member id: 277057

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

95.5 %

1 608 of 1 683 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (+5.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.1 %

1 562 of 1 608 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+3.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.9 %

30 of 1 546 votes where their group had a clear line

15 opposite (for ↔ against), 13 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

1.6 %

26 of 1 608 votes cast

Participation 95.5 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Marie-Sophie CHRIST	95.5 %
EPP median	89.9 %
Lowest in the group	17.0 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	196

With majority line 97.1 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Marie-Sophie CHRIST	97.1 %
EPP median	93.6 %
Lowest in the group	70.2 %
Highest in the group	99.5 %
Members	196

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 1 683

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 46 — part 2	406 for, 214 against, 29 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 46 — part 1	470 for, 117 against, 63 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 3	334 for, 270 against, 34 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 2	327 for, 272 against, 42 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 1	433 for, 153 against, 53 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 44	349 for, 228 against, 79 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 43 — part 2	340 for, 285 against, 24 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 43 — part 1	358 for, 210 against, 81 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 41	362 for, 214 against, 75 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 24 — part 2	337 for, 303 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 24 — part 1	532 for, 42 against, 82 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 21 — part 2	433 for, 135 against, 65 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 21 — part 1	548 for, 37 against, 60 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 19	215 for, 294 against, 144 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Abstained
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 19	278 for, 304 against, 69 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 3	399 for, 182 against, 72 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 2	299 for, 354 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 1	435 for, 197 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 4	353 for, 224 against, 63 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 3	330 for, 256 against, 57 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 2	339 for, 302 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 1	539 for, 20 against, 88 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 3	388 for, 169 against, 88 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 2	472 for, 133 against, 45 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 1	501 for, 61 against, 74 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6	194 for, 309 against, 145 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Abstained
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 6 — part 5	342 for, 280 against, 30 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 6 — part 4	601 for, 46 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 3 — part 2	490 for, 141 against, 26 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 3 — part 1	406 for, 200 against, 35 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	An EU cardiovascular diseases strategy Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Adopted 545 for, 47 against, 75 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 470 for, 129 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 6, adding text after recital F	213 for, 426 against, 20 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64	218 for, 434 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64	220 for, 432 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 64	175 for, 438 against, 50 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 9 to paragraph 64	205 for, 442 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 8 to paragraph 56	216 for, 439 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 7 to paragraph 35	231 for, 426 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034 Final vote	Passed 625 for, 20 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	EU-Norway Agreement on the participation of Norway in GOVSATCOM and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Final vote on the draft Council decision	Consent given 612 for, 8 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation 2028-2034 Final vote	Passed 600 for, 21 against, 48 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	EU-Iceland Agreement on the participation of Iceland in GOVSATCOM and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Final vote on the draft Council decision	Consent given 631 for, 7 against, 15 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	EU-Switzerland Agreement on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime Final vote on the draft Council decision	Consent given 549 for, 75 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	EU-UK Agreement regarding cooperation on the application of their respective competition laws Final vote on the draft Council decision	Consent given 640 for, 5 against, 26 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Final vote	Passed 496 for, 53 against, 125 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 86 to Article 9, paragraph 2	131 for, 532 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 85, adding text after Article 8	138 for, 532 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 84 to Article 4, after paragraph 1	168 for, 505 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) Final vote on the provisional agreement	Passed 530 for, 125 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 20 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	214
29 Apr 2026	296	272
30 Apr 2026	68	67
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	95
21 May 2026	98	95
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	39
17 Jun 2026	127	123
18 Jun 2026	77	77
6 Jul 2026	2	0
7 Jul 2026	72	69
8 Jul 2026	144	129
9 Jul 2026	67	67
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	151
16 Sept 2026	80	75
17 Sept 2026	124	123

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	EPP	Romania	99 % of 482 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 387 shared	89 %
Select Andrea WECHSLER	Andrea WECHSLER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 585 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 603 shared	89 %
Select Alexandra MEHNERT	Alexandra MEHNERT	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 523 shared	89 %
Select Verena MERTENS	Verena MERTENS	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 459 shared	89 %
Select Norbert LINS	Norbert LINS	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 583 shared	89 %
Select Stefan KÖHLER	Stefan KÖHLER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 602 shared	89 %
Select Ralf SEEKATZ	Ralf SEEKATZ	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 337 shared	89 %
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 600 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	86 % of 1 142 shared	82 %
Select Claudiu MANDA	Claudiu MANDA	S&D	Romania	86 % of 279 shared	75 %
Select Stéphanie YON-COURTIN	Stéphanie YON-COURTIN	Renew	France	85 % of 1 062 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	85 % of 1 173 shared	82 %
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	S&D	Romania	85 % of 794 shared	75 %
Select Sandro GOZI	Sandro GOZI	Renew	France	84 % of 1 473 shared	82 %
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	84 % of 1 032 shared	75 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	84 % of 1 261 shared	82 %
Select Nathalie LOISEAU	Nathalie LOISEAU	Renew	France	84 % of 1 459 shared	82 %
Select Gilles BOYER	Gilles BOYER	Renew	France	84 % of 1 602 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Substitute	19 May 2026	now
Committee on Public HealthSANT Committee	Member	19 May 2026	now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	17 Sept 2026	now

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
European Investigation Order in criminal matters and European Remote Participation Order (recast)	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	7 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	7 Sept 2026

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

No speech or statement in plenary recorded this term.

Questions and motions, 1

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
23 Jul 2026	Energy Performance of Buildings Directive E-10-2026-003113	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	Not yet answered

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=4&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marie-Sophie CHRIST”. Member record. memberId 277057. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=4&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/277057. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/277057?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-277057,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marie-Sophie CHRIST}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=4&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=4&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 277057. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/277057. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 1 683

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 1

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 1 683