Member

Marie-Sophie CHRIST

EPP · Germany

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 95.5 %ⓘ of 1 683 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 97.1 %ⓘ of 1 608 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office: Since 27 Mar 2026
Against clear line: 30 of 1 546 votesⓘ
Committees: LIBE (substitute), SANT
Member id: 277057

National party: CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office: Since 27 Mar 2026
Against clear line: 30 of 1 546 votesⓘ
Committees: LIBE (substitute), SANT
Member id: 277057

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

95.5 %

1 608 of 1 683 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (+5.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.1 %

1 562 of 1 608 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+3.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.9 %

30 of 1 546 votes where their group had a clear line

15 opposite (for ↔ against), 13 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

1.6 %

26 of 1 608 votes cast

Participation 95.5 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Marie-Sophie CHRIST	95.5 %
EPP median	89.9 %
Lowest in the group	17.0 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	196

With majority line 97.1 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Marie-Sophie CHRIST	97.1 %
EPP median	93.6 %
Lowest in the group	70.2 %
Highest in the group	99.5 %
Members	196

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 1 683

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 5 to paragraph 4	138 for, 468 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 2 — part 2	461 for, 130 against, 15 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 4 to paragraph 2	128 for, 469 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1	248 for, 294 against, 60 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 1 — part 2	478 for, 117 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 2 to paragraph 1	134 for, 436 against, 35 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Adopted 467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 395 for, 136 against, 80 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Recital AD — part 2	413 for, 143 against, 50 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Recital AD — part 1	575 for, 13 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 85 — part 2	403 for, 146 against, 50 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 85 — part 1	449 for, 100 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 63 — part 3	401 for, 181 against, 29 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 514 for, 61 against, 33 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 55	197 for, 400 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 29	189 for, 387 against, 23 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Separate vote on paragraph 17	487 for, 45 against, 66 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Adopted 562 for, 1 against, 33 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1	195 for, 373 against, 29 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Amendment 5 to paragraph 8	145 for, 417 against, 24 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Amendment 4 to paragraph 7	153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 459 for, 12 against, 86 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Separate vote on paragraph 3	517 for, 8 against, 31 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Genetically modified maize MON 87460 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Objection passed 433 for, 159 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Genetically modified soybean MON 94313 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Objection passed 457 for, 184 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Objection passed 442 for, 184 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 390 for, 218 against, 29 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on citation 19	359 for, 210 against, 81 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on citation 9	353 for, 204 against, 79 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital AC — part 2	311 for, 309 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital AC — part 1	466 for, 128 against, 40 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital AB	354 for, 205 against, 89 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital AA	362 for, 208 against, 79 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital Z	431 for, 165 against, 50 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital J — part 2	335 for, 279 against, 23 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital J — part 1	509 for, 115 against, 17 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital D	593 for, 37 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital B — part 2	411 for, 213 against, 21 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital B — part 1	395 for, 179 against, 63 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 3	351 for, 272 against, 28 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 2	429 for, 153 against, 69 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 1	460 for, 129 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 3	325 for, 296 against, 33 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 2	446 for, 138 against, 59 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 1	450 for, 168 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 60	386 for, 230 against, 40 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 3	322 for, 313 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 2	409 for, 150 against, 79 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 1	510 for, 78 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 20 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	214
29 Apr 2026	296	272
30 Apr 2026	68	67
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	95
21 May 2026	98	95
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	39
17 Jun 2026	127	123
18 Jun 2026	77	77
6 Jul 2026	2	0
7 Jul 2026	72	69
8 Jul 2026	144	129
9 Jul 2026	67	67
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	151
16 Sept 2026	80	75
17 Sept 2026	124	123

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	EPP	Romania	99 % of 482 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 387 shared	89 %
Select Andrea WECHSLER	Andrea WECHSLER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 585 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 603 shared	89 %
Select Alexandra MEHNERT	Alexandra MEHNERT	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 523 shared	89 %
Select Verena MERTENS	Verena MERTENS	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 459 shared	89 %
Select Norbert LINS	Norbert LINS	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 583 shared	89 %
Select Stefan KÖHLER	Stefan KÖHLER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 602 shared	89 %
Select Ralf SEEKATZ	Ralf SEEKATZ	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 337 shared	89 %
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	EPP	Germany	98 % of 1 600 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	86 % of 1 142 shared	82 %
Select Claudiu MANDA	Claudiu MANDA	S&D	Romania	86 % of 279 shared	75 %
Select Stéphanie YON-COURTIN	Stéphanie YON-COURTIN	Renew	France	85 % of 1 062 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	85 % of 1 173 shared	82 %
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	S&D	Romania	85 % of 794 shared	75 %
Select Sandro GOZI	Sandro GOZI	Renew	France	84 % of 1 473 shared	82 %
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	84 % of 1 032 shared	75 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	84 % of 1 261 shared	82 %
Select Nathalie LOISEAU	Nathalie LOISEAU	Renew	France	84 % of 1 459 shared	82 %
Select Gilles BOYER	Gilles BOYER	Renew	France	84 % of 1 602 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Substitute	19 May 2026	now
Committee on Public HealthSANT Committee	Member	19 May 2026	now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	17 Sept 2026	now

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
European Investigation Order in criminal matters and European Remote Participation Order (recast)	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	7 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	7 Sept 2026

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

No speech or statement in plenary recorded this term.

Questions and motions, 1

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
23 Jul 2026	Energy Performance of Buildings Directive E-10-2026-003113	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	Not yet answered

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=3&rows=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marie-Sophie CHRIST”. Member record. memberId 277057. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=3&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/277057. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/277057?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-277057,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marie-Sophie CHRIST}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=3&rows=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=3&rows=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 277057. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/277057. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 1 683

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 1

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 1 683